You don't seem to hate vaporware in general tho, because you like to advertise your own after every self-spam campaign in every thread you visit since months if not years.
Agree, and based on this I made my conclusion above that he is actually promoting his upcoming P&D, but after I had to agree with smooth that it is quite unfair to make such accusation. Still, the fact is, as you said that he has been promoting his vaporware. TPTB_need_war is a good man when he is in a right mindset and he contributed a lot to this forum already. Lets hope he is promoting his vaporware for ethical and honest reasons. |
|
|
|
But why should it dip at all? Unfortunately, I can't afford the Gold report. The dip was announced for 2016 Q1, so far it hasn't occurred.
It is not exactly what Arsmtrong has "announced". It seems you are looking for guarantees from Armstrong and from his often wrong interpreter, TPTB_need_war. On the other hand, Armstrong provides you with signals which are always conditional. That means, the expected event - in this case the decline of gold - depends on certain criteria/conditions, i.e. gold decline will happen if a, b, c, etc., conditions are in place. He has clearly outlined those in his analysis and reports, so you could hedge your trades by taking into account those a, b, c, etc., conditions. That’s how you trade, ain’t you? In fact, even if you were heavily betting on the decline of gold, but if you hedged your trade sensibly (e.g. with stocks just to mention the most obvious), you actually could make lots of money even if gold was going against you. On the note of technicalities, I wrote several times here that I don’t trade gold, but I hedge all the time with gold miner (GDX) and based on my daily involvement with gold miners here is what I can see. It seems to me, the indicators pretty much in line with Armstrong’s expectation about gold. The technicalities clearly indicate that the bulls were trying to start a rally in 07/14, 07/15, 10/15 and 03/15, but in then then they quit after only 4 days of upward price movement in all those cases. This indicates that they (gold investors and the market) did not have the ammunition to form a meaningful rally when they had the perfect opportunity to do so. This means, the bulls probably don’t have the capacity to stop a further decline in the near future. Based on the trends, I would think it is extremely risky to invest in gold, though of course the situation can change in the next 1-2 months (after all you never know that the corrupt Troika will come up with what kind of bulllshit). Personally, I will keep using GDX as a hedging instrument, this time shorting it. |
|
|
|
This seems somewhat unfair. You can't say what he will or won't do in the future and it isn't fair to criticize someone for what he hasn't done yet. AFAIK, he hasn't launched any coins or released any software (which as you say above, is part of the problem), P&D or otherwise. Please wait until he does something wrong before condemning him for it.
Yeah, you are right, it was quite unfair. We should wait and see how he is progressing. |
|
|
|
I'm mostly referring to your pathological homoerotic prison-fantasies.
Scammers like David boy, who collect money from the idiots by marketing blatant scams and nonsensical business plans - who is in the meantime so useless that he can't even deliver a fucking GUI, never mind JINN, the revolutionary microprocessor or an IoT system - always end up in prison. There is no fantasy about it. |
|
|
|
|
TPTB_need_war is indeed a very smart fellow, most likely the smartest in this whole place. He has a very good understanding of software development and technology ... in theory. He would be a great chief software architect, you know that guy who never delivers anything within the software development team, but everyone is amazed by his intellect and deep understanding of software development and technology.
His post on politics and economy affairs are very interesting, and always a great material.
However, his super intellect and his 160 IQ leads him nowhere.
His financial predictions are completely off the charts and useless. I pointed out in the Armstrong thread how wrong he was about the BTC price in several occasions - still he is marketing himself as a great forecaster. Total nonsense.
On software development, terms of implementation he is hopeless. I read not long time ago, he said none of the popular existing programming languages - which could expose the project to existing developer communities - satisfies his requirements, and therefore he is evaluating now the Rust language/framework. WTF? So he delays his progress again, because right now the programing languages are not suited to his use case. WTF again? It seems he doesn't have the ability to deliver anything, except showcasing his super intellect in this forum.
Terms of his scam busting mission, as I said several times, make no mistake, he is not worried about the scams - in fact he said scams are "part of the game" -, he is just building up his honest and ethical profile, because he is preparing for a P&D to satisfy his "angel investors". Still, he is right about the scams, but he is not so innocent scam busting crusader as he present himself.
On the personal level, - apart from his incoming P&D venture - he is a very nice guy, the BCT forum wouldn't be the same without him.
|
|
|
|
IOTA will be the backbone of the ElectricChain and at the heart of the first ChainOfThings event to explore data integrity and security in ecosystems such as smart-grids. Anyone here in London at the end of May? Read more at: http://www.chainofthings.com/casestudy Wow! After 5 months the $500K was collected from the idiots, David boy, the completely clueless and zero-experience, momma's basement based "CEO" of IOTA managed to get into a non-profit, absolutely irrelevant Hong Kong based initiative of 5 noname IT personals. Nobody knows them and nobody cares about them in IoT - no wonder David boy could make a meaningless non-profit deal with them. WoW! What an achievement in 5 months and having the scammed $500K in hand. Just as I predicted: no revenue, no monetization from the scammers. Of course they don't need it. The business plan is to scam with IOTA/JINN by selling a coin which has no relevance whatsoever to any real world business process. |
|
|
|
Alternatively, take a flying fuck into a rolling doughnut hole and admit that if you idiot & greedy enough to "invest" in a zero experienced university student and a wanker-lawyer (who doesn't mind to give his name to a blatant scam), then you shouldn't be surprised when the whole scam is collapsing.
In the past in Iota thread you said "one scam at a time". Now I feel myself like you have cheated on me. I hope it's just a threesome and you didn't really break up with Iota... LoL That was at least funny Sergey. On the serious note, it is too late son, your crime has been committed - now you are the yesterday news. When you will be in jail for your blatant IOTA scam and the horny prison population fuck so hard your tight ass with their giant Belarusian dicks, then you will wish be in this threesome. |
|
|
|
Holding my bag but extremely unprofessional for the kids to make a move like this.
You need to plan ahead and be able to foresee things that will happen.
Young business people make this mistake way too often. And its only experience that makes them learn.
Unfortunate in this situation that all of us investors are on that learning ride with the dev team as well.
Never mind, you, the matured, experienced and wise man gave money to the university student and a German lawyer-wanker, the LISK scammers. It is "unfortunate", isn't you idiot? on the lawyer. he did fail to reply to my ICO due diligence email, which i consider to have been unprofessional. i also have not seen any results from said lawyer or any true reply/people behind LISK sharing their info/plans. Not good. ie. The dev of Bitswift for how small they are (for now only) is also on linked-in but even added myself way back as per me asking him directly, not to mention they are always reachable by email (somewhere in Ontario, Canada) and even have (had?) a 1-800 ph# setup. They are also reg'd with the CDN government with docs to prove it, they have HUGE stuff coming too. THAT is how you run a legit business (crypto or not), not this typical BS have-hidden ICO crap. It is also obvious lost of the ICO BTC was self-bought. I hope LISK makes it big though sure....guess we'll see. like mentioned above...seems mostly whiners with barely 1btc here in it lol, the big btc holders will be patient for ROI as usual. To be honest Bob, I have to admit you have been a class act compared to these wankers. At least you told the crowd, