Vanity you don't realise how close we are to saying fuck it and just let brit die for good.
Lol why would you throw in the towel when you've just got an investor to invest £2,000 per month and a potential payout of over £300,000 in the short term? ROFL Investor. With that money I could have had Britcoin on the global currency exchange by now. Brit wont die. Simply your one last chance to get money out of it has just been rumbled. If you had any care for Britian, Britcoin or any interest for stakeholders (whom already paid to invest in Britcoin once by the way when it was listed on Bittrex) then you would do everything above board and not try and deceive people that you have an investor. Lets see all these wonderful documents, an investor would have a very detailed contract, so lets see it, lets see the transactions, lets see something? I have offered to provide a proportion of an increase POS to a Britcoin Not For Profit foundation (and a donation to those involved in the development), which would replicate the models of all other coins. I have obfuscated myself from any involvement and have advised you according to the laws of the UK and best practice, if you don't see that as helpful then on your own heads be it. If you do place a fraudulent transaction on the blockchain you accept the consequences of your actions and I will create another Britcoin with official approval, documented trademarks and any necessary protection for the general public of Great Britain. I hope that is clear. Wow just wow. We posted who the investor is a few pages back. Why would we lie? Wtf? You are really petty. All you care about is extracting 50btc off C-cex for your brit. Telling us to produce a contract? Show what money is being spent? Who do you think you are? You seem to forget that there is no buy support for brit what so ever. The moment someone sells the market cap will fall a few hundred K. 300k short term gains? Really, my boss hasn't got a single coin yet. He told me that if we couldn't get the community to agree then he would pull out. Right now that looks like it might actually happen. Your shooting your self in the foot. |
|
|
|
|
Vanity you don't realise how close we are to saying fuck it and just let brit die for good.
|
|
|
|
I have a development roadmap which I presented to the investor, along with a investment deck for Brit. I'm going to rewrite the dev roadmap over the next few weeks and make it public, but I'm in the process of moving/finding somewhere to live right now and have a lot of other commitments. We tried to keep the news about the investor/s private until we knew 100% sure he was willing to fund the project, which was only a few weeks ago after meeting a number of times. It will enable myself and mogreen to work on Britcoin development until 2017 and then if all goes to plan we'll see a large injection of cash in to the project in early 2017. Including a £20,000 marketing budget  Like Leigh says, the alternative to what we're doing now is the coin dies and everyone loses, so let's pull together and make it work. Fast moving is better now for britcoin. YOBIT is good place to get more attention!! Yobit don't update wallets in a timely fashion neither do they respond to support tickets. So I'd rather give them a miss. Wouldn't bittrex be better? |
|
|
|
Admin. please help me! I bought 5.5 million of you on the floor coin icostart.com! but unfortunately I made a mistake and he moved the wrong address coin! an address of one other coin types have identical names you! Please help me get back, okay? These are all my transactions! http://pastebin.com/TURqHJSeplease help me! send all of my coin purse to this for me! BRacPMWDSx1XkyVqtzRL8Ca12qyoP9DkHm If you're gonna lie about losing coins at least do it properly. You say you bought 5.5m when that's over half the available supply, which no one owns. Happy to see cryptographic proof, until then sorry but it sounds like pure a grade bollocks to me mate. Will. I think that guy posted in the wrong thread. I thought 5.5M WTF? too. |
|
|
|
|
We need to get UNIQ on coimarketcap to get more exposure.
|
|
|
|
Anyone else find DRKSLK a bit expensive?
Considering the USD 0.25 starting point and the 4M supply that gives a USD 1M market capitalisation on day 1. Right now Silkcoin is valued at USD 400k without any of the nice features DarkSilk has. We estimate DarkSilk's worth to be well over 2.5 times that of the current Silkcoin, at it's peak Silkcoin even had a market cap of USD 1.5M. When looking from a user's perspective, a currency should not have a too low worth or it would be cumbersome in daily use. There is still a lot of room for price growth with DarkSilk. Fair points. |
|
|
|
Lots of action on c-cex.
Can't wait to see some new updates for britcoin.
Once price is stable I will add it to my faucet.
Thanks mate. I just looked at the marketcap: $ 486,469 Nice http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/britcoin/ |
|
|
|
|
You were boarder line trolling.
We tried to buy up a share of the supply on c-cex for the investor, but no one was selling as you can see.
