Enemy adopt sp_ "improvements" and release his miner that is faster than sp_ slow miner with all those "improvements".
Nice logic. 

For a person with normal logic it is evident that sp_ can't compete with z-enemy/t-rex miners and he make his "improvements" based on what z/t already implemented. That's why this miner is not sold as others - noone will by slow miner. That's why in this case sp_ decided to be a "knight in white clothes" and release slow but opensource miner. 

P.S. But anyway - it is good work from some point of view.

Exactly on 1080rig I get ~325 from EWBF and ~300 with your miner.
It's only PL55 and EWBF still make 46.5sol/s average. With PL90-100 it can be much faster.

EWBF is faster by considerable margin.

I thought that dev should say something about situation with MN rewards - or better to say NO REWARDS for all except hackers.
Will it last for days/weeks/months? Or everyone just need to run those hacking scripts?

What's the problem? 50Mh/s are achieved at PL65 and no OC. With 100/500 52 is not a problem.

I wouldn't call it negative. Pragmatic view or pessimistic - is a better definition.
All is based on the over a year of experience. Just what I see from deeds not words. It doesn't matter for investor what is "behind the scene" if it exists only in words. We already had bad experience with an "advanced SP_devastating miner", when all words remained only words and "soon" became "never will". New SWEEP wallet was also supposed to be released but not in reality:

It was on 23.08.2017-25.08.2017. A year had passed - but wallet is still "under way". And please don't tell me that you gave no definite period - I don't want again to argue about evident things that seednodes don't need a year to get them "compiled - installed - and running".
So, that is what potential investor really see behind your big posts claiming something like "we are making new Manhattan project but won't show you, or will show, but tomorrow" ... that never come.

Of cause I'n hopping for better but ready for worse.

I doubt that someone will buy at 25, 16 or even 7sat price with only: "we will start working in next month". It is much cheaper to mine with current diff - if someone really need SWEEP.
Potential investor can only see none of the development for a year since you've got SWEEP, no exchanges at all, no whitepaper. If he can he will calculate mining price and realize that even 3sat is very very pricy.
So, whats the plan when your "sale" fails?

WTF happened recently?

The same picture on different wallets.
All were mining mostly lyra2z. But Actual24 profit is what it is supposed to be. 0.04mbtc even slightly more that estimated average.

I think you dont get it. Im talking about luck to solve a share. 3 instances of the same miner would find different number of  shares, and the difference could be the same 10 20%. The only way to equalize chances is increasing the quantity of gpu or time.

Thats what I was talking about. 1gpu and 10hours is not enough to exclude luck factor.
You can get 10 times black in roulette while each time chances are equal.

Are you serious? You can run 3 instances of the same miner on these gpus and easily get 10% difference in shares.

Of cause its better than nothing. But 1gpu and 10hours - at least 10-15% is luck difference.

It' s only in sleasy dreams of sp.

Both 1080 and 1070ti (3400) are slower than 1070(3750) in lyra2z.
1060 is very close to them.(3300)

1.44$ from 1080ti - doesn't make sense.

Not always. I got 0H/s when 50PL on 1070 (at least)

1) Again you speak about your soft as a miner.
2) There is a difference between soft for geeks and userfriendly one. Nicehash made NH2 much more simple then previous version. Simplicity of usage is important anyway. Also there are different requests from small motherhouse miners and owners of dozens/hundreds of rigs.

You'd better look at your competitors. Many of them give the ability to mine directly. For example HashAuger is much more user friendly. Also can mine custom coins and include them in profit switching algo. MinerControl also can do the same. AwsomeMiner - the same and also has some kind of "server" part. HiveOS has great userfriendly and stylish server part - but it's linux and has it's drawbacks for ordinary miner. Especially in profitswitching terms - not "out of the box".
For the moment - you definetly need at least a UI designer - yours is not good at all. Even pdf has colors that tear out my eyes.
Miners also are obsolete in your soft. Latest versions gave nice improvements. The idea to download all of them in a zip (nicehash way) is not good at all. Redownload each time whole zip, when 1 or 2 were changed?

I mean that anyone can also use faster miners with nicehash and get better results also. But the point is that comparing hashrate of algoswitching soft is ridiculous. Miners are compared by hashrate. But you present it as if your soft was a miner.

What comparison? Different miners? Everyone can use better miners than nicehash.
What I see is rather bad soft. It downloaded 1Gb+ of miners. On nvidia only rig it downloaded a bunch of useless sgminer and other amd-only miners. For what reason? Than it just hang because of hang hardware monitoring driver and didn't even gave no option not to use it.