[ANN] CRAVE 1st POS Masternodes | Dark Assets | I2P | Market =Embrace The Dark=

[coinspredator]

Approximate time until the end of the BLUR burning period. BLOCK 60200



IS THIS CORRECT ?

 i think it will take more time. For the last 12 hours 50 min was found ~500 blocks

it is not a block every 60 seconds? I can set up another timer, no problem

[trader19]

Approximate time until the end of the BLUR burning period. BLOCK 60200



IS THIS CORRECT ?

 i think it will take more time. For the last 12 hours 50 min was found ~500 blocks

it is not a block every 60 seconds? I can set up another time, no problem

no 89 seconds in average, blockchain is moving slower than expected. Less coins getting generated daily also what makes it interesting even more  

[coinspredator]

Approximate time until the end of the BLUR burning period. BLOCK 60200



IS THIS CORRECT ?

 i think it will take more time. For the last 12 hours 50 min was found ~500 blocks

it is not a block every 60 seconds? I can set up another time, no problem

no 89 seconds in average, blockchain is moving slower than expected. Less coins getting generated daily also what makes it interesting even more  

89 seconds, I gonna make a correct one.

[coinspredator]

Approximate time until the end of the BLUR burning period. BLOCK 60200



Ps. considering a new block each 89 seconds.

 
 

[coinhugger]

Now is there someone who can help me burn some Crave to Blur?  I'd be willing to pay for the service. Thank you.

[CraveIt]

Just received some profit from Kimowa's and Sologap's masternode hosting service

thanks a lot guys

 

[EmilioMann]

Now is there someone who can help me burn some Crave to Blur?  I'd be willing to pay for the service. Thank you.

i also need help.
tm2013 and darkproton are busy

[EmilioMann]

I also think that, but I do not see any problem.
crave has a better name, a much better community and skulls are pretty cool 
The sling community is basically formed by the worst members of shadowtrash community, probably after obtaining a profit they will destroy the currency

[striker7334 2.0]

I also think that, but I do not see any problem.
crave has a better name, a much better community and skulls are pretty cool 
The sling community is basically formed by the worst members of shadowtrash community, probably after obtaining a profit they will destroy the currency

Don't feed the trolls lol No one knows who either are and honestly who cares I own both but definitely more CRAVE!

[hughbt]

I also think that, but I do not see any problem.
crave has a better name, a much better community and skulls are pretty cool 
The sling community is basically formed by the worst members of shadowtrash community, probably after obtaining a profit they will destroy the currency

Don't feed the trolls lol No one knows who either are and honestly who cares I own both but definitely more CRAVE!

Same old shit... Few weeks ago people were claiming that ICM is developing TRON. By the end of the month probably I will read that he is Satoshi Nakamoto.

[rocoro]

People who think they're the same dev...  I would say no because the way they do things (with code) doesn't look the same.

You might ask, maybe they would be doing that on purpose? 
But what would be the real motive..  and why go through all of that.. doesn't make much sense.

[burner640k]

OK, so I took a break from looking at it but now am back again trying to figure out why I was not credited Blur for the Crave I burned using darkpoold (block 52061, hash 1a278074b96bc61f913c0df3afca88c5fd0771757e2f02b171adf9bc6553001d, address CDssAhibe5m4hx3yMyi5TuxrqrSDuJRwqk).

I noticed that someone else may have run into the exact same problem as me, though I do not see them posting here.  Whoever burned 13.99994986 Crave from address BvEeWXL6qz3YXRmBQbbh25ri4uQudpD67H at block 53204 you did not get any Blur. 

In looking at that I noticed that both that person and I did the same thing, we burned all the Crave we had at our address, no change.  Every other burn that I see has change.  So maybe the bug with darkpoold is that if the burn does not have change it does not get recognized? 

[darkproton]

OK, so I took a break from looking at it but now am back again trying to figure out why I was not credited Blur for the Crave I burned using darkpoold (block 52061, hash 1a278074b96bc61f913c0df3afca88c5fd0771757e2f02b171adf9bc6553001d, address CDssAhibe5m4hx3yMyi5TuxrqrSDuJRwqk).

I noticed that someone else may have run into the exact same problem as me, though I do not see them posting here.  Whoever burned 13.99994986 Crave from address BvEeWXL6qz3YXRmBQbbh25ri4uQudpD67H at block 53204 you did not get any Blur. 

