jvper
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 26, 2017, 01:11:07 AM |
|
I believe 30k is the next stop, small retracement here and there, but a new pump could happen pretty soon. The environment is very optimistic.
Please, elaborate more on why you believe so... Otherwise, this sounds just like a spam post. I have wrote many posts about AMP, you should read my blog (signature link). I don't think I need to repeat myself about the arguments that I have made months ago. I have always been positive on AMP since the time I bought it, and even before that I had an eye on AMP just waited for the best moment to buy in. The alpha will probably come out anytime now, and that is why I believe 30k is the next step, perhaps even more if investors will be satisfied. Maybe trolls need to take a break and recognize how hard the Synereo team has been working in the past 3 months, while the trolls do nothing but just spread fear and lies.
See his name, he just spread spam and wants noobs to buy his bags at 30k.
I don't think you get the picture. If Synereo comes out, in it's final form, it will be more like 0.01 BTC/AMP 30k is a teaser if perhaps the Alpha slowly starts to come out, but when the real thing comes out, only sky will be the limit. Think of it like being the early days of Facebook. It could be worth tens of billions later! It'll go down to the 3-5 cent range soon and then I'll just buy MORE! I'm actually considering focusing more on Synereo than Ethereum, I'll thank myself later. Also, it's not like people won't notice it anyway, it's in the top 50 on CoinMarketCap. The problem here is the 950 million total supply, which is a big burden even if the product is delivered.
|
|
|
|
profitgenerator212
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 26, 2017, 01:14:38 AM |
|
The problem here is the 950 million total supply, which is a big burden even if the product is delivered.
Who cares, I don't think the Synereo team will sell them. They are working hard on Synereo, and it will be probably worth a lot if they deliver it correctly. Why sell the 950 million now, then you can sell that in 10-20 years for potential billions of dollars? I believe most social media was also 80-90% in the hands of a few guys, so this is no different than investing in early Facebook or Google. I dont think people should be scared of the supply. If the price rises, they won't sell, because their assets would only grow in price, and who is that stupid to sell into a starting bull market?
|
|
|
|
jvper
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 26, 2017, 03:03:00 AM |
|
The problem here is the 950 million total supply, which is a big burden even if the product is delivered.
Who cares, I don't think the Synereo team will sell them. They are working hard on Synereo, and it will be probably worth a lot if they deliver it correctly. Why sell the 950 million now, then you can sell that in 10-20 years for potential billions of dollars? I believe most social media was also 80-90% in the hands of a few guys, so this is no different than investing in early Facebook or Google. I dont think people should be scared of the supply. If the price rises, they won't sell, because their assets would only grow in price, and who is that stupid to sell into a starting bull market? Who claimed they would sell? The issue here is: there is a huge amount of coins, which makes the valuation quite high, even for few cents per coin.
|
|
|
|
JoeyDaMan7
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 26, 2017, 03:44:36 AM |
|
The problem here is the 950 million total supply, which is a big burden even if the product is delivered.
Who cares, I don't think the Synereo team will sell them. They are working hard on Synereo, and it will be probably worth a lot if they deliver it correctly. Why sell the 950 million now, then you can sell that in 10-20 years for potential billions of dollars? I believe most social media was also 80-90% in the hands of a few guys, so this is no different than investing in early Facebook or Google. I dont think people should be scared of the supply. If the price rises, they won't sell, because their assets would only grow in price, and who is that stupid to sell into a starting bull market? Who claimed they would sell? The issue here is: there is a huge amount of coins, which makes the valuation quite high, even for few cents per coin. I'm with PG on this one, there's still only 82 million coins in circulation - the total AMP supply doesn't matter. Synereo already burned half of them! Dor said earlier that they would use the remaining AMPS for development purposes. Development=more money brought into Synereo.
|
|
|
|
cherry11800
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 26, 2017, 03:57:14 AM |
|
What are the main developers now?
|
|
|
|
jvper
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 26, 2017, 04:07:23 AM |
|
The problem here is the 950 million total supply, which is a big burden even if the product is delivered.