The investor was going to pull funding, then the project would of been dead again, everyone's coins would of been worthless again, we were left with no choice but to add to the supply.
There is a plan in place for Brit, i'm going to let Will7iam or Mo tell it to you.
Just chill, sit back and watch and enjoy the ride, a currency for the UK is a big deal, now we have funding and full time development we can take it to the next level.
|
|
|
|
|
Set them sells high everyone.
|
|
|
|
Given the volume and price hikes that seem to be happening - wouldn't we be better off harnessing the community through bounties to develop the coin rather than double the supply and fork it at this point. Just saying. I'll throw in some for bounties for sure if we can find people to help.
Are you gonna fund development and pay for exchanges and everything else that needs paying for? There was a reason that Will7iam walked away for this project in the past, that was the lack of finances. If the investor doesn't get his coins there will be no funding, then we'll be back to square one. If Brit's price continues to go up, I'd be happy to contribute BRIT for bounties as they will be worth someone's time and effort. Finances for a coin are usually (with exception to ICOs or the 'investor plan' here) self perpetuating, if there's a good enough plan, momentum will carry it through all sorts of bounties and incentives to improve the coin. What your post actually implies is Will7iam walked away because there was (and still is) no plan for the coin. That is all that people in our little bubble look for. Are you gonna pay for 2 developers to work on this project full time? 1. What will the developers be doing? That's what I'm missing here. 2. How long will investor man's 12k last if paying for two full time developers? Not very long at all. Ask will7iam or Mo Green, they have a plan for Brit. The 12K is just a starting point, if the project does well, then there's going more money invested into the project. Stop trolling as your starting to annoy me. As the marketcap grows your thinking that your coins will be devalued by 50% so your starting to winge, that's all. |
|
|
|
Given the volume and price hikes that seem to be happening - wouldn't we be better off harnessing the community through bounties to develop the coin rather than double the supply and fork it at this point. Just saying. I'll throw in some for bounties for sure if we can find people to help.
Are you gonna fund development and pay for exchanges and everything else that needs paying for? There was a reason that Will7iam walked away for this project in the past, that was the lack of finances. If the investor doesn't get his coins there will be no funding, then we'll be back to square one. If Brit's price continues to go up, I'd be happy to contribute BRIT for bounties as they will be worth someone's time and effort. Finances for a coin are usually (with exception to ICOs or the 'investor plan' here) self perpetuating, if there's a good enough plan, momentum will carry it through all sorts of bounties and incentives to improve the coin. What your post actually implies is Will7iam walked away because there was (and still is) no plan for the coin. That is all that people in our little bubble look for. Are you gonna pay for 2 developers to work on this project full time? |
|
|
|
I clicked on balances on trex I had a shock It will be interesting to see where the market value will settle, popcorn time. |
|
|
|
lol, okay |
|
|
|
|
Anyone else find DRKSLK a bit expensive?
|
|
|
|
I spoke with the investor today about trademarking Brit, he said it would be very difficult to do, but suggested that we register Brit as a LTD company to protect us fro the man down the road so to speak.
As for having everyone's interest at heart? He said to me only get into this project if you want to make money PERIOD! The guy is has a personal wealth of £50M, for him to take on this project, he obviously sees that it has potential. So does making money sound like he has everyone's interests at heart?
That's an even weirder suggestion. A Ltd company has shareholders and directors and is a legal entity in its own right. You can't do that as a community of anonymous currency holders. Is his suggestion just for managing whatever funds are moving about during development in order to be tax efficient? I understand that from a 'Coin development consultancy business' perspective but not as a 'Britcoin Ltd' the actual coin perspective. I think we need some clarity on what the guy will actually do for us, casting aside for a minute the rose tinted perspective of his claimed enormous wealth. Can we not hear from him? It was just a suggestion. Do we really need to do anything? it's a "decentralized" payment network. |
|
|
|
Given the volume and price hikes that seem to be happening - wouldn't we be better off harnessing the community through bounties to develop the coin rather than double the supply and fork it at this point. Just saying. I'll throw in some for bounties for sure if we can find people to help.
