i quit

[PeterVenter]

keep having to restart and then lose my stakes...

what is the correct config settings?

[heavensopen]

keep having to restart and then lose my stakes...

what is the correct config settings?

we all need to restart for now

config:
addnode=91.121.6.19
addnode=93.157.4.11
listen=0

[PeterVenter]

keep having to restart and then lose my stakes...

what is the correct config settings?

we all need to restart for now

config:
addnode=91.121.6.19
addnode=93.157.4.11
listen=0

thanks, but does not work

[samspaces]

For the time being, I think everyone except the two nodes, need to turn off staking in the .conf: reservebalance=100000000, clear out the .litedoge folder except for wallet.dat and litedoge.conf, and then redownload the chain. Until a definite fix, this will keep everyone on the same chain.

[xPooky]

i think that 1 of the nodes is not working, i only have 1 connection

[not.you]

The new block crawler is only showing 3 connections.  My wallet was frozen so I have attempted to resync to the 2 nodes.  It says I have 2 connections but it is not syncing.  Says I am synchronizing.  Says I am 21 hours behind.  But it doesn't appear to be downloading any blocks.  

EDIT:  I had the wrong conf file in the folder.  Using the correct one I too am only connecting to a single node as xPooky mentioned.  But at least I was able to resync now and the block height agrees with the crawler.  Not sure why the crawler reports so few connections though.

[luongdk]

The new block crawler is only showing 3 connections.  My wallet was frozen so I have attempted to resync to the 2 nodes.  It says I have 2 connections but it is not syncing.  Says I am synchronizing.  Says I am 21 hours behind.  But it doesn't appear to be downloading any blocks.  

EDIT:  I had the wrong conf file in the folder.  Using the correct one I too am only connecting to a single node as xPooky mentioned.  But at least I was able to resync now and the block height agrees with the crawler.  Not sure why the crawler reports so few connections though.

Block Crawler is using CheckPoint Server node, itself node and my node.

My node

addnode=183.91.4.3

[not.you]

Does anyone know what this is?  That is not my wallet address (all of my wallets have labels like the one that says wallet3) but it appears in my history like a block I mined.  I have seen a few of these, each with a different address, some of them happened when I was forked so they disappeared after I resynced but this one made it into the main chain.



txid: 4db08faabc35c2c94f8c45b5ef2afc35c71e060d83dbfcc32e2e42fe44d64679

[xPooky]

whenever i try to stake this gets forked :\
So i turn off wallet now

[not.you]

whenever i try to stake this gets forked :\
So i turn off wallet now

I saw same thing today but worse now is that I am not staking, I am only syncing with the nodes given in this thread recently (one doesn't work though as mentioned above), and I am apparently on a different chain than the crawler.  Possibly the crawler is frozen.  It is on 45608 right now but the node I am connected to has gone past that.

EDIT:
C:\Users\Administrator>nslookup 91.121.6.19
Server:  dc1.mydomain.com
Address:  192.168.2.5

Name:    ns328125.ip-91-121-6.eu
Address:  91.121.6.19


C:\Users\Administrator>netstat

Active Connections

  Proto  Local Address          Foreign Address        State
  TCP    192.168.2.236:3389     192.168.1.114:49421    ESTABLISHED
  TCP    192.168.2.236:58944    ns328125:17014         ESTABLISHED
  TCP    192.168.2.236:58998    sh01:http              LAST_ACK

So looks like the node that works is 91.121.6.19

Also looks like this node is not on same chain as the block crawler 

[mellon]

Mellon,

First, I apologize for couldn't keep my word to help you dump your salvage wallet. I had tested before with a corrupted bitcoin wallet.dat and can dump it to text file with private and public key by pywallet. But this time, I tried but unsuccessful, maybe I missed something.

For your problem, I think it does not relate to forking issue. Once you recover your wallet, I think your balance will be same as you had.

I read your post to end, but sorry, not really understand what you mean.

