Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 03:48:00 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 [57] 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 »
1121  Other / Meta / Re: u=190734 hacked on: June 10, 2016, 10:57:42 AM
Account has been tagged
1122  Economy / Reputation / Re: Who is ibminer on: June 09, 2016, 07:24:13 PM
Quote from: Dogedigital on June 09, 2016, 04:50:52 PM
Why would you define my response as uneducated?  Seems like a funny thing to say when the person claiming it doesn't seem to know the difference between 'your' and 'you're'.
Seriously?  You're going to stoop to throwing out grammatical errors?
I've never claimed to be an english major. You should check out some of my run-on sentences. Blame my english teacher.

Quote from: Dogedigital on June 09, 2016, 04:50:52 PM
It is a fact that currently your only positive feedback left on your account is from CanaryintheMine, a member which was allegedly caught selling off trust into the default lists. 

Do you deny that this true? 
          - If you do, please show me how it is not. <-FTFY   Angry
          - If you don't, would you like to rescind your talking out ass and uneducated response comments?
I'd hate to say it, but, another uneducated response, although grammatically correct - except for your missing period.  Roll Eyes.

Your statement is true but it means nothing. I don't know why the people I've traded with haven't added feedback for me, I added it for them but I do not force or require anyone to give me feedback in return.
I bought miners from Canary a long time ago, and he added me into his trust list. Again, when he was removed, my status was also removed.
Your point makes no sense, you're just attacking me.

Quote from: Dogedigital on June 09, 2016, 04:50:52 PM
My only gripe is that your account holds power and you refuse to admit you made a mistake and would rather make it personal, embellish untrue statements to fit your own agenda.

What do you think my agenda is?

As for it being personal, I didn't even know of your existance until the facts that were presented in the Meta thread led me to you.

You then came in and stated it wasn't your account and that you gave it to Nauro on December 26th, a known scammer at the time and linked to others, which you claimed to do business with.  You then posted an interesting conversation where you communicated to the scammer on Skype the same day, who instructs you on the rules of the forum and offers advice to get the negative removed that I had left. It is all quite fascinating.

Quote from: Dogedigital on June 09, 2016, 03:48:08 PM
You don't even know if or when I found out that he had red trust and what that was connected to.  You are making rash generalizations and assumptions to try and fit your agenda.  Stop.  

I thought you were trying to help someone "right their wrongs"??  You knew he had done wrong. So stop acting like you didn't.
1123  Economy / Reputation / Re: Who is ibminer on: June 09, 2016, 04:24:31 PM
Quote from: Dogedigital on June 09, 2016, 03:40:24 PM
Not wanting to discuss the situation any further, but it's not as clear cut as you may think and judge.  

There's a huge difference between helping someone right their wrongs and helping someone scam.  Which one do you honestly think happened?

Anyways, back to the issue at hand, You have 0 transactions other than CanaryintheMine and the rest are all negative.  What exactly makes you trusted or eligible to be on the list?

Again, more uneducated responses. I've done a good amount of transactions on this forum in the past when I've needed to. And you can see proof of *some* of them in the positive feedback I've left for other people. Your just talking out of your ass without researching. I've slowed down my trading due to the shadiness that has overcome this forum, and your scamming buddy contributes to that.

Your welcome to try and help out scammers if you want. And I'm welcome to not trust you because of it.
The guy is linked to people that have scammed multiple times (BabbaD/SuperSTAR777/JosIzem/HarshitPeer/etc)
But sure, I guess you will be the one to convert the scammer to a good person by giving him a free no-neg account.

And what did he do with the free account you gave him? Well, he first signed up to a signature campaign, of course.
And then he applied for multiple loans, attempting to use his new account as collateral. (denied, LUCKILY)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1311386.msg13421158#msg13421158
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1311531.msg13422373#msg13422373

And the ONE lender that accepted his loan and confirms a re-payment ends up being confirmed as a HACKED account and the original 'letyoulearn' states it to be hacked "before a while" (bad english, I take this to mean its been hacked for a while).
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1280455.msg13422445#msg13422445
hacked: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1339269.msg13660788#msg13660788


I do not trust you because of all of this, your still defending him, and the more you keep defending him just makes you look worse. Your lucky its neutral. I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt, which I probably shouldn't be doing because its against my better judgement.

I didn't add myself to the trust list so your asking the wrong person. I believe my feedback has always been accurate, and I assume that's why I am on the DT list.
1124  Economy / Reputation / Re: Who is ibminer on: June 09, 2016, 03:05:38 PM
Quote from: Dogedigital on June 09, 2016, 02:18:53 PM
Quote from: minifrij on June 08, 2016, 01:42:57 PM
People don't get added to DT because of their trust score; that would open the door for abuse. People are added to DT because a DT1 member sees their feedback and considers it to contribute to the forum.

