Bitcoin Forum
June 24, 2024, 12:56:39 PM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 ... 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 [95] 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 ... 185 »
  Print  
Author Topic: DaDice.com - Next Gen Social Gambling Dice Experience | Progressive Jackpot  (Read 257863 times)
dadice (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250


DaDice Administration


View Profile
June 03, 2015, 01:03:34 PM
 #1881

sudden silence?  Grin

except for the obligatory shill accusations against anyone proving you guys being at least highly incompetent/shady etc of course.

*yawn* you guys are disappointing.

Can you read?

Quote
We should ignore him, he is a shill, probably a paid shill, that just signed up 2 days ago, wondering if he ever visited our site before the 1st of June, or somebody who as either an alt account or there is somebody who is dictating him what to write. But he is bumping our post, so I am happy  Cool

<- My trust rating is a joke, due to the poor and worthless implementation of trust ratings at bitcointalk.org
fox19891989
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 840
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 03, 2015, 01:05:46 PM
Last edit: June 03, 2015, 01:35:26 PM by fox19891989
 #1882

It is unfair that so many people on default list gave dadice and dadice staff neg rate and dadice has never scammed anyone.

But see this real scam site btcbook.eu, OP only gets 1 neg trust, it is very obvious that those people have double standards against scams, gave you innocent guys with red trust, but don't give real scam neg turst?

See the link, this site has run away with users' funds for a month   https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=864590.520  But his rate is -2, how can non-scam dadice got -16(some days ago, now is -4)??
dadice_dev
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 48
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 03, 2015, 01:09:11 PM
 #1883

btw the hr tab seems to be down right now. not sure if it is just buggy as usual or if you guys are manipulating hard again  Grin

It is part of standard practices at Da Dice, all rolls below 180m have been archived and are available on https://stats.dadice.com
marcotheminer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2072
Merit: 1049


┴puoʎǝq ʞool┴


View Profile
June 03, 2015, 01:37:18 PM
 #1884

Is dadice paying signature campaign funds out of their own pockets or out of their cut of site profits?
dadice (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250


DaDice Administration


View Profile
June 03, 2015, 02:07:18 PM
 #1885

Is dadice paying signature campaign funds out of their own pockets or out of their cut of site profits?

Everything is paid from our initial budget: Salaries, campaigns, bonuses, advertising, other expenses. As it was explained before, we couldn't have done so with our current profits.

<- My trust rating is a joke, due to the poor and worthless implementation of trust ratings at bitcointalk.org
bodgybrothers
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 106
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 03, 2015, 03:22:55 PM
 #1886

Can DaDice explain the popup that occurred? I heard a popup saying "Hi" appeared on user accounts. This means someone ran the javascript "alert("Hi")" on client computers. Being able to run Javascript code on anyone else's machine is a serious issue. I heard the Mod said it was some new feature... So is it due to live testing or a hack?


Yup it's live testing indeed. There are some updates coming along

Ok, fair enough. I now have another couple of questions. Why are you running test code on a production site? Standard practice is to have a development server that gets tested on.
And what awesome function is coming from using "alert('hi')"? I don't see anyone using JS alerts anymore.
tspacepilot
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456
Merit: 1078


I may write code in exchange for bitcoins.


View Profile
June 03, 2015, 03:28:17 PM
 #1887

Is dadice paying signature campaign funds out of their own pockets or out of their cut of site profits?

marcotheminer, you should know better than to troll in this thread.  didn't we go through this a few months ago and you promised to behave?
marcotheminer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2072
Merit: 1049


┴puoʎǝq ʞool┴


View Profile
June 03, 2015, 03:32:11 PM
 #1888

Is dadice paying signature campaign funds out of their own pockets or out of their cut of site profits?

marcotheminer, you should know better than to troll in this thread.  didn't we go through this a few months ago and you promised to behave?

How am I trolling? I asked a sensible question that should've been asked a long time ago. I got my answer so thank you dadice.
vendetahome
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 03, 2015, 03:38:57 PM
 #1889

Is dadice paying signature campaign funds out of their own pockets or out of their cut of site profits?

marcotheminer, you should know better than to troll in this thread.  didn't we go through this a few months ago and you promised to behave?