In looking at that I noticed that both that person and I did the same thing, we burned all the Crave we had at our address, no change.  Every other burn that I see has change.  So maybe the bug with darkpoold is that if the burn does not have change it does not get recognized? 

That's possibly it. It does need to charge a fee. I would contact counterpartyd guys or their forum. Darkpoold is just a port from dogeparty which is from counterparty.

[Digital_Currency_LTD]

People who think they're the same dev...  I would say no because the way they do things (with code) doesn't look the same.

You might ask, maybe they would be doing that on purpose? 
But what would be the real motive..  and why go through all of that.. doesn't make much sense.

" I would say no because the way they do things (with code) doesn't look the same."

For example?

[Adderral]

Sling and Crave? twins? Not likely imo but you never really know especially in crypto.

[burner640k]

OK, so I took a break from looking at it but now am back again trying to figure out why I was not credited Blur for the Crave I burned using darkpoold (block 52061, hash 1a278074b96bc61f913c0df3afca88c5fd0771757e2f02b171adf9bc6553001d, address CDssAhibe5m4hx3yMyi5TuxrqrSDuJRwqk).

I noticed that someone else may have run into the exact same problem as me, though I do not see them posting here.  Whoever burned 13.99994986 Crave from address BvEeWXL6qz3YXRmBQbbh25ri4uQudpD67H at block 53204 you did not get any Blur. 

In looking at that I noticed that both that person and I did the same thing, we burned all the Crave we had at our address, no change.  Every other burn that I see has change.  So maybe the bug with darkpoold is that if the burn does not have change it does not get recognized? 

That's possibly it. It does need to charge a fee. I would contact counterpartyd guys or their forum. Darkpoold is just a port from dogeparty which is from counterparty.

I did pay the fee, it was higher than most burns since I had quite a few inputs. 

I have searched some through counterparties forum to find any hints about this problem not sure how useful posting there would be since their burn has been done for a long time.  And their code is quite a bit different from darkpoold now from a quick look at it. 

But as I mess with the python in darkpoold it does seem like it is not detecting the burn until it processes the second vout that sends the change back to the original address.  It detects the proper destination address in the first vout but then it does not trigger a burn until after the second vout which is change going back to the sender. 

[rocoro]

People who think they're the same dev...  I would say no because the way they do things (with code) doesn't look the same.

You might ask, maybe they would be doing that on purpose? 
But what would be the real motive..  and why go through all of that.. doesn't make much sense.

" I would say no because the way they do things (with code) doesn't look the same."

For example?

Well for one,  one is using github and the other is using bitbucket

Another thing,  one just compiled a mac wallet and the other didn't.. why wouldn't the same person do both?

Another thing, one dev just posted that the market is based of another coin (the interface) and the other dev doesn't seem to say its based off anything like that.

Want me to list more?

[trader19]

People who think they're the same dev...  I would say no because the way they do things (with code) doesn't look the same.

You might ask, maybe they would be doing that on purpose? 
But what would be the real motive..  and why go through all of that.. doesn't make much sense.

" I would say no because the way they do things (with code) doesn't look the same."

For example?

Well for one,  one is using github and the other is using bitbucket

Another thing,  one just compiled a mac wallet and the other didn't.. why wouldn't the same person do both?

Another thing, one dev just posted that the market is based of another coin (the interface) and the other dev doesn't seem to say its based off anything like that.

Want me to list more?

ICM is developing Urge protector, multisig escrow and is one of the kind, the other ones market is bitmarket fork.

[rocoro]

People who think they're the same dev...  I would say no because the way they do things (with code) doesn't look the same.

You might ask, maybe they would be doing that on purpose? 
But what would be the real motive..  and why go through all of that.. doesn't make much sense.

" I would say no because the way they do things (with code) doesn't look the same."

For example?

Well for one,  one is using github and the other is using bitbucket

Another thing,  one just compiled a mac wallet and the other didn't.. why wouldn't the same person do both?

Another thing, one dev just posted that the market is based of another coin (the interface) and the other dev doesn't seem to say its based off anything like that.

Want me to list more?

ICM is developing Urge protector, multisig escrow and is one of the kind, the other ones market is bitmarket fork.

Yes, thank you..   in my opinion,  things just don't add up to say its the same dev...   maybe a same "team of devs" or something but,  just seems like too much of separate projects.

[Hyperjacked]

It just wasn't the same without you pump...lol
Welcome back! Soon crave will grab the attention of the crypto world and we will make the last 800k rally look small IMHO $$$