Guys,
The thread is about Guo's statement and Ethereum as a whole, not about NXT, PoS coins or the new Tesla. Some people are already yelling at ETC calling it a scam, but in my views this is the original crowdfunded Ethereum project, so...
Simple truth is that the Ethereum foundation gathered (at some point, depends when/if they sold some of the funds, and the BTC price) over $200 MILLION for 2 projects. One of them is now gone (TheDAO), the other one is outcasted by its original creators. Yes, some people voted about the fork (though I have some doubts on how the voting went....), but they were somehow forced to do so. Its like deposit 2 x $50 in the bank and after some time the bank calls you and says "Come in 5 days to pick a $100 bill, otherwise you are going to lose it.". Maybe I don't want a $100 bill and I don't want to take it after 5 days? Basically, the Ethereum Foundation completely screwed up.
P.S. Would like to remind you that I am not trolling EF, I am just frustrated on how they are doing things so far.
|
|
|
Those are antminers in the photo, for mining btc.
I know that, but this is him on the picture. You can check his FB profile and see some big farms with GPU's... Then post a picture of his GPU farm. This sounds like a bluff to me. ... and it looks like he got some serious equipment (not sure if it's real or not, feel free to check his profiles)
Edit Asking people to provide their personal information to the NSA (among others) via Facebook / PRISM is not going to cut it with many here.
I'm not sure what you mean. Is it because of this? (not sure if it's real or not, feel free to check his profiles)
|
|
|
Those are antminers in the photo, for mining btc.
I know that, but this is him on the picture. You can check his FB profile and see some big farms with GPU's...
|
|
|
I took a quick look to these articles, but I'm not even going try to reading them. Next time try using your own words. Here are some points you should consider: 1. There is no DAO, there was "D"AO. 2. 10% of the miners voted for the hard fork (I'm not quite certain if that was the %, but I'm not like some guys, which are using google to prove their point. I use my mind and memories.). What does that tell you? 3. It tells you that a "handful" of people decided it's destiny. Much like the % of people around the world who decides it's destiny. There are Classic Ethereum pools. The miners who do not vote for the fork can switch to those pools. I know that, but so what? Would you like me to tell you a story? "Give us $18,5 million and we will present you Ethereum. Now please give us $100s of millions (not going to make calculations) and you'll have TheDAO. Unfortunatelly, TheDAO failed and we want you to vote for a fork. Oh, well, 10% of you voted for a hard fork? No worries, hard fork it is. TheDAO is now gone. There are people who are not happy with that? Here is the Ethereum Classic." Now the speculations will be much more.
|
|
|
Would that not be acceptable to the ETC defenders? He wouldn't be breaking any rules.
The hard fork was already condemned by many people, famous in the cryptocurrency space. I also think that it was mistake, but I am nobody. Translation: It's just a greedy Chinese guy that bought 5 billion GPUs to mine with. He really doesn't give a flying shit about anything cryptocurrency related and thinks if he can take down Eth Classic then it might increase his mining rewards if there's not 2 Eths.
He can buy them and he did it. I wouldn't judge him.
|
|
|
I think that newbies must be prevented to post in certain sections of the forum.
|
|
|
Spartak you said you never bothered to even read my first post.
No, my exact words were: Don't have the time to read, but will do it tomorrow.
I made my last post after I readed everything in the thread. Then you just asked what do you hope to accomplish then mentioned Anonymity.
The issue is SECURITY Which is compromised by request of the US govt at will.. when ever they want.
No, it's not like they are giving your personal info to Richard Kuklinski. There are laws about that. In my previous post I implied that there is no way to refuse to cooperate with the authorities, because it would be stupid. People (arguably) have their freedom, privacy or whatever when they are on a vacation (for example) to some remote location. When it comes to a certain laws (no matter how twisted and abusive they may are), exchanges (or whatever - you are right with your Conbase/Gmail/etc examples) must comply, or they will face unnecessary troubles. Posts in this direction (anonymity/privacy/security), which takes you hours of reading/writing are pointless, unless you are writing a book or something similar. They bring nothing positive to you. Humanity is controlled by a handful of people and you can't do anything about it. The best thing you can do is to "change the world" which surrounds you (friends, neighbours, planting trees, protect the environment etc.).
|
|
|
Have they commented on this yet, because I don't understand what is happening at all with this project.
Didn't you read the screenshot from the Tweet? They told me to send them an e-mail if I have some questions. You should post a link to the previous thread where we were discussing it. There is a link. Please next time read more carefully if you are interested in some topic.
|
|
|
Maybe you (as a major/or not holders, or "believers" (let's put it in this way)) should try to do something in VIA's favour, instead asking for some news? Drak is not the one who should do that. His responsibility is the coding part. romanornr, for example, did something in VIA's favour and it doesn't matter if it is because he is holding some coins, or he's a "believer".
|
|
|
I took a quick look to these articles, but I'm not even going try to reading them. Next time try using your own words. Here are some points you should consider: 1. There is no DAO, there was "D"AO. 2. 10% of the miners voted for the hard fork (I'm not quite certain if that was the %, but I'm not like some guys, which are using google to prove their point. I use my mind and memories.). What does that tell you? 3. It tells you that a "handful" of people decided it's destiny. Much like the % of people around the world who decides it's destiny.
|
|
|
Spoetnik,
What are you trying to accomplish with this thread? It should be obvious that there is no such thing as anonymity. Handing over personal information from exchanges and such to the authorities, should be also a well known fact. And you know what? I see nothing wrong with that! People must be responsible for their actions and exchanges/forums/etc., are not the ones who should protect their privacy. If John (for example) decides to run a child porn website and receive payments in some "anonymous" cryptocurrency (or whatever), then he must face the consequences. I am quite sure that some services and the authorities as a whole are sometimes abusing with personal information, but this is not the case here. Your privacy should be kept between you and the average Joe (no need for conspiracy theories here).
