Let's assume they do deliver a working version, what will happen after delivery?
Will they do bug repairs and if so, will that be done in the same leisurely pace?
I hope ipo money will be given to devs after 1 month of stable work. I agree... My Crystal Ball says: Perfect, release something stable for a few days. Take the escrow money and disappear. FUD |
|
|
|
Well.... The official "beta" was suppose to be released in September and then 3 weeks after the distribution. I would also like to know when it will happen.
no need to rush. just look at NODEcoin to see what happens when you push a release date or, please rush so I can pick up cheap NEM when dumpers dump upon a premature release Even if we released right this second it wouldn't be as premature as NODE  I have no doubt yet ANOTHER delay is hurting us, seems like NEM was all the hype but people have moved on. Hopefully once the longest IPO ever is at an end the hype will return. I have not noticed that. I'm feeling quite opposite, seems like NEM had gathered more followers and some guys have even ended up to develop alternative wallet! Launch is almost there and be ready to fasten your seatbelt, guys!  This are the things u comment on NEM thread.. Do you get any benefit for coming here to spread fud you kiddo? Do you feel threatened by NODE? Why u have so much interest about coming to talk crap about node if u are really into NEM? GTFO You nailed it right there. I've said many times there are 2 motivations for the FUD spreaders that plague our thread. 1) They want to push the price down so they can buy cheap or 2) They are holding another "bag" and they feel threatened. In this case, clearly #2 - he's a NEM bagholder and feels threatened. End of story. |
|
|
|
Any progress?
I didn't wanted to post anything as long as i am not having something for sure, but i am sharing with you a small update. I got many offers from devs or wannabe devs that they are willing to try to fix the wallet, but you shall understand that i am very picky in handing over the source of a unique coded coin to an unknown developer. Awesome, thanks for the update! I knew when I saw people posting that they offered help with the wallet but you didn't take them up on their offer that this was the reason why. Obviously you can't be handing out the source code to just everyone. Just keep doing what you are doing, it is obvious you have a good plan, just stick to the plan and ignore the haters. There are loads of people in here who support you! |
|
|
|
I sent my pm
I hope to get my shares soon.
This is an interesting project for sure
yeah me too How can people accuse the dev dumped when the coins are in the wallet lol Fudders are getting lazy lol Yeah, exactly. And you'll notice that after ReserveShare posts, they go silent. Unfortunately I'm sure they will be back, looking to push the RSU price down so they can buy cheap, or try to damage ReserveShare as they feel their own bags are threatened. It won't work though. You can tell ReserveShare is serious. The dev leaving is only a minor setback - a ton of code has already been produced and the wallet is near completion. Also, there is a major exchange interested in listing RSU. In other words, good things come to those who wait - now is the time to buy |
|
|
|
yo!
so i bet you guys noticed my absence in the last 3 days! Well the reason is simple: my mother-in-law visited! And as you already know (from your experience or anecdotes) that sucks!
ok back to Node!
Thank you guys for being patient with our team!
At the end of this week the linux version will, be launched, and the APi will be published, so everyone will be able to contribute in their personal style!
The PoA Engine is being developed from scratch, and as the Node scenario, it will take time to be made!
Management, Marketing & PR or CR(Community relationship) should and won't be rushed! We will slowly get to that phase with a suitable plan and working medium, step by step! Rushing this part will bring only short term success - which isn't essential for a Payment Processing System!
As always we are open for dialog, and we will constantly bring new reports on our current and future development!
What you should expect in the next weeks:
- Promo discussion Thread
- Bounty Thread
- Job Offers!
- Public fund distribution discussion topics!
- and more.
As Always Thank you for your Support and Continuous Encouragements!
Awesome news! I've been eagerly awaiting the Linux client as I just can't stand using Windoze. As for the mother in law, hang in there Koop, and take pride that you are in good company Adam was the luckiest man; he had no mother-in-law.
~ Mark Twain |
|
|
|
Have you guys seen the Crypti aka XCR bullshit Fiasco!
Their client network is down! Forging doesn't work.... all their efforts smell like a scam to me!
And they gathered 750 BTc...omg poor investors! NODE is the Only Operable Node.js based Cryptocurrency Now!!!!