Who cares, I don't think the Synereo team will sell them. They are working hard on Synereo, and it will be probably worth a lot if they deliver it correctly. Why sell the 950 million now, then you can sell that in 10-20 years for potential billions of dollars? I believe most social media was also 80-90% in the hands of a few guys, so this is no different than investing in early Facebook or Google. I dont think people should be scared of the supply. If the price rises, they won't sell, because their assets would only grow in price, and who is that stupid to sell into a starting bull market? Who claimed they would sell? The issue here is: there is a huge amount of coins, which makes the valuation quite high, even for few cents per coin. I'm with PG on this one, there's still only 82 million coins in circulation - the total AMP supply doesn't matter. Synereo already burned half of them! Dor said earlier that they would use the remaining AMPS for development purposes. Development=more money brought into Synereo. It is contingent. Therefore it cannot be neglected... Although those coins are currently locked, one day they will be unlocked, so the real market cap will be 949 million times price per coin.
|
|
|
|
JoeyDaMan7
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 26, 2017, 04:35:56 AM |
|
The problem here is the 950 million total supply, which is a big burden even if the product is delivered.
Who cares, I don't think the Synereo team will sell them. They are working hard on Synereo, and it will be probably worth a lot if they deliver it correctly. Why sell the 950 million now, then you can sell that in 10-20 years for potential billions of dollars? I believe most social media was also 80-90% in the hands of a few guys, so this is no different than investing in early Facebook or Google. I dont think people should be scared of the supply. If the price rises, they won't sell, because their assets would only grow in price, and who is that stupid to sell into a starting bull market? Who claimed they would sell? The issue here is: there is a huge amount of coins, which makes the valuation quite high, even for few cents per coin. I'm with PG on this one, there's still only 82 million coins in circulation - the total AMP supply doesn't matter. Synereo already burned half of them! Dor said earlier that they would use the remaining AMPS for development purposes. Development=more money brought into Synereo. It is contingent. Therefore it cannot be neglected... Although those coins are currently locked, one day they will be unlocked, so the real market cap will be 949 million times price per coin. Oh, sure, Synereo will sell ALL of their AMPs at the same time. You'd think that they would've done it sooner though, it's been 3 years. Hmm... ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
|
jvper
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 26, 2017, 04:43:24 AM |
|
The problem here is the 950 million total supply, which is a big burden even if the product is delivered.
Who cares, I don't think the Synereo team will sell them. They are working hard on Synereo, and it will be probably worth a lot if they deliver it correctly. Why sell the 950 million now, then you can sell that in 10-20 years for potential billions of dollars? I believe most social media was also 80-90% in the hands of a few guys, so this is no different than investing in early Facebook or Google. I dont think people should be scared of the supply. If the price rises, they won't sell, because their assets would only grow in price, and who is that stupid to sell into a starting bull market? Who claimed they would sell? The issue here is: there is a huge amount of coins, which makes the valuation quite high, even for few cents per coin. I'm with PG on this one, there's still only 82 million coins in circulation - the total AMP supply doesn't matter. Synereo already burned half of them! Dor said earlier that they would use the remaining AMPS for development purposes. Development=more money brought into Synereo. It is contingent. Therefore it cannot be neglected... Although those coins are currently locked, one day they will be unlocked, so the real market cap will be 949 million times price per coin. Oh, sure, Synereo will sell ALL of their AMPs at the same time. You'd think that they would've done it sooner though, it's been 3 years. Hmm... ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Market capitalization is calculated regardless of the owners intention of selling or not. That's my point.
|
|
|
|
Elokane (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 26, 2017, 10:00:22 AM |
|
The problem here is the 950 million total supply, which is a big burden even if the product is delivered.
Who cares, I don't think the Synereo team will sell them. They are working hard on Synereo, and it will be probably worth a lot if they deliver it correctly. Why sell the 950 million now, then you can sell that in 10-20 years for potential billions of dollars? I believe most social media was also 80-90% in the hands of a few guys, so this is no different than investing in early Facebook or Google. I dont think people should be scared of the supply. If the price rises, they won't sell, because their assets would only grow in price, and who is that stupid to sell into a starting bull market? Who claimed they would sell? The issue here is: there is a huge amount of coins, which makes the valuation quite high, even for few cents per coin. I'm with PG on this one, there's still only 82 million coins in circulation - the total AMP supply doesn't matter. Synereo already burned half of them! Dor said earlier that they would use the remaining AMPS for development purposes. Development=more money brought into Synereo. It is contingent. Therefore it cannot be neglected... Although those coins are currently locked, one day they will be unlocked, so the real market cap will be 949 million times price per coin. Oh, sure, Synereo will sell ALL of their AMPs at the same time. You'd think that they would've done it sooner though, it's been 3 years. Hmm... ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Market capitalization is calculated regardless of the owners intention of selling or not. That's my point. Is the market cap of Bitcoin based on 21 million coins or what is now available in the market?
