Could you let me know what your max bet is?  |
|
|
|
|
Ah, so another case of social engineering.
|
|
|
|
A uniformly distributed random number is still a random number, Dabs. You're saying here that the results aren't random because they're random?  I'm challenged because I don't know how to explain it. I'm trying to say that while the pattern fits and looks random, it is predictably random. Please investigate this more and claim a few millions when you find a flaw in SHA256. |
|
|
|
Investors in this turd are like battered wives at this point. Just leave. Btcg had a run of great luck leading up to and shortly after the difficulty hike.
Labcoin lied about daily increases of hashing power just as they've lied about nearly everything else. Current market cap is STILL 17k BTC for a mining company with a hashrate of < 800Gh/s and soon to have zero liquidity. To say that it's still grotesquely overvalued is an understatement. R U N A W A Y
My own mining company(market cap 4344BTC) hashing at just north of 1Th/s on btcg currently has 19 blocks in shifts currently being paid.
I would of course point out that Labcoin will be bringing more hash rate online acquiring Avalons through the week, months and coming months. The team is also working on choosing an exchange for share transfer. |
|
|
|
satoshi lags... they have ludacris claims Our Dice site is under an 80GB/s heavy flood. That's quite interesting, because 80GB/s is 640 gbps and one of largest DDoS attack ever recorded on the internet was 300gbps. We're spending more than $20,000 a month on protected hosting, and even THAT provides insufficient at times. You believe they spend $20000 per month on fucking cloud protection? http://www.neobux.com/ spends less, with millions of hits per day. Now, I'm no web developer but, even I know that some of the claims from BetcoinTM are bullshit. I think that you have it a bit backwards friend. For someone who is spending $20,000 a month on cloud DDoS protection, it is interesting that their nameservers are the domain registrar's and that their IP is hosted on Amazon Web Services. Are you sure it is AWS? He told me it is the Computer Sciences Corporation in PM. Man this company is such a fraud... MX for betcoin.tm: 192.185.38.97 192.185.38.97 is a WebsiteWelcome / HostGator IP address. This IP also hosts 50 or so sites. Received: by gateway13.websitewelcome.com (Postfix, from userid 5007) id 7BF994AA8B2BF; Sun, 22 Sep 2013 06:28:24 -0500 (CDT) Received: from gator4061.hostgator.com ( gator4061.hostgator.com [192.185.4.72]) by gateway13.websitewelcome.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C80E4AA8B29B for < admin@glados.cc>; Sun, 22 Sep 2013 06:28:24 -0500 (CDT) A for betcoin.tm: 54.229.110.140 http://myip.ms/info/whois/54.229.110.140 belongs to Amazon Web Services (EC2). I was about to give them the benefit of doubt, maybe they're using EC2 to filter traffic.. but they have port 22 (SSH) open. |
|
|
|
satoshi lags... they have ludacris claims Our Dice site is under an 80GB/s heavy flood. That's quite interesting, because 80GB/s is 640 gbps and one of largest DDoS attack ever recorded on the internet was 300gbps. We're spending more than $20,000 a month on protected hosting, and even THAT provides insufficient at times. You believe they spend $20000 per month on fucking cloud protection? http://www.neobux.com/ spends less, with millions of hits per day. Now, I'm no web developer but, even I know that some of the claims from BetcoinTM are bullshit. I think that you have it a bit backwards friend. For someone who is spending $20,000 a month on cloud DDoS protection, it is interesting that their nameservers are trademarkarea (their domain registrar) and that their IP is hosted on Amazon Web Services. |
|
|
|
btct关闭影响到dms，会影响到coinlender吗？
CL是獨立網站由TF營運而TF支付利息的主要來源是投資跟借錢出去。以TF的投資經驗BTCT關門對TF或CL影響不大 TF有大量投资在ASICMINER，现在股价跌了那么多，他的损失应该很惨重。他有足够的币还给coinlenders的存款人吗？这个时候coinlenders发生挤兑怎么办？ 使用谷歌翻译的道歉， 我们持有不少的ASICMINER股份，并遭受损失，然而，是不是我们拥有的唯一资产。我们仍然是积极的，如果它进入一个城县，我们有更多的负债比我们的账面价值的，我们就会让大家知道，而不是试图去恢复正。 投资是没有风险的，它是关于对冲风险。 |
|
|
|
|
So far I'm up 211 BTC. Fun.