Price is going to rise, be prepared!
=3
Wow, I did not know that about Crypti, thanks for the update. I had a bunch of Crypti a while back, which I promptly exchanged for Node the minute Node went up on BTER  |
|
|
|
how could he have done that , answer me that question and i will join you on the side of the people screaming scam.
He sent people RSU tokens, right? How many of these were real users and how many were fake? If he was able to sell 50,000 tokens, he made 100,000+ nxt out of the scam. You were not even joining the project, you doesn't registered and now you are screaming scam. Seems that few members of the community come up with false accusations. Personally i think it's useless for me to start to complain with these. I've sacrificed my time since late July, and i was working on the project as much as possible. Now i feel very disappointed. You have the opportunity to check the issuer account. I can guarantee you that you'll not find any suspicious transfers.
One of the biggest problem of this 'freecrypto' community are the sockpuppets. In a few days I will make a thread where a i will post the SockPuppets accounts list, found during the project. I will try to help the community at least by this, even if i get hard accusation, which i've never expected.ReserveShare, please don't let these idiots get to you. As you can see, there are people here who support you and believe in the project. It is obvious that the wallet is close to finished based on the updates Badam provided before he left. Just stick to your plan of finding a new dev and then get a beta version of the wallet out as soon as possible. Unfortunately, a lot of people frequenting this thread are just immature children who have the patience of a fly and couldn't put together a logical argument if their lives depended on it. If things don't improve, may I suggest that you simply close this thread, leave this toilet of a forum and then the serious people here can relocate somewhere else. This is exactly what Etherium and the Maidsafe people did. |
|
|
|
You have been fucked you noobs. Leave this thread and never trust that SCAMMER again.
Says the guy with the 2 week old account. There was definitely something suspicious here. The guy hyped about how the launch was within a day, and then comes back and says there is nothing. Looks like it was a classic scam. He probably made hundred thousand nxt out of the scam using NXT AE. This is incorrect. He never said launch was within a day, he said he was going to make an announcement. My guess is that he was coming to terms with the departure of the dev and preparing to tell everyone about it, which is exactly what he did. As I have said repeatedly, these arguments against ReserveShare don't make any sense. Put your self in ReserveShare's shoes - if you wanted to pump the price and cash out, why tell people anything at all, let alone that your main dev is no longer with the project? I would have kept quiet, or even lied that the wallet launch would be in a few days and it would coincide with listing on a major exchange - that would have had the effect of pumping the price, not collapsing it. Finally, if you look at the trades on the NXT AE, very little trading was going on before the announcement came that Badam left. There is absolutely no evidence that this was planned and the dev was dumping shares. It's just your garden variety Bitcointalk FUD. |
|
|
|
You have been fucked you noobs. Leave this thread and never trust that SCAMMER again.
Says the guy with the 2 week old account. LMFAO! |
|
|
|
Listen, it's not a straight scam but it is some type of "Get Rich Quick Scheme".
Again, this is just FUD as your argument does not make any sense whatsoever. How exactly is this a get rich quick scheme? As someone pointed out, there has been no selling from the genesis account. So are you trying to imply that the dev just created a whole bunch of sockpuppets like UtopianFuture? That argument also does not stand up. First of all, there were restrictions as to who could get a share. If you look at the stakeholders list, these are accounts that existed long before ReserveShare showed up. I've been on these forums since 2011 and I personally recognize a lot of the user names. Even if your argument was true and the dev had a bunch of sockpuppet accounts, if that were the case, don't you think it is strange that he informs everyone that the main dev left? Seems to me that is counterproductive if he was in the process of cashing out. He could just has easily said the wallet will be ready at the end of the week at the same time ReserveShare will be launching on a major exchange. That would have pumped the price instead of crashing it. So if you are holding RSU, I'd recommend laying off the FUD as that is certainly not going to increase the price, nor will it inspire the dev to finish the wallet as soon as possible. |
|
|
|
Sooo , I heard you all hate this coin and want to get vpn instead , I am a strong promoter of vpn as well , I offer you to buy your rsu at a price of 0,5 vpn per rsu which is still about double or triple the current highest buyorder.