*snip*

... and/or buys trust from Canaryinthemine (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=990074.0). 

Since you seem uneducated in the situation, you should know that my DT status was removed, like all others added by Canary, when Canary was taken off of DT.
That's how the system works. I was added back in later. You can keep trying to troll me though, its all good.

You do seem really upset at me, but I'm not the one that decided to do repeated business with a known scammer. Even giving him a free no-neg account after he had been publicly called out as a scammer, and IMO your supporting his scam behaviors. And after you find out about this, you get defensive and try to defend supporting a scammer. It is not my fault you've chosen to be shady.
1125  Other / Meta / Re: I caught someone cheating in auction on: June 08, 2016, 07:44:00 PM
Quote from: Dogedigital on June 08, 2016, 07:34:52 PM
Furthermore, nowhere did I openly state that I'd continue doing business with him.

You're resorting to lies now to try and embellish your unwarranted accusations?

Blatant trust system abuse IMO.

You are correct, I misread one of your messages... when the scammer asked for your business, you said "Perhaps soon". I've modified my feedback.
I have nothing personal against you except the fact that you are helping out someone that I believe is a scammer.
Based on the positive trades you've had, I'm going to convert it to neutral, but I really don't have a good feeling about you.
1126  Other / Meta / Re: I caught someone cheating in auction on: June 08, 2016, 07:32:07 PM
Quote from: AcoinL.L.C on June 08, 2016, 07:28:33 PM
I can vouch that Doge Digital is an upstanding member of the Bitcoin community. I have done a plethora of transactions with him over the past few years and he has always been transparent and honest in these dealings.

I fail to see how he should be "shamed" for giving a forum account away for free during the holiday season to help someone out.

I'm surprised at some of the reactions here... are you all failing to see that he gave this free account over to a known scammer?
1127  Other / Meta / Re: I caught someone cheating in auction on: June 08, 2016, 06:52:46 PM
Quote from: Quickseller on June 08, 2016, 06:50:24 PM
I think you should work on your months. It doesn't seem to be one of your strengths.

Where am I going wrong?
1128  Other / Meta / Re: I caught someone cheating in auction on: June 08, 2016, 06:43:23 PM
I have no doubt there are plenty of rich scammers around here, it doesn't mean they are going to stop scamming.
Some of the largest scams I've seen are conducted by accounts that, logically, shouldn't need to scam. But they do.

If you wanted professionalism, you should have publicly stated you were handing an account over to a known scammer.

Quote from: Dogedigital on June 08, 2016, 01:51:46 PM
I gave the account away to a user that did graphics for me on Skype.  This was just after Christmas.  

I had the kaykawa account from July 31 (4:23:35PM) - December 26.

You can obviously tell the difference in the way we speak and that the account was used for graphics services (I absolutely suck at drawing).

The 'alts' connected to that account are all Indian based.  I am from Canada.  This is me (bitrated.com/dogedigital).  I am not Kaykawa and have no involvement in that account from Dec 26 onward.

Quote from: Dogedigital on June 08, 2016, 06:17:23 PM
You're simply trying to play cop and are doing a bad job at it.  

Shame on you ibminer.
You stated yourself that you gave this account over to Nauro on December 26/27th.

At that time, Nauro would have been red flagged by many and would have been highly untrusted.
(most of his negative feedback was posted at the beginning of December, and TomatoCage had linked him to other scammers back in January of 2015)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=403195

You helped him out with a fresh account.

Its asinine to hand over an account to someone who is red flagged for scams.
Shame on YOU!




Quote from: Dogedigital on June 08, 2016, 06:09:44 PM
I didn't sell the account.  I gave it away.  If it was up to me, all account sales would be banned.

I gave it to 'Supers Sonic' on skype.  Also goes by 'Nauro' on bitcointalk.  He did graphics for me in the past and kept hitting me up for work.  I didn't really want to pay him anything, but he was insistent and it was Christmas time, so I told him he could have my account to make money from signature campaign.  

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It's quite ridiculous that I now have to prove myself from these accusations.  

This was why I wanted my first purchase of the account to be private because I don't want any connections to it after I'm done with it and yet  I have to listen to your condescending 'shady' comments.  

I get that you're trying to 'help' the public.  I just really think it could have been handled much better and with actual professionalism.  

I'm part of 3 people that hold over 1000btc in our possession.  A quick look into myself would have led you to the logical realization that I'd have no reason to involve myself in shady behaviour.
1129  Other / Meta / Re: I caught someone cheating in auction on: June 08, 2016, 06:39:05 PM
Quote from: Dogedigital on June 08, 2016, 06:09:44 PM
Quote from: ibminer on June 08, 2016, 05:35:12 PM
Quote from: Dogedigital on June 08, 2016, 12:05:11 PM
I gave the account away several months ago.

