Yes, I'm sure it acted as a reinforcement.

Investors always look for signs of strength or weakness on the market. A fall from 20 thousand to 6 thousand was a sign of weakness and we fell even lower to 3000.

A rebound back to 6000 was the first sign of strength followed by 10 thousand and then 14. Each of these made more investors join the rally.

Private keys should be even more secure. More like your password than your card details.

Knowing your card number a thief can make a transaction but this transaction will be small because most people have limits on their cards and would require a pin code for a larger transaction.

Knowing your private key they can drain your wallet to 0 without any pins or numbers.

Storing in the cloud is stupid.  

Altcoin campaigns are more common and allow for easy access. Most bounties for new campaigns don't have any trust requirements or anything like that.

You can be a forum spammer with basic vocabulary and still manage to earn a few coins. That's why people join them because to get a spot in a bitcoin campaign you usually need more effort. Then they get scammed or get less money than they were expecting and complain about it.

It's not ups and downs, it's the choices you make.

Any control over the free market from a third party is unacceptable.

If they have to lock coins to stop people from dumping it it means the coin has no value and the one you see is fake.

When you see a coin team do this you know you've done a bounty for a shitcoin that will never be worth anything. Such actions will never make people hold the coin just postpone the inevitable dump.

Crypto is not there to remove fiat. It's to give people an alternative they never had.

Now you either use government money to trade or barter. There are no other currencies just one per country. It would have been fine if governments were not controling it, spying on you, deciding what you can and can't buy. Because of this we need some form of money that cannot be taken from us at the airport because the government decides that you can only take 10 thousand dollars with you in cash.

My opinion is everybody can say anthing they want but it doesn't mean they're right and it doesn't mean their remarks have value.

If someone said that Bitcoin is a scam currency the opinions should be backed by evidence. I dare anyone to prove that this is true. If you manage that I'm sure many people will be willing to pay you big money

This is thousands of Bitcoins. I'm not even going to start counting but it hurts to see it. Hope you put the money to a good use because you could have been a billionaire. You could own people like CZ, Ver, and all other rich Bitcoiners.

I came late to the party but I held to what I had and don't have any big regrets.

1 minute later


The survey is really long OP. You should think of making it less time consuming if you want more people to participate. Not many people will want to spend 15 min clicking through a series of very similar questions.

What's the point of asking if bitcoin transactions are cheaper than bank transactions, then again if bitcoin transactions are cheaper than card transactions, and then again if you can send coins cheaper to your friends with bitcoin than with your bank. If bank transfers aren't cheaper than bitcoin, which is true at this moment, sending money to friends and card payments will also be cheaper in the bank. This is all the same thing.

It's even worse than that. He stole it using his own account, mixed, sold and moved the money to his personal bank account.

Even if the company missed the theft or failed to find who was selling the cards they'd sooner or later notice that a low level employee had millions of dollars moved to his bank account. I'm sure there was another investigation started by the bank or the IRS but the police was notified much faster.  So stupid.

I also don't feel like there would be any reason for people to be mad about it.

The only downside is it would create more confusion on the market similar to what BCH managed to do when it was advertised as Bitcoin's successor and sold as Bitcoin on Roger Ver's website. I'm pretty sure some people would buy/hold these coins thinking they are getting the real thing.

Another smart idea.

Instead of buying BTC advise people to get more shitcoins forked from BTC like BCH. LTC isn't any better since even its founder sold and abondoned the project years ago.

If you have a choice to get more BTC or get more altcoins always choose BTC unless you have so much of it that you want to gamble with some alts.

I don't understand how the charts posted by OP might indicate a trend of going to 0 or in any way support the idea in the title of this thread.

Literal 0 is only possible if all exchanges disappear. Even if there's a single exchange somewhere in the land of the nerds where people collect various things, like Japan, the value will always be above 0.

I can see that transaction value is going down, but the total value of the asset is going up so it's normal. Long time ago you had to spend 100 BTC to buy a car but now just 1 is enough so it's understandable that transactions will become smaller but as long as there will be any the amount and $ value will be above 0.

I remember reading a thread about it some time ago but I haven't really paid much attention to how I write it. I often wrote it with capital letter as a proper name unless I forgot about it.

I often misspell things and don't use proper punctuation because I'm clumsy and easily distracted.


I like this definition. Some deseve to be written like this: bSV bLOCKCHAIN.

Dollar is not the only world reserve currency and not the only tradable pair with BTC.

Weak Dollar means stronger bitcoin but it's only one of the factors that influence the market.

I guess the Federal Reserve doesn't take donations

In theory it's possible to gamble with ponzi schemes. I've never done it but there are threads on this forum started by people who did.

I even saw posts where people said it's a good and easy way to earn money and that ponzis should be advertised because when you know it's a ponzi you cannot lose. You just deposit and withdraw fast with small profit and you know you're safe which is of course a lie.

Probably half of all ponzis on the market are total scams where only their shills and maybe a few first people are able to withdraw anything. The rest gets stuck there forever. You think you can enter and exit but your money is lost the moment you deposit. I don't recommend it it's not real gambling.

An electronic doglike creature will not do the same job as a waiter/waitress. What is this thread even about?

You can train a monkey to sell entry tickets at the zoo but will that monkey be a reliable worker? Will you be able to keep it working for 8 hours a day 7 days a week?

We need human interaction and robots are not developed enough to work without supervision and supervision is expensive.

What would you prefer to pay a waiter $10 per hour or employ a robot for free but pay the supervising technician $20 per hour and cover the cost of parts?

It will always have a collectible value so even a few years ago there was no chance of it going below $1.

By 0 many people don't mean a literal 0 but a very small value like $5 or so. At this point if Bitcoin were to lose more than 99% of its value it would be dead as any other tradable asset is.

Usually when altcoins lose this much they are delisted by exchanges and abandoned by traders so it wouldn't really matter if Bitcoin went to $0.1 or $5 the result would still be the same.

I wonder if this has something to do with Biden and the rumors that he's going to be bad news for the rich.

If this happens to be true many rich people will choose Bitcoin at least as a hedge investment or a safety fund. Nowadays keeping money in Bitcoin is better than keeping it on a Swiss account.

He's naming it wrong. It wasn't just a fee error but a human error.

You can do things like that in Bitcoin as well and there were instances where people set higher fees than the coins they were trying to send.

It's an expensive mistake and I agree that there should be a system preventing users from setting their fees too high.

Don't you know that saying that you are never rich enough. Would any of the popular billionaires turn down a chance to make another million?

He's rich, but you always have to take these tweets with a grain of salt. He'll say he thinks of buying 32 and really means another 32


IGood luck to you too. I also have some ETH, but I wouldn't buy just because CZ is tweeting about it. Rich people trying to pump on tweeter are pathetic.