Could handle this through dev if he agrees.
If you are interrested just om me.
If you came to complain sell me your coins now and never look back , if you did not feel free to baghold a little while , until wallet release , with me ^^
I'm afraid you heard incorrectly as nobody here wants to trade their RSU for some Scrypt shitcoin. |
|
|
|
Bitcointalk really needs to regulate scams like this, it doesn't just hurt some people. It hurts the whole BTC community and its credibility.
BCT really's gotta get rid of fudders like you... I'm not a FUDder, I've seen enough scams like this to know one. I've lost BTC also because of scams like these, when OP stops posting and disappears don't say you weren't warned. I know a lot of people are trying to get rid of their shares before it value goes down more, but reality is this was a scam all along. ^ He's not a FUDder. I've also seen just too many scams recently at BCT and the majority come from the so-called 'free distribution crypto' world. Now free is no add-value (think Linux), so ask yourself where does this coin get its value from? I've already said it; the distribution was more than haphazard. Some have coins, others have to wait and wait, some even buy it... and then a major developer drops the project. Why??? First of all who are these guys??? Its getting crazy in here. Sadly, it is getting crazy and more since summer. Confidence in altcoins is being hurt because of these types of things. I hope no one lost too much on this. I'm very disappointed that you now have resorted to FUD as you used to be a supportive member. This forum has become so ridiculous that even when a dev gives a coin away for free, people still accuse him of running a scam. How is this a scam exactly? Oh yeah, the dev has been dumping his shares. But I just read a post where the dev asked you to go check the balance of the original account which sent the RSUs to everyone? Did you do that? Of course not, that would require effort, while it is much easier to just make up stories. ReserveShare is not to blame here. If you want to blame someone, blame Badam. As ReserveShare said, he cannot force to make Badam continue developing the wallet if he doesn't want to. I can tell from the dev's description of the events that basically Badam got in over his head and was incapable and/or unwilling to continue working on the wallet. I find it hard to believe that he agreed to come onto the project just a couple of weeks ago and then all of a sudden work and life issues overwhelmed him. I have heard that excuse many times before and it just means that when faced with a challenge, he decided he couldn't be bothered, which quite frankly is par for the course nowadays. If you don't want to be a part of this project then sell your stake and be done with it. Go invest in VPN coin or some other crap Scrypt clone coin. The ReserveShare wallet is nearly done, I am confident he will find a new dev to finish it up and then it will be released. Whining and complaining in this thread and making accusations to which you have absolutely no proof will not speed up the process. + 1 i agree with you hypersire this thing isnt RSU Project Lead 's fault, the mere fact that he announced the bad news and telling the community the solution ( finding a new dev to work on wallet) does not mean they are abandoning the project You raise a very good point here Lionheart - if ReserveShare wanted to dump shares, it does not make any sense that he would come out and announce the dev is no longer with the project which caused the price to drop. Quite the opposite, he would have kept quiet and just made up excuses as to why the wallet isn't ready. There is no scam here, anyone saying so is just spreading FUD to buy RSU cheap, or pump some other coin (for example that one guy who tried to steer everyone towards VPN coin). Don't fall for the tricks people and don't give away your stake for pennies, you will regret it. This isn't some Scrypt clone, this is a new crypto platform written from scratch and there are already exchanges interested in it. Setbacks will always be a part of life - what separates the winners from the losers is how you deal with them. |
|
|
|
Bitcointalk really needs to regulate scams like this, it doesn't just hurt some people. It hurts the whole BTC community and its credibility.
