is it possible to get listed on Poloniex?
Yes, Will be listed on Polo on 31. February |
|
|
|
yeah, Dave Wilkinson is back.
But no worries, there's always people on bitcointalk who will tell people about his scams.
Merry christmas Dave, you stupid scammer.
"Dave=wasserman", must be the same scammer or scammer group, including bitcoingo, declouds, opair, ebitz, mentrio, oracle and so fucking forth, wish they have a bag luck new year, sick fuck scammers will be tortured by demons must be a well organized group with dedicated people for graphics, logos, public relation, promo etc.. I doubt one person alone can do that |
|
|
|
|
Check the new moderated Thread, still enough sheep who believe
|
|
|
|
What did I do wrong ? : no of mining  ZecMiner64.exe -zpool SSL: //zec-eu1.nanopool.org:6633 -zwal t1RGQ4QhSqMMDNF8RaZRm5AHvrP7zyFZD6v.1 -zpsw r -i 8 Thanks ZecMiner64.exe -zpool SSL:(YOU HAVE SPACE HERE)//zec-eu1.nanopool.org:6633 -zwal t1RGQ4QhSqMMDNF8RaZRm5AHvrP7zyFZD6v.1 -zpsw r -i 8 so my question is why do I want SSL? HOW MUCH is fee with and with out ssl At the moment I have no SSL on my 11 miners I certainly am willing to upgrade to SSL but what do I gain? -0.5% devfee in case of using Claymore's miner There is also 0% fee during the holidays on https://zec.suprnova.cc in case you want so save some fees. SSL port is of course also available would be even better if it ended 12:01 01/02/2017 Don't worry, won't be the last promo  ocminer, Thank you for your Christmas and New Year gift  Pleasure, great to have you on the pool |
|
|
|
|
Well finally something I can build a decision on, let's wait 24-36h and then I'll update the pool accordingly to what will be the winner.
|
|
|
|
What did I do wrong ? : no of mining ZecMiner64.exe -zpool SSL: //zec-eu1.nanopool.org:6633 -zwal t1RGQ4QhSqMMDNF8RaZRm5AHvrP7zyFZD6v.1 -zpsw r -i 8 Thanks ZecMiner64.exe -zpool SSL:(YOU HAVE SPACE HERE)//zec-eu1.nanopool.org:6633 -zwal t1RGQ4QhSqMMDNF8RaZRm5AHvrP7zyFZD6v.1 -zpsw r -i 8 so my question is why do I want SSL? HOW MUCH is fee with and with out ssl At the moment I have no SSL on my 11 miners I certainly am willing to upgrade to SSL but what do I gain? -0.5% devfee in case of using Claymore's miner There is also 0% fee during the holidays on https://zec.suprnova.cc in case you want so save some fees. SSL port is of course also available would be even better if it ended 12:01 01/02/2017 Don't worry, won't be the last promo |
|
|
|
The Devs of XZC decided not to cooperate anymore and go their own, separate ways. The coin has a 'founders reward' on every block which is paid to the devs. In poramins new version Gary's address was removed and replaced by a new address, however, there was no official statement or whatever. Bittrex has the original version (pre-fork) listed and it is yet undecided what happens after the fork. Gary's version has poramins founder reward address removed. Which version of the coin do you want to mine after the fork? Be aware that bittrex has to use the same fork in order to be available for withdrawals of the pool. It might be they simply halt trading at all of the coin and desist it after the fork. The devs don't comment or communicate on that issue currently and the slack is very toxic, so I couldn't get any info anywhere I simply let the miners decide. Please vote which version you want to mine. Also have a look here : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1638450.msg17289355#msg17289355Pool is at : https://xzc.suprnova.cc |
|
|
|
Merry Christmas to all miners and their families!
0% fee during the holidays.