Guys plz simple read that to the end.Im try to write that on simpe common sentences,Because my bad English get a not right understanding my posts by some ppl.Here is a few main parts,like its look and what a result we have(im never have and not have now any opinion that are build only for my own profit and not on my own  negative or positive opinion about anybody here).
Fix:
1. First fix was made on block explorer chain(right database) with current amount of total coins.
a) Why we are not have a stable fix as a result? Because fixed block with number around 43K.
2. Second step of fix( its take a place now.) Fix block after 44K with much more many issues than at first and was suggest when that variant of block chain show amount of total coins biggest than can be supplied on that block. Thats why many adresses now have a callback from database with issue about any unconfirmed(unmount) coins and that issue have appearce after wallet status=true result.Simple wait few seconds and set again "getinfo" command in rpc console.
3.Result: On that moment it's much many hard to fix issues( right impossible in short time). Because all that time with new block in chains we are getting two or three issues for addresses.And also both fixes fixed issues in databases like a current way of work,and here impossible not getting problems with sync and balance on addresses(wallets exactly wallet.dat files).
4. A most available start points of problem with database(it's not a wallet issues,but windows wallet have too some not so critical issues). :
a) Last critical fork of chain - block numbers 40150-40158 - start stuck orphans chain and had lost a current next block on main chain( in that period most of addresses replaced on orphans(fork chain and start to getting rewards in orphans blocks,chain start to getting stronger and stronger with each new address.and in result was fix like a main chain. That's why in same period main current chain was tanked slowly and as result in your database appears a blocks with hashes that not have addresses who are first two days jump from one to another chain periodically and all that mixed info was fixed by first fix on cryptopoper block explorer site.
b) But if even make a rollback to block number 38k-40k it's cannot get us a 100% successfully result like a strong stable chain and same situation can be take a place in any time with any new blocks. It's my own opinion about. It's a result of my own analyzing logs from different addresses on few OS. Debug.log they are have same situation when start sync at first time since 1 block of chain so they are all have not balances simple sync only database info.
Since block 7700-7870 starting graw amount of orphans and that wave are down only on block 8500-8700. (That first serious wave). And until block number 40158. Same waves are appeares before blocks that are discris rewards. Every wave have a biggest amount of organs blocks and continued longer.Like example that critical stuck ( fork that we have now) start to build  since block with number around 38300 and faster grow up on 39600-40158. Why that wave not put down like all another,but continue grow up until chain was not doubled? I see here a result of specific Spreadcoin rewards scheme that start at block 40K and each block discris rewards catalyze wave and it's stucked and stucked and stucked in all next period you can fix it how much more until all 35 billions LDOGE-orphans not be collected,but you are would be getting same situation again and again. Why? Answer in code but I'm not look at PoS settings in true. But I'm sure that here have not be currently setts constants of size transaction,block time that's why Antigravity wave not take any effect. And cannot dump new waves on Spreadcoin scheme on you fixes.
5. For not simple spammed a thread like I do that usually I'm post in next half hour log here and you all can check it if you have a wish in every second. I can make a mistake in any numbers of blocks (on 100-200 amount in period),I'm sorry for that at once. Here now 7:44 AM lol time to wake up,but I'm cannot do that because not sleep yet today. MinerTFM yes you are right I'm do that and post all same info earlier in thread all that days only because I'm buy LDOGE I'm known that my wallet.dat was corrupt at 14.05.2015 in 20:41 (Moscow) and all time before that happened I'm think only about how it's would be going when it's corrupt,that's why I'm post after 5 hours of start that issues my wish about that I want to change nodes and start to sync wallet in single then in dual wallets. (You are say that it's a not take any effect).And that's why I'm say to you that you can ask me about any help if you need,sent you PM where tell you about where exactly you can look same algo and what they have same issues and fix it,that's why I'm get update graphics of wallets on me not asked how much I'm getting for that coins,that's why I'm all last day try to get answer from you what link is correct because want to compile wallet,that's why I'm since start until that moment post here "spam" about that fix and what effect they are would be have. It's only because I'm knows that my wallet.dat would be corrupt and I'm ask here in thread about help. But it's exactly only because I'm think only about my own money. Lol boy you are dancing around here only after you are see 100 mill reward. Be honest. And yes I'm really bored not.you about my balance and want to back it up because I'm not want lost 500$ only because Dev not think that easy fix fork are not be fixed anyone here three days in a row. M.b. All around are milliarders and can easy burn you money for nothing,but I'm not same,but 500$ for me not a critical drop lol,but the way how it's going now are more than stupid way.

Best Regards
Mellon

Oh I'm not know how much more understatible say it your all now fix forked chains. Look again in my post and look in thread I'm say at this morning about that now your are can fix that dirty database and always any adress would be have issue about balance or synchronization because you all are have difference in database and information of database in your wallet.dat file. Open your liteDoge folder if you are start to getting any unusual issues and open files db.log and debug.log you are see where it's a problem take place.

[xPooky]

[
{
"addr" : "91.121.6.19:17014",
"addrlocal" : "*",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1429365963,
"lastrecv" : 1429365963,
"bytessent" : 2509,
"bytesrecv" : 21999,
"conntime" : 1429365951,
"pingtime" : 0.10383900,
"version" : 60015,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.0.0.1/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 45640,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : true
}
]
one of the nodes that are listed in op is way in front of explorer
block 45640
and my wallet connects to it even if i remove it from conf file

[mellon]

are you sure it is a good idea to put listen=1 right now?