Are you gonna fund development and pay for exchanges and everything else that needs paying for? There was a reason that Will7iam walked away for this project in the past, that was the lack of finances. If the investor doesn't get his coins there will be no funding, then we'll be back to square one. |
|
|
|
I have advised Mo and Wil to register (at least) a UK trademark for Britcoin. Whilst the basic build of Britcoin is based on Bitcoin, all other layers of IP are effectively open to copyright (subject to the original MIT license of the software) and trademarking.
It is highly unfortunate that the UK Government and UK Fintech (which claimn to lead the world) are several years behind the adoptive curve, myself previously writing to the UK Government and Prime Minister on a previous occasion. Playing second fiddle, unfortunately should require them to "invest" in the existing blockchain of that brand/trademark or at least merge to create a powerful blockchain solution for both private and public financial scrutiny.
They should note;
- Britcoin is a brand and intellectual property of its stakeholders (and can be legally protected as such) despite having no such centralised ownership
- Brit is slang and is a non trademarked reference to a person or object from or originating from Great Britain, or for example a term used for internationals that are birth or non birth affiliated
- The legal system protects stakeholders from losses and as such Britcoin is a tangible "business" with investors subject to losses through copyright or brand infringement
- The UK Government and Bank of England can create their own "Britcoin" however cannot use Britcoin if it is registered as a trademark, the value is in the trademarked brand
- As Britcoins are as such empty assets (blocks) in a global space of operation with no single point of ownership, as with all blockchain public ledger currencies, and are not issued via a single geographical landmass it is acceptable therefore that Britcoin can be trademarked globally, despite being created in the UK
The UK Government and Bank Of England should take this post as notice that there has been previous discussion and instruction from a stakeholder to trademark "Britcoin" on behalf of it creators and stakeholders and that any steps to advance any trademark or implementation of Britcoin without subject discussion with existing stakeholders of the "Official Britcoin Blockchain" would be deemed as anti-competitive and against the open ledger blockchain for the scrutiny of public (and indeed private) financial transactions.
I would suggest that the community establishes a fund for the implementation of at least a UK Trademark. The application can be downloaded from the UK IP Office website and you can register a Trademark for up to 10 years with annual fees somewhere between £300 and £500. I would suggest that "your investor" begins this process, in particular helping to fund the registration of this brand. I would suggest consulting a trademark lawyer for an initial consultation for verification.
Great Britain is itself a democratic brand that its people adopt of free well, and as such the UK Treasury, Government and Bank Of England do not have the authority in the digital currency sector to implement the brand, it is however important to understand that the "official crown of her Majesty the Queen" cannot be displayed on anything that does not have the official Royal seal of approval, I am sure that there are severe penalties for such practices, so please be forewarned and advised.
It is likely that only whereby the Crown issues Britcoins using HM Treasury money, can the Crown be displayed to indicate a Royal seal of approval.
Great Britain of course was established by King James VI of Scotland (i think!) merging for the first time England, Scotland, Wales and Ireland under one financial centralised rule and with Scotland with the potential of becoming independent again in the future it is perhaps best that Britcoin is independent of both current UK Treasure and Finance, and remains independent of future Scottish Treasury and Finance. It is likely also that Wales and Northern Ireland will also look to seek independence from England and financial rule, further supporting the need for a DIGITAL CURRENCY THAT REPRESENTS THOSE NATIONS COMPLETELY INDEPENDENTLY of any one centralised financial authority allowing anyone to invest or deinvest as necessary.
Independence of financial affairs of course does not mean necessarily that any nation would seek to not participate in the brand that is Great Britain, its purely of individual identity.
It's good to see some work on this blockchain and to see it on exchanges again, I am looking forward to some news of it appearing back on Bittrex!
Good luck!!!
Interesting idea trademarking Brit as a legal brand. I'm not sure if we need to? But then again i'm not up on my trademark law. I'll talk to the investor, and report back. How is all that investor stuff getting on? Trademarking something decentralised sounds like an oxymoron to me. Someone has to own a trademark. Craig Wright is essentially trolling Bitcoin right now trying to file patents for Bitcoin, this is a similar vain to be honest. And who's to say Mr Investor has everyone's best interests at heart? Surely the real Satoshi being anonymous is the only saving grace for when big establishment try and wield control of BTC, therefore trying to formalise all this and give people, organisations and government a 'target' seems rather counter intuitive. Besides, Britcoin was the name of an exchange back in 2011, wouldn't they qualify for prior use or have existing marks? I spoke with the investor today about trademarking Brit, he said it would be very difficult to do, but suggested that we register Brit as a LTD company to protect us fro the man down the road so to speak. As for having everyone's interest at heart? He said to me only get into this project if you want to make money PERIOD! The guy is has a personal wealth of £50M, for him to take on this project, he obviously sees that it has potential. So does making money sound like he has everyone's interests at heart? |
|
|
|
Bitcredits gonne on bittrex..
uniqredits come to daddy!