Thank you very much, Sir. Much appreciated! Merry Christmas! Thanks, merry Christmas to you as well There is also an ssl port available on suprnova in case you want so mine with claymore and save some extra fees. |
|
|
|
What did I do wrong ? : no of mining ZecMiner64.exe -zpool SSL: //zec-eu1.nanopool.org:6633 -zwal t1RGQ4QhSqMMDNF8RaZRm5AHvrP7zyFZD6v.1 -zpsw r -i 8 Thanks ZecMiner64.exe -zpool SSL:(YOU HAVE SPACE HERE)//zec-eu1.nanopool.org:6633 -zwal t1RGQ4QhSqMMDNF8RaZRm5AHvrP7zyFZD6v.1 -zpsw r -i 8 so my question is why do I want SSL? HOW MUCH is fee with and with out ssl At the moment I have no SSL on my 11 miners I certainly am willing to upgrade to SSL but what do I gain? -0.5% devfee in case of using Claymore's miner There is also 0% fee during the holidays on https://zec.suprnova.cc in case you want so save some fees. SSL port is of course also available |
|
|
|
Can somebody explain why the founder address was swapped by a new one? Is poramin getting double the reward now?
New investor. Existing investors are aware of it. Poramins share remains the same. I'd like to update too, can you talk with bittrex so they adapt to your source as well? |
|
|
|
Hi, dude. I'm curious... What parameters do you use when miner goes to devfee mode? In this mode the miner finds much more shares than it does with my parameters. I'm talking about ZClassic mining. ZECMINER64 -zpool ssl://zcl.suprnova.cc:4142 -zwal marcelospera.zclassic_frank -zpsw xxxx -i 7 Thanks. I believe you really deserves your devfee for your hard work. Make us rich, please!  This just happens because diff is lower when dev mining starts, it's the same speed as when you're mining normally |
|
|
|
Got my support.
Will be mining, stacking and trading.
Which version? |
|
|
|
What did I do wrong ? : no of mining ZecMiner64.exe -zpool SSL: //zec-eu1.nanopool.org:6633 -zwal t1RGQ4QhSqMMDNF8RaZRm5AHvrP7zyFZD6v.1 -zpsw r -i 8 Thanks ZecMiner64.exe -zpool SSL:(YOU HAVE SPACE HERE)//zec-eu1.nanopool.org:6633 -zwal t1RGQ4QhSqMMDNF8RaZRm5AHvrP7zyFZD6v.1 -zpsw r -i 8 Alternative: ZecMiner64.exe -zpool ssl://zec.suprnova.cc:2242 -zwal t1RGQ4QhSqMMDNF8RaZRm5AHvrP7zyFZD6v.1 -zpsw x -i 8 |
|
|
|
What did I do wrong ? : no of mining ZecMiner64.exe -zpool SSL: //zec-eu1.nanopool.org:6633 -zwal t1RGQ4QhSqMMDNF8RaZRm5AHvrP7zyFZD6v.1 -zpsw r -i 8 Thanks ZecMiner64.exe -zpool SSL://zec-eu1.nanopool.org:6633 -zwal t1RGQ4QhSqMMDNF8RaZRm5AHvrP7zyFZD6v.1 -zpsw -i 8 Alternative : ZecMiner64.exe -zpool ssl://zec.suprnova.cc:2242 -zwal t1RGQ4QhSqMMDNF8RaZRm5AHvrP7zyFZD6v.1 -zpsw -i 8 |
|
|
|
Just noticed Claymore has a sense of humor: When setting AMD_OCL_BUILD_OPTIONS_APPEND Setting AMD_OCL_BUILD_OPTIONS gets: However after a quick hex edit of the amd opencl shared library export AMD_OCL_RALPH_OPTIONS_APPEND=-save-temps
Works just great. :-) Yeah - I've unpacked the real miner binary (zecminer64 is only 66k, this is because it loads Data3.bin, decodes it, and then runs it.) From there you end up with a binary that looks to have been packed by a modified version of UPX - unpacking what it drops looks like an ELF loaded at 0x80000 - it patches several jumps in it to make it work, because it looks like it expects to be loaded at 0x40000. THAT looks like it drops ld.so and the real miner ELF into memory. Yo dawg, I herd you like executing, so I put an ELF64 in your ELF64 so you can execute while you execute. I think now one of my points about Linux release is clear - other devs want to see how my miner works and do reverse engineering as soon as they can. It's much easier to do it in Linux. My License.txt prohibits such things clearly, so you violate the license. Remember I violated MIT license in past and was blamed that I steal other's work. Now I see same thing from