Bitcoin Forum
June 14, 2024, 06:52:49 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 ... 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 [97] 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 ... 185 »
  Print  
Author Topic: DaDice.com - Next Gen Social Gambling Dice Experience | Progressive Jackpot  (Read 257863 times)
dadice (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250


DaDice Administration


View Profile
June 03, 2015, 05:08:46 PM
 #1921

I undestood Marcos question that way, that he wanted to know if any site profit was used for the campaign, which I just proved. while you claim some initial budget was solely used for that.

maybe I understood Marcos wrong.

You have proven nothing mate. I have many cold wallets here and there, so I take funds where I have quick access to, to pay our bills. Also you should re-read properly what I have said earlier Smiley

<- My trust rating is a joke, due to the poor and worthless implementation of trust ratings at bitcointalk.org
mfaspk
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 03, 2015, 05:10:38 PM
 #1922

@RHavar... you're concerned for solvency, MoneyPot before being a "vault" (whatever you call it) ... accepted private investors? well the posts history suggests there was private investment with "mentioned amount of bitcoins",,, but I will take your word for it, care to show me your cold storage address when moneypot was a game? or proof of solvency except those "Total Bullshit" hashes Smiley (when moneypot was a game!) ...or should we rather discuss this on moneypot thread?

You apologized, I apologized, where did you come back in the picture? oh I see, because I got fed up with the crap that dooglus is throwing all over, isn't it?
RHavar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2557
Merit: 1886



View Profile
June 03, 2015, 05:16:01 PM
 #1923

@RHavar... you're concerned for solvency, MoneyPot before being a "vault" (whatever you call it) ... accepted private investors?

Again, the private investors never transferred a satoshi. It was just a gentleman's agreement, before my time, to share the profits and/or losses. The investors had no solvency concerns, as the money never left their wallets.

Quote
well the posts history suggests there was private investment with "mentioned amount of bitcoins",,, but I will take your word for it, care to show me your cold storage address when moneypot was a game? or proof of solvency except those "Total Bullshit" hashes Smiley (when moneypot was a game!) ...or should we rather discuss this on moneypot thread?

Sounds like a good idea, as it's getting a bit off topic here =)

Check out gamblingsitefinder.com for a decent list/rankings of crypto casinos. Note: I have no affiliation or interest in it, and don't even agree with all the rankings ... but it's the only uncorrupted review site I'm aware of.
dadice (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250


DaDice Administration


View Profile
June 03, 2015, 05:16:09 PM
 #1924

And yes, I'm concerned about DaDice's solvency and would not recommend anyone to play there until they sort it out. Feel free to deride me for being a jealous competitor, but we both know that's nonsense.

Of course you are only concerned about our solvency - obviously! Do you have any interest in our site? Ever deposited? Waiting for a withdrawal?

<- My trust rating is a joke, due to the poor and worthless implementation of trust ratings at bitcointalk.org
RHavar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2557
Merit: 1886



View Profile
June 03, 2015, 05:18:18 PM
 #1925

You apologized, I apologized, where did you come back in the picture? oh I see, because I got fed up with the crap that dooglus is throwing all over, isn't it?

You brought up my site with incorrect information, I just wanted to set the record straight. =)

Check out gamblingsitefinder.com for a decent list/rankings of crypto casinos. Note: I have no affiliation or interest in it, and don't even agree with all the rankings ... but it's the only uncorrupted review site I'm aware of.
dadice (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250


DaDice Administration


View Profile
June 03, 2015, 05:25:34 PM
 #1926

You brought up my site with incorrect information, I just wanted to set the record straight. =)

Do this in your thread or with the concerned member "mfaspk" via PM. I would never discuss my very own issues in another sites thread.

<- My trust rating is a joke, due to the poor and worthless implementation of trust ratings at bitcointalk.org
mfaspk
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 03, 2015, 05:27:25 PM
 #1927

You apologized, I apologized, where did you come back in the picture? oh I see, because I got fed up with the crap that dooglus is throwing all over, isn't it?

You brought up my site with incorrect information, I just wanted to set the record straight. =)

Don't worry all our records are straight, I remember them by heart now... Moneypot bankroll was private, dooglus "informally" invested 53 BTC, you paid him 11 BTC profit (lmao), you had no need of proving solvency when you were running it as a game, you only did it when you turned it into a vault. I guess its such a good story that I must also add "...and they happily lived ever after!" ... see our records are straight Smiley straight all the way
dadice (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250


DaDice Administration


View Profile
June 03, 2015, 05:46:52 PM
 #1928

Don't worry all our records are straight, I remember them by heart now... Moneypot bankroll was private, dooglus "informally" invested 53 BTC, you paid him 11 BTC profit (lmao), you had no need of proving solvency when you were running it as a game, you only did it when you turned it into a vault. I guess its such a good story that I must also add "...and they happily lived ever after!" ... see our records are straight Smiley straight all the way

Yeah they are all Saints of course, only we are willful sinners.

