Which real facts are you referring to? These buy orders taken from btc-e.com?
I'm talking about the "cheap" solidcoin you denied had been removed. If the price has gone up 2-4x and over 80000 SC has been taken off the exchanges since the change was announced it's pretty certain the "cheap" SolidCoin has been removed, replaced with more expensive stuff  But the price has not gone up 2-4x, it had a one hour spike then sold off. It now languishes at 4 cents. You killed the trading volume yes, but it was not "replaced". A few weeks ago it was "Languishing" at 1.7 cents. So 4cents is how much more than that? Do you need help with the math? "A few weeks ago" was long before your announcement of the economic re-education campaign. You made the assertion that Amorphouscoin rose on your announcement. I pointed out that it was just a spike on tiny volume and had since reverted to pre-announcement prices. I provided data to back that up. You are now flopping around trying to find a way out of this conversation. Do you need help with misinformation and scams? |
|
|
|
Until that enforcer key is revoked by your 3.0 client. or 4.0 client. or 5.0 client. Again, even if keys were revoked in later versions, trust account holders could run earlier versions. As such it is a necessity to ensure everyone involved is on board with all changes which is why these things are discussed. Thankfully the people involved with SolidCoin are very intelligent and logical people, so disagreements are rare or over minor details. The enforcer node could run 1.x Solidcoin versions for all that will matter. You simply disallow blocks and transactions from that private key to be processed by the new client or to enter the block chain. The block chain forks with 11 of the 12 SC disciples on the longer fork. Your enforcer pool hash rate backs the new regime, most other miners already quit because of the "economic re-education" changes. Get one exchange to back the new fork and disallow the old private key and Zimbabwecoin enters a new phase. You can remove any enforcer node you like since there is so little hash power protecting your chain. |
|
|
|
Which real facts are you referring to? These buy orders taken from btc-e.com?
I'm talking about the "cheap" solidcoin you denied had been removed. If the price has gone up 2-4x and over 80000 SC has been taken off the exchanges since the change was announced it's pretty certain the "cheap" SolidCoin has been removed, replaced with more expensive stuff But the price has not gone up 2-4x, it had a one hour spike then sold off. It now languishes at 4 cents. You killed the trading volume yes, but it was not "replaced". |
|
|
|
You have the private keys that control the wallets that fund the control nodes. As anyone familiar with bitcoins knows, he who holds the private keys holds all the power. You've already admitted to being able to shut down control nodes. We all know you can.
Do you even understand how a trust node in SC works? Let me answer that for you. No, no you don't. If you did you would realize that as soon as someone has a trust account key they could continue the network "as is" if they disagreed with any future changes. Until that enforcer key is revoked by your 3.0 client. or 4.0 client. or 5.0 client.  |
|
|
|
You haven't "gotten rid" of anything. They are still there on the exchange. The price is back down to 4 cents with less than $200 in buy orders above a penny. Grats, you killed your own coin. Again.  Haha, even with real facts you deny it. Keep trolling kid. Which real facts are you referring to? These buy orders taken from btc-e.com? price SC USD 0.040014 112.13910481 4.48713413 0.040012 1000 40.012 0.04001 1000 40.01 0.040001 100 4.0001 0.0361 14.6652795 0.52941658 0.03605 68.32785 2.46321899 0.036002 300 10.8006 0.035016 58 2.030928 0.027 1500 40.5 0.02362 100 2.362 0.02 2200 44 0.016 3300 52.8 0.015502 2300 35.6546 0.01202 100 1.202 0.012012 181 2.174172 0.01111112 0.133332 0.002 1000 2 0.001111 25000 27.775 0.0011 9000 9.9 0.001 90 0.09 Taken @ 10:34pm (PST) Thursday, Feb 16. Anyone can go take a look. @ https://btc-e.com/exchange/sc_usdNow run along back to your alternate reality. /pats the cute little scammer on the head. |
|
|
|
Announce change. Submit large buy orders into liquidity vacuum. Claim short-lived rise in price is due to announced changes. Watch value drop back to where it was before change was announced. Working hard for a scammer label are we? Same could be said with Bitcoin, just different scale. P.S. With $250 anyone could buy the price of Solidcoin up to 12 cents each on btc-e. That's what the new economic changes have done, gotten rid of "cheap" SolidCoins. When the price of a SolidCoin goes over $1 we will start to see mining become profitable again for some people and coin generation will rise. You haven't "gotten rid" of anything. They are still there on the exchange. The price is back down to 4 cents with less than $200 in buy orders above a penny. Grats, you killed your own coin. Again. |
|
|
|
Announce change. Submit large buy orders into liquidity vacuum. Claim short-lived rise in price is due to announced changes. Watch value drop back to where it was before change was announced. Working hard for a scammer label are we? P.S. With $250 anyone could buy the price of Solidcoin up to 12 cents each on btc-e. |
|
|
|
When the day comes that we have many natural trust nodes, the original 10 trust wallets could be "destroyed" for everyone to see, by creating a regular trust tx but then setting the output of the tx to zero, and then have a special node mine them into a block where the generate tx of that block was for the regular amount. This would cause the coins that would have normally been considered a tx fee to simply be lost instead. And the entire world can verify they are now gone.
