Okey let me put it this way for more clarification,  the success of a bounty campaign and the success of a project are different, the former depend largely on the bounty manager because when you have an unexperience or lazy bm to handle a campaign, their attitude can ruin that campaign even if the project itself where to be successful, there are some few cases where as a result of the bm misconduct ruin the bounty to some extent,

While on the other hand, the success of the project itself depends largely on the team, this has nothing to do with the bm, only the team are responsible for the outcome of the project, so both need to be successful to have a completely successful campaign.

There are alternatives to usdt like the Busd for instance, fully backed by us dollar and is approved by the "New York State Department of Financial Services (NYDFS)" in my opinion, I would much rather use a stablecoin with this type of approval and support than the former, after all, they serve the same purpose, because you never know what will come up some day in the future, if they are pumping more usdt in circulation without any control then I believe sooner or later, things will take a different turn, in other to avoid any future harm,  better to stick with the one that is fully approved.

Quote from AmoreJaz  and I just want to stress more on this, nowadays it is all about the money, people don't care who get hurt in the process, for humanity sake and not for anything else, I think it would be better to have a little consideration,
Many innocent people fall victim of this kind of scam is not right, some people have their last penny invested in this type of project for them to get scammed,  however, some people can forgive and move on but some can go at any length to seek justice, we should be careful with what we do.

I see some misconception about the way some hunters describe the situation of bounty hunting,  i think the misconception here is some members don't regard themselves as hunters because they promote btc paying campaign, they are all "bounty"

Speaking of bestchange campaign,  i do believe what they have in this forum is called "bounty" ^{(regardless of the reward type, btc or alts payments)}    bottom line is they have a good bounty running, hunters are participating and they are paying well, which now means there are still good bounties available but they are few and limited to participants,  so if you are a participant of this bounty, it means you still do bounty and you are a hunter,

'Affiliate programming' are you saying the bestchange campaign is now considered as such or you are referring to something different 🤔
Anyways, in all honesty, yes I do believe 90% of most bounty campaigns (especially from the alts side) are a waste of time, this is as a result of lack of interest from both investors and project team, if you understand the previous occurrence in the crypto space, then you will see the reason behind this current situation,   but that doesn't mean there are no few good ones out there.

i do agree this methods are recently introduced by project owners in other to control dump in price, but what happen when there is already a dump in price and no bounty reward has been distributed? who is to blame or what method should be applied to fix that!

i do respect the opinion of the project and bm who support this method, but to me i don't see it as best solution to prevent price from falling, if they are truly interested in protecting the price of their tokens, team should start by given less tokens for hunters and have fix participants in their campaign, this way only limited amount of tokens will be in the hands of hunters to sell which won't have any impact on price. Tachyon was a good example.

whatever the level of their IQ, i think the crypto community should be glad this hackers never thought of the above listed, that would have been detrimental to the market, knowing the way crypto work, any slight bad news can affect price greatly, they fail on their attempt to steal funds that is much better,  
i think any clever hacker may already have a plan what to do before hacking, pretty sure this guys don't have any plan what to do when they succeed, it was more like a fun thing to them the way i see it.

Am also speechless, can you imagine the number of high profile people whose twitter account has been compromise withing the same time frame! i sincerely don't want to believe that twitter failed to step up on security, if this is not the case, what then is the problem that hackers are gaining access to high profile account, one or two can be overlooked but more than that is really questionable,
i may not be a high profile person but i don't feel secure using twitter after this incidence, they should really do something about their security or whatever loopholes are there.

Yeah he is clearly living in a dream land if he thinks such growth will happen in this project that have already experience its price growth since last bull run, he must have forgotten there are new Defi project coming up in the market every day which also have the potentials to bring good profit to investors, this are fresh promising project that can make x10-20 when the bull market has come,
If Bancor is as great as the op describe then we would see some price movement.

I just check the website and it is opening fine, I guess at that moment the op tried it the website was a temporary down, between this sites are no longer popular and are hardly used by crypto communities any more, since it was stated that most of their reviews are biased and probably influenced, I guess they already lose their value in the eyes of many,
Although it is good to warn members about this but I just wonder what harm can they really cause at this stage! It is not as if there money involved.

I would much rather buy btc than to mine especially when I don't have the mining equipment, imagine someone with $200 wants to buy btc, it will be much easier to pick up some btc from any good exchange than to go through mining process, just save yourself the trouble and buy,
But if you are a miner, then you may want to mine the $200 worth of btc because you have the equipment and experience, still, buying is a preferred option for me, low stress, low cost.

Isn't that what we all wanted! All the anti-bitcoin should see reason to be btc lovers, it doesn't matter what is the motive behind changing their mind, the important part is they are gradually coming in, instead of being against btc, they are now supporting btc,
Rather I think you should wish there are more cz in the industry to push things to the right direction, all cz has done was to make crypto easily accessible to all, he may have some shortcomings while doing that but he is working towards it unlike many who just look for opportunity to siphon.

A healthy criticism is always good for business, it makes them want to fix those shortcomings and do even more better, the important thing is knowing this shortcomings and willing to make necessary adjustments, binance has been an inspiration imo with the way they have managed to raise the bar of exchange, kudos to them for this achievement and their hard work, their innovation is impressive.

Exactly, trying to keep a healthy post among participants is necessary but it is equally important not to over stretch it,  maybe this method will prevent spam posters not to find the campaign interesting enough to join, 4 hours in between post is a bit much imo, it will seem the participants will have to come back every 4hrs to make a post.

I have never seen where Airdrop have request a deposit of some payments to receive the reward, I think any project requesting this is definitely a scam and should be avoided, normal Airdrop don't request deposit, scammers will always want to deceive people through every possible means necessary.

I think utility should be number one feature to look out for because in the very near future this will be the driving force of projects, any project which have no utility will find it difficult to survive, only demand can bring about a healthy price growth, if this is absent then that project can only survive temporarily.

I would love to know what is the action taken when this suspicious projects are reported to this site, do they hold the project owners accountable for any misconduct in the project or they just give the usual warning!
It would have been more satisfying to know the people behind such scam project are being apprehended if possible, this will then reduce the number of scam project we have. Nevertheless, thanks for sharing.

A bounty is regarded as good when it is able to list on exchange to have value for hunters to be able to sell, so if this is the criteria to determine a good bounty, then I think there are quite a few of them that are available which I can say will be trading in an exchange pretty soon, at the end of the day the reward is what matters to hunters most.
All you need to is look closely and carefully you can find a handful of decent bounties to join.

By signing up with your link on crypto.com then both you and the person get to share $50 is it without investing any amount or the person must invest before this bonus can be given?
Between regarding staking on the exchange, I think I like their method, all you have to do is have the assets on the exchange and start earning, but assuming we choose a lock period can it be unlock whenever you feel the need or the lock period must be reached before it can be access?

I think the price already correct since after the tiktok video, I always knew the price is just temporary pump with no major updates,  even if tiktok started to get banned in some countries, it may only affect the price for some time and soon things will go back to normal, dogecoin is an old project that keeps fighting to be in the market, they have good dev so I believe the team will keep the project going no matter what. It is part of market for price to go up and down.

Buying the dip depends largely on individual, if you have knowledge of the market and how it operates then buying every dip would be very satisfying, but from the point of a newbie who had already bought from the top and has less or limited knowledge of the market won't even consider it, their eagerness would be to sell and leave,
I would rather buy in every major dip than in every dip, although the former comes rarely.