|
|
|
|
20:29:20 (153338) <percent> -976. OK I surrender. |
|
|
|
|
Shortly after updating my forum signature, Inputs.io was under a bigger DDoS attack. This attack was the scale that managed to take down our CloudFlare endpoint.
|
|
|
|
Who? Me? ROFL You think I'm shilling for them or something? Hey I'm glad someone does blockchain tracing and figures this stuff out but I could care less. Plenty of other interesting bitcoin stuff then to worry about some gambling site. Most of them I'm sure are a scam anyways. The whole "provably fair" only proves % going in and out it doesn't mean their own plants aren't the only ones winning. The more wealth/fiat they are willing to sink into btc the better for my holdings.
I'm not referring to you and I haven't assumed you're a shill. I'm making a general statement about if one site uses scripts to artificially inflate their betting volume, they should own up to it. |
|
|
|
Why? Wasn't bitcoin created to not be controlled by some central decision maker as to who should use it? Pay the fee get your trans mined. Not to mention the only reason this is pissing people of is because another private biz ie blockchain.info posts the transaction wall as their own sort of marketing don't they? The miners are about to be so screwed with overpaying for asics maybe they'll raise trans fees and problem solved.
Sure, own up to the fact that 95% of your "bitcoins won" and "recent bets" and "big wins" are from your own. |
|
|
|
I think that's a different discussion if you are talking about blockchain spam. Wasn't some other dice gambling accused of spamming the blockchain before? Or is one company ok to spam blockchain but not another. Who's supposed to decide? That's an issue of miner fees and has nothing to do with unethical marketing.
There's a difference between users spamming the blocchain and the house spamming the blockchain themselves. |
|
|
|
2013-09-25 07:38:38 (153338) ACTION (withdraw, "*.*.*.*") success: 255.99990000 to 17ziML8b3hZEKpYeJu3UeSx8TTBDKTDHoU txid 77df6a3b86765386793b0033e56fc29f5a1cae37b2ee7c001ffaa0cf99b144bb I wouldn't post a customer's IP. |
|
|
|
Not exactly. It just meant that the supporters of the candidate I supported, and I, spent most of our time posting and discussing the election here, trying to drum up support, while Elizabeth pretty much spent all her time posting there, where people are actually able to vote for her. We spent time on people who couldn't vote, while she spent time only on people who can. It's simple as that.
As well as sending unsolicited PMs. |
|
|
|
I am curious on the public's opinions of where to invest my funds. I will make the decision myself but would not mind to get input from others. Should I stick with bitcoin or should I explore the alt world? Seems that the alts may have more potential for growth %, but I have seen some outlandish projections for bitcoin future price as well. Thank you all in advance.
Invest in Bitcoin and put it in CoinLenders.com |
|
|
|
I had totally forgotten about that giveaway post. I was perplexed as to why I had gotten this random payment, but I wasn't complaining.
Thanks for your generosity, CrazyRabbi!
You are very welcome ^_^ Thank you for the positive feedback PS: I like to share. It's the CrazyRabbi SUPA way XD FTFY |
|
|
|
So after placing 15,000 bets you are surprised that you lost a handful in a row. Weren't you claiming just yesterday that you figured out some pattern to make infinite money off PD?
Maybe bet high instead of low |
|
|
|
Are you telling me they actually make money off defaulting users at the cost of investors? They do charge the fee even if borrowers default but that's hardly noteworthy. |
|
|
|
Please increase your max bet |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