Kind of stupid tagging me without asking me about the situation. Especially in something with a previous transaction that was supposed to be kept confidential.

Quite disappointed in alesx.  Next time try to clear things up in a sensible way instead of trying to throw everybody else to the wolves to save your own ass.

I like to keep trust issues out in the open so everyone can see what is going on.
Messaging a potential scammer to check with them just tips them off and they could just tell a few lies to delay the feedback for a few days and sell the account before they get tagged.

Everyone on this forum should be aware when accounts change hands. The only proof I have seen at this point shows you as the last owner of the kaykawa account. Outside of a writing style change, I have no reason to believe it switched hands again after you owned it. You unfortunately haven't shown any proof otherwise. If your being honest, who did you give away the account to and do you have any type of proof?  

If there is another person involved as of December, then that person appears to be linked to scammers due to an address posted in January. So are you a scammer, or are you doing business with one?

The fact that you guys all hide these account trades is shady in and of itself. If you want to sell your account, do it publicly so everyone is aware and neutral trust can be left on the account stating it has changed hands.

You are both running into a good reason why you should never sell your accounts.

I didn't sell the account.  I gave it away.  If it was up to me, all account sales would be banned.

I gave it to 'Supers Sonic' on skype.  Also goes by 'Nauro' on bitcointalk.  He did graphics for me in the past and kept hitting me up for work.  I didn't really want to pay him anything, but he was insistent and it was Christmas time, so I told him he could have my account to make money from signature campaign.  


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It's quite ridiculous that I now have to prove myself from these accusations.  

This was why I wanted my first purchase of the account to be private because I don't want any connections to it after I'm done with it and yet  I have to listen to your condescending 'shady' comments.  

I get that you're trying to 'help' the public.  I just really think it could have been handled much better and with actual professionalism.  

I'm part of 3 people that hold over 1000btc in our possession.  A quick look into myself would have led you to the logical realization that I'd have no reason to involve myself in shady behaviour.  

I sent him a message today on Skype (http://imgur.com/fVj6cv7)

All of it because it's pretty hard to read:

