Very nice question which would really be good to ask on oneself before deciding to engage on day trading.We do know most people would say here that day trading is profitable but without knowing the risk you would surely lose up money if you do jump without any proper knowledge and skills.This is why we should make sure steps before engaging and im sure it would be tough on the very first place.

ATH is coming, again..

Oh yeah that, I have noticed. Wonder what's up. I know they get ddos'd from time to time.

Sorry, I'm not interested with this stuff.
coz I haven't yet quite understand thus:)

Rachel Maddow

I know there's a lot of misinformation about it, and a lot of people seem to be using the event to spin for their team. But false flag is a fkn bold claim. Unless you write for the Daily Stormer, I expect a bit more to back it up.

It could just as easily have been somebody paid the guy to do it to boost gun stalks. There's just not enough reliable information available to form a sensible conclusion.

I have no problem at all with the exchange/sharing of ideas and non-confrontational debate. It's healthy and should be applauded.

But c'mon, this whole block size thing? FFS, it's getting really old guys. Like for years and years now has this topic been discussed and debated ad nauseam. By internet armchair warrior geniuses who have no computer programming or blockchain coding expertise, but somehow think they know better than the very people involved with the project, the Bitcoin Core dev team. The block size debate is a dead horse that has been beaten so much over the years, it's been pounded into complete dust.

And then these same people, after years and years of flooding the forums with teeth gnashing, circular and confrontational debate, FINALLY get what they want (BCH w/ 8MB block limit) and their own dev team separate from Core, and then they have the audacity to dismiss it lightly and come back and continue the debate around shoving bigger blocks into Bitcoin? Like now BCH wasn't somehow good enough, wasn't what they wanted after all? I thought that bigger blocks was the answer to all of Bitcoin's problems? Wasn't BCH supposed to solve everything?

These people aren't just debating and discussing ideas. They are trolling.

It depends on the NEO price, you will get 1300 RPX/NEO on the first day. NEO for 15 million $ are accepted, one hour before Tokensale KYC-accepted members will get an email with details, and the NEO/$ price will be fixed.
Just go to their homepage ... https://coin.red-pulse.com/#ico

Does anybody know the ICO sale price

There is really no way to know, and may never be.  In this day and age all possibilities should be considered.

It is certainly not necessary for there to be multiple shooters, or indeed no shooters, for the event to be a false flag.  Allow me to illuminate the playbook for those lacking in imagination or pessimism.

The agency in question (the acronym of the moment is unimportant) maintains a network of practicing psychiatrists who keep their eyes out for promising subjects.  In this way a steady stream of people already seeking help for psychological problems can be assayed.  Once a particularly promising subject is identified an operation is crafted around their particular circumstance.  The subject is prescribed a cocktail of psychotropic pharmaceuticals often including, but not limited to, various SSRIs to make them more susceptible to suggestion.  Then, the subject's environment is altered by various means to begin implanting the suggestion.  This may include sub-audible bombardment of their home, alteration of their news and social media feeds and seemingly "random" encounters with other people.  The combination of drugs and suggestion is worked to a fever pitch until the subject acts out.  The operators may not even have to know the specifics of the action.  Through the crafting of the suggestion they place the subject on a certain course, but may leave the actual planning and execution to the subject.

Do I have any proof of this?  Of course not, but it is the logical extension of the decades old MK Ultra work that we do know about.  It is also certainly what I would do were I a Machiavellian deep state fuck.

If that is one their "Panoramic View" Suites, and it might be considering their corner location, it could be two windows of the same room.

Anyways... those windows have thick glass but are not bulletproof at all, besides he could have used other means to break it before the shooting. Also the second window could have been broken by police gunfire when they entered the room.

The first photo is too bad quality to determine that the glass is not broken as you seem to imply. Hard to tell when it is dark outside and inside the room. It is way easier in the day when the mirroring treatment reflects the sun (as seen in the second photo which also have way better quality)

I don't see any conspiracy here. Just another tragic crime.

They couldn't do that at least until after October 5th, when approved Claimants must submit the IRS. form etc.

Even then, I doubt we'll know right away.

Whoa whoa whoa.

Failing?  My first bitcoin was bought between $100-$200 and the most I have ever spent on one bitcoin is $400. I accumulated some coins during the bear market after gox. To not work I would have have had to invested around $50k at this time. (Which I did not unfortunately)

I wish I was earlier in to bitcoin believe me.

Anyway, I feel I am in a decent position right now.

Is this the biggest thread on this board? Was a legendary scam back in the day.

I understand that your questions are for cAPSLOCK; however, I just cannot resist chiming in... Go figure!

Over the years, that chart has come up frequently, and it does seem to capture some aspects of various interim bubbles, and it may even capture some aspects of some speculative assets that go through a shorter life cycle and maybe just one hype cycle.

I am with you, empowering, that it does not seem to capture bitcoin very well, and it could be that we are quite early in such a life-cycle curve, if such a curve would be applicable to bitcoin in any kind of meaningful sense.

If bitcoin were to be some kind of flash in the pan that ends up dwindling, then yeah, we could see it petering out, and none of us know whether ultimately bitcoin will peter out - especially if it were to get sabotaged or coopted in some way, right?

Bitcoin has surely shown a certain level of robustness, and I think that some of us HODLers recognize that robustness, and we have been rewarded financially (and generously) for HODLing through the good and bad times of bitcoin.. while recognizing that bitcoin is still building and bitcoin has a foundation that provides a considerable amount of upside potential, which would be still putting us in the likely early stages of any growth curve that is even a bit earlier than institutional investors in the above depiction, as you say.

It is a bit unclear about whether some BIG ASS upside curve is necessary in all asset classes, and especially if their life cycle ends up being a couple hundred years, then you may have a different kind of curve.

Maybe the sum of the situation is that this particular graph does not apply very well to bitcoin - because even though we have gone through numerous hype cycles, those hype cycles may show up as blips within a larger s-curve adoption scale - and sure, what are the odds of an s-curve adoption, certainly not 100%.... but I thin that a lot of bitcoin HODLers/accumulators recognize that there are decent chances in bitcoin to go through s-curve adoption, and that we remain in early years in the lower levels of such an s-curve slope.  

Personally, I am quite satisfied with my investment, and I would even be content if BTC prices were to languish between $1k and $4k for several years; however, many of us likely recognize that it is more likely that we are going up from here (at least if we consider the longer term), and we have decent chances of continuing to be rewarded generously for our bitcoin investment, whether we are just beginning to establish a stake or if we have already established a decent stake.

Edit: In the meantime, some of the Chinese might get left out, if they do not take actions to protect their bitcoin investments, and if they have been a longer term bitcoin investor, they will likely figure out ways to store their bitcoin and to exchange them in the future, or perhaps, just become longer term HODLers, until the regulatory regime becomes more friendly - and like many folks said, a lot of this may just be FUD that changes chinese options, without completely removing their options (including use of local bitcoins and other direct means).