<- My trust rating is a joke, due to the poor and worthless implementation of trust ratings at bitcointalk.org
marcotheminer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2072
Merit: 1049


┴puoʎǝq ʞool┴


View Profile
June 03, 2015, 06:11:24 PM
 #1929

Well it seems to me that most people here are immature.

lol you understand a shit about dice sites Wink

Thanks for your reply anyway I guess.

dadice (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250


DaDice Administration


View Profile
June 03, 2015, 06:22:36 PM
 #1930

Well it seems to me that most people here are immature.

lol you understand a shit about dice sites Wink

Thanks for your reply anyway I guess.



You forget to quote the second part, where I explained Smiley By intention or overseeing it?

Btw, nice trust rating you have there, I thought mine was worse, but yours is much better  Roll Eyes

<- My trust rating is a joke, due to the poor and worthless implementation of trust ratings at bitcointalk.org
marcotheminer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2072
Merit: 1049


┴puoʎǝq ʞool┴


View Profile
June 03, 2015, 07:23:51 PM
 #1931

Well it seems to me that most people here are immature.

lol you understand a shit about dice sites Wink

Thanks for your reply anyway I guess.



You forget to quote the second part, where I explained Smiley By intention or overseeing it?

Btw, nice trust rating you have there, I thought mine was worse, but yours is much better  Roll Eyes

Thanks Smiley
dadice (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250


DaDice Administration


View Profile
June 03, 2015, 08:04:05 PM
 #1932

Indeed, dooglus is the biggest piece of envious shit you will ever find!

Well, for us dog is just another jealous competitor.

<- My trust rating is a joke, due to the poor and worthless implementation of trust ratings at bitcointalk.org
iram91445
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100

★YoBit.Net★ 200+ Coins Exchange & Dice


View Profile
June 03, 2015, 08:31:35 PM
 #1933

Indeed, dooglus is the biggest piece of envious shit you will ever find!

..and your last 50 posts are either shilling DaDice here, or on the PrimeDice thread. Please hurry up and run with peoples funds, so we don't need to see your DaDice spam.
its interesting to see a brand new account talking like that, i also think that they might be scammers

bodgybrothers
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 106
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 03, 2015, 08:42:15 PM
 #1934

Can DaDice explain the popup that occurred? I heard a popup saying "Hi" appeared on user accounts. This means someone ran the javascript "alert("Hi")" on client computers. Being able to run Javascript code on anyone else's machine is a serious issue. I heard the Mod said it was some new feature... So is it due to live testing or a hack?


Yup it's live testing indeed. There are some updates coming along

Ok, fair enough. I now have another couple of questions. Why are you running test code on a production site? Standard practice is to have a development server that gets tested on.
And what awesome function is coming from using "alert('hi')"? I don't see anyone using JS alerts anymore.

My questions have not yet been asnwered..
XinXan
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064
Merit: 505


View Profile
June 03, 2015, 08:47:46 PM
 #1935

Indeed, dooglus is the biggest piece of envious shit you will ever find!

Well, for us dog is just another jealous competitor.

Yes im sure dooglus is super jealous of your site, are you stupid? You have been proving lately that you are either a kid or just a really stupid person wich only makes you look even more like a scammer, just look at your last few posts here, insulting people, insulting dooglus?? One of the most trusted if not the most trusted casino owner, are you for real?
Quickseller
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2912
Merit: 2339


View Profile
June 03, 2015, 08:51:35 PM
 #1936

Indeed, dooglus is the biggest piece of envious shit you will ever find!

..and your last 50 posts are either shilling DaDice here, or on the PrimeDice thread. Please hurry up and run with peoples funds, so we don't need to see your DaDice spam.
+1

Also so we can have all the DaDice shills (the people who are all the same person as DaDice) can be outed. I think it is pretty clear which accounts that DaDice is behind anyway.

I am pretty tired of DaDice making petty arguments as to why they are the victim here.
dooglus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2940
Merit: 1330



View Profile
June 03, 2015, 09:01:48 PM
 #1937

I'll reply in a single post so as not to spam this thread too much more. I'll try to make this my last post as I think everything has already been said...

Proof of solvency proves solvency. It's in the name. It doesn't prove anything about trustworthiness. It simply proves that they still have the coins they were entrusted with. Isn't that worth proving? Isn't it alarming if someone who you trusted to look after coins for you refuses to show you that they still have them and makes up weak excuses about why they can't?

..."It doesn't prove anything about trustworthiness."... which concurs my point above.

I think you misunderstand.

If you prove that your site is solvent, it means you have proved that you are able to honour withdrawals if you choose to. It doesn't prove that you will, but it proves you are able to.

If on the other hand you are unable to prove that your site is solvent, it means that you are unable to honour withdrawals. That is a bad state to be in.

Do you understand my point now?  The fact that they refuse to demonstrate that they are bankrolled to offer the size of bets that they offer when it is trivially easy to do so is a red flag. It likely means that they aren't bankrolled to offer the bets, and are risking becoming insolvent, or indeed may already be insolvent.

How dooglus rolls:

1. "hey! I am not saying they are not trustworty!!"
2. "hey! I am not saying they are a ponzi!!!"
3. "hey! I am not saying they would scam!!!"
4. "hey! I am always wrong at predicting future but I wouldn't give it up, why should I?"
5. "hey! I don't think they will run away with funds but they still could??"

