@Jaromil - I think there was a misunderstanding. Sirius has taken me off bitcoin.org because I am not considered a core developer. I think there are simply so many things happening now and since our projects are more long term, it is easy for people not to see the extent at which I am involved. I will send him a message and clear it up.

no worries

"I wanna be a bitcoin billionaire sooo freaking bad" < haha, hilarious

Kak dela?

Not giving an exact figure here but the amount of funds on Britcoin are usually 100x the volume of the market.

But it varies: there was a point where we were getting 3k volume per day and had 10k GBP, 10k BTC.

Usual MtGox volume is 20k, so I'd say they likely have ~200k online.

Not sure if you know: https://britcoin.co.uk/ 

I've been inundated with impatient people while I was upgrading the site. Sorry payments took a bit longer than usual - if you check our site we say 3-5 working days and this time it took 3 days rather than 1.

You sound like you're 14

PM'ed you.

If you are a US company, operating a US exchange then there is an incredible amount of laws that you must abide by that makes it near impossible due to the huge initial expense.

HAHAHA so true.

Yeah, perhaps I did get a little bit excited.

It won't scale currently,
http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=7450.0

Do:

use intersango;
delete from baskets;
INSERT INTO baskets (code, fullname, sibl) VALUES ('NC', 'Namecoin', 'N');
INSERT INTO baskets (code, fullname, sibl) VALUES ('N', 'Magical N, 'NC');

Put the required images under  www/images/flags  (N_flag.png NC_flag.png)

You people forget that the public key is visible. Therefore you cannot invalidate the card because you can look up the bitcoin address on blockexplorer.com to see if it has the funds in that the card claims.

Once someone decides to crack open the card, they'll be the first to spend them.

BitBills should include some kind of serial code / id number which can be used to verify it on their website. That way you can verify that the card actually came from them. Maybe they could sell POS scanners that verify the tokens when swiped.

Instead of having the reward half every 210k blocks,

I wouldn't have it drop by 1/4 every 105k blocks.
Nor would I have it drop by 1/8 every 52k blocks.
Nor drop by 1/16 every 26k blocks.
But drop by 1/32 every 13k blocks.

Seems much easier/closer to the current scheme than an approximated exponential.

Yep you have to add the currencies you want as I mentioned above to the table 'baskets'.

Yep. It's written specifically for linux

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Friend of mine. I logged onto his PC without telling him because my internet was acting up.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNx0QcAAoJEH8nvZxjT+xntDUIAJCDWzrK8zVf0D9jhTp4T55y
+5IMN4O6tPyJt6DUoKbCGmacRzINservU9HckaN29N2/Dtqw+P5nJIdHWR9so7Rj
b0DAMu/gFdkHdbeIbKL1oFHz6OE9Pql7tNjN+jhvAvT8sdywwDFm32360TluXXdj
twSO1vKUQVMsLpghsUntnB6Xc1rY5+O3Kb+1TmouvvwfLvhOZQ0F+J1wVadCOOqV
Ee/SphySrtDi0zHoYgUo/xYQ13HwWhhb7RCIMU9k6kNoL0pSISnmBGGZvf256E8+
rBiQ4N6BhBTa46MvvWlzekE64scpGgsyIRCpffX3kHskQWGAZWAurI8I2R4p+hA=
=uttF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

http://www.bitcoin.org/genjix.gpg

BTW, this is not genjix (I didn't realize I was signed into his account)

Observing now the hashrate distribution and knowing someone who sold their BTC because of the current distribution... it would seem in the best interests financially of both Deepbit miners and the Bitcoin economy as a whole if Deepbit were to branch out and 'de-monopolize'. I'm not sure exactly how these mining pools work. If Deepbit is using closed software which gives them an edge, I hope that their members have access to the code of that software... otherwise it is very damaging the the confidence of the entire BTC world and this will no doubt negatively effect the bottom line of the Deepbit miners.

Perhaps I'm a non-technical noob, but please let me know why this disparity exists.

Hey,

I missed your post, but if you scroll down to process() you'll see I lock the database first.