|
|
|
|
Triload
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 26, 2017, 10:27:18 AM |
|
What are the main developers now ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) One was kicked out, his name is Greg. Dor is dumping his premined coins, sad project.
|
|
|
|
GoogleBit
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 26, 2017, 11:17:53 AM |
|
Twitter is actually loosing 500.000.000 $ a year, this year and last year they did. What about using Synereo AMP for creating revenue... Any idea ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif)
|
|
|
|
jvper
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 26, 2017, 04:44:36 PM |
|
The problem here is the 950 million total supply, which is a big burden even if the product is delivered.
Who cares, I don't think the Synereo team will sell them. They are working hard on Synereo, and it will be probably worth a lot if they deliver it correctly. Why sell the 950 million now, then you can sell that in 10-20 years for potential billions of dollars? I believe most social media was also 80-90% in the hands of a few guys, so this is no different than investing in early Facebook or Google. I dont think people should be scared of the supply. If the price rises, they won't sell, because their assets would only grow in price, and who is that stupid to sell into a starting bull market? Who claimed they would sell? The issue here is: there is a huge amount of coins, which makes the valuation quite high, even for few cents per coin. I'm with PG on this one, there's still only 82 million coins in circulation - the total AMP supply doesn't matter. Synereo already burned half of them! Dor said earlier that they would use the remaining AMPS for development purposes. Development=more money brought into Synereo. It is contingent. Therefore it cannot be neglected... Although those coins are currently locked, one day they will be unlocked, so the real market cap will be 949 million times price per coin. Oh, sure, Synereo will sell ALL of their AMPs at the same time. You'd think that they would've done it sooner though, it's been 3 years. Hmm... ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Market capitalization is calculated regardless of the owners intention of selling or not. That's my point. Is the market cap of Bitcoin based on 21 million coins or what is now available in the market? Some websites consider 21 million. Others, like coinmarketcap, consider the current supply. If one considers the current supply, then the difference to 21 million must be considered a cost (paid through dillution) to run bitcoin blockchain. A cost that will be paid by current bitcoin owners in order to attract more miners, which is fundamental to the blockchain long term existence. Similarly, we can either consider the market cap to be 949 million * price per AMP (especially considering all those tokens already exist) or consider only the current supply, but then all the locked AMPs are a huge burden AMP holders will pay through dillution and must be considered beforehand. Different approaches, but either way it is the same thing at the end of the day.
|
|
|
|
JoeyDaMan7
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 27, 2017, 03:19:59 AM |
|
The problem here is the 950 million total supply, which is a big burden even if the product is delivered.
Who cares, I don't think the Synereo team will sell them. They are working hard on Synereo, and it will be probably worth a lot if they deliver it correctly. Why sell the 950 million now, then you can sell that in 10-20 years for potential billions of dollars? I believe most social media was also 80-90% in the hands of a few guys, so this is no different than investing in early Facebook or Google. I dont think people should be scared of the supply. If the price rises, they won't sell, because their assets would only grow in price, and who is that stupid to sell into a starting bull market? Who claimed they would sell? The issue here is: there is a huge amount of coins, which makes the valuation quite high, even for few cents per coin. I'm with PG on this one, there's still only 82 million coins in circulation - the total AMP supply doesn't matter. Synereo already burned half of them! Dor said earlier that they would use the remaining AMPS for development purposes. Development=more money brought into Synereo. It is contingent. Therefore it cannot be neglected... Although those coins are currently locked, one day they will be unlocked, so the real market cap will be 949 million times price per coin. Oh, sure, Synereo will sell ALL of their AMPs at the same time. You'd think that they would've done it sooner though, it's been 3 years. Hmm... ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Market capitalization is calculated regardless of the owners intention of selling or not. That's my point. Is the market cap of Bitcoin based on 21 million coins or what is now available in the market? Some websites consider 21 million. Others, like coinmarketcap, consider the current supply. If one considers the current supply, then the difference to 21 million must be considered a cost (paid through dillution) to run bitcoin blockchain. A cost that will be paid by current bitcoin owners in order to attract more miners, which is fundamental to the blockchain long term existence. Similarly, we can either consider the market cap to be 949 million * price per AMP (especially considering all those tokens already exist) or consider only the current supply, but then all the locked AMPs are a huge burden AMP holders will pay through dillution and must be considered beforehand. Different approaches, but either way it is the same thing at the end of the day. Again, it won't be a burden if the extra AMPs are being used to better the platform. I'm not sure how you can try to make close-to-accurate price predictions when you figure in the total AMP supply. Wanna sell me your AMPs?