How am I trolling? I asked a sensible question that should've been asked a long time ago. I got my answer so thank you dadice.
thats not trolling i think, also most probably they payout from site profit as they have to pay a lot, is there something wrong that they payout from profit?
dadice (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250


DaDice Administration


View Profile
June 03, 2015, 03:50:18 PM
 #1890

Is dadice paying signature campaign funds out of their own pockets or out of their cut of site profits?

marcotheminer, you should know better than to troll in this thread.  didn't we go through this a few months ago and you promised to behave?

How am I trolling? I asked a sensible question that should've been asked a long time ago. I got my answer so thank you dadice.
thats not trolling i think, also most probably they payout from site profit as they have to pay a lot, is there something wrong that they payout from profit?

Our expenses are far beyond of our site profits. Was explained just a bit earlier today.

<- My trust rating is a joke, due to the poor and worthless implementation of trust ratings at bitcointalk.org
dooglus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2940
Merit: 1330



View Profile
June 03, 2015, 03:50:38 PM
 #1891

So far we have honored each and every withdrawal request.

That is what every scammer says while they're in the "building trust" phase of the scam.

Try going to any Ponzi scam thread and warning that it is a scam. Their first defence is always "but we are paying"...

Just-Dice                 ██             
          ██████████         
      ██████████████████     
  ██████████████████████████ 
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
    ██████████████████████   
        ██████████████       
            ██████           
   Play or Invest                 ██             
          ██████████         
      ██████████████████     
  ██████████████████████████ 
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
    ██████████████████████   
        ██████████████       
            ██████           
   1% House Edge
dadice (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250


DaDice Administration


View Profile
June 03, 2015, 03:52:51 PM
 #1892

Is dadice paying signature campaign funds out of their own pockets or out of their cut of site profits?

marcotheminer, you should know better than to troll in this thread.  didn't we go through this a few months ago and you promised to behave?

He had begged me so badly to run our campaign and I said I don't want somebody like you - that is the result Cheesy

<- My trust rating is a joke, due to the poor and worthless implementation of trust ratings at bitcointalk.org
dadice (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250


DaDice Administration


View Profile
June 03, 2015, 03:57:54 PM
 #1893

So far we have honored each and every withdrawal request.

That is what every scammer says while they're in the "building trust" phase of the scam.

Try going to any Ponzi scam thread and warning that it is a scam. Their first defence is always "but we are paying"...

Well dog, I thought you said you will stay away from here last time, or am I mistaken? Or is our growth still bothering you?

Anyway, you should know better that a dice site is not a ponzi scheme, can't even be compared to a ponzi. We deal with players here at dadice. If they win they withdraw their profits, if they loose they loose.

Just to inform you what a ponzi is: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ponzi_scheme

<- My trust rating is a joke, due to the poor and worthless implementation of trust ratings at bitcointalk.org
cazkooo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1540
Merit: 1013



View Profile
June 03, 2015, 04:01:36 PM
 #1894

Is dadice paying signature campaign funds out of their own pockets or out of their cut of site profits?

Everything is paid from our initial budget: Salaries, campaigns, bonuses, advertising, other expenses. As it was explained before, we couldn't have done so with our current profits.

By budget does this mean this including your investor fund? I believe you still have a few private investor that stick with you. Without you providing cold address it is hard to look at this if you are paying from your investor fund or no because you spend like more than 15 btc just for promotions in 1 month I guess
tspacepilot
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456
Merit: 1078


I may write code in exchange for bitcoins.


View Profile
June 03, 2015, 04:03:48 PM
 #1895

So far we have honored each and every withdrawal request.

That is what every scammer says while they're in the "building trust" phase of the scam.

Try going to any Ponzi scam thread and warning that it is a scam. Their first defence is always "but we are paying"...

To fair, it's also exactly what every honest person says who pays and plans to continue to pay.  It's not logical to act like pointing to a solid reputation is an indicator of guilt.

To be honest, I think that the fair, well-meaning advice for everyone to caveat emptor when dealing with dadice was quite fair.  But I think turning that into a continual harping, and now trolling is pretty shameful.
Quickseller
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2912
Merit: 2347


View Profile
June 03, 2015, 04:05:49 PM
 #1896

So far we have honored each and every withdrawal request.

That is what every scammer says while they're in the "building trust" phase of the scam.

Try going to any Ponzi scam thread and warning that it is a scam. Their first defence is always "but we are paying"...

Well dog, I thought you said you will stay away from here last time, or am I mistaken? Or is our growth still buggering you?

Anyway, you should know better that a dice site is not a ponzi scheme, can't even be compared to a ponzi. We deal with players here at dadice. If they win they withdraw their profits, if they loose they loose.

Just to inform you what a ponzi is: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ponzi_scheme
DaDice is not a ponzi. However the comparison between your site and a ponzi are accurate. People understand the ponzi analogy because there have been so many Bitcoin ponzis.

IMO it is pretty clear that your site is a scam at this point. You claim to have this massive bankroll, offer huge max bets, yet all the evidence points to you having significantly less then that, maybe 5 BTC or so.

After all of your expenses, all it would take is one or two high rollers to be on your site at the same time for you to be able to profit after scamming.
dadice (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250


DaDice Administration


View Profile
June 03, 2015, 04:07:15 PM
 #1897

We started as a commercial dice site, not a 'hobby business' like all the others started as. Me and my partners have invested significant funds into this venture and will continue to do so in the months to come. End of story. We don't have to prove nothing, especially not in this forum. Who doesn't like us is welcome to stay away Cheesy

<- My trust rating is a joke, due to the poor and worthless implementation of trust ratings at bitcointalk.org
dadice (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250


DaDice Administration


View Profile
June 03, 2015, 04:12:16 PM
 #1898

So far we have honored each and every withdrawal request.

That is what every scammer says while they're in the "building trust" phase of the scam.

Try going to any Ponzi scam thread and warning that it is a scam. Their first defence is always "but we are paying"...

Well dog, I thought you said you will stay away from here last time, or am I mistaken? Or is our growth still buggering you?

Anyway, you should know better that a dice site is not a ponzi scheme, can't even be compared to a ponzi. We deal with players here at dadice. If they win they withdraw their profits, if they loose they loose.

Just to inform you what a ponzi is: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ponzi_scheme
DaDice is not a ponzi. However the comparison between your site and a ponzi are accurate. People understand the ponzi analogy because there have been so many Bitcoin ponzis.

IMO it is pretty clear that your site is a scam at this point. You claim to have this massive bankroll, offer huge max bets, yet all the evidence points to you having significantly less then that, maybe 5 BTC or so.

After all of your expenses, all it would take is one or two high rollers to be on your site at the same time for you to be able to profit after scamming.

Well just calculate together what we have spent by now, just for marketing Cheesy Not too bad for a 'dead' site isn't it. Again, we give a shit about your, or dogs or dogdybrothers concerns here, comprende? You are not our lifeline - our 9,265 members are!

<- My trust rating is a joke, due to the poor and worthless implementation of trust ratings at bitcointalk.org
tspacepilot
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456
Merit: 1078


I may write code in exchange for bitcoins.


View Profile
June 03, 2015, 04:17:41 PM
 #1899

Now that this guy is off default trust and the damage he can do to people's reputations with his nonsense is limited, I'm starting to love him for the lolz.

DaDice is not a ponzi. However the comparison between your site and a ponzi are accurate. People understand the ponzi analogy because there have been so many Bitcoin ponzis.
This is fun.  "Okay, you're not a ponzi, but the comparison is accurate".  Hey, quickseller, take a quick logic lesson: P &!P is the definition of absurdity.
Quote


IMO it is pretty clear that your site is a scam at this point.
IMO your O isn't worth very much these days and the more you go on, the less people are paying attention.   In recent months you've shown yourself to be a highly-volatile self-promoting egomaniac with a penchant for quick-moves and little forethought.  You get so thrilled to call someone out, especially someone you're mad at, that you post nonsense scam accusations and then have to embarrasingly backpedal all the while claiming "ahem, well, it's most likely that, I think that probably, in my opinion, the OP may not have scammed but would have scammed if it had been a Tuesday and we were just lucky that it was a Wednesday but I will catch him next time..." or those kinds of things.  Now that you can't hurt people with this shit, it's actually kind of entertaining.
Quote
You claim to have this massive bankroll, offer huge max bets, yet all the evidence points to you having significantly less then that, maybe 5 BTC or so.

