https://pool.viabtc.com/Now we are sure that ViaBTC is misreporting the information. According to them, still, after the block mine, half of the entire Bitcoin world is mining BCC.    There seems to be one reason for that: There is a sub-community who considers ViaBTC authorative, who is relying on ViaBTC for information. I am so sorry for that community. I'm even sorrier that we have to be the recipients of all this anti-effort at the behest of untruth. I just about cannot stand it. Just about...  This is what is called "evil". Hmm I'm not sure and I didn't do much diligence myself but from what I've heard and read that BCC thing is the "last try" of the Antminer producers to save their advantage in SHA256 mining by using the "Asicboost technology". Asicboost isn't compatible with segwit and they'd lose their advantage and would need to miner like every other sha256 asic if the network switches to segwit blocks. However - the way that bitcoin abc (BCC) handles it - IS Asicboost compatible.. Now if I'd had a farm (in china) with several Petahashes and thousands of miners / racks - I'd at least understand why I'd try to save my 25% speedup against other miners.. My company is 25% more profitable as long as I can mine "empty" blocks where only 1 TX is incuded - the TX which pays the block to the miner (myself).. AFAIK (not sure) ViaBTC / Roger Ver is somehow connected to Antminer etc... |
|
|
|
Hmm funny I did some experiments with that Bitcoin Clash Daemon but it seems the oversize Block doesn't get accepted on the abc daemon as well... 2017-08-01 18:29:27 ERROR: TestBlockValidity: Consensus::CheckBlock: bad-txns-oversize, Coinbase check failed (txid 1f5132b4722a9dec48092f6b9490594df3676cd0c6322f6ceb0c1812cbb851b2) (code 16) Who's coding that thing ? Roger himself ?  Do not worry it is well tested or at least i was told so by experts here  Hmm I tried to get testnet up with the new blocksize but it seems there's still the old rules in place.. Yeah.. looks decently coded ^^ |
|
|
|
Hmm funny I did some experiments with that Bitcoin Clash Daemon but it seems the oversize Block doesn't get accepted on the abc daemon as well... 2017-08-01 18:29:27 ERROR: TestBlockValidity: Consensus::CheckBlock: bad-txns-oversize, Coinbase check failed (txid 1f5132b4722a9dec48092f6b9490594df3676cd0c6322f6ceb0c1812cbb851b2) (code 16) Who's coding that thing ? Roger himself ? |
|
|
|
@ocminer Is it possible that you missed my question or you've just changed your mind on the issue? ...or whatever Hmm weird.. I've got an ancient version ..
I'll try it again tonight and let you know.. But maybe it's more simple to just adapt a python proxy to the stratum stuff.. I'll have a look.
Please let me know if dcr proxy working with your pool is something that you can make available. Oh sorry I missed the question, I'm still on it, maybe I can iron out the last issues on the weekend, i'm having some issues with the python stuff but hope I can figure it out |
|
|
|
|
From what i see the hashrate and shares reported / submitted by some ccminer versions are fake and therefore those versions are all not working on suprnova.
with the static diff setting you could effectively circumvent the check and "steal" from the other miners - thats why its permanently disabled
|
|
|
|
supernova maintenance caused hash rates drop. Its back up again .
actually it was only the frontend that was down.. the stratum was running all the time since it's on a separate server... |
|
|
|
Is it back up? Yes and now give it a few moments to process all the stuck payments.. This will take some time does it effect mining? currently website sigt.suprnova.cc on maintenance. Nope, doesn't effect mining, the pools wallet crashed, i had to switch to the backup wallet and it's back up now, the page is reachable too again, thanks for patience. |
|
|
|
You don't follow me.
I setup to 0.5. I mine 0.5 with my workers. When I receive the payment I don't receive 0.5, I just receive 0.15, so.. 0.35 of fees.
That's the problem.
Thats impossible and a ridiculous high fee Check your Transactions, you have a "Credit" and a "Debit" Transaction in "Edit Account" -> "Transactions" - you can see every amount there. I assume you probably did a manual payment instead of a automatic and therefore simply withdrew before you hit the 0.5 threshold. Some people misinterpret unconfirmed and confirmed coins.. round estimates etc |
|
|
|
Is it back up? Yes and now give it a few moments to process all the stuck payments.. This will take some time |
|
|
|
Send them a mail. And another twitter message. But you did notice, that I responded two times already ? I need 2 more mins |
|
|
|
|
The wallet crashed - I'm on it, it'll be back in 5 mins
|
|
|
|
|
I'm already on it but the wallet is a bit jerky...
|
|
|
|
I get very often the error message : stratum_subscribe timed out..
Mining on suprnova
Do you have it too ?
Yes, the pool is unstable for now. fixed Hi ocminer,I am a player from China.I always connect the pool to be unstable, start can, over a short time can't connect, is you set IP limit？ PM me your IP and I can check it, in the meanwhile I'd advise to spread your rigs between the pools, there is also https://maxminers.net/xcn now ! |
|
|
|
I receive a little payment. I configure that for try the pool.
Set to 0.5 decred automatic payment.
I receive 0.15745046 DCR. So, 90% of fees? NICE.
I've already replied to you via email already but it seems you didn't get it.. The pool won't pay if your balance is below the threshold (that's why it's called threshold).. so something is obviously wrong on your side |
|
|
|
ocminer,
i have been mining decred within 25 hours at your pool but the total coin round+unconfirmed+confirmed only reach like 30% of the whattomine.com forecast with the exact amount of Blake (14r) hashrate.
any problem with the pool right now ?
Nope, all good. Luck is okay too, make sure you actually see the hashrate on the dashboard which your rigs are mining with |
|
|
|
Coin is not dead, according coinmarketcap.com SIGT is better than FUCK
well played  i see what you did there |
|
|
|
I get very often the error message : stratum_subscribe timed out..
Mining on suprnova
Do you have it too ?
Yes, the pool is unstable for now. fixed |
|
|
|
 Bye bye btc-e :-( Ha it looks so badly done I also thought you were kidding, but it's real =( Oh well, it was fun. IMHO FBI needs a better graphics designer  this is worse than paint |
|
|
|
If you're still can't see the page, open it through an anonymizer like; http://webanonymizer.org/ (simply enter http://btc-e.com there) recent browsers block the page because it was https former and it's http now - not secured via SSL anymore What this means for the funds ? Well.. Not more or less than before, the site is down and at least the former domain will remain down as it's no longer in the hands of the old admins.. Did btc-e have any secondary domains ? Preferably NOT .com/.net/.org ? |
|
|
|
I am not seeing that page--at least not yet. Are you joking?
This is no joke, clear your (browser) cache and then go to http://btc-e.com/banner.png (Make sure your browser doesn't redirect to the old http s page) |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