[8:35:10 AM] Doge Digital: Dude, wtf?  I'm negative trust marked because of the account I gave you
[11:19:58 AM] supers sonic: this is hilarious !
[11:20:01 AM] supers sonic: simply tell them
[11:20:25 AM] Doge Digital: tell them what?
[11:21:24 AM] supers sonic: that u sold account
[11:21:24 AM] supers sonic: and its not against TOS
[11:21:49 AM] supers sonic: if you sell a account and the person who bought scams u dont are responsible
[11:21:54 AM] supers sonic: moreover u didnt sold priv keys
[11:22:03 AM] supers sonic: so no intentions to sell trust
[11:22:09 AM] supers sonic: moreover with kaykawa accunt
[11:22:13 AM] supers sonic: NO SCAM HA BEEN DONE !
[11:22:36 AM] Doge Digital: I'll see how it goes first.  It should be taken care of now.  I'll message if anything goes wrong further
[11:22:49 AM] supers sonic: please can you lin me though
[11:22:51 AM] supers sonic: I want to see
[11:22:59 AM] supers sonic: now what reason those guys generated
[11:23:07 AM] Doge Digital: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1436577.msg15113090#msg15113090
[11:23:13 AM] supers sonic: really some guys there like lutpin , etc and just too much Sad
[11:23:38 AM] supers sonic: u hacked his account ?
[11:23:46 AM] Doge Digital: whos account?  I don't know how to hack lol
[11:23:50 AM] supers sonic: well, u see I took account from you
[11:24:01 AM] supers sonic: he is saying he : Since that day, the account (kaykawa) was out of my control, the new owner was "Dogedigital".
[11:24:09 AM] Doge Digital: oh... no, i bought it from him
[11:24:16 AM] supers sonic: why he saying so then ?
[11:24:28 AM] Doge Digital: He's saying that he's not kaykawa
[11:24:35 AM] Doge Digital: he was saying that I was kaykawa
[11:24:43 AM] Doge Digital: which i was for like 3 months until i gave it to you
[11:24:50 AM] Doge Digital: but since you have red trust
[11:24:55 AM] Doge Digital: they're linking me to it
[11:24:56 AM] supers sonic: well, we can prove this that u sold it
[11:25:01 AM] supers sonic: I have proof !
[11:25:06 AM] supers sonic: how u want to know ?
[11:25:22 AM] supers sonic: a person messaged me that he owns me ( kaykawa account ) some 2 btc as he scammed him
[11:25:27 AM] supers sonic: I said sorry I have bought this accunt now
[11:26:08 AM] supers sonic: what the actual problem sis ?
[11:26:10 AM] supers sonic: is*
[11:26:18 AM] Doge Digital: Just that they think i'm kaykawa
[11:26:19 AM] supers sonic: He is clearly saying that he was the owner
[11:26:24 AM] supers sonic: no
[11:26:28 AM] supers sonic: see this post 1 min
[11:26:40 AM] supers sonic: @Dogedigital, I'm not throwing you to the fire, I quoted "when" i sold the account, and who was the "buyer".
Without that, how can I proove that i did it?.
[11:26:48 AM] supers sonic: looks like kaykawa was his account and got hacked ?
[11:27:32 AM] Doge Digital: no, I was saying that he was accusing me and trying to get people after me instead of him
[11:27:45 AM] supers sonic: ok and main thing
[11:27:48 AM] supers sonic: what wrong kaykawa did
[11:27:51 AM] supers sonic: ?
[11:27:58 AM] supers sonic: why they think kaykawa is scammer man ?
[11:28:22 AM] supers sonic: I mean why they looking who is kaykawa ?
[11:28:30 AM] supers sonic: that account scammed anyone earlier or what ?
[11:29:25 AM] Doge Digital: No
[11:29:34 AM] Doge Digital: Kaykawa has red trust
[11:29:38 AM] Doge Digital: Since they think i'm kaykawa
[11:29:42 AM] supers sonic: ohhh ..
[11:29:44 AM] Doge Digital: someone gave me red trust
[11:29:53 AM] supers sonic: must be lutpin idiot ..
[11:29:59 AM] supers sonic: anyways wait let me think something
[11:31:52 AM] supers sonic: see this
[11:32:04 AM] supers sonic: http://prntscr.com/bdwole
[11:32:25 AM] supers sonic: u can see I told him that I hve bought this account
[11:32:33 AM] supers sonic: so this is obvious, no ? that I have bought it ?
[11:32:50 AM] Doge Digital: i dunno.  just let it be for now i guess.
[11:32:57 AM] Doge Digital: I'll msg you if the guy still doesn't un mark me
[11:33:06 AM] supers sonic: ok
[11:33:14 AM] supers sonic: i am very sorry because of me you get red
[11:33:45 AM] supers sonic: shall I msg ibminer too ?
[11:33:50 AM] supers sonic: or wait til you guide me ?
[11:33:53 AM] Doge Digital: i'd just wait
[11:33:58 AM] Doge Digital: let's see if it corrects itself first
[11:33:59 AM] supers sonic: ok ..
[11:34:05 AM] supers sonic: ohok if not
[11:34:07 AM] supers sonic: I HAVE MANY PROOFS
[11:34:11 AM] supers sonic: we have skype history
[11:34:15 AM] supers sonic: which WE CANNOT CREATE
[11:34:17 AM] supers sonic: right ?
[11:34:20 AM] supers sonic: then we have that messages
[11:34:30 AM] Doge Digital: yea.  should be ok.
[11:34:32 AM] supers sonic: moreover once i remember was asked to sgn message and I fail to ...
[11:34:36 AM] supers sonic: anyways sorry .
[11:36:39 AM] supers sonic: andat last if nothing works , ask a mod to have a ip scan
[11:36:50 AM] supers sonic: clearly ur ip would be different from me .. range too i mean
[11:36:55 AM] supers sonic: anyways bye have to go for now.
[11:37:01 AM] supers sonic: any work for me any design ?
[11:38:25 AM] Doge Digital: Not at this moment.  Perhaps soon though
[11:38:41 AM] supers sonic: thanks, please let me know, I am always keen to design for you.
Quoting for reference.
1130  Other / Meta / Re: I caught someone cheating in auction on: June 08, 2016, 05:35:12 PM
Quote from: Dogedigital on June 08, 2016, 12:05:11 PM
I gave the account away several months ago.

Kind of stupid tagging me without asking me about the situation. Especially in something with a previous transaction that was supposed to be kept confidential.

Quite disappointed in alesx.  Next time try to clear things up in a sensible way instead of trying to throw everybody else to the wolves to save your own ass.

I like to keep trust issues out in the open so everyone can see what is going on.
Messaging a potential scammer to check with them just tips them off and they could just tell a few lies to delay the feedback for a few days and sell the account before they get tagged.

Everyone on this forum should be aware when accounts change hands. The only proof I have seen at this point shows you as the last owner of the kaykawa account. Outside of a writing style change, I have no reason to believe it switched hands again after you owned it. You unfortunately haven't shown any proof otherwise. If your being honest, who did you give away the account to and do you have any type of proof? 

If there is another person involved as of December, then that person appears to be linked to scammers due to an address posted in January. So are you a scammer, or are you doing business with one?

The fact that you guys all hide these account trades is shady in and of itself. If you want to sell your account, do it publicly so everyone is aware and neutral trust can be left on the account stating it has changed hands.

