Do we know if the jackpot will have an affect on the dividends or not? I mean if 20k is already set aside and was taken from each bet by a small sum and not put on dividends than it means that is 20k that could have been distributed to dividends but did not in order to create jackpot which I am sure many would agree is a good marketing strategy but doing something like that without the approval of shareholders sounds a bit centralized, maybe it should have been "voted" somehow with bet tokens to see if the bet owners want that money on their pocket or want that to be a marketing budget.

If it hasn't been collected so far and will be given after the jackpot hit and affect the dividends that is even worse and would probably create problems in ownership but I doubt that is the case, eosbet is ran much better than that.

Yes that’s true; anyone can promote a thread but be at least sure that the sites are trustworthy. It’s not how long a site exists that determines how reputable it will be, there can be new sites with good reviews. But, I guess the OP is new to gambling and was probably amazed to see the sites that gave him instant withdrawal because he commented on the post that he mentioned the websites based on his experience.

For me, one site that I am very sure that is reliable and yet offers instant transfer is Cloud bet, its currently my favorite gambling platform, with lots of games and I like how they offer me 50 free spins on every of my first deposit.

Personally, I don’t care what amount of money is involved. If it has anything to do with animal games then count me out. I know that I am desperate to make money   but then I love something I can as well enjoy. I can be very selective when it comes to games and I don’t play any kind of game.

I sincerely see it as a disgust-full game and I have never imagined myself in the midst of its players let alone playing it myself. For now I don’t think there is any game like online gambling, you get to see varieties of games in different casino sites, and I wonder if anyone in this generation would participate in such games.

Majority of the ones that has ended up becoming shitcoins or garbage as we call them and also now see as scam didn’t intend packing their package and abandoning their project, some of us still contributed to why they parked up, we have many people that have sound ideas but not great fighter.

Instead of us investing with them and leaving them to fully develop before we cash out our profits, we dump them shortly after they enter exchange by selling off and then we come here to accuse them of being scam, the only people I see as scam are the ones disappearing immediately after raising money for the ICO.

It is not a plus to many people, sometimes leaving the IEO in the hands of these top exchanges could be dangerous, do you think any exchange will go that far to create IEO platform just because they have the interest people at heart? They do so to in other to make more money, using people’s weakness.

They have seen the week point of many potential investors now and fear of getting scammed if they get involved, and when thy built on that, the people they said they are protecting cannot even get involved other than whales, because only a whale would have such money to gather lots of the tokens at once without given little chance to the one that are not much financially buoyant to participate.

We are all too in a haste to make some drastic predictions for Bitcoin without really considering the factors that will make this happening.  For bitcoin to really reach that price of $100,000 we really need mass adoption, we need people from diverse background to start using Bitcoin as a utility token. I.E payment of goods and services, payment of salaries and many more.

As companies’ use BTC for this, the beneficiaries will gradually be getting use to the system till it becomes massively adopted and every adoption stage will have its price value, so our target now is to seek for BTC adoption and then that value will be nothing for BTC to achieve in future.

I have also heard from some great analyst of the possibility of bitcoin falling back a little to $3800 before going on bull run, but I have tried to do my analysis too and I have not really see anything factor that could lead to dump of bitcoin for it to reach that value.

We should not just be speculating, we need to think it through too, if they say that the price will dump again to that low, are they expecting people to react to news or factor that will trigger that ? I don’t think the price will be easy to drop again, because a lot of holders are keeping bitcoin value they have now in their portfolio for the future increase.

I am glad that we are all beginning to see bitcoin for what it is, bitcoin has been in its uptrend since 2015, we cannot compare the achievement of Bitcoin now in value to that of 2015, if we could look back, then we will totally believe in the future of Bitcoin.

It is better bitcoin continues on this part of its steady and slow increase, this is better to guide against any form of euphoria that is always resulting to dumping of the coin, sharp increase are what people are now getting use to that is making bitcoin look too slow in progress to them, but good thing about humans, they can easily adjust and adapt, so we have to adapt to this slow and steady increase in price of BTC.

If we talk about monopoly, I think ethereum is even the one monopolizing it, they would have also left it for bitcoin alone, ethereum came, built on BTC weakness to make blockchain better to operate, so I don’t think Binance should be picked on for doing so, they have simply seen the weak point of ethereum too that they need to develop on.

There is need for Binance chain, because ethereum has not completely resolve the issue of their slow transaction, I don’t know why they have been unable to resolve this but I believe it will be due to the large user database and number of transactions going through them, so they need more hands and Binance has chosen to be the helping hand.

You are such a strong man, how where you coping with both trading and gambling, they are both very risky jobs and I can only imagine how much you have lost and how emotional you must have been because both games are risky.

I have only been trading and I know what I have been through analyzing the market and the changes that happens overnight unpredictably. It is always a nightmare. Gambling is based on luck actually and it’s good for those who have good luck for gambling, I still prefer trading because you can at least check past record, analyze, even though it’s still risky but it is at least still safer than gambling.