you. Have fun... Actually, it would have been easier to reconstruct the actual miner binary on Windows. There's nice tools to do this for the PE32+ (PE 64-bit) format, but jack shit for ELF64. My owner and I recovered the binary in its original, unpacked form, btw - not much in the way of anti-debugging once you get to there. Some obfuscation, but not much. Checkmate - that was a fun workout; time to figure out something else to do. Stop worrying about your devfee, it's not about removing it or altering it. It was just fun to do. Clay you can rest assured that every big(er) cloud hashing company has your miner variations and optimizations already - regardless of ssl, packing, upx, linux etc.. |
|
|
|
You need to give any pool about 24 hrs to normalize. As I said, I give myself a lot of effort and invested a lot of time and you can count on me ! Let your miner time a 24 in the F2pool you can in the seconds run clock as your earnings rises Best Regards from Germany and finally, I am very happy about every donation ! t1VADKGszY9uUnns7FJQXinDm1ioZau6at1 Stop advertising in other peoples threads. Best Zcash pool I've been on is flypool, absolutely rock solid. Dwarf would be a close second, but they don't have enough hash. I'm not advertising you nose :-)) and flypool is bullshit :-)) you have unfortunately understood nothing :-)) You are definitely advertising your pool. nonsense, I speak from experience and give the information to the miner are not cheated, and fair pay. I didn't have to make Mate ! Yeah, it's pretty easy to see that you were referring to your pool as 'yours' off and while advertising it. Speaking from experience, flypool is definitely the lowest variance pool currently with close to 100% earnings every day. I mine with a pretty decent amount of hash so it's not nearly as prone to variance as well. Dwarf pool is a very long and time tested pool. Flypool is from Ethermine and Ethhash, both very long running pools. F2pool is... random Chinese guy in a shack trying to make some hash? You're also totally not german, pretty sure you're chinese based on how you put together your sentences and respond. If you're earning more then you should be getting paid that means there is a lot of variance there and it will bite you in the ass. PPS/PPLNS/RBS has absolutely nothing to do with pool variance, pool variance can only be minimized by large amounts of hash. This is putting aside the pool code being garbage, block times, skimming, and connectivity issues with the pool... all that factor into a 'good' pool. If you run long term on a good pool who has a large amount of net hash you'll get very little variance. After testing this pool for a few hours (f2pool), i don't like it much, lots of timeout, lots of latencies on shares, and fishy hashrate report. Going back to dwarf ! Not saying it's bad since they seems to show quite a bit of hashrate in their pool, but it just doesn't work for me. I tested also on another rig flypool, but it doesn't seems to show proper hashrate, im about 150 less sol than in reality after 2hours running. Dunno if it's normal or not, but i find it odd. Usually i'll have to agree, but the discrepancies were far too important (at least on f2pool), anyway Peace Mate ! 😂😂😂😂😂✌️✌️✌️💪💪💪🖖👍 and finally, I am very happy about every donation ! t1VADKGszY9uUnns7FJQXinDm1ioZau6at1 To add something useful to this funny pool discussion : There is a merry Christmas special on https://zec.suprnova.cc with 0%fee Edit : oh and payout scheme is pplns |
|
|
|
|
All tries getting the linux miner to work just fail for me with either access violations or a complete lock up of the rig where only a hard reset helps. Optiminer works fine though.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
