He wouldn't because he is a leftie. Look around, even in this very thread. How's the distribution? Other than Harry and yogi and maybe a few others, everyone is some shade of right. Even Bob the black gay cowboy.

Let me refer you to Icygreen, i'm just an observer in this Wall Observer thread.
By the way to OP : great thread you created.....

all very true.

again, you're acting like all things marx related - no matter how small - are inherently evil. but there are multiple countries, as i already pointed out ,that have various socialist systems, democractic ones and under royal authority as well, depending. russian style soviet rule? oh yea. bad. sure. universal healthcare and reasonable corporate regulation, like living wages? eh, i don't see it.

RABBId ideologues, you mean?
I'm sure the producers are joos. They all are.

You could open a nice thread with a few other WO participants. An echo chamber. Not as good a gas chamber, I know, but we all have to make do with what we have.

Even though I don't agree with the Majormax suggestion of a kind of nearly inevitable bitcoin downtrend to be necessary prior to a return to UP, I do agree with you that likely there would be more value in the construction of more creative poll questions...  

Periodic hit-piece from some Dow Jones-owned rag.
https://www.fnlondon.com/articles/financial-heavyweights-pour-scorn-on-bitcoin-20180521

Seems that you are making two main points in your above response post:

1) regarding word choice, and whether there might be better or worse ways to make your point:   If you make your post in a kind of rash, then in those situations, you might make mistakes regarding your word choice, and sometimes, you may go back to your post and consider that your word choice is not fitting for what you were attempting to communicate.  Even though, from time to time, I am criticized for my word choice, including the length of my posts, there are pretty rare times that I would either change the post or go back to rewrite the post, because the vast majority of the times, my word choices are what I chose at the time and are reflective of my then thoughts on the topic.  

In the end, I think that the point is that each of us makes a choice about how much to edit or reread our posts before we hit "post." So, there is a considerable amount of personal discretion there, including the discretion to modify our posting practices.

2) ongoing mtgox manipulation:  This subject matter of mtgox manipulation comes off as another one of those distracting and misleading talking points that seems to infiltrate into a lot of discussions, including discussions by seemingly smart people who are finding a pattern or attempting to find a pattern.  I remain of the "who gives a shit" perspective on this particular talking point.  Sure, you can include mtgox into your analysis, but it remains one of many factors that seems retrospectively over-hyped.  For example, when the trustee first began to sell coins between December and February, those sales were not getting too much publicity, but after the fact, they are being described as if they were in the public consciousness at the time of the initial dumps and able to affect the price.  I remain of the perspective that there was so much trade volume between December and January that the mtgox coin dumps were quite unlikely to have any kind of meaningful effect, but such supposed effect has been exaggerated after the fact in order to attempt to get affect on the current price dynamics,  and in order to attempt to shake some additional weak hands of their bitcoins.

I think "who gives a fuck?" is fine, depending on the tone and the emphasis that you intend to provide.

If you later concede that you did not intend such tone or emphasis, then so be it... Any of us can make those kinds of mistakes.. seems to me.

To be fair, menace has been teetering on the edge for a while.

It is pretty amazing how effectively some people are able to demonstrate the abrasive nature of their personality in a few lines of text.

who cares?

lol

Oh come on. That's a bit harsh. Take it easy. 
"crypto is electronic currency" and my personal welcome "Your welcome" already made my day.
Apparently the previous IQ discussion is still relevant. Legendary...

1. Do you know what crypto is?
2. Do you know the difference between their and there?
3. Thank you for answering my questions.

How do you know BTC was version 1 ?  How many versions might not have survived ?

In your opinion (with little to no evidence to back it up)

It is mt. gox damn it....from what I figure they have to dump $240 million in usd of BTC a month, to get the liguidation done by the end of this year....*them

trustees want their cut and the Japanese Gov't wants this all over with)

thus, we will go to 9k and drop to 7k and rinse wash repeat for a month or two...then the mt. gox trustees will have a timeline, say end of the year and we will

drop to 4k ...it is gonna suck!

Well on reddit and twitter is like since 5 months that we are going to skyrocket to 100k anytime TOMORROW or maximum NEXT WEEK. So I guess they are not the right places LOL

So your plan to defeat the (((rulers))) is to use a system that has built-in, rent seeking middlemen residing over every transaction that you must pay a ransom fee to transact, while also asking them permission to transact at all, and simultaneously deleting the 5th amendment where anything you do is evidence against you by default, instead of using silver and gold which has none of these problems?  You're trying to con people into believing dystopia is utopia.

The trading with the enemy act where "THE CORPORATION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA" declared inhabitants of North America as enemies of the state is not a transaction validator.  Metals don't have transaction validators! (aka middlemen)

The only thing mathematically certain about bitcoin is that transaction validators are mathematically designed to centralize, and that means it's mathematically certain to be a permissioned ledger where the rulers ruling over you can do anything they want, from blacklisting all your funds, to slipping in things like chain anchor, to altering coin count and anything else.  If you wish to be ruled over and be someone's bitch in a dystopian technocracy, then bitcoin is for you. If not, there is silver and gold.