You can delete this 30 more times, I will repost until you come clean about endthefed and higherhighs.BIG announcement, they have BCH, lol. Not even worth logging in to see this disappointment of an update. By the way, wasn't there 1 member here who said user endthefed is 100% an employee even though he claimed not to be (but promoting tournaments in the chat the whole time). SWC also wrote here he is not staff. But yet he has green chat again, only staff has green chat. https://imgur.com/a/VnS3ePIAnother lie exposed, just like with higherhighs. Also, swc staff winning bigger tournament, interesting. https://imgur.com/a/HiDgUbe There's nothing wrong with a mod playing, don't be such a riggy. I think it actually helps having a member of the community moderate the troll box (endthefed has been around forever). quis custodiet ipsos custodes The actual staff. breaking news, 9/10 participants in gang rapes are willing. You ever wonder why exactly doctors have to take an oath? Obviously staff should be barred from playing and when they win it kicks swc's reputation in the nuts There's a difference between staff and chat moderators. Mods are part of the community, they don't run the site. |
|
|
|
Another thing with the corona outbreak I noticed in my country is that everybody is speaking of the British, Brazilian or South African virus mutation, but when speaking about the original virus it is not okay to say it is the Chinese virus. How can that be? It feels like there are so many things happening behind closed doors that we will never find out. It's been almost 1.5 years and we still don't know if it was an biological attack or not. I wish the politicians would pressure more to get answers.
Because the people that started calling it "The China Virus" are the same people that spread a bunch of misinformation about China spreading the virus on purpose. Calling it the China Virus at this point doesn't really do much harm other than make you look like an ignorant idiot. |
|
|
|
Basically you are not gambling with fiat as you do not even deposit with fiat. It is just a unit/denomination of your crypto to be shown in fiat as it gives the best minimum bet amount as pointed out by ryzaadit previously. There were some sites use mBTH/mETH for the 3rd party games but dont you know that most players are not convenience with it then suggest the casino to use $/€ as they can bet lower amount than when the games uses mBTC/mETH. Stake has build their own games that you can play with crypto directly. If you suggest more games, it needs time and effort for them to build their own games. At the moment, Stake is the one with biggest number of original games (16) than other casinos imho. Other may have few original games only.
I still think that it is not cool to show fiat in a crypto place because there are some of us who came here (to crypto) to get away from fiat and here we are talking about how we are gambling in fiat money. I understand that it could be easier, but I do not want to know how many fiat I have, I want to know how much bitcoin I have, that is a much better version. This is why it is not liked by certain people. Don't get me wrong, that is not something bad in the main principle of things, it is not like it would ruin stakes reputation or a shady or scammy thing, it is simply showing fiat how much and that's it, not like it is something very dangerous which is not a problem. This is why some people may "dislike" it but that is not a big deal, it could be acceptable and it could be understandable and there won't be any problems about it like people leaving over it neither, it is something tiny and unimportant. You don't have to look at it, at least for games developed by stake. You can toggle between viewing fiat estimate or crypto. Personally I think it's super convenient. It's a pain to count all the zeros, it's too easy to be off by one digit making your bet 10x more or less than you want, and if you use multiple diff cryptos keeping track of the prices and doing simple math all the time can get very tedious. |
|
|
|
Your argument would hold up IF Dr. Baker ruled positional asphyxia as the cause of death and he didn't. So that means that fentanyl and methamphetamine clearly did play a role in Floyd's death and the whole point of contention is whether Chauvin's knee had "substantial causal factor" (this is the phrase used in the jury instructions for 2nd degree manslaughter and I think the murder charges as well) in Floyd's death
I never said fentanyl or meth didn't play a roll in the death. I'm saying it doesn't matter if they did. It wouldn't make Chauvin any less guilty of staying on top of the guy for 9 minutes while he begged for his life and then died. |
|
|
|
hmm so how come he was still alert and able to talk and spell his name and give date of birth and answer questions..