I have 2 favourite sayings about stupid people and will try to translate them: One of them says (you can use it in situation were a person shows stupidity in some form): "Your IQ is equal to a room temperature." The other one says: "You are so stupid that if you put a seashell (rapaninae) closer to your ear, the seashell will hear the ocean." (means you have no brain (and you all know that you "hear the ocean", when you put a seashell near your ear)).
I don't want to insult anybody, but if you truly believe in the 100% anonymity/privacy, then you can use these 2 sayings for yourself. I am quite sure that there are people here in the forum, which know how to protect their anonymity/privacy, but remember - you can always find someone smarter than you. It is like a pyramid of minds, but you nobody knows where is the top. Just look back at the history and see how many hackers were caught. For me there are two reasons not being caught (if you/somebody do something): 1. Some "people" are not interested in you. 2. These "people" are the ones doing it.
Plain and simple.
|
|
|
Have they commented on this yet, because I don't understand what is happening at all with this project.
Didn't you read the screenshot from the Tweet? They told me to send them an e-mail if I have some questions.
|
|
|
Hello, guys. There is already a thread ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1531029.0), which you can find some of the information posted below, but I just wanted to bring more awareness. That is why I have decided to launch a new thread. Razormind guys are clearly behind the already failed RazorCoin ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=644498.0), which screwed a lot of people (me included, but that's not the reason for posting this thread), and this is enough for me not to believe in any of their future projects (or whatever): Proof for being involved with RazorCoin: https://cointelegraph.com/news/uk-based-razormind-emerges-as-blockchain-rival-to-ethereum-microsoft-ibm-and-eris“Your readers may remember we built the first digital currency factory - Razorcoin - and started selling custom digital currencies, with their related clients, seed nodes, enterprise APIs etc. to businesses directly. I’m glad to say we built the first version of IrishCoin which was featured in the Wall St Journal. Our motivations were clear - we wanted to make blockchain accessible and safe to use for everyone.”
So far they gathered 2157 BTC from their crowdsale (source: http://www.razormind.co.uk/crowdsale), which (at least in my views), is a big amount of money. Can Jawad Yaqub ( https://uk.linkedin.com/in/razormind, https://www.facebook.com/jawad.yaqub) shows up and proves that Razormind is not a scam? I think that we have 2157 reasons for it. Tweet to Razormind from the FailCommunity: https://twitter.com/FAILCommunity/status/756941309466869760Some reference and good observations from the previous thread: Found out info about Razormind and DeOS ico in 2 Cointelegraph articles. After 30mins due diligence I'm 100% sure this is scam.I wonder how Cointelegraph let these bullshit articles to be on their website. (Author: Niall Maye) https://cointelegraph.com/news/razormind-targets-ethereum-by-crowdfunding-deos-blockchain-on-july-15https://cointelegraph.com/news/uk-based-razormind-emerges-as-blockchain-rival-to-ethereum-microsoft-ibm-and-eris1. Company Razormind has been registered twice. 1st time on 22.04.2014, dissolved on 01.12.2015 via compulsory strike-off: https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/090052142nd time (current): 19 feb 2016 (5 months ago) https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/NI6365342 shareholders\owners. Statement of capital on 2016-02-19, GBP=1 - https://[Suspicious link removed]/kBsD0D Serious capital, enterprise solutions, yeah. As I understand, you can register a company in UK over the internet, providing owners, shareholders and company data + 12 pounds fee. 2. Website razormind.co.uk looks very cool, but almost all of the content is copied form other sources. 3.The owner of the company has not been seen in public by anyone. No photos or public profiles of the team etc also. Even though the article in Cointelegraph states that Razormind has 260 employees 4. Twitter account @Razormind also looks cool and has over 15000 tweets. Most of them are tweets copied from other sources. And if you manage to scroll down to the first tweet, you can see that account has been created on 29/03/2016 BTW, @Razormind blacklisted me right after my tweet about DeOS scam 5. No escrow for ICO funds. You need to send an email to deos@razormind.co.uk to invest to the ICO. After that you receive an email with "uniquely generated BTC Address" to invest. Oooook. Also, you can have bonuses as a wise early fintech adopter! Quote from the answer email: "Some perks for funders: * 2 BTC an email thank you written personally by CEO Jawad Yaqub * 5 BTC the above plus a tweet from @razormind to say thank you. * 10 BTC Dinner with Razormind * 75 BTC DeOS Foundation Membership" Hell yeah! Dinner, beeatch! Cheers, Spartak Tomanov
|
|
|
Hello, Here is the latest example:
|
|
|
The people who did not vote, give up their rights to decide. So the people who voted decide the fate of the Ethereum.
Given the "unstoppable code" marketing, the people who did not vote may not have even been aware there was a vote, or that immutability was something controversial that could possibly and suddenly come up for a vote. You can't suddenly hold a referendum on a DAO TARP and expect busy people to be paying attention, much less have the time to come to an informed decision in a few days. Hey I know, let's have a vote on doubling the number of Bitcoins, to 42 million total. Quick, go figure out how to sign a vote with your proof of stake! You have Two Weeks. Oh what, your coins are in an exchange? Sorry, you'll just have to let other people act as your proxy. Let's start taking bets on how long until there's another TARP fork. I'll be optimistic, and wager ETH can make it another year with another obnoxiously hypocritical bailout for a TBTF dumb contract. You clearly don't know what a bail out is. You really should think twice, before post such bs. I have 2 questions for you: 1. Where is TheDAO now? (look at the thread's title for reference) 2. What is a bailout? (will ignore Hueristic's quote)
|
|
|
|