This is why it is important to: - increase TEK recognition - new marketplace ( https://www.allcoin.com/vote/#TEK others?), new announcements, twitter and facebook presence - have a trading plan favouring regular small sales (25% of stake every month) 25% only if you dont insta dump them. Right, this is the part I don't know how to handle still. What is a reasonable price to place sell order at? Just below lower sell, other? How many sell orders, one big one, several small ones, etc... |
|
|
|
That's why we should consider monero type of currency the bitcoin complement and not it's competitor, If and when they could become somehow conjugated.. Exactly. That's why it will succeed; because it doesn't compete, it complements. XMR's competition is 1) other Cryptonote coins 2) bitcoin-based mixers (including bitcoin-based anon coins like DRK) Notice I did not say "threat"; I just said competition. Being the competition doesn't prevent you from leaving it in the dust  Bitcoin as bank transfer alternative, Monero as cash alternative ?  Very nice analogy! Cash does have serial numbers, don't forget. Let's say it is a nice catchphrase, even though like most catchphrase, it has limitation. So yes, monero is the cash of cryptocurrency - the coins, not the serial-numbers-encumbered-notes. |
|
|
|
See above Thanks. Also, I wrote a "oneliner" for downloading and compiling CAP wallet and create a shortcut on your desktop, on Linux (tested with Manjaro) mkdir ~/cryptos ; cd ~/cryptos && rm -rf bottlecaps && git clone https://github.com/bottlecaps-foundation/bottlecaps && cd bottlecaps && qmake-qt4 bottlecaps-qt.pro && make && ln -s ~/cryptos/bottlecaps/BottleCaps-qt ~/Desktop/CAP Notes: - The mkdir ~/cryptos ; cd ~/cryptos && rm -rf bottlecaps is not necessary - I just prefer things tidy
- ln -s ~/cryptos/bottlecaps/BottleCaps-qt ~/Desktop/CAP takes care of the shortcut; if you are not using an English Linux, change Desktop to how the desktop is names in your language.
|
|
|
|
1. we need an exchange. my coins are sitting in cryptsy languishing...
https://www.allcoin.com/vote/#CAPBottlecaps is #6, keep voting! Once CAP will be adopted, let's all vote for HBN. 2. I was running 2.0 ntil today (did not notice the update). I am presently syncing 2.1 from start (deleted the blockchain). Before that, I had my wallet open mostly 24/7. I never receive any single stack. => is the fact that I was on 2.0 (not 2.1) AFTER July 4th detrimental? => is it normal that I did not mint a single CAP ever (I have several thousand CAP)? => did is lose stacking time? Did I left my wallet open 24/7 for nothing? => when can I expect next staking? 10 days from now or earlier? Thank you. 3. Also, what is the maximum amount of coin I should have per address to maximise reward? On NOBL, it will be 100k, how many is it on CAP? |
|
|
|
This seems it could end up much more profitable than monero  I have XMR and NOBL I saw live what the said great PoS dev can do to a coin and I was truly impressed (I'm not talking about promises - I am talking about what actually happened) Among other news, I erected a buy wall - it seems to work, minutes after I erected it, buy orders started to appear Do we know the final fork parameters?
pos rate, max coins etc..? Nothing definitive, but you can check Noble stake, a informational and collaborative document. |
|
|
|
This is why it is important to: - increase TEK recognition - new marketplace ( https://www.allcoin.com/vote/#TEK others?), new announcements, twitter and facebook presence - have a trading plan favouring regular small sales (25% of stake every month) |
|
|
|
Side note...why the ticker change ? Regardless if it was officially changed, let's stick to MRO with eachother. ISO 4217. See Monero Missives. link for Top 100 Richest Addresses ? Impossible by design |
|
|
|
Can we stop doing EC2 math with the wrong numbers? Only the uninitiated are paying full price for EC2 instances.
