|
Bigal
|
 |
October 08, 2012, 02:51:17 PM |
|
"Receiving Payouts to a Specific Address" doesn't seem to be working correctly.
Could you give me example txid? It worked fine in test I did. Yeah it's weird sometimes it works sometimes it doesn't, here is the last one I could find: b83aa953705c67557bc9831c2144094a7d7393d8a6bcca72745a7ded050768f0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The forum strives to allow free discussion of any ideas. All policies are built around this principle. This doesn't mean you can post garbage, though: posts should actually contain ideas, and these ideas should be argued reasonably.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
Tittiez
|
|
October 09, 2012, 10:56:15 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mem
|
|
October 10, 2012, 04:37:15 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
AvL42
|
|
October 10, 2012, 07:12:25 PM |
|
I just dug out this thread to post something similar, but as it seems, all I need to write is: me, 2. Note, that all the BTCDice-outputs have been spent, so obviously the bet did arrive at the address. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SRoulette
|
|
October 11, 2012, 01:52:46 AM |
|
Lets hope the admin is away for an extended period...
|
|
|
|
|
mem
|
|
October 11, 2012, 11:04:21 AM |
|
Lets hope the admin is away for an extended period...
well, until he resurfaces the site again gets shifted to pending in the list. |
|
|
|
|
ErebusBat
|
|
October 11, 2012, 01:49:21 PM |
|
Lets hope the admin is away for an extended period...
well, until he resurfaces the site again gets shifted to pending in the list. I wonder if it would be useful to track that metric. Meaning: while it is nice to know where a site is currently on the list; to know that it has been flopped back and forth would also be good information. |
|
|
|
|
AvL42
|
|
October 11, 2012, 08:41:00 PM |
|
Just for completeness sake, I just received those missing payouts.
(only losses, but that's probably just my bad luck ;-)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tittiez
|
|
October 11, 2012, 08:53:45 PM |
|
Just for completeness sake, I just received those missing payouts.
(only losses, but that's probably just my bad luck ;-)
As did I. |
|
|
|
|
|
mem
|
|
October 12, 2012, 12:16:52 AM |
|
Just for completeness sake, I just received those missing payouts.
(only losses, but that's probably just my bad luck ;-)
As did I. all losses ? Can we verify the results of these TX's please. |
|
|
|
BTCDice (OP)
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
|
|
October 13, 2012, 02:29:46 AM |
|
Just for completeness sake, I just received those missing payouts.
(only losses, but that's probably just my bad luck ;-)
As did I. all losses ? Can we verify the results of these TX's please. You can verify when secret is revealed. They were losses. |
|
|
|
|
|
Bigal
|
|
October 13, 2012, 03:28:55 AM |
|
I feel like I should chime in here, I have place several thousand bets at btc dice and have yet not to have one come back win or lose, granted the responses have been quite slow lately for whatever reason, and sometimes the transactions seem to get "stuck" but I've had the same thing happen at "other" dice sites as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AvL42
|
|
October 13, 2012, 08:53:41 AM |
|
Those sent in the same transaction will have the same lucky#. This is a trivial consequence of how the lucky# is determined. I feel like I should chime in here, I have place several thousand bets at btc dice and have yet not to have one come back win or lose, granted the responses have been quite slow lately for whatever reason, and sometimes the transactions seem to get "stuck" but I've had the same thing happen at "other" dice sites as well.
Same here (except not *that* many), but I had become used to rather fast payouts, so a delay of two days *was* ringing the "unusual"-alarm for me. On a sidenote, I'm wondering about the "value" of 0.00000001 payouts and the byte-cost for the bitcoin network of including these in a new tx. I suggest to BTCDice to offer a second set of bet-addresses, and who bets on those agrees to *not* expect those peanut loss-payouts. For saving them (especially the mining-fee for them), the house edge could be lowered a tiny bit for those bets, as an incentive to save the bitcoin network those peanut-outputs. |
|
|
|
|
BTCDice (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
|
|
October 13, 2012, 10:19:01 PM |
|
Same here (except not *that* many), but I had become used to rather fast payouts, so a delay of two days *was* ringing the "unusual"-alarm for me.
Yes, unfortunately I had some host issue that was causing lot of problems (and is still causing problem with speed) that I'm deal with. Hopefully it will be fix soon. On a sidenote, I'm wondering about the "value" of 0.00000001 payouts and the byte-cost for the bitcoin network of including these in a new tx. I suggest to BTCDice to offer a second set of bet-addresses, and who bets on those agrees to *not* expect those peanut loss-payouts. For saving them (especially the mining-fee for them), the house edge could be lowered a tiny bit for those bets, as an incentive to save the bitcoin network those peanut-outputs.
I will go over the math and see if I can implement something like this. Maybe top 4 or 5 most popular game. |
|
|
|
|
🏰 TradeFortress 🏰
Bitcoin Veteran
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1043
👻
|
|
October 17, 2012, 10:16:52 AM |
|
Ouch. I noticed how Lucky #s tended to stay constant, and I'm like, 'hey is there a bug'? So I bet 0.5 btcs instantly after I had the lucky # of 6119. Well no, just found out it doesn't work like that  |
|
|
|
|
BTCDice (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
|
|
October 18, 2012, 01:34:06 AM |
|
Ouch. I noticed how Lucky #s tended to stay constant, and I'm like, 'hey is there a bug'? So I bet 0.5 btcs instantly after I had the lucky # of 6119. Well no, just found out it doesn't work like that Lucky number will only staying same for sendmany bet to multiple game addresses of same transaction |
|
|
|
|
22bones
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
October 19, 2012, 03:13:43 AM |
|
I've lost the last 21 times I've played the less than 32000 game on BTCDice. I cannot believe that is legitimately possible. What are the odds?
|
|
|
|
|
|
AvL42
|
|
October 19, 2012, 06:43:05 AM |
|
I've lost the last 21 times I've played the less than 32000 game on BTCDice. I cannot believe that is legitimately possible. What are the odds?
The odds of losing 21 *independent* lt32000 games in a row is about 1:1000000 very unlikely but not impossible. Unless you did so already, go to btcdice.com and into the search field enter each of the transaction id's and see what each's lucky number really was. Have you been playing through blockchain-wallet's bet-feature or directly by creating a transaction to the respective addresses? |
|
|
|
|
|