BCT really's gotta get rid of fudders like you... I'm not a FUDder, I've seen enough scams like this to know one. I've lost BTC also because of scams like these, when OP stops posting and disappears don't say you weren't warned. I know a lot of people are trying to get rid of their shares before it value goes down more, but reality is this was a scam all along. ^ He's not a FUDder. I've also seen just too many scams recently at BCT and the majority come from the so-called 'free distribution crypto' world. Now free is no add-value (think Linux), so ask yourself where does this coin get its value from? I've already said it; the distribution was more than haphazard. Some have coins, others have to wait and wait, some even buy it... and then a major developer drops the project. Why??? First of all who are these guys??? Its getting crazy in here. Sadly, it is getting crazy and more since summer. Confidence in altcoins is being hurt because of these types of things. I hope no one lost too much on this. I'm very disappointed that you now have resorted to FUD as you used to be a supportive member. This forum has become so ridiculous that even when a dev gives a coin away for free, people still accuse him of running a scam. How is this a scam exactly? Oh yeah, the dev has been dumping his shares. But I just read a post where the dev asked you to go check the balance of the original account which sent the RSUs to everyone? Did you do that? Of course not, that would require effort, while it is much easier to just make up stories. ReserveShare is not to blame here. If you want to blame someone, blame Badam. As ReserveShare said, he cannot force to make Badam continue developing the wallet if he doesn't want to. I can tell from the dev's description of the events that basically Badam got in over his head and was incapable and/or unwilling to continue working on the wallet. I find it hard to believe that he agreed to come onto the project just a couple of weeks ago and then all of a sudden work and life issues overwhelmed him. I have heard that excuse many times before and it just means that when faced with a challenge, he decided he couldn't be bothered, which quite frankly is par for the course nowadays. If you don't want to be a part of this project then sell your stake and be done with it. Go invest in VPN coin or some other crap Scrypt clone coin. The ReserveShare wallet is nearly done, I am confident he will find a new dev to finish it up and then it will be released. Whining and complaining in this thread and making accusations to which you have absolutely no proof will not speed up the process. |
|
|
|
|
Let's not freak out guys, the wallet is almost finished, ReserveShare is in possession of all the code and a new developer is going to be taking over.
Basically, everything is still on track, let's just wait for the new dev to finish up the wallet.
Do not forget that an exchange has already expressed interest in this coin. I have no doubt the wallet will be finished and we will soon be trading RSU on a real exchange and the price will be much, much higher than it is now.
PS - This is a great time to buy with all the panic selling going on!
|
|
|
|
It's just, cryptocoins are a failure or a success mostly thanks to their communities and not by their technical superiority.
There are gazillions coins much better then Doge on technical and usability side but Doge is one of the biggest coins.
I liked the idea behind RSU and want it to succeed but that won't come without proper communication/news feed by the devs.
And you think you build, support and help the community with your complaining posts? I'm trying to point out the mistakes. Nothing will get better with posts like "This seems great, Dev is very capable, we are going to da moon". Someone needs to be the bad guy to wake people up from their dreams. You do realize that it is Sunday right? Maybe some of you guys should ditch your RSU and buy Facebook or Apple shares. Most publicly traded companies update their customers and investors on an hourly basis, especially those high rolling whales who invested $0 - a couple of hundred bucks. |
|
|
|
ShareThis, Inc. owns that particular button design (as explained on http://www.sharethis.com/legal/privacy/usage-guidelines/#sthash.omZ0f3AN.dpbs). Several websites, like YouTube as someone mentioned, use the same symbol stylized differently. The NODE logo does resemble it, but it is slightly different in shape. In the context of NODE, the logo actually works well, but I can understand why some would want it to be changed. "Except as discussed in these guidelines, the mark is intended to stand alone and should not be integrated into other logos. So, the mark should not be used as a trademark or service mark, or incorporated as part of a trademark or service mark, in a manner where it is, would be, or could be associated with a particular individual, organization, product, or service, or in any other way that would imply, indicate, or convey to a casual observer, consumer, or otherwise, that the Share Button, widget, toolbar, or other ShareThis product or service was exclusively or primarily associated with a particular individual, company or organization, product, or service not owned or controlled by ShareThis, Inc." NODE is not using the "mark", which is the ShareThis Button according to their Usage Guidelines. There is no copyright associated with the Node logo. It is a universal "share" icon that is included as an icon font in numerous font packages. Which is supposed to be used as a share icon, not as a trademark or service mark, also it's not supposed to be modified (which you would know if you actually read/understood the usage guidelines). You can't just slightly modify something and claim it's not the same logo. There is most definitely a copyright, but the copyright holder has allowed usage under their usage guidelines, which the current use of the logo violates. @koop4u @skillroad PM me, I'll give you the logo I designed for free.LMFAO, are you for real? The current logo hasn't been modified in any way. All you did for YOUR logo is modify the orientation of the circles and change the font. Try again please. Ha. Dweeb. If I am a dweeb, that would make you a complete imbecile. I'm sure you don't understand the meaning of the word so go ahead and Google it. |