do you still not know how overdoses work
its funny how the video has been public for months.. the jury has already passed its verdict.. but you as a sofa jurer have a different story to tell that does not follow ANY ACTUAL EVIDENCE
by the way the medication packaging found in floyds sisters car was not fentanyl. and the amount of that other medication in his blood was not overdose amount. it was not even therapeutic/recreational amount
This goes both ways. Floyd gave his name but it appeared he was a bit incoherent and erratic. But how come he was nodding off in the car? The passenger in the car testified this, that he kept falling asleep and he couldn't be woken up. How come he was alert while he was in the store, then suddenly just passes out and is unable to be awakened? And in regards to the fentanyl levels, I'll believe Dr. Baker when he says 11 ng/mL of fentanyl is an unsafe level and put fentanyl intoxication as the contributing factor. He testified that he's certified fentanyl levels of 3 ng/mL as OD's, so not a harmless amount of fentanyl. Why does it matter if he was high or overdosing when we have a video of the cop kneeling on his neck for 9 minutes until he was dead? Being high or overdosing does not make someone unmurderable. |
|
|
|
Flloyd died "from police force, not drugs or underlying health conditions"
-The Medical Examiner This is wrong. He said Floyd died after his "heart gave out* following subdual by law enforcement with contributing factors of heart conditions, fentanyl intoxication, and recent methamphetamine use. It's just not true to say he just died from police force and not drugs. I still don't understand this. We're all suppose to listen to the experts on the cause of death, they each contradict one another. Dr. Baker (forensic pathologist) - Floyd's heart gave out following law enforcement subdual with contributing factors of heart conditions/drug use. Openly stated no anatomical evidence to support a conclusion of positional asphyxia. Dr. Thomas (forensic pathologist) - Floyd died of positional asphyxia with contributing factors of heart conditions/drug use. Dr. Tobin (pulmonologist) - Floyd *did not die* of underlying factors. They did not play a role in his death. Floyd died of positional asphyxia. Dr. Rich (cardiologist) - George Floyd had a strong healthy heart and his heart condition did not play a role in his death. I watched each one of these doctor's testimony and did so closely. They all were contradicting each other. So which expert do I listen to? I pick one? Manslaughter was the only charge here worth debating. Murder 2 and Murder 3 are so unbelievably wild I don't understand what trial this jury was watching. I don't think it's that confusing at all. He didn't overdose. Chauvin killed him. The whole "he did drugs" argument really is just grasping at straws. It doesn't matter. |
|
|
|
The physical evidence available to the medical examiner suggests that Floyd died from an overdose.
Flloyd died "from police force, not drugs or underlying health conditions" "George Floyd did not die from drug overdose" -The Medical Examiner "George Floyd Did Not Die from Drug Overdose" -Cardiologist (Expert Witness) |
|
|
|
Of all the defenses I've heard for Chauvin, I think these two are among the most insincere: If Floyd was saying he couldn't breathe prior to being put on the ground, a reasonable person might not give similar statements much weight when he is put on the ground We all know that "I can't breath" is what someone says when they're having trouble breathing or short of breath. Trying to discredit the victim as a liar because he said he couldn't breath but didn't turn blue and pass out and somehow justifying sitting on top of him while he's screaming it and until he's dead is just dumb. You are misrepresenting my argument. I am saying that Floyd was saying he couldn't breathe before Chauvin was doing anything that would possibly interfere with Floyd's breathing. This means one of two things, 1) some factor other than Chauvin was causing Floyd to be unable to breathe, or 2) Chauvin had a reasonable reason to believe Floyd was not actually unable to breathe when making these cries. Yeah, he was having a panic attack. This doesn't make it ok to stay on top of him for 9 minutes while he dies. In fact, it's a reason not to stay on top of him for 9 minutes. Floyd having 3x the lethal amount of drugs in his system is relevant....how would one expect someone to survive after having that level of fentanyl in his system? And we all know that the '3x the lethal amount' line does not take into account Flloyds size or tolerance and meanwhile you have multiple experts testifying that he did not die from an overdose. The medical examiner said that if it had not been for the video, he would have believed Floyd died from an overdose. I am not even sure why medical examiners are looking at anything other than the body when making these kinds of determinations. The medical examiner said "George Floyd did not die from drug overdose". I believe the comment you're referring to was the hypothetical "If we found Flloyds body at home, alone and in the same state, it would be ruled an overdose." But what happened was a cop sat on top of him for 10 minutes until he was dead and it was all caught on video from many angles. |
|
|
|
Of all the defenses I've heard for Chauvin, I think these two are among the most insincere: If Floyd was saying he couldn't breathe prior to being put on the ground, a reasonable person might not give similar statements much weight when he is put on the ground Floyd having 3x the lethal amount of drugs in his system is relevant....how would one expect someone to survive after having that level of fentanyl in his system? We all know that "I can't breath" is what someone says when they're having trouble breathing or short of breath. Trying to discredit the victim as a liar because he said he couldn't breath but didn't turn blue and pass out and somehow justifying sitting on top of him while he's screaming it and until he's dead is just dumb. And we all know that the '3x the lethal amount' line does not take into account Flloyds size or tolerance and meanwhile you have multiple experts testifying that he did not die from an overdose. |
|
|
|
Boiled down to watching the video and seeing a handcuffed man crying out for his mother and saying he can't breathe it seems.
And dying. You left out the dying part. |
|
|
|
|
Guilty on all counts.
Good.
|
|
|
|
Can't imagine that judge not noticing or not doing anything about a sleeping juror.