|
|
|
|
jvper
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 27, 2017, 04:14:23 AM |
|
The problem here is the 950 million total supply, which is a big burden even if the product is delivered.
Who cares, I don't think the Synereo team will sell them. They are working hard on Synereo, and it will be probably worth a lot if they deliver it correctly. Why sell the 950 million now, then you can sell that in 10-20 years for potential billions of dollars? I believe most social media was also 80-90% in the hands of a few guys, so this is no different than investing in early Facebook or Google. I dont think people should be scared of the supply. If the price rises, they won't sell, because their assets would only grow in price, and who is that stupid to sell into a starting bull market? Who claimed they would sell? The issue here is: there is a huge amount of coins, which makes the valuation quite high, even for few cents per coin. I'm with PG on this one, there's still only 82 million coins in circulation - the total AMP supply doesn't matter. Synereo already burned half of them! Dor said earlier that they would use the remaining AMPS for development purposes. Development=more money brought into Synereo. It is contingent. Therefore it cannot be neglected... Although those coins are currently locked, one day they will be unlocked, so the real market cap will be 949 million times price per coin. Oh, sure, Synereo will sell ALL of their AMPs at the same time. You'd think that they would've done it sooner though, it's been 3 years. Hmm... ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Market capitalization is calculated regardless of the owners intention of selling or not. That's my point. Is the market cap of Bitcoin based on 21 million coins or what is now available in the market? Some websites consider 21 million. Others, like coinmarketcap, consider the current supply. If one considers the current supply, then the difference to 21 million must be considered a cost (paid through dillution) to run bitcoin blockchain. A cost that will be paid by current bitcoin owners in order to attract more miners, which is fundamental to the blockchain long term existence. Similarly, we can either consider the market cap to be 949 million * price per AMP (especially considering all those tokens already exist) or consider only the current supply, but then all the locked AMPs are a huge burden AMP holders will pay through dillution and must be considered beforehand. Different approaches, but either way it is the same thing at the end of the day. Again, it won't be a burden if the extra AMPs are being used to better the platform. I'm not sure how you can try to make close-to-accurate price predictions when you figure in the total AMP supply. Wanna sell me your AMPs? I don't understand the relationship between the discussion about market cap and my intention to sell AMPs or not. But anyway, let me answer by saying that I am willing to sell my AMPs for you for the acquisition price, no profit intended... A price considered and set by Synereo Team as fair. Deal?
|
|
|
|
UnknownEye
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 27, 2017, 06:50:41 AM |
|
Finally clawed some of my losses back risking it buying at 3k selling at 9k. Why should I need to play the market like this while these fuckers are sitting on my btc that payed 30+k. I'll get my money back then I'm out of here, these people can't be trusted.
|
|
|
|
ooom
Full Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 165
Merit: 100
Learning is the beginning of wealth.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 27, 2017, 07:04:52 AM Last edit: March 27, 2017, 07:29:30 AM by ooom |
|
Will you be able to AMP content on FACEBOOK? YOUTUBE? where else? Will browser extension be able to setup on any browser?
The plan is to make this a ubiquitous layer on top of the Internet. We'll publish more information about our model next week. Our team has many, many years of experience and we have gone through two prestigious startup accelerators, becoming familiar with the cutting edge. I assure you we're aiming at creating a product of the highest quality.