You are correct however that it is not the most profitable on EC2 and it hasn't been since the price fell below about 0.006 - unless of course your name starts with a C and you have a killer nVidia GPU miner. Plus, c3.8xlarge Amazon EC2 is not the profitable one. A lower one is better. With c3.8xlarge, you spend money for unneeded RAM and such. Plus, there are cheaper cloud services than EC2 - I used at least two cheaper ones. |
|
|
|
Alternatively you can wait for NEM's official launch -- you'll be able to claim your NEM via your BTT account then. I prefer this, yes. I just want to be sure my BTT account is properly registered. But if you don't want the token and want to receive NEM on the official launch, you should not request NEMstake token. If you are not comfortable with Nxt asset exchange, you should not request NEMstake tokens. |
|
|
|
Thanks. I note this: But if you don't want the token and want to receive NEM on the official launch, you should not request NEMstake token. If you are not comfortable with Nxt asset exchange, you should not request NEMstake tokens. I want NEM, not NEMstake token. I am an investor, not a trader. And I am not comfortable with NEMstake either. So I assume I should just wait for the release, right? |
|
|
|
|
How do I claim my NEM stake?
|
|
|
|
|
How do I claim my NEM stake?
|
|
|
|
Selling 3230 Tek for 2BTC. Pm me. A bit less than 61,920 satoshi per TEK. Too expensive for me. 1.65 BTC. Looking to get rid of it all or either keep it and buy more. I usually buy at 45k top. I'll consider your offer though. We will continue via PM. I'll need an escrow, though. Who is willing to? (1% fees). |
|
|
|
Selling 3230 Tek for 2BTC. Pm me. A bit less than 61,920 satoshi per TEK. Too expensive for me. Whatever you bought, wasn't mine xD That was some days ago, during the dump. |
|
|
|
Ive got 1070 tek sell up, feel free to buy that xD I did I agree with biomech on the necessity to spend TEK from time to time. My trading plan is to stake enough to have 12 BTC a month. At this moment, I will sell every month 25% of my stake, ending with 3 BTC per month (StakeHunter pledge: sell 25% of your stacking every month). If after this moment, selling 25% of my stake doesn't translate into 3 BTC (because of a price drop), I don't know what I will do - probably stake more until it happens |
|
|
|
if I understand correctly, in this case we must not forget that the coins that we get as a reward, after a while, too, will receive the award, so in this case 175% per annum of 10,000 coins will not make 27,500 coins, but much more, about 55,000 coins Yes, this is called compounded interest. such a high stake will have the same effect as asics mining. especially if theyre mining now in anticipation. my advice is to do no more than 25%-50% max per year. remember that pos coins are also vulnerable to 51% attacks via staking. even if you set a requirement to split the total amount into multiple wallets. you will still effectively have one person controllling large majority of the stake which is same as largest hashpower mining. The problem with midrange-PoS (10-50) is that it doesn't protect agains pump and dumpin and panic sells. tokyoghetto: "Coin devs need to understand that 20% APR is not attractive for a long term investment, when MINT can lose/gain over 100% in one day." BTW, 400th page UPDATE: I moved the Noble stake document to commenting only, partly because it was a request, partly because I am not familiar with the newest Google Drive addition, the "suggest" feature, which could mitigate the reason for going comment-only. Commenting is done by selecting a text and pressing ctrl+alt+m. |
|
|
|
so whats better now HBN or CAP ?
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I think they compliment each other. They both have different strengths and weaknesses. But I am interested in other people's opinion as well.. One calculation I made is: CAP: 7500, 200% rate HBN: 15000 (well much less presently), 100% rate => twice the price, half the rate => four times less interesting. HBN should be at 3750 (and TEK at ~ 35000) with this calculation to be on par Now, my reasoning is certainly incomplete (user adoption, network solidity, naming, features, dev support... all that counts too) and maybe even flat-out wrong, but that's a start. |
|
|
|
Until and unless ZC can evolve so that it no longer requires a trusted mint, I do not think it can succeed. The overhanging risk of the mint defecting, and secretly issuing unlimited amounts of the currency, is just too great. This and obscuring the whole economy, which makes it impossible to notice something is going wrong until it is too late. This later threat is more difficult to explain and more dangerous. |
|
|
|
I finished the short FAQ. I am not particularly proud of it but here it is. Now I will consider the helpline idea. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