Your glorious leader has been trumpeting how wonderful and beneficial the enforcer nodes are. Now you say the enforcer nodes should be destroyed in front of everyone? I foresee you spending some time at the Ministry of Love for re-education. Stick to the party line: Solidcoin has always been at war with Eastasia. |
|
|
|
Unlike Bitcoin we don't want to support a protocol developed in 2009 when we have more knowledge on how a true p2p currency should work.
I'm having trouble reconciling this statement with... what ? You're on the 3rd major protocol-breaking rev of SolidCoin now since 2011 ? Soon to be 4th. |
|
|
|
Yeah, and anyone can open a bank in the United States if they meet certain criteria. That doesn't mean Federal Reserve notes are examples of decentralized currency.
Banks cant print their own currency, they have to rely on the central bank to "Give it to them". Read the myths page :- In SolidCoin every single person can :- *Create the currency *Determine how much total currency is created, *See the rules by which the currency operates *See the goals of the developers. http://solidcoin.info/myths.htmlYour centralized arguments are bordering on ridiculous because you don't understand SolidCoin very well or you are purposedly trying to spread FUD. You forgot: *Watch Coinhunter change the rules to fill his own bank account |
|
|
|
Interestingly, this thread is no longer locked.
If it remains unlocked, the 5 solidcoin supporters will get shat upon by the other 1,000 forum users. |
|
|
|
The benefit being you don't need to download the chain or wait for anything, it's all instant.
Yep. Who wants those pesky blocks anyway. Distributed block chains are for nancy-boys. Centralized transaction authorization is the new meme!  |
|
|
|
Been here all the time you mofo, just not socializing with you.
Now I'm out. Before I catch your sewar rat smell...
Only twenty-two words and he managed to include three punctuation errors, one massive misspelling on his key concept, and completely misused the ellipsis. Reads like RS/CH/Douchebag sock-puppetry to me. Coinhunter can mostly form complete sentences. Psy is probably a discrete entity (albeit one with the writing skills of a third grader). I am sure there is plenty of fisting involved in their relationship, just not of the sockpuppet variety. |
|
|
|
Don't you just love that whole "OUR developer" thing? Just as if any of the socially awkward fan-boys who work on the ShortBusCoin are legit, educated programmers!
Wrong tootweasel, anyone involved in "development" (and by that we mean the completely incompetent and rather ham-fisted repackaging of other people's work with a few critically fucked up bugs added in, all released under an illegal copyright notice!) is an ass-clown just like their bitch-master. Oooh, your "developer"? Don't you mean the poor dumb bastard that you are currently ripping off code from and passing it off as your leet mad hakzor coding skillz? Those skillz make you, what was it again? Hundreds of imaginary dollars per hour? While living in your mom's rat-infested basement pleasuring yourself with lingerie ads? That kind of developer?
Listen, you have a whole cadre of believers (if two can be a cadre) on your own site. Why not hie your happy ass back there and have a group hug and tell yourselves conspiracy stories around the campfire about how aliens are real, tinfoil hats work, and ShortBusCoin is going to take over the world and allow you to implement your plan for world anarchy. Then Mommy can bring you all some warm milk and cookies and you can make shadow puppets with your secret decoder flashlights and marvel at how clever you are.