It is not up to the judge to notice a sleeping juror. if opposing counsel does something that is not allowed per the rules of evidence, it is up to the other side to object, and if they do not raise the objection, the resulting testimony will be allowed. Wasn't saying it was the judges responsibility. Just saying if it did happen, I would be surprised if the judge didn't notice it and pause the trial to sort things out with the juror before moving on rather than wait for one of the lawyers to bring it to the courts attention. |
|
|
|
Another provably fair stake original, limbo. Its not about the money as I obviously did almost bet nothing, just wanted to find out if this is a fair game. Those numbers/results don't add up here. Target multiplier 200x, win chance 0.495% . So at every 210 spins or something there should be a win. Result, 1181 spins, 2 wins. Thats a win ratio of 0.1693% .Almost 3 times smaller than should it should be. https://imgur.com/a/4r5EDkjBy the way those 2 wins came within 3 spins. First 600 spins no win, then 2 wins and next 578 spins no win. Very fair numbers here yet again. They call this "not getting lucky". Really, this is a totally expected possible outcome. And because the game is provably fair, you can check for yourself to see if the game is fair or not. Your losing sessions have nothing to do with this. Yes I agree the screenshot cannot prove whether it is fair or not but I know Limbo is a high-risk game because it offers a multiplier x1,000,000 even the highest multiplier of any game, right? I just tried it the same way, Wins : 2 Losses :351 https://imgur.com/XQizZG8 So the conclusion is about luck LOL you did 800 spins less then me u clown. And I did not go for max multiplier, only for 200x with a 0,5% chance. And yes, orginals plinko is the exact same rippoff. All stake originals are rigged as fuck. Thats why even this guy in the stream on Saturdays doesn't play them, even if he uses "fake money". Keep dreaming about fairness on this site/these site games . If you think the outcome of the bet was manipulated by stake all you need to do is post the bet id and server/player seed + nonce and they won't get away with it. If you just post a losing graph that proves nothing you'll only look like another riggy crying about losing. |
|
|
|
Another provably fair stake original, limbo. Its not about the money as I obviously did almost bet nothing, just wanted to find out if this is a fair game. Those numbers/results don't add up here. Target multiplier 200x, win chance 0.495% . So at every 210 spins or something there should be a win. Result, 1181 spins, 2 wins. Thats a win ratio of 0.1693% .Almost 3 times smaller than should it should be. https://imgur.com/a/4r5EDkjBy the way those 2 wins came within 3 spins. First 600 spins no win, then 2 wins and next 578 spins no win. Very fair numbers here yet again. They call this "not getting lucky". Really, this is a totally expected possible outcome. And because the game is provably fair, you can check for yourself to see if the game is fair or not. Your losing sessions have nothing to do with this. |
|
|
|
Have the final prizes been posted anywhere? Or do we know how many will place in the money? Just curious, no rush.
First 10 players will place in the money and you have final prizes in the OP. Very respectable amounts with the current BTC price and hopefully they will be even better by the time league finishes  That's for 34 players and it looks like we have 48, assuming everyone in the league has paid. The total prizes will depend on how many people ultimately join, but based on 34 users joining at 0.0045 which will make the total pot a little over 0.3 the prizes will likely be as follows:
1st 0.1
2nd 0.05
3rd 0.04
4th 0.03
5th 0.02
6th 0.01
7th 0.01
8th 0.01
9th 0.01
10th 0.01
|
|
|
|
Yeah, he is the one who has 2 more accounts specially created for the million-dollar race  Just check the race page and there is more than 1 ClassyBeef, I have no idea if the alt account is allowed or not but it is obvious that the Staff let him do so. Good luck all hunters on race It's a streamer group, they've been using the two accounts for a long time now. And, unless they manage to take first and another top prize, nobody at the top of the leaderboard is benefiting from the using multiple accounts in the race, despite everyone complaining about it. Just do the math. |
|
|
|
with different dice scripts I can wager around $200-$350 per dollar
Best you can average with a 1% house edge is $100 per $1. |
|
|
|
The site has "real" in its name so it must be real. Totally not fake, like all this stuff too:  Standing orders to stop the president from entering the pentagon, use deadly force if necessary. lol. Our source said U.S. Pentagon Police, part of the Pentagon Force Protection Agency, stopped Biden and his Secret Service detail in their tracks, informing them that they had standing orders to prevent Biden administration members–including Biden–from entering the building. Those orders reportedly included the use of deadly force. Tash your brain is gonna turn to mush if you keep clicking those links. |
|
|
|
Move forward with self-management, all kinds of alliances from small to large, cooperation instead of coercion.
You mean like a democracy with local state and federal governments? |
|
|
|
|
Have the final prizes been posted anywhere? Or do we know how many will place in the money? Just curious, no rush.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