After all of your expenses, all it would take is one or two high rollers to be on your site at the same time for you to be able to profit after scamming.
after running a dice site
FTFY.  All dice sites take profit if a high-roller shows up and loses. All take losses if a high-roller shows up and wins. Running a dice site != Scamming.
mfaspk
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 03, 2015, 04:23:50 PM
 #1900

I am sadened  to see that fact that this debate is never ending one, why? because of vendettas for some, and personal grudges or envious feelings for rest. It is exactly like driving around a roundabout now, which takes you no where?

There have been a lot of posts since I was here last time, so Instead of quoting them all individually, I will try to write a collective answer.

What do they want?

Its clear that more number of posts here are from either competitive casino owners, their co-owners or private investors. (Dah! sure! investing in public is a whole different animal isn't?) and their agenda is nothing but to slander Da Dice. I mean Exactly what proves that Da Dice is going to scam in future?. If you look at the odds for a second, OK! you say Da Dice doesn't have the funds it claims! I say OK! but what about those who does have the funds they claim? What is stopping them from running away and scamming their own investors? NOTHING! underline that, NOTHING!. Does NLNico, Dooglus offers their personal assurance in this matter? NONE! again underline my words there: NONE! PrimeDice, PocketRocketCasino, BitDice, MoneyPot vault all have equally or more odds of scamming before Da Dice does. I mean only an "stubborn idiot" will deny the fact that funds in cold storage are vulnerable as if they were in ordinary wallet of any program's admin either having proved solvency or not!.

Proof of solvency proves solvency. It's in the name. It doesn't prove anything about trustworthiness. It simply proves that they still have the coins they were entrusted with. Isn't that worth proving? Isn't it alarming if someone who you trusted to look after coins for you refuses to show you that they still have them and makes up weak excuses about why they can't?

..."It doesn't prove anything about trustworthiness."... which concurs my point above.

What other wrong excuses you got? We kinda been over all of them already..

This "WE" from Nico speaks a thousand words! it reflects a vendetta and ganging up mind-set! You know what? Nevermind! Smiley I demand no explaination there, don't bother.

... There and back again! Let me explain about cold wallet here.


I don't how proud Nico is while posting an re-posting the same thing over and over again. I have already answered in my post before that PRC took about 8-10 months, BitDice took 6 months and MoneyPot had been accepting "private investors" since October 2014 or even before while cold storage is from 10th april 2015 (I know I know we've been over this, since it was a private bankroll, it didn't need a cold storage / proof of solvency) but our dear dooglus (whome I still respect) still had invested there and was one of their private investors back in 2014. Trust me I can keep going on about this, SatoshiDice might be since 2012 but both of their cold storage addresses signed and announced last month (April 2015), SafeDice the wallet is there since November 2014 but it was never announced in forums, nor I can find "any evidence" of having it published anywhere on internet before, I even tried the "waybackmachine".

It is not the cold storage that bothers Nico, before this it was some other technical issues, before that it was something else... and its all documented in main Da Dice thread.

Now lets address: Trust Issues...

I apologise but since the roots of this one goes back to dooglus, I have to quote doog here.

Proof of solvency proves solvency. It's in the name. It doesn't prove anything about trustworthiness.

yet negative trust was added. I don't care why doog still defends it, when he has also admitted by saying "I'm not claiming they are doing anything wrong.... It still obviously wouldn't stop them from being able to steal everyone's coins, but it would at least instil extra confidence in potential investors."[/i]

I guess so. But at what point? I'm horrible at predicting the future. I thought dicebitco.in and dice.ninja were the good guys, and that PRC wouldn't last 6 months. I was wrong in all 3 cases...

Mr. dooglus Smiley I know that you have not accused da dice of being an scam. You are may be making yet another "prediction"  by pointing out yet another "potential scam"... (which, in your own words, has more chances of being completely way off beam!)

Now my question is When they are not accepting any public investors any more, how come they can turn scam? By not honouring withdrawals? right? right? Well you will never know until you find a real such case here and again the odds of this happening here is same as any other site. If you don't believe me just go to google and type "PrimeDice scam", "Just-dice Scam", "PockRocketCasino Scam"... I am not sure if "Da Dice scam" are indexed yet by google or not lol. Most of them will link you back to BCT and OPs are not what they call "shill" accounts, they are also from members having "Hero" ranks and no negative trust... (I know I know for fact that JD and PD are not scams, I still have my faith in you doog!!!)

