I still do not see where I have said that the scam occurred on September 3rd.

Furthermore, h4ns did not state that you began scamming them starting from the date of September 3rd.

---

If we prepend your system of beliefs to all our statements, then we shall find the present ever-present thereof

With a rambunctious philosophy of living carpe diem even fishiness can be cast beyond the void. The date on the scam doesn't really matter, does it? This is some point that you really want to press, but we should totally toss it out the window.

You already agree that h4ns is owed 210€ regardless of how you like to twist linguistic semantics around.
Hence, clearly, you did not complete the case.
In this 'defamation campaign' h4ns accuses you of not returning the 210€. This is true, given that you have not done so.
Defamation by definition requires an untrue statement.

Retroactively incurring financial burden upon a client preliminary to the absence of substantial financial fulfillment to mitigate costs over a prearranged agreement is absolutely iniquitous.

I know of no one who was banned for the trite offense of bumping more than once per 24 hours (when it's not in an egregious fashion involving multiple accounts and co-conspirators) nor do I know of any individual who has been banned for multi-posting.

Most bans are from plagiarism or from spamming. The latter is not enforced that much, either. I've reported some users over 300 times (which subsequently involved a post deletion/alteration) and they're still around.

A few bans here and there will be for malicious or illicit files... but most of the rules are enforced via post/thread alterations, not account changes.

Suppose you have an individual who has been known to spam.

Their posts are worthless and for the past couple hundred posts, someone has been reporting literally all of them.
These posts are removed. The user continues to post. The posts are continually reported.

Such is the case when it comes to the top users of my farm suppression list.

How many of them do you think improved their quality?
How many of them do you think simply stopped posting?

I'm not going to tell you the answer to the first... but just know that from what I've seen so far, it's a single-digit number.

2 @ 0.02

I already report a huge number of posts that come from Altcoin Discussion. I have probably only scratched 2% of the spam there, though.

---

Why not move to Serious discussion, where it's much higher quality than Altcoin Discussion but flexible enough to open for the topic?

You'll need to put the [img] tags around the image itself, not the gallery link: https://i.imgur.com/jpGdESU.jpg

e.g.

I don't remember when I said I was investigating a scam which happened on September 3rd.

I also don't remember the relevance of my investigation in relation to all other members. I do not speak for all other users on the forum and neither do you.

You need to be Jr. Member or above.

Do you know what part I am not able to understand?

The part where you respond to a question with something completely irrelevant. Have you started any legal work on this 20 000€ case?

Most of the time these are people who have not and never are going to genuinely care about Bitcoin. The other case is that they are bought&sold accounts, so you have a knowledge disparity and the account owners don't know enough to comment deeply on anything bitcoin-related.

I call these borderline cases. They are on the edge of being spam but have commented just enough to sneak by. It's like when people are asking empty questions that they don't truly care about.

Example: topic="How to start trading?";reply="Well OP it would be great to have some more details on your trading like how much capital you want and what market you are going to enter, can you answer this?";postNumber=56

Partially... but he doesn't accept them: they are automatically registered via YoBit's website, which is why you'll see such crappy posts.

If YoBit cared. They launched the campaign several ties w/o a manager and only brought yahoo on board after the campaign started.

Post removed when original creator edits their post to contain images.

7 @ 0.007
2 @ 0.009
3, 6 @ 0.006
5, 8, 9 @ 0.005
K @ 0.009

(edit was made as 6 needed additional amount for qualifying bid)

$ grep 2double0 reports | wc -l
0
$ wc reports
  38068  564545 3375940 reports

There are literally hundreds of spammers worse than you... and I did a quick look through the search history, nothing near the border of egregiousness.

Have you started any legal work on this 20 000€ case? Surely, if it's that much money to you, it must be worth pursuing.

Maybe I want to join this case! Perhaps h4ns has defamed me as well... what are the details of this case?

You shouldn't be refunding the 210€ to yourself before a decision has been made, after all... so what's the court date?

This is untrue unless you are sharing your own experience. The residency of one in a psychiatric clinic does not have a causative effect on their moral integrity: it is usually the other way around, in which a mental condition affects one's morals, such as a case in which one decides to steal money from another and refuses to return the aforementioned funds.

If your definition of "winning" is a one day of 2-digit gains, then I suppose thousands of shitcoins also 'has win in this discussion' [sic].

Let's not forget that the market cap of BTC is much, much higher and you still have US$4.1739B of a difference in the gains made today.

A 10% movement in the DJA is much more significant than a 1000% movement in a crappy penny stock.

You're right... asking for 10€ isn't a scam, if you're going to return the money. Refusing to pay back 210€ after the date you were supposed to is a scam.

A scam does not occur at the same time that someone realizes it is a scam. It was a scam from the moment the scammer intended to scam.

---

So what are you trying to derive from this? "I didn't scam him on July, I scammed him on September"?

Basically, instead of asking questions, you redirect the question to the other party.

Hence:

You oppose this scam accusation, so you need to know what the deal was. right?

Or are you just a scammer?

That would be a crimninal [sic] offense in many jurisdictions!