..."I will still leave a negative trust here, eventhough I don't think they are not trustworthy"

The negative trust is to flag the suspicious behaviour so that others can have all the facts before making their own decision. I'm not making any prediction or any judgement. I am saying that refusing to demonstrate solvency when it is easy to do is suspicious. What is so hard to understand about that?

As the other poster just confirmed, we are the only dice site with transparent statistics.

Now you're definitely full of shit. How are you more transparent than all the other dice sites?

Very sad to see dooglus being a total FUD... "I don't think they are scam, but could be a scam!" I mean "wtf? is that?"

There are some very stupid people in this thread. I didn't say that I don't think they are going to scam. I said we can't tell, but that their behaviour is suspicious and should be flagged.

@RHavar... you're concerned for solvency, MoneyPot before being a "vault" (whatever you call it) ... accepted private investors? well the posts history suggests there was private investment with "mentioned amount of bitcoins",,, but I will take your word for it, care to show me your cold storage address when moneypot was a game?

He already answered that, just before you asked it:

We already covered this. The private investors transferred zero coins, they only agreed to pay if the site took a loss and be paid if the site made money. The site made money, they got paid. End of story. What do you want, proof of 0 coins?

When I "invested" in moneypot, it was a gentleman's agreement. I told him "OK, I'm in - consider me invested for X coins". The site won, and so he sent me the profit on the "investment". I never sent him the investment and he never sent it back. I didn't even prove to him that I had that many coins. Since no coins (other than the profit) changed hands, how is showing you a cold wallet address going to prove anything?

Indeed, dooglus is the biggest piece of envious shit you will ever find!

Well, for us dog is just another jealous competitor.

As far as I can see you have very little volume on your site. You have a bunch of people betting faucet dust and little more. Just-Dice gets more volume than DaDice and that's after I switched from BTC to CLAM to scale everything down. I don't want huge volume and never advertise whereas you plaster your ads everywhere and still get less volume that JD. What is there to be envious of?

Just-Dice                 ██             
          ██████████         
      ██████████████████     
  ██████████████████████████ 
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
    ██████████████████████   
        ██████████████       
            ██████           
   Play or Invest                 ██             
          ██████████         
      ██████████████████     
  ██████████████████████████ 
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
    ██████████████████████   
        ██████████████       
            ██████           
   1% House Edge
tspacepilot
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456
Merit: 1078


I may write code in exchange for bitcoins.


View Profile
June 03, 2015, 10:52:36 PM
 #1938

..and your last 50 posts are either shilling DaDice here, or on the PrimeDice thread. Please hurry up and run with peoples funds, so we don't need to see your DaDice spam.
+1

Also so we can have all the DaDice shills (the people who are all the same person as DaDice) can be outed. I think it is pretty clear which accounts that DaDice is behind anyway.

I am pretty tired of DaDice making petty arguments as to why they are the victim here.

Ok, this is fun.  QS is +1ing an account called, literally, "AttackDog" and saying that he wants people to get scammed so that he can be proven right in his hatred?!

QS is funny.

I'll reply in a single post so as not to spam this thread too much more. I'll try to make this my last post as I think everything has already been said...
I think that's the right move.
Quote
As far as I can see you have very little volume on your site. You have a bunch of people betting faucet dust and little more. Just-Dice gets more volume than DaDice and that's after I switched from BTC to CLAM to scale everything down. I don't want huge volume and never advertise whereas you plaster your ads everywhere and still get less volume that JD. What is there to be envious of?

Okay, but at this point there are more haters here plastering their bile on dadice and staff than there are advertizements for dadice (ok, that's an informal estimation, but you get my point, I think).

You talked above about your "gentleman's agreement" between you and RHavar.   I hope you can see that if it's okay for Ryan to trust you and for you to trust Ryan, without, as you say, providing proof of your funds and whatnot that it's also okay for somone out there on the internet to trust dadice enough to deposit some bitcoin and play some games and then withdraw.  They get to make that gentleman's agreement the same way that you and Ryan did.  You've made it more than clear that you don't trust dadice.  And you've attracted a whole cadre of haters who are rocking the echo-chamber like CNN news or something.  I think it's time for you to offer a gentleman's agreement with all of us here that you've had your say and that it's time for everyone to move along---that shout-fests on forum threads don't make the world a better place.
Ging287
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 14
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 03, 2015, 11:19:54 PM
 #1939

Is there any particular reason when I attempt to login with my own passcode, it says to 'authenticate' as if I ever set up two factor authentication? I can't even login to my account to even try the site out.
tspacepilot
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456
Merit: 1078


I may write code in exchange for bitcoins.


View Profile
June 03, 2015, 11:24:56 PM
 #1940

Is there any particular reason when I attempt to login with my own passcode, it says to 'authenticate' as if I ever set up two factor authentication? I can't even login to my account to even try the site out.

I can't tell from your post whether you've already got an account or not.  It sounds like you do have one, but then you say "try the site out" which makes it sound like you don't.
Pages: « 1 ... 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 [97] 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 ... 185 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!