Bitcoin Forum
May 27, 2024, 06:42:25 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 [77] 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 »
1521  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: BBQCoin, the coin you want to eat. on: February 23, 2013, 01:26:29 PM
Okay, I managed to push it to https://github.com/knotwork/bbqcoin

-MarkM-

its STILL wrong! seriously, how hard is it to use the hashes of the actual chain? i did it for u!
Code:
k1773r@AltcoinVM:~$ bbqcoind getblockhash 86425
5bb676c3ea2d9cdc2589e7fa53874c425317aa9dadf0ae503fb7cf804cab9762
k1773r@AltcoinVM:~$ bbqcoind getblock 5bb676c3ea2d9cdc2589e7fa53874c425317aa9dadf0ae503fb7cf804cab9762
{
    "hash" : "5bb676c3ea2d9cdc2589e7fa53874c425317aa9dadf0ae503fb7cf804cab9762",
    "confirmations" : 217002,
    "size" : 190,
    "height" : 86425,
    "version" : 1,
    "merkleroot" : "a0df5ebb02972257912d5528777df379ca052110f8c078ad5ad176cdef7e3dea",
    "time" : 1347952774,
    "nonce" : 3554,
    "bits" : "1e3d14e2",
    "difficulty" : 0.00006395,
    "tx" : [
        "a0df5ebb02972257912d5528777df379ca052110f8c078ad5ad176cdef7e3dea"
    ],
    "previousblockhash" : "48aa019d01345dc5e8e6c188d419497de6a1b53df1ac9fe84cfedfc98d77b5a1",
    "nextblockhash" : "5c5db91066822f2c20682320c19cbbac74e37f38a0d40a01cc6a20f99d736807"
}
the newer checkpoint u set is again wrong (there is no such block in our actual chain, same as the one before u made)
Code:
k1773r@AltcoinVM:~$ bbqcoind getblockhash 303403
6d7493ffc82a9553cf20ffca41ace762c3e4e7db4fe6f820675cdf387116342f
k1773r@AltcoinVM:~$ bbqcoind getblock 6d7493ffc82a9553cf20ffca41ace762c3e4e7db4fe6f820675cdf387116342f
{
    "hash" : "6d7493ffc82a9553cf20ffca41ace762c3e4e7db4fe6f820675cdf387116342f",
    "confirmations" : 25,
    "size" : 190,
    "height" : 303403,
    "version" : 1,
    "merkleroot" : "9fbb3e71cf0666bbd06cb84640afa0ef49ee072dda8d4c41106d52b50e27e150",
    "time" : 1361624074,
    "nonce" : 2147484914,
    "bits" : "1d5441cf",
    "difficulty" : 0.01186826,
    "tx" : [
        "9fbb3e71cf0666bbd06cb84640afa0ef49ee072dda8d4c41106d52b50e27e150"
    ],
    "previousblockhash" : "09846e10a0b699bc95ea14730f56ded61f4f13602d357b9f3ec35920e79a24c5",
    "nextblockhash" : "71bb287ea8dd40d5537dd422fc97899ad3711ab0f3434c41e9de81438cfc8648"
}
1522  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Begging for XRP on: February 22, 2013, 03:52:56 AM
Hey Just sent you guys some XRP!!!

Cheers!


ty
1523  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Begging for XRP on: February 22, 2013, 03:20:39 AM
so i guess the 300 ripples are from you, ty Smiley
1524  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Begging for XRP on: February 21, 2013, 10:24:07 PM
id'like some too Smiley
rLNhscFSgMdSBFEjquDyvRZX5juc6F7zyE
1525  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: BBQCoin, the coin you want to eat. on: February 21, 2013, 10:21:12 PM
If when one fires up the daemon, even with -rescan flag, it does not check checkpoints in its existing already on disk blockchain, then I suppose it is possible that my node simply has not actually checked its blockchain against that new checkpoint.

I cannot remember now exactly what I did that finally got me a second node up and running, maybe I simply copied over my ~/.bbqcoin directory as ~/.bbq-privnet so maybe my second node that I fired up to check I could connect okay also ended up not actually checking that checkpoint.