My Hero LOL That's the kind of post that could make you rich!  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=63092.msg743279#msg743279That should get him at least 100 LTC Poker Chips.... I will award him 10 magic beans out of my personal stash...the captain's cabinet. hmmmmm, delicious I didn't know there was men's lingerie, let alone entire magazines devoted to it. |
|
|
|
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=63365.0This is the last straw. He is coming here and spewing outright lies about a "competing" currency in order to prop up his repeated failing ventures. His spreading of Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt damages Bitcoin and other projects, and is a blight on our community. Moderators, you should be well aware of CoinHunter/Realsolids reputation on here, and it's clear as day he is not acting in the best interests of the community. Please label him as a scammer, once and for all. His well documented price manipulation of his own currency should be reason enough. The Scammer tag is probably appropriate given how many bait and switch maneuvers Coinhunter has made. |
|
|
|
Another shart from the folks at Solidcoin. They say that people shit their pants when they die. I guess cryptocurrencies do too.  |
|
|
|
|
Solidcoin was the answer to everyone problems. Now Solidcoin 2.0 is.
Solidcoin 2.0 was the answer to everyone problems. Now Solidcoin 3.0 is.
Solidcoin 3.0 was the answer to everyone problems. Now Solidcoin 4.0 is.
Solidcoin 4.0 was the answer to everyone problems. Now Solidcoin 5.0 is.
repeat ad infinitum...
This looks like the output of the following loop
while(Coinhunter.wealth < 0xFFFFFFFF)
Solicoin(version++, rand());
|
|
|
|
|
1685 MH/s, 660 Watts from the wall, 2.55 MH/W
|
|
|
|
Lets look at the two scenarios shall we?
Pool bad, people are free to leave the pool. Plus P2Pool is gaining ground so this issue is diminishing not growing.
Enforcer node bad, people are free to make forum posts about how they are trapped in a cryptocurrency controlled by one guy. There's no difference to rogue trust nodes than Bitcoins rogue pools or rogue miners, except a rogue SC trust node CANNOT DOUBLE SPEED. The other difference is that to be a trust node you need a lot of investment in SolidCoins, to be a pool operator you need to pay $50 a month. The current people with trust nodes have invested a lot into SolidCoin, whether time, money, development, etc. Several splinter groups have split off the forums and made their own place to discuss cryptocurrencies (yourself included).
Gavin can't shut down bitcoin with the alert key. He can only suggest that the network be shutdown by using the alert key. Furthermore I have just modded a bitcoin clone that completely ignores alerts. Gavin is now powerless to stop me with alerts. Welcome to free software. Haha you really are bitter about how SolidCoin is more secure. Firstly why would I want to "shut down SolidCoin" ? I created it and I want it to prosper because it solves many problems facing the human species. You already shut it down once. It will probably be the same reason as before, a broken protocol due to poor design choices. "But they can just take out one guy" . Firstly the keys are encrypted, the trust node ones in operation may not be but they don't know where the trust nodes are and who is running them. It's not just me. And to capture me , torture me, threaten me, to get the keys and locations is way beyond buying some hardware online. Secondly I have a layer between who they will think is "me" and the real me, I will have a small amount of time upon which I realize I am in danger and take precautions (ie get the F out of dodge). My hope is the NPO is running this risk soon instead of me though, don't get me wrong.  It is so much harder to "order a hit" and torture someone than it is to just spend fiat money they have created out of thin air and buy some GPUs/FPGA. If you can't understand that then there is nothing more to say. Keep living in your delusion where a little bit of money created out of thin air can't just collapse Bitcoin in a minute. Nobody said anything about capture and torture. Someone can just lift the keys off your computer, and *poof* your whole cryptocurrency dies. Oh, and all we have is your word that anyone other than you has control of an enforcer node. Again, it all comes back to just trusting some random dude on the internet. Bitcoin is rooted in mathematics, Solidcoin is rooted in the paranoia of a damaged mind. I prefer math. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