Just ignore these games and focus on what we're actually building. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F2ZBO7zI.png&t=665&c=MEDPXid3Pub1jQ) Read this article to understand why we need all those AMPS. Ofcourse they could burn some but: https://blog.synereo.com/2017/03/20/epiphytian-decentralization-a-new-business-model-for-ugc-publishing/When software will be working and populated, there will be a high demand for AMPs worldwide. For me supply doesn't rise problems. Main concern is that they deliver working software. Software that would create a precedent in marketing usage around the crypto world and INTERNET. If their second round TEST will be great, we will never see todays price anymore. As more people TEST, more will practically feel the possible future of AMP attention economy. People who test now are privileged to feel assured that their investments a safe. Who participated in the first testing round of alpha said it will be huge. Now I am waiting for TODAYs the news UPDATE ON SYNEREO.
|
Disclaimer: My material is for informational purposes only. It should not be considered legal or financial advice. I do not make any guarantee or other promise as to any results that may be obtained from using my content.
|
|
|
wildduck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 27, 2017, 08:27:45 AM |
|
Like me, and i want to test it.
|
|
|
|
morda
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 77
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 27, 2017, 10:15:08 AM |
|
Will you be able to AMP content on FACEBOOK? YOUTUBE? where else? Will browser extension be able to setup on any browser?
The plan is to make this a ubiquitous layer on top of the Internet. We'll publish more information about our model next week. Our team has many, many years of experience and we have gone through two prestigious startup accelerators, becoming familiar with the cutting edge. I assure you we're aiming at creating a product of the highest quality.
Just ignore these games and focus on what we're actually building. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F2ZBO7zI.png&t=665&c=MEDPXid3Pub1jQ) Read this article to understand why we need all those AMPS. Ofcourse they could burn some but: https://blog.synereo.com/2017/03/20/epiphytian-decentralization-a-new-business-model-for-ugc-publishing/When software will be working and populated, there will be a high demand for AMPs worldwide. For me supply doesn't rise problems. Main concern is that they deliver working software. Software that would create a precedent in marketing usage around the crypto world and INTERNET. If their second round TEST will be great, we will never see todays price anymore. As more people TEST, more will practically feel the possible future of AMP attention economy. People who test now are privileged to feel assured that their investments a safe.
Who participated in the first testing round of alpha said it will be huge. Now I am waiting for TODAYs the news UPDATE ON SYNEREO. Bingo that's the position I'm at, after iv tested the product my confidence sky rocketed, such simple but effective product
|
3DjB5gFXnh9TZF5DS7Zm6eSs64RbSYP9JU
|
|
|
MellowYellow14
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 27, 2017, 02:13:43 PM |
|
Will you be able to AMP content on FACEBOOK? YOUTUBE? where else? Will browser extension be able to setup on any browser?
The plan is to make this a ubiquitous layer on top of the Internet. We'll publish more information about our model next week. Our team has many, many years of experience and we have gone through two prestigious startup accelerators, becoming familiar with the cutting edge. I assure you we're aiming at creating a product of the highest quality.
Read this article to understand why we need all those AMPS. Ofcourse they could burn some but: https://blog.synereo.com/2017/03/20/epiphytian-decentralization-a-new-business-model-for-ugc-publishing/When software will be working and populated, there will be a high demand for AMPs worldwide. For me supply doesn't rise problems. Main concern is that they deliver working software. Software that would create a precedent in marketing usage around the crypto world and INTERNET. If their second round TEST will be great, we will never see todays price anymore. As more people TEST, more will practically feel the possible future of AMP attention economy. People who test now are privileged to feel assured that their investments a safe.
Who participated in the first testing round of alpha said it will be huge. Now I am waiting for TODAYs the news UPDATE ON SYNEREO. Bingo that's the position I'm at, after iv tested the product my confidence sky rocketed, such simple but effective product Everyone is talking about the alpha release. Lets bring it on already! I think today they will release info, or public alpha is out?
|
|
|
|
Elokane (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 27, 2017, 08:55:12 PM |
|
https://blog.synereo.com/2017/03/27/a-liberated-network-is-born/" The Synereo Attention Economy Layer transcends the separation between the different platforms through which content travels from creator to consumer, and establishes a platform-agnostic chain of users linking and distributing content among them, compensating value-creators along the way accordingly.
The next iteration of Synereo’s product will soon reach MVP status and be released to a wider audience as a closed beta. We will unveil this product next week, including a first glimpse of its UI, utility and projected release dates." ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fo96siGA.jpg&t=665&c=v9y6vUD2N9amRw)
|
|
|
|
|