|
|
|
ShareThis, Inc. owns that particular button design (as explained on http://www.sharethis.com/legal/privacy/usage-guidelines/#sthash.omZ0f3AN.dpbs). Several websites, like YouTube as someone mentioned, use the same symbol stylized differently. The NODE logo does resemble it, but it is slightly different in shape. In the context of NODE, the logo actually works well, but I can understand why some would want it to be changed. "Except as discussed in these guidelines, the mark is intended to stand alone and should not be integrated into other logos. So, the mark should not be used as a trademark or service mark, or incorporated as part of a trademark or service mark, in a manner where it is, would be, or could be associated with a particular individual, organization, product, or service, or in any other way that would imply, indicate, or convey to a casual observer, consumer, or otherwise, that the Share Button, widget, toolbar, or other ShareThis product or service was exclusively or primarily associated with a particular individual, company or organization, product, or service not owned or controlled by ShareThis, Inc." NODE is not using the "mark", which is the ShareThis Button according to their Usage Guidelines. There is no copyright associated with the Node logo. It is a universal "share" icon that is included as an icon font in numerous font packages. Which is supposed to be used as a share icon, not as a trademark or service mark, also it's not supposed to be modified (which you would know if you actually read/understood the usage guidelines). You can't just slightly modify something and claim it's not the same logo. There is most definitely a copyright, but the copyright holder has allowed usage under their usage guidelines, which the current use of the logo violates. @koop4u @skillroad PM me, I'll give you the logo I designed for free.LMFAO, are you for real? The current logo hasn't been modified in any way. All you did for YOUR logo is modify the orientation of the circles and change the font. Try again please. |
|
|
|
ShareThis, Inc. owns that particular button design (as explained on http://www.sharethis.com/legal/privacy/usage-guidelines/#sthash.omZ0f3AN.dpbs). Several websites, like YouTube as someone mentioned, use the same symbol stylized differently. The NODE logo does resemble it, but it is slightly different in shape. In the context of NODE, the logo actually works well, but I can understand why some would want it to be changed. "Except as discussed in these guidelines, the mark is intended to stand alone and should not be integrated into other logos. So, the mark should not be used as a trademark or service mark, or incorporated as part of a trademark or service mark, in a manner where it is, would be, or could be associated with a particular individual, organization, product, or service, or in any other way that would imply, indicate, or convey to a casual observer, consumer, or otherwise, that the Share Button, widget, toolbar, or other ShareThis product or service was exclusively or primarily associated with a particular individual, company or organization, product, or service not owned or controlled by ShareThis, Inc." NODE is not using the "mark", which is the ShareThis Button according to their Usage Guidelines. There is no copyright associated with the Node logo. It is a universal "share" icon that is included as an icon font in numerous font packages. |
|
|
|
The reason I made that particular point is that a lot of legitimate, regulated high risk investments are not allowed to market themselves to "ordinary Joes", only professional traders and investors. The fact that this is a very high risk investment, open to anyone, is another sign that it is not legit.
We're talking about Bitcoin here. Such regulations may not apply. Exactly. The thing is - the regulations exist for a reason. To stop anyone from being able to con gullible uneducated folks out their life savings by promising unsustainable returns then running off with their money. The fact that we are operating here in a sphere where regulations do not apply means you should be even more cautious , and take absolutely everything with a pinch of salt. There is no safety net. Yes, I would certainly feel much, much better if Bitcoin Trader was regulated. Regulators prevented the savings and loans crisis in the 80s, they stopped Madoff, they prevented the meltdown in 2008, and to this day they ensure that the stock, forex and commodities markets are fair for all participants. Yes, more regulation is what is needed. |
|
|
|
My BTC refunded
Thanks Anon!
so...... does this mean more coins for us? Good point you just brought up... looks like since a bunch of people have gotten refunds from Anon, the stake amounts will have to be recalculated and will end up higher |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
