Hi all, does anyone mining QRK and why? I think that QRK is absolutely unprofitable now. I respect that currency, it's the first currency with good profit but that was before 3-6 month. Amount of block was 2048 to 256, now is only 1 QRK per block. Look here https://www2.coinmine.pl/qrk/index.php?page=statistics&action=poolRank User Name KH/s QRK/Day BTC/Day 1 anonymous 129,213 342.921 0.0230 129 KH/s for 0.0230 BTC ? with that speed can earn much more if mining other new quark based coins. As I said, I respect that currency and even my avatar is QRK logo but QRK is NOT profitable. thats 129'213 kHs not 129.213 kHs. some stupid european thing... it surely is a botnet owner. lets not forget the yield on a GPU can be around 2.2 M# so that's about 56 high Quality cards. not unreasonable. or maybe 70 or 80 lower types. nope, with 56 high quality cards, even ltc is a lot more profitable, let alone middlecoin/similiar. |
|
|
|
Hi all, does anyone mining QRK and why? I think that QRK is absolutely unprofitable now. I respect that currency, it's the first currency with good profit but that was before 3-6 month. Amount of block was 2048 to 256, now is only 1 QRK per block. Look here https://www2.coinmine.pl/qrk/index.php?page=statistics&action=poolRank User Name KH/s QRK/Day BTC/Day 1 anonymous 129,213 342.921 0.0230 129 KH/s for 0.0230 BTC ? with that speed can earn much more if mining other new quark based coins. As I said, I respect that currency and even my avatar is QRK logo but QRK is NOT profitable. thats 129'213 kHs not 129.213 kHs. some stupid european thing... it surely is a botnet owner. |
|
|
|
Yea..unfortunately dev. hasn't shown up so that is the cause of price dwindling...If someone with good tech skills can help dev. or possibly take over until he is back that'd be great.
the problem is you need permissions for his github repos and currently only he has. otherwise id be happy to help out. |
|
|
|
getting weird messages trying to sync
it loads, then says 1 block left, then jumps to 2194 and just sits there.
I have updated to the latest qt. The issue non sync has been present for a while.
had it too, seems every new block you accept is automatically checkpointed, which makes the whole point of a blockchain/checkpoint useless... because of that, its impossible to switch to the longest chain if its once forked (as it is now) after deleting the chain it worked again. |
|
|
|
Can someone please tell me what the hell GLARIC is?  The coin of glari (AKA Icoin) |
|
|
|
He must be mining it all himself then lol then coming back once hes rich in coins...
Seems he updated the OP. @Icoin: why a crappy file hoster? use git pls so we can send pull reqs. |
|
|
|
so someone with an asic can come and mine a million of these a day? Isn't sha256d merged mining in a new coin a bad idea now?
it has no merged mining But its planned? Wait until diff is high enough to switch? like i know, he didnt say anything. he just linked to some crappy file hoster and thats it |
|
|
|
Hello there,
Quark has been added on our website www.coins2themoon.com
You can exchange QRK/DOGE
 Happy Tradings  If you want some Volume, you need BTC/QUARK I for one, would never touch Doge just because of the scummy-ness. Currently it just ensures you get more with fees (which is your opinion to do so) and pushes Doge even more. |
|
|
|
so someone with an asic can come and mine a million of these a day? Isn't sha256d merged mining in a new coin a bad idea now?
it has no merged mining |
|
|
|
is there still only the proprietary miner?
I am using minerd on Linux. (I think that is the name, that is the program I run.) You can use the wallet but don't think that is really practical, neither is profitable. The new wallet will supposedly have an ability to support the network with a 20% CPU button (or the like). IAS no, im talking about the GPU miner |
|
|
|
|
anyone got a refund in BTC?
|
|
|
|
|
still go the two codes, anybody interested?
|
|
|
|
It works. Getting 1.45MH/s with my 7970 I would call it a failure. I mean if you're not using Windows (with all those Microsoft and malware 'services', anti-virus scans and viruses running the background), that's hardly any advantage. And I think the CPU miner can be optimized more. Well, from a profit point of view, that is the first thing I thought - failure. But from an ASIC resistant (key word, resistant) point of view, that is interesting. If a top GPU gets 1.45Mh/s (@300 watts) and my AMD FX8350 gets 850Kh/s (w/extra air cooling @ 120 watts or so) that is interesting. But the CPU uses less than have the watts (barely) and costs half as much (app.) Wait, that actually seems in line, no? What "should" a card like that get, theoretically? Seems close to what it "should" get. My R9 290 gets 870kH/s on Scrypt coins. On second thought, not bad. If it was just profitable to mine QRK (that will come I hope.) IAS who said anything about using 300 watts per GPU? my 4 7970s normally pull about 1150 watts according to my Kill A Watt. It is only pulling 580 watts for 1.45 MH/s/GPU. And as for mining QRK, well, obviously. But there are other coins released based on the quark algo, you know. And their value is yet to be determined. I said 300 watts as my card is the R9 290, as I said later on. 1150 or 1200, not a big difference. Not sure of your point there? I'm more here to support Quark coin, not so much to make money. I do mine other coins for that, so it is good to know, perhaps a hedge. I really like the idea of a coin that is ASIC resistant, key word being "resistant". Still early in the experiment though. Well, you are at the support level for QRK. My point is that when considering profitability you must not assume that the GPU is using 300 watts. The GPU is using more like 112 watts and getting 1.45 MH/s, and you no longer need a box fan either. Temps are in the 50s. I hold 6 figures deep of QRK and plan on holding it. But it is not economical to mine it, for me at least. Thanks for clarifying things but I sort of had that idea. I notice my Video card (of course) changes A LOT regarding wattage with any change in settings. So, I'm using half of my CPU to "mine" Quark but really to just support the network. There is a deep feeling about the potential need of a coin with an algorithm such as Quarks. I like the idea of having a coin that anyone and EVERYONE can mine/support. is there still only the proprietary miner? |
|
|
|
|
no available peers, no specs. icoin what is it?
|
|
|
|
use latest git, it includes a dnsseed.
the last one I found is 0.6.3 if I'm not mistaken. But it is the one which writes me out of sync. If there's a newer version compiled for win platform, I would be very grateful to get the link to it. Meanwhile I'm using direct transactions to burse, so not really in need for offline wallet. But may be comes time to store some coins locally figroll is maintaining the winblows build, drop him a PM. |
|
|
|
|
got 2 new ones, selling again!
|
|
|
|
Is this coin still supported?
The same question. And if yes, what nodes should I add to sync the wallet with the current blockchain? use latest git, it includes a dnsseed. |
|
|
|
this happens when i2p is not running, or if the client SAM inside i2p isnt enabled.
if you disable i2p, it stops trying to connect to it.
Thanks K1773R. Still happens with stfu=1 :/ Its ok though as a new terminal window stops it from displaying. i wasnt talking about stfu, i was talking about disabling i2p. It will always try to connect to SAM, but not I2P itself. well, this works for me on one of my servers if you want i can check which parameters are needed to stop trying to connect to SAM/I2P |
|
|
|
The X1 & X3 are going to be fantastic. And that's just the beginning.
Which miner would you buy? A) $5/gh delivered next week B) $3/gh delivered in three months @ the current BTC prices none. this is sad, but true! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