Still no swap on trex. Wonder why the hold up? |
|
|
|
I have advised Mo and Wil to register (at least) a UK trademark for Britcoin. Whilst the basic build of Britcoin is based on Bitcoin, all other layers of IP are effectively open to copyright (subject to the original MIT license of the software) and trademarking.
It is highly unfortunate that the UK Government and UK Fintech (which claimn to lead the world) are several years behind the adoptive curve, myself previously writing to the UK Government and Prime Minister on a previous occasion. Playing second fiddle, unfortunately should require them to "invest" in the existing blockchain of that brand/trademark or at least merge to create a powerful blockchain solution for both private and public financial scrutiny.
They should note;
- Britcoin is a brand and intellectual property of its stakeholders (and can be legally protected as such) despite having no such centralised ownership
- Brit is slang and is a non trademarked reference to a person or object from or originating from Great Britain, or for example a term used for internationals that are birth or non birth affiliated
- The legal system protects stakeholders from losses and as such Britcoin is a tangible "business" with investors subject to losses through copyright or brand infringement
- The UK Government and Bank of England can create their own "Britcoin" however cannot use Britcoin if it is registered as a trademark, the value is in the trademarked brand
- As Britcoins are as such empty assets (blocks) in a global space of operation with no single point of ownership, as with all blockchain public ledger currencies, and are not issued via a single geographical landmass it is acceptable therefore that Britcoin can be trademarked globally, despite being created in the UK
The UK Government and Bank Of England should take this post as notice that there has been previous discussion and instruction from a stakeholder to trademark "Britcoin" on behalf of it creators and stakeholders and that any steps to advance any trademark or implementation of Britcoin without subject discussion with existing stakeholders of the "Official Britcoin Blockchain" would be deemed as anti-competitive and against the open ledger blockchain for the scrutiny of public (and indeed private) financial transactions.
I would suggest that the community establishes a fund for the implementation of at least a UK Trademark. The application can be downloaded from the UK IP Office website and you can register a Trademark for up to 10 years with annual fees somewhere between £300 and £500. I would suggest that "your investor" begins this process, in particular helping to fund the registration of this brand. I would suggest consulting a trademark lawyer for an initial consultation for verification.
Great Britain is itself a democratic brand that its people adopt of free well, and as such the UK Treasury, Government and Bank Of England do not have the authority in the digital currency sector to implement the brand, it is however important to understand that the "official crown of her Majesty the Queen" cannot be displayed on anything that does not have the official Royal seal of approval, I am sure that there are severe penalties for such practices, so please be forewarned and advised.
It is likely that only whereby the Crown issues Britcoins using HM Treasury money, can the Crown be displayed to indicate a Royal seal of approval.
Great Britain of course was established by King James VI of Scotland (i think!) merging for the first time England, Scotland, Wales and Ireland under one financial centralised rule and with Scotland with the potential of becoming independent again in the future it is perhaps best that Britcoin is independent of both current UK Treasure and Finance, and remains independent of future Scottish Treasury and Finance. It is likely also that Wales and Northern Ireland will also look to seek independence from England and financial rule, further supporting the need for a DIGITAL CURRENCY THAT REPRESENTS THOSE NATIONS COMPLETELY INDEPENDENTLY of any one centralised financial authority allowing anyone to invest or deinvest as necessary.
Independence of financial affairs of course does not mean necessarily that any nation would seek to not participate in the brand that is Great Britain, its purely of individual identity.
It's good to see some work on this blockchain and to see it on exchanges again, I am looking forward to some news of it appearing back on Bittrex!
Good luck!!!
Interesting idea trademarking Brit as a legal brand. I'm not sure if we need to? But then again i'm not up on my trademark law. I'll talk to the investor, and report back. |
|
|
|
Britcoin goes to 2000K sats !!!!!
Someone bought upto 5K the other day. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