You are both running into a good reason why you should never sell your accounts.
1131  Other / Meta / Re: I caught someone cheating in auction on: June 07, 2016, 10:28:40 AM
Quote from: alesx.onfire on June 07, 2016, 01:27:54 AM
I received "Kaykawa & betterangels" from default loans years ago.
Months ago i sold both accounts.

I used escrow, i can show the proof & signed msg. (shorena & sebastianju)

I don't know why are you calling "scammer"?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1329109.0

Betterangels :

Quote from: shorena on February 26, 2016, 06:57:55 PM
Coins released

-> https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/tx/95415c2a52acf26507f32385e60c185034723363a1f26a2400c96e49582f1be2

enjoy.

Quote from: mihtju on February 26, 2016, 06:54:38 PM
Email and password changed. Looks like everyhing is done.

Quote from: shorena on February 26, 2016, 06:52:56 PM
Account secured?

Quote from: mihtju on February 26, 2016, 06:52:22 PM
Thank you for perfect deal.

Quote from: shorena on February 26, 2016, 06:51:35 PM
Quote from: mihtju on February 26, 2016, 06:49:37 PM
So how can I get access to my purchased account?
-snip-

I already send it to you, here:

and the link for pot. acct.: http://www.bctalkaccountpricer.info/?token=necr598t
archive: https://archive.is/RFhh0

Quote from: shorena on February 26, 2016, 06:45:42 PM
-snip-
User : betterangels
Pass : changeme123
No secret question

BTC ADDRESS : 1v4N3J7GAeuQJZiWfA7ewmggdNoTSspxr

Posted in 2 posts (2014) :
1)https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=751056.msg9039531#msg9039531
2)https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=807195.msg9050330#msg9050330

The current status is "un-edited", archived :
https://web.archive.org/web/20160226142117/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=807195.msg9050330#msg9050330
https://web.archive.org/save/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=751056.msg9039531
_______________________________________________________________________________ _______________
Signed Message from 1v4N3J7GAeuQJZiWfA7ewmggdNoTSspxr  :
_______________________________________________________________________________ _______________


Hi, this is betterangels (soanip95) from bitcointalk.org
Today (02/26/2016) I'm selling my account (betterangels) senior member 240+ (potential hero 505+) to mihtju for 0.12 ("shorena" as escrow).

_______________________________________________________________________________ _______________
Signature:
HM2iLJM3BeAwmdKBt+DTAOZVsDkLUgtMUnLNb03NFnlfHrqQlyoiQxvDXG+io5KykKurVhOURQ5B/mfS4hCI/Rw=
_______________________________________________________________________________ _______________

:.........................................

kaykawa
Quote from: SebastianJu on January 16, 2016, 04:46:00 PM
Coins, login details and signature are on the way... Smiley

In case you want to tip me, see my donation jar in my profile page... (Left side of page... click on my username) or simply scan the QR-Code from my avatar picture. Wink

I would appreciate when you could post a review on my service thread, that i finally opened. Smiley Its located at [ANN] SebastianJu - Free Legendary Escrow Service - Escrowed over 8150 BTC.

I use http://www.cointape.com/ for checking out if the network gets spammed and i adjust the fee accordingly. If the network doesnt gets spammed i mostly use no fee or the minimum fee because the transaction then gets a confirmation fast too.

Till next time... Wink

Quote from: btc-surf on January 16, 2016, 04:39:56 PM
!!! WARNING: This user is a newbie. If you are expecting a message from a more veteran member, then this is an imposter !!!
Sounds ok.
Waiting for the login details
Thank you.

Quote from: SebastianJu on January 16, 2016, 04:31:12 PM
There is a working signature from a post that was last edited on 10.11.2014. Should be pretty sure that this account is not hacked.

Posts 750, activity around 450.

Post quality is not so good, mostly only a couple of words though that doesn't matter to you since you don't want to join a signature campaign i guess.

It's a Sr. Member.

No default trust feedback, and untrusted positive feedback.

Let me know if you are fine with that account, then i can change pass and make a wrong email, then send it to you and you can secure it by changing pass again.

Quote from: soanip95 on January 16, 2016, 03:48:39 PM
!!! WARNING: This user is a newbie. If you are expecting a message from a more veteran member, then this is an imposter !!!
Account info, password and signed message sent to the escrow.


Quote from: btc-surf on January 16, 2016, 03:06:44 PM
!!! WARNING: This user is a newbie. If you are expecting a message from a more veteran member, then this is an imposter !!!
Payment has been made.

Quote from: SebastianJu on January 16, 2016, 02:07:15 PM
Yes, that fee works fine though a tenth of the fees worked fine before too. Bitcoin is losing slowly one of it's sales arguments which are free transactions. I think that is not good for adoption. Well, if they are successfull then it only will become worse. :/

Let's see how it will go. Smiley

Quote from: soanip95 on January 16, 2016, 02:00:50 PM
!!! WARNING: This user is a newbie. If you are expecting a message from a more veteran member, then this is an imposter !!!
idk know guys, blockchain is working fine for me, fast confirmations with 0.0001 fee.