Yes, there are still a lot of people that make much profit in gambling and on the contrary the number of people that make it might even be higher than those loosing. I think most people who make money from gambling never come out to say it, either some are ashamed to admit it or they just don’t want to expose too many people to the game because I know about 2 people that gambled their way out of poverty this year. One of the guys is my good friend.

Money is not easy to get, that is the reason we see many people who loose coming out to complain that gambling is not good, because it really hurts to lose money.

I think there are other ways as well to become a whale, such as hitting a big number on primedice which is the topic here, a whale could be made in many shape or form but I agree that it doesn't mean they know what they are doing. Of course there are whales who are really smart and totally deserve to be whale because they literally a self made whale but there could be lucky whales as well where they just happened to hit off big thanks to something, maybe a big dice roll, maybe early investment that they forgot and just remembered, there are many things they could potentially be whales for and that s why I am saying a whale could be anything, they could be smart or they could have no idea, it just depends on how they got to be a whale and not if they are whale or not.

It is really not even remotely fair that one team has Messi and the other doesn't. You may have seen the highlights and you may have seen the goal but what he was doing last night was otherworldy in every single time he got the ball.

When any other player in the pitch got the ball their first reaction is to not lose the ball and they try to either pass or if they are open run to wide open side like really working hard to not lose the ball, when Messi got the ball he ran at people and those people literally ran back instead of running at him because they knew if they run at him he will just go pass them with a trick and he was capable of that. He got the ball many times and each time it was a "how does he do this" and that really shocked me because I was expecting him to be less effective with age but he is still amazing.

It would definitely require a lot of money and its something that I feel the OP should be able to raise because considering the expected profit, one would know that it is worth it. If I knew all about the startup amount needed to start up and all, I would not mind also learning more about how to do this business, because it’s a good profit making business.

Having so many competitors is not an issue, is just to give his own site a good standard that would attract players to the site. And once its is already known to be reputable with varieties of games, then he is sure of many players visiting the site and money starts rolling in.

It really amazes me when I hear that hunters are being blamed for the dumping occurring, even if they were to be true, have they not already factored this in while they were constructing their whitepaper? Imagine a company that hires someone to work for him and he agreed to pay such worker at the end of the month, after paying the worker, and he tells the worker not to withdraw the money now till further notice.

This is the game they are trying to play with us, I have already worked for you, you paid me my salary in your token, I can decide to do whatever I wishes to do with the token, it’s my salary and I should not be blamed for withdrawing what I worked for.

Now you have said the reason why they are still staying on top, because everything has always been pure speculation and not fact, when news is created based on speculation and there is no proof or whatsoever t backup the claim, then it becomes very useless in having any negative effect on the project.

If tether were really behind the pump of BTC is 2017, then why have we not seen its effect again, since it is so easy to manipulate the market of Bitcoin, to me, tether has served me better than what it is out there written about it, I just see it as mere FUD news that is not true to displace them of their 10th position.

I think the reason why people jump from one exchange to another is because they have not found what they require as service in the ones they have been using, that is why it is very necessary for one not to just start using an exchange based on what the team tells us or based on one or two reviews we see on them. Choosing an exchange to also requires great research and strong conviction based on many opinions.

No is even the time that we need to be more careful in using an exchange, since ICO scammers are no longer getting business in ICO, they will want to use the opportunity of IEO to continue with their fraud through low exchanges, so its best they stick with your pattern of choosing exchange based on their popularity and effectiveness.

It is good to take precaution and be careful with storing our assets on exchanges because the they can fail at any time if they see any hit that is beyond their control, so it is best to use personal wallets that is beyond the control of these exchange, despite all this, there is still one exchange I can vouch for that would in no way default even if we have our assetsstored on their exchange, and that would be Binance.

Any other exchange apart from Binance, I would rather store my cryptocurrency in desktop wallet or hardware wallets which is the safest among all forms of wallet that we have.

I think the only reason why this person got more interest than the other "win lambo" type of raffles is that this guy actually sold his house for bitcoin before and he has doxxed himself willingly to prove that he is not lying and dude even got on news couple of times and gave interviews and got his news printed on newspapers.

I am not saying that makes him legit but compared to someone who we do not know and have no clue about I would prefer to go with the dude I can track down at least right? Not saying both of them are legit or not but one looks more legit than the other at least. Of course, when there is places like freebitcoin that is doing the same thing and you can actually participate in a very trusted website for the same thing I don't know who would pick this one.

As long as you are playing on a trusted dice site there is no need to consider which dice site is better since most of the time the outcome is the same, you losing your money to the casino.

There is a reason why people say house always wins, almost all proper dice casinos have around 1% house edge except a few of them and they are all doing the same thing, giving you a small chance of winning big if you just hit big once and leave but otherwise if you keep gambling constantly and given enough time the house will get you back since they are literally getting more profit from the same bet than you do, if you bet 49.5% then bet 1 btc, they get your 1 btc if you lose but you get back 1.95 or something and not 2 btc back, which is the reason why dice sites doesn't matter, they are basically the same.