I wonder how I managed to copy the hash wrong though in the first place. It was a copy/paste operation and umber of bytes so presumably it must be the wrong block's hash. I have made checkpoints a lot of times, I thought I had it down that he height shown in the debug.log a few lines adter the hash of the block is the height pertaining to that hash.

I guess I'll have to try again, see if I can do it right this time.

Do any of the allchains-explorer type sites feature a BBQcoin-explorer?

-MarkM-

the older versions do only scan for missing tx's, not revalidate the blockchain.
i have to upgrade my block explorer to support scrypt based chains, afterwards i add LTC/BQC to it too
1526  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: BBQCoin, the coin you want to eat. on: February 21, 2013, 04:51:39 PM
EDIT: if ur compiling it, be sure to remove the latest checkpoint. #86425

I don't think that is actually necessary, really?

What does your block 86425 look like and what is its hash? Is it actually different?

I think there is something other than those checkpoints that is causing connects to be dropped and so on.

I had a hard time just getting a second instance on my same machine to connect to my first instance. But finally after changing the order in which I started them up I got them to connect.

If you recall we did compare what block we were on etc, plus also I have recieved coins osmeone (maybe even it was you?) sent so it did seem we are both on the same chain, which should not even be possible if your block #86425 differs from mine.

-MarkM-

all nodes in the network had a different block #86425 than the one in the checkpoints.cpp
as soon i was at this block, all cons got droped and new connections couldnt be established.

EDIT: maybe the release on SF containts a wrong checkpoint hash?
1527  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Ripple Giveaway! on: February 21, 2013, 12:54:41 PM
rLNhscFSgMdSBFEjquDyvRZX5juc6F7zyE
1528  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: BBQCoin, the coin you want to eat. on: February 21, 2013, 12:47:16 PM
use the default ports
Code:
rpcport=19322
port=19323
afterwards just wait and u get connected to my public node.

EDIT: if ur compiling it, be sure to remove the latest checkpoint. #86425
1529  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Devcoin on: February 21, 2013, 12:18:48 PM
Quote
probably if you double-spend them
Yes, i agree that could be the solution by now for the 35M when i would be the sender. But how do you wanna prevent that all transactions worldwide become greater than the 21M Block limit? Means when i send 11M DVC then i have to hope that noone else sends 11M DVC in the same block?

We need to go over the user-interface again, making sure it rejects any attempt by the user to send more than max number (currently probably 21M) coins at a time.

It might even turn out that it is the GUI that is allowing it not the deamon, as I know nithing about wxwidgets nor QT widgets and input/output forms/templates and so on thus I'd think myself far more likely to have missed a spot in the GUI code than in the daemon. But maybe not, maybe both don't check user inputs against the max and reject ones that are too large.

-MarkM-
well, this is only a hotfix, the bugfix would be to lift the 21M coinlimit.
atleast u can delete the TX so u get ur coins back Smiley
1530  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Bitcoin client upload saturating my DSL connection. (No bandwidth throttling ?) on: February 18, 2013, 02:46:59 PM
In linux you can use a tool called "trickle" to limit your bandwidth like this:

Code:
trickle -u50 bitcoind

That will limit its upload to 50kb/s

So useful even now, half year later, I dug this from google. Thanks!

Is there anything equivalent to trickle for cpu usage?
cpulimit Wink
1531  Economy / Services / Re: Facebook verification on: February 17, 2013, 11:27:10 PM
well crapbook has 1 good thing: use it as tard filter Tongue
1532  Economy / Services / Re: Facebook verification on: February 17, 2013, 04:31:56 PM
Believe me, you aren't missing anything.  Just a website that tries to capitalize on everything you upload or post on their site.  I deleted my profile years ago and wouldn't touch them with a ten-foot pole.
you know its not deleted, just not visible?
1533  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [400GH/s] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool on: February 16, 2013, 03:21:16 PM
yes, we definately need fallback nodes. so in case 1 bitcoind goes down, p2pool goes to the next, same if its lagging.
could you do this forrestv?

My post has nothing to do with the actual p2pool software (that forrestv develops).  I'm talking about the p2pool.info website that monitors the blockchain looking for blocks found by the p2pool software. 