As I said before, I know doog you're concerned for health of bitcoin dice/gambling industry, but so far all your concerns are merely accusations, allegations and speculations which renders your negative trust totally baseless. I am not saying you remove it, all I am saying is that I leave it upto your wisdom Smiley p.s. One casino owner gives a negative trust rating to another casino owner... I mean come on guys!

Bankroll Issue

Nothing much to say here, since I will be quoting Nico and Doog here again so I will rather not do that and simply go ahead with my answer: Since the investment option is now private, primarly factor here is that bankroll amount does NOT concern you and general public anymore. For all we know, they can decrease there bankroll to 150 BTC anytime or either increase it to 1000 BTC when they find necessary. The max-payout issue is now none of the concern of general public? Let me give you an example,,, Stunna and his PD. Stunna has used the term "bankroll" numerious times which reflects they also have a bankroll which they have choosen to hide. (Unless a dooglus has done a private audit for PrimeDice lol) there max payout used to be 40 BTC, after some unfortunate incidents its also 20 BTC there... what is the difference in PD and DD now? One chooses to hide its bankroll while other one has made its bankroll private now but still hopes to come back and take investors in future so still shows the bankroll amount.

Conclusion for everyone: Da Dice doesn't want to show you their books! period! since the bankroll is now private, max payout amount is also none of anybodys concern. Read my above post once again please.

Isn't everyone doing a little unjust?

* Da Dice as far as I know is the only site which "officially" provides real-time statistics site.
* Da Dice as far as I know is the only site that provides complete transparency in users related statistics. You can literally see there how much a USER has DEPOSITED, WITHDRAWN, CALIMED FROM FAUCET, WAGERED, PAYOUTS, TIPS SENT, TIPS RECEIVED, NUMBER OF DOWNLINES, REF. COMMISSION EARNED...
* Email notifications on various events to ensure Da Dice can do no wrong. (Some programs have been known to send large bitcoin to wrong addresses) with email notification there is a proof of action on various events.
* Personalised daily gameplay reports via email.

Other dice owners should follow this example first and provide complete TRANSPARENCY such as that so we can also see and learn more about their users and site's efficiency. Don't match one of two items from above, I am talking about the whole thing. Yes! Da Dice still doesn't want to justify its solvency or show you the its books but it still provides more transparency then any other dice site. Reckon that!

Shill Accounts?

Keeping it real comprehensive: BitcoinTalk is merely a minor component of Bitcoin industry, but Bitcoin industry is not Bitcointalk!!! So when a new user comes it doesn't necessarily mean they are the shill accounts. This should be enough for any smart fellow.

Just a minor amendment... Number of "shill accounts" in favour or Da Dice still doesn't beat the number of "shill accounts" bashing / slandering Da Dice.

....
....
....

Alright guys! The whole "whore show" must come to an end now, enough bashing Da Dice, pack up your knieves and hammer and come back next time Da Dice invites you to invest publically without proving >solvency< --- I know I know everyone is thrilled with rapid development at Da Dice, its fast popularity, huge marketing campaigns and giveaways as even one of the criticizer here admitted he has been paid 1 BTC or more by Da Dice but they still don't want to show you their books! And after investment option is gone, you have no right to ask for it!

(I am really really hurt to admit this Sad but:)Dean did the "right" thing by leaving this discussion. Rest should follow his example and spend their time more productively on their own sites now.

Remember "innocent until proven guilty, NOT the other way around."

so to conclude this: ONLY TIME WILL TELL, THERE ARE 2 GROUPS NATURALLY, ONE THAT SUPPORTS DA DICE AND OTHER THAT SPREADS FUD, ULTIMATE CONCLUSIONS OF THIS WHOLE DEBATE WILL BE "I TOLD YOU SO!!!" BY EITHER SIDE. BUT NOW IS NOT THE TIME Smiley Again, Everyone, Your valued time could be spend more productively (of course unless there are financial/corporate interests in keep bashing Da Dice without any concrete evidence).[/size]
Pages: « 1 ... 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 [95] 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 ... 185 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!