Quote from: SebastianJu on January 16, 2016, 01:54:47 PM
Yeah, these guys that want to keep 1MB blockchain block in order to force the transaction fees to go up are unfortunately successfull. I never thought the developers would think so too. It's sad for bitcoin. :/

Quote from: btc-surf on January 16, 2016, 01:32:41 PM
!!! WARNING: This user is a newbie. If you are expecting a message from a more veteran member, then this is an imposter !!!
Waiting for few hours on one blokchain transaction to come in, delayed unluckaley.
Hoping for it to come in in the next hours. Will send the payment as soons as the transaction clears

Quote from: SebastianJu on January 16, 2016, 01:07:47 PM
Such an old signed message sounds pretty safe. Waiting for funded escrow address.

Quote from: soanip95 on January 16, 2016, 01:00:43 PM
!!! WARNING: This user is a newbie. If you are expecting a message from a more veteran member, then this is an imposter !!!
Quote from: SebastianJu on January 16, 2016, 12:35:12 PM
Buyer, what details should i check when i have the account in escrow? I would receive the account and secure them when the escrow address is funded. Then i can check the details you want me to check.

Is there a signed message? If so please seller provide it to me too and a link to the post where that address was posted first.

When answering PM's, please always use "Reply to all" so that all involved parties get informed. And keep the quotes so that all trading partners and the escrow know exactly what deal the pm is meant for.

The escrow address is:
Code:
1DASLJ89qU21H3oUZixxXJixv96rBo96p1
Please ONLY send to an escrow address i sent you directly. Dont send to quotes the seller claims i wrote. Only if i send you the address directly its ensured the address is correct. I will attach a signature whose message contains the escrow address, signed with an old address of mine, i posted may 2013 on bitcointalk. See my Servicethread: [ANN] SebastianJu - Free Legendary Escrow Service - Escrowed over 8150 BTC.

Before payment i would suggest you take a look at http://www.cointape.com/ to check out if the network gets spammed again. Below the graph there is shown what amount of fee is needed to get instant confirmation for a normal transaction, which means a transaction with coins coming from one address, and going to two addresses. That would be the target address and the source or a change address where the remaining coins are sent to. Checking that page could prevent that transactions are stuck for hours or days because they dont get a confirmation.

The payment of the bitcoins can be found and proved the fastest way through blockchain.info or automatically by email through bitcoinmonitor.net.

In case you are new to bitcoin trades on the forum or with escrows, please don't sit before the browser and click reload all the time. That is doing no one. Deals will take some hours, often days too. Some other escrows only log in once a day or even less than that.

Seller, whats the bitcoin address i should release the Bitcoins later to? Please send that info to escrow and buyer so that its easily proven i sent to the correct address.

Please buyer and seller make an arrangement when the Bitcoins should be released by me. So that everyone has the same thoughts about it.

In case signed messages has to be verified, then its the fastest to visit http://wallet-2sx53n.sakurity.com/#verify. Then you can proove fast if a signature, given by me or the seller, is correct and so you know that the address is controlled by the one giving the signature.

Escrowfee is donation based... see my donation jar in my profile page... (Left side of page... click on my username) or simply scan the QR-Code from my avatar picture. Wink

Code:
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
20160116 This is the escrow address for the trade from soanip95, as the seller to btc-surf, as the buyer and the escrow address is 1DASLJ89qU21H3oUZixxXJixv96rBo96p1
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1K2UFGCKyNQNx4h2m5ZRCaw9BWHTBcCZAA
G18MpvJzQKJy/dRbzX6XuzFUVrWiv1TUDcEEIjJ/1VCEQRlZRTNyv1Lp+bW4JldIrS1l6uH1vLUclAroqC1z6iI=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Message signed with an old address of mine, that i posted may 2013 on bitcointalk. See my Servicethread: [ANN] SebastianJu - Free Legendary Escrow Service - Escrowed over 8150 BTC.

Quote from: soanip95 on January 16, 2016, 11:29:32 AM
!!! WARNING: This user is a newbie. If you are expecting a message from a more veteran member, then this is an imposter !!!
Hi,

Can you help us as escrow?

I'm the seller (soanip95), and the buyer (btc-surf)

I'll sell an account :

Senior Member
Activity 476 (Will be hero @monday)
Posts 600+
No negative trust, no pending loans.
Signed message

Price : 0,27 BTC (@$100)

Please provide your btc address for this TX.

thanks



Thanks for the reply,

My btc address (seller/soanip95) is : 1Ctjt63DoB5umav1MM2gRZJpS1t9L1KbjA
The signed message will be from a post created in 2013, last edit in nov 2014.