Currently, it doesn't have fallback support.  While it is theoretically possible to add it, I'd rather just find a bitcoin instance to talk to that is in theory available 24/7 (baring unplanned downtime) vs something that comes and goes regularly.  If I can't find a 24/7 bitcoin to talk to, I'll suck it up and either keep running my own out of my house, or I'll do the work to point p2pool.info at blockchain.info.
yea, saw that later too, sry!
1534  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Armory - Discussion Thread on: February 15, 2013, 06:59:06 PM
seems like apache crashed, since its a CONRST
1535  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [400GH/s] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool on: February 15, 2013, 06:56:58 PM
I am expecting to get out of the bitcoin mining business sooner that later.  At the same time, I am still a fan of p2pool and would be happy to continue to maintain p2pool.info long after I am no longer personally mining.  However, as I shut down my home mining operation and all the servers running in my house that support that operation, I'd like to remove the dependency p2pool.info has on server(s) running inside my house, and I'm hoping someone in the p2pool community can help.

What p2pool.info needs is access to a bitcoind server's RPC interface.  For security reasons, ideally this would be a bitcoind instance that had an empty wallet that had never been used.

These are the RPCs that p2pool.info uses:

* getblockcount
* getdifficulty
* getblockhash
* getblock
* getrawtransaction

As for bitcoin version, it needs to be at least 0.7 as some of the RPCs above were new in 0.7.  If it happens to be running a version of 0.8 or the GIT tree with the new optimized storage structure, it needs to be running with the txindex=1 configuration setting because p2pool.info needs to be able to look at all generation transactions for all blocks.

I'm hoping that someone here is already running bitcoind in a datacenter somewhere and would be willing to let p2pool.info's web server connect to it to watch for p2pool blocks.  If you have a bitcoind server whose RPC interface is accessible over the internet and that you'd be willing to give me access to, please let me know.
would it have fallbacks?  my bitcoind is on most of the time, but not always..
yes, we definately need fallback nodes. so in case 1 bitcoind goes down, p2pool goes to the next, same if its lagging.
could you do this forrestv?
1536  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Vanitygen: Vanity bitcoin address generator/miner [v0.22] on: February 15, 2013, 08:37:23 AM
It seems simple but I just get a code 4 error when trying to add the private key, am I missing something? I updated to the newest client and tried several addresses.


Code:
importprivkey 5JR1q13wc8JxPxaggs7zm292LVYb2L2FzUYvCLsrq4fFLsP44wW

Error adding key to wallet (code -4)


did you unlock it? btw, really bad idea posting the privkey!

Unlock it? I don't see any references to anything like that.. That's just some random private key.
Code:
$ bitcoind help walletpassphrase
walletpassphrase <passphrase> <timeout>
Stores the wallet decryption key in memory for <timeout> seconds.
afterwards u should be able to import it
1537  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Vanitygen: Vanity bitcoin address generator/miner [v0.22] on: February 14, 2013, 02:57:03 PM
It seems simple but I just get a code 4 error when trying to add the private key, am I missing something? I updated to the newest client and tried several addresses.


Code:
importprivkey 5JR1q13wc8JxPxaggs7zm292LVYb2L2FzUYvCLsrq4fFLsP44wW

Error adding key to wallet (code -4)


did you unlock it? btw, really bad idea posting the privkey!
1538  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: NovaCoin - Balthazar's PPC scrypt fork on: February 13, 2013, 09:19:14 AM
Been solo mining for a few hours now.  All my found blocks are being rejected.  Used -E 1 fro cgminer but still no joy. Any ideas?

post screen or log , maybe diff<target

only "BLOCK!! on pool 0 " are real finds


From what little I understand that you said. I am still confused.



Uploaded with ImageShack.us
winblows ppl dont get the difference between scrypt and sha256d lol
1539  Bitcoin / Hardware wallets / Re: [ANN] Trezor: Bitcoin hardware wallet on: February 13, 2013, 08:01:52 AM
Price should be around € 100, but it still depends on many factors, what I read on a blog.

Ouch, that seems a little expensive. I mean, can't you buy old smartphones with that amount? Or perhaps second-hand netbooks that you could format and turn into an offline wallet.
if you ask these questions then you didnt understand this project very well.
1540  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: MineDown - A Linux GUI front-end Watchdog for cgminer with SMS alert..... on: February 12, 2013, 02:54:03 PM
watching Smiley
Pages: « 1 ... 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 [77] 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!