Not sure - but its working better now - much more network weight showing ...

as long as listen is below nodes

... but I think I will wait for permanent fix now ...

It's working better because it's a right scheme how must work p2p network and stand decentralized with much more better security and stability. When your turn "listen" to value 1,your are start a new server-client adress(node-seed).

[mellon]

[
{
"addr" : "91.121.6.19:17014",
"addrlocal" : "*",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1429365963,
"lastrecv" : 1429365963,
"bytessent" : 2509,
"bytesrecv" : 21999,
"conntime" : 1429365951,
"pingtime" : 0.10383900,
"version" : 60015,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.0.0.1/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 45640,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : true
}
]
one of the nodes that are listed in op is way in front of explorer
block 45640
and my wallet connects to it even if i remove it from conf file

In that case that seed is a basic and written in source.

[heavensopen]

Does anyone know what this is?  That is not my wallet address (all of my wallets have labels like the one that says wallet3) but it appears in my history like a block I mined.  I have seen a few of these, each with a different address, some of them happened when I was forked so they disappeared after I resynced but this one made it into the main chain.



txid: 4db08faabc35c2c94f8c45b5ef2afc35c71e060d83dbfcc32e2e42fe44d64679

go to console and hit listaddressgroupings
this will tell you all the addresses currently into your wallet and their balance
it may be one of your addresses that receive change

[MinerFTW]

aquitasIJ:

When you get online. Please check your pm's
Now crawler gets forked doing nothing also.

My advise unless you have a lot of time to keep resyncing. Stop staking and buy up all cheap lodge until permanent fix is around.


P.s. i just resynced crawler node it was forked but back to checkpoint server.

[xPooky]

aquitasIJ:

When you get online. Please check your pm's
Now crawler gets forked doing nothing also.

My advise unless you have a lot of time to keep resyncing. Stop staking and buy up all cheap lodge until permanent fix is around.


P.s. i just resynced crawler node it was forked but back to checkpoint server.

i am on same chain also now

all 3 hardcoded seednodes are on different chain
can anyone post on which one is the checkpointing node

[not.you]

Does anyone know what this is?  That is not my wallet address (all of my wallets have labels like the one that says wallet3) but it appears in my history like a block I mined.  I have seen a few of these, each with a different address, some of them happened when I was forked so they disappeared after I resynced but this one made it into the main chain.



txid: 4db08faabc35c2c94f8c45b5ef2afc35c71e060d83dbfcc32e2e42fe44d64679

go to console and hit listaddressgroupings
this will tell you all the addresses currently into your wallet and their balance
it may be one of your addresses that receive change

I do see it listed there along with a number of others that I do not recognize.  If these are all mine where did they come from and why are they not listed under the receive tab where the addresses I generated are listed?

[layer1gfx]

there is an issue with the checkpoint being too old for other PoS coins (also for asiacoin, peercoin and paycoin and most likely others)
i got now a warning message that looks similar (not exactly the same) but saying things about the checkpoint as well:

Safe mode: WARNING: Invalid checkpoint found! Displayed transactions may not be correct! You may need to upgrade, or notify developers. (code -2)

their solution might also be fixing our problems:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=595999.msg11111115#msg11111115

[mellon]

Does anyone know what this is?  That is not my wallet address (all of my wallets have labels like the one that says wallet3) but it appears in my history like a block I mined.  I have seen a few of these, each with a different address, some of them happened when I was forked so they disappeared after I resynced but this one made it into the main chain.



txid: 4db08faabc35c2c94f8c45b5ef2afc35c71e060d83dbfcc32e2e42fe44d64679

go to console and hit listaddressgroupings
this will tell you all the addresses currently into your wallet and their balance
it may be one of your addresses that receive change

I do see it listed there along with a number of others that I do not recognize.  If these are all mine where did they come from and why are they not listed under the receive tab where the addresses I generated are listed?

because your wallet.dat have a informations from right and forked chain now. But database not have that info that's why you are now synchronization successfully at start because you wallet.dat find same with fixed database lns ends in some checkpoint but to next checkpoint you are again come back to your own fork and start download a txid from your wallet.dat. Check your debug log now for more clear info about your address. And same situation would be take a place around. Fix that by the way like that want to do dev and MinerTWXnot impossible now. Because they are already twice now fixed a forked chains variant and now database have a lot of issues same type like you see. You understand what I'm say now?