@btc-surf: Send the btc to the escrow address.

thanks.

Also(that time, months ago) i was thinking in sell this (alesx.onfire) my main and only account, because i was in need of money.
But i didn't and i will never do that.

Quote from: soanip95 on February 13, 2016, 04:04:59 PM
Hi guys, I'm going out of btc world for a while, and i have some overdue bills to pay, so, i'm selling my main account

alesx.onfire is my nick in all the internet forums, so, i'll no risk my reputation.
You can check for yourself (google).

This was my unique problem in the forum : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=869002.0

I'm transparent, i'm not hiding anything.

(First let's solve this misunderstanding, after that we can talk about the bid issue (I know I was wrong) and the sanction).



You are admitting that you owned kaykawa before January 16th. This shows you were trying to dump the account that after it was linked to the scammers. You sold it the day AFTER the thread was started. The thread which links kaykawa to txbtc, JosIzem, etc. Furthermore, the transaction that links you all was from January 7th. It appears you start alt accounts to scam people or conduct shady practices, with the hope that they would never be linked to your "main" account, but it looks like you were wrong.

As for betterangels, if this sale is confirmed by the escrow, then you may not be linked to the ponzi operation, but you still used the account for the double/triple dipping giveaway and shill bidding.
1132  Other / Meta / Re: I caught someone cheating in auction on: June 05, 2016, 09:45:50 PM
Quote from: twister on June 05, 2016, 05:45:53 PM
He Triple-dipped actually and that's just unhygienic. Angry

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=869442.msg9630834#msg9630834 Archive: http://archive.is/FBlPp#selection-6345.0-6338.4
https://blockchain.info/tx/5b9857ec5f5599173aa075ec9cf681b91c0d8596e07ab34f7fa8105fc5d2cf73

Interesting... so since they are now linked to kaykawa, I assume its safe to now link alesx.onfire & betterangels to this list:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1329109.0

Looks like kaykawa can also be linked to txbtc, txbtc can be linked to JosIzem and you can see all of the alts of JosIzem

So how far does this rabbit hole go??  Undecided
1133  Other / Meta / Re: I caught someone cheating in auction on: June 05, 2016, 09:08:08 AM
I've updated my post... he also used the alt to double-dip in a free giveaway by BiPolarBob.

Greed has consumed this one.  Cry

https://youtu.be/P_RVL7m7OLo
1134  Other / Meta / Re: I caught someone cheating in auction on: June 04, 2016, 08:15:41 PM
Quote from: twister on June 04, 2016, 05:18:20 PM
I also think this is bad, added about this in the list I created earlier.

Quote from: hilariousandco on April 14, 2016, 05:15:18 AM
Quote from: Joel_Jantsen on April 14, 2016, 03:56:33 AM
Quote from: jacee on April 14, 2016, 03:04:08 AM
Hey, So I saw someone in the auction who cheated in raising the bid with his alt. Is it allowed here or should the user be penalized for this?

How do you "penalize" users around bitcointalk ? Isn't "negative rep" the term you are looking for ?  I don't think raising bids by the Alt should be a problem.Eventually he will end up having the highest bid with his product unsold.

Not necessarily. He'll likely just use it to bump up the price then contact the other highest bidders and offer them it if the price is reasonable. I would leave negative if there was reasonable evidence for the behaviour.

Quote from: Blazed on May 05, 2016, 01:42:09 AM
Shill bidding is bad and I would drop a negative on someone for it. There is just no justification for doing it other than being greedy.

Hope you guys stay true to your words..

Account auctioning goods: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=329021
Shill account used to up the bid: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=361617

Auction thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1073157.0 archive: http://archive.is/sEJ9R

Shill account uses this address 1LN3DgFutZDzUnovVKFvTBeFYvHcwWVE9k here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=857670.msg11060213#msg11060213

Account auctioning goods uses this address 18Qu6rym9WA3G1GJEWZSPn8ifA1eckMtdC here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1364280.msg13878564%23msg13878564

Archive: http://archive.is/bRVTc and http://archive.is/lXdFR#selection-1975.0-1975.34

Both connected here: https://blockchain.info/tx/d1960da7baecf24175a8fc8a27ea54f501a5a635fd58d6a484387c1ac1aae0d3

Account one also tips his own shill account here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=857670.msg11060237#msg11060237  Cheesy
https://blockchain.info/tx/161fdbc9636a04ca226af1c39aa2e3af0f727c79614695f73d9bbe73e3d4377b

He has done other auctions as well, I guess it is safe to assume, he probably would have done the same other times also with different alts.

Quoting for reference.

EDIT: Seems shady but I can't continue research at the moment, will review more later.

