How do we enter the lottery?

These assets,

Better late than never!!!!!!






... but we need more details ... how do we prove we control the NXT account with the coinomat assets?

If miners process transactions on the blockchain that are involved in illegal activities, and this is clearly visible, then they are at risk

It is far better if miners never know what any particular tx is for, otherwise, CSW's warning is valid, miners could be legally liable for KNOWINGLY facilitating illegal activities by processing tx into a block where the purpose is illegal, and this can be seen in the op code. Nothing really to do with CSW personally, or ethics, just legal realities of the world we live in today.

disclaimer: CSW is a dick, I agree!

Thanks for the links, CSW is like a medical doctor with catastrophically awful bedside manner giving brutally honest, but truthful,  bad news, I think he's correct. If miners process transactions that can be demonstrated to be involved in illegal activities,  and these tx are not encrypted and can be viewed in plain text on the blockchain, then the miners are vulnerable to legal action. This seems pretty clear cut to me now, just a shame CSW's personality obscures his message.

Edit, I remember hearing about a case where a guy went to jail for lending his brother a car, just because his brother asked "I need to use your car to do X', and X was obviously illegal. If he just asked 'I need to use your car' , then the brother would not have known of any illegal activity involving his car, so he would not have committed any crime.

Can someone explain reasoning behind why CSW believes ABC changes would make BCH illegal, has he spelled out in detail what the problem is?

From the POV of users of the P2P storage product the situation has improved considerably if nebulous is in better shape, long term dev support of the sia network is much more important than mining centralisation.

You could give BSH Bitcoin level security using Komodo's delayed proof of work consensus mechanism, it would only cost a few hundred $$ per year, and it would literally make BSH as secure as Bitcoin, so no re-org attacks or 51% attacks, BUT, without needing any centralised checkpoints, and without needing to brown nose ecosystem players like exchanges, or bother with proof of social media.

Raad the dPoW whitepaper, I think dPoW would make BSH a real contender!

https://github.com/KomodoPlatform/komodo/wiki/Delayed-Proof-of-Work-(dPoW)-Whitepaper

Looks like Bstash is the best of ABC & SV, back to the Bitcoin whitepaper but without wormhole tokens, and community based without billionaires (on both sides) telling everyone what to do.

I would prefer using komodo delayed proof of work, dPoW , over merged mining though, dPoW periodically notarizes to bitcoin, so after about 20 blocks the notarized blockchain ends up effectively having bitcoin level PoW securing it. If only ABC devs read more widely they could have added dPoW to their chain for about 500 USD per year, and avoided 'checkpoints'

Bstash could do ok, need to know more about the devs, what skill level, and how committed.

Thanks, that makes sense!

What proportion of vrsc are staking at any time,  how can we check that?

Is any exchange trading Bstash yet?

https://bstash.org/

I predict the hash war will ultimately be seen as a triumph for Bitcoin and nakamoto consensus, unlike conventional wars where the generals and commanders in chief send OTHER people into battle from the comfort of their bunkers, in a hash war the combatants deploy their OWN resources, and the winner will be the side that commits the most of their OWN resources over time, not other people forced into battle against their will, and the loser in this hash war WILL lose billions of their own money.

This is how the system works, and it's beautiful to watch!!

The temporary market dump is worth recalibrating everyone's attention back to how Bitcoin actually works.

After this expectations will be reset, everyone will know hash decides everything, and combatants in the next hash war know they need to risk their OWN resources to win. This is a historic reawakening of Bitcoin!

This level of founders reward looks greedy, obviously founders were ready to mine the second this launched, founders should end up with a good stack anyway, you guys could have done what Verus foundation did and not have a premine or founders reward, the long term respect generated from a fair launch with no block reward tax would outweigh the short term benefit of tax imo.

If you guys are here for the long term you don't need 35% tax

The fundamentals are still good, in the next bull run we'll see 99% turn around, no doubt about that.

^ This, Bitcoin & blockchain are all about what provably happened, CSW loves to trigger people, it doesn't alter how much hash he controls, and we'll soon see how much that is.

What is relative ROI for masternodes and staking, are they approx the same?

I think in a few days we see how much hash CSW & friends control, I think it will surprise ALL of us!

Independent rational thinking without emotion is needed which many here lack, some struggle with the idea that people involved with the 'satoshi entity' and the creation of bitcoin might be arrogant dickheads with nasty personal habits, and even might have acted dishonestly in many provable ways. That is ALL irrelevant in what is to come, if satoshi bitcoins start moving in 2020 it doesn't matter diddly squat about the personality and character of the people moving them, just WHERE they move them, and how much hash they control.

Humanity is conditioned to using great innovations created by dishonest dickheads.

I agree, CSW was involved in the earliest days of bitcoin and ignoring what he says because he comes across like a dickhead is dangerous, like ignoring Trump in 2016 because he was a failed businessman turned reality TV personality. CSW wants to be disliked, probably to make the fuck you sweeter if/when he moves satoshi bitcoin in 2020. He wants to destroy alts like XMR.