Also uses alt to triple-dip in a .02BTC free giveaway by BiPolarBob
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=869442.msg9630834#msg9630834
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=869442.msg9630692#msg9630692
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=869442.msg9630803#msg9630803

https://blockchain.info/address/1QJGeUZ49RTczix8bsv1VLmcynsjPzmHZp
coins end up back to 18Qu6rym9WA3G1GJEWZSPn8ifA1eckMtdC

After conducting these shady activities, he sells off his accounts to scammers.
This is why you should not farm or trade accounts.
This guy is not a trustworthy person in my book.
1135  Other / Meta / Re: Suggestion: Members should leave religion matters out of Bitcoins discussions on: June 02, 2016, 11:52:41 PM
Quote from: Evildrum on June 02, 2016, 11:10:21 PM
Quote from: ibminer on June 02, 2016, 11:04:51 PM
This forum should allow all viewpoints, whether in a bitcoin discussion or not. It would be silly to try and quiet the majority of the world.  Wink

Quote from: Vod on June 02, 2016, 09:19:31 PM
Quote from: Symeave on June 02, 2016, 11:10:32 AM
What does religion and bitcoin have to do with each other? those are 2 very different and separate things.

One attracts the intelligent, the other attracts the ignorant.

I knew Vod would have something to say here  Cheesy  If only he knew the amount & caliber of people around the world he was calling ignorant, he would realize how ignorant he was by calling them ignorant. I still got no problem with him expressing his ignorance though, its all he knows. Although, I do still love you Vod.  Grin

That does not work. You can not point to a majority and imply that they are not ignorant because they are the majority.

The issue of religion is it sways decisions and the people that follow it are blind to how it effects those people that do not follow the Name your God here. The response you gave shows how entitled you are to pass judgement based on it.

They were 2 separate statements. One speaking to the OP about why this forum shouldn't push to keep religion out of Bitcoin discussions, and one speaking to Vod. I never implied they are not ignorant because they are a majority. There are plenty of ignorant religious people, and there are plenty of ignorant non-religious people. I've bolded what I said above, if you can try to read and not quickly post to increase your count and make your YoBit quota. This is to say there are plenty, plenty of well educated high caliber people that he just called ignorant in his asinine generalization. I would explain more, but I'm realizing you wouldn't read it.
1136  Other / Meta / Re: Suggestion: Members should leave religion matters out of Bitcoins discussions on: June 02, 2016, 11:04:51 PM
This forum should allow all viewpoints, whether in a bitcoin discussion or not. It would be silly to try and quiet the majority of the world.  Wink

Quote from: Vod on June 02, 2016, 09:19:31 PM
Quote from: Symeave on June 02, 2016, 11:10:32 AM
What does religion and bitcoin have to do with each other? those are 2 very different and separate things.

One attracts the intelligent, the other attracts the ignorant.

I knew Vod would have something to say here  Cheesy  If only he knew the amount & caliber of people around the world he was calling ignorant, in the past and present, he would realize how ignorant he was by calling them ignorant. I still got no problem with him expressing his ignorance though, its all he knows. Although, I do still love you Vod.  Grin
1137  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Web Interface Access on S3 Wifi? on: June 01, 2016, 06:45:36 PM
Is the computer/device your connecting from on wifi?

I've always used hard wired connections so I'm not sure if there are any limitations on running completely off of wifi but do you have any wlan isolation modes enabled on your wireless router/ap that could be stopping you from talking to it on the wifi network?
1138  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Hack me (if you are board) on: June 01, 2016, 04:18:25 PM
Quote from: KenR on June 01, 2016, 04:13:12 PM
Quote from: ibminer on June 01, 2016, 04:09:32 PM
Its unfortunately not worth attempting for .003, I would think a person is going to spend more on the resources used to crack it, even if you had information about the password.

I made the same point.Seems like OP took it as an offence and his reply applies for you to.

Quote from: spazzdla on June 01, 2016, 03:55:21 PM
I will do whatever the fuck I feel like.

I was more subtle in my reply  Grin
1139  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Hack me (if you are board) on: June 01, 2016, 04:09:32 PM
Its unfortunately not worth attempting for .003, I would think a person is going to spend more on the resources used to crack it, even if you had information about the password.
1140  Economy / Securities / Re: NastyFans: The Bitcoin Enthusiast Fan Club (est. 2012) on: May 31, 2016, 04:11:50 PM
Quote from: OgNasty on May 31, 2016, 03:58:23 PM
Anyone have any thoughts on the S9?  Should we wait until a price drop before purchasing?

https://bitmaintech.com/productDetail.htm?pid=0002016052907243375530DcJIoK0654

My initial thought is to wait for the halving... but there are a lot of calculations to be done on this Smiley

EDIT: FTFM (Fixed This For Myself)  Grin
Pages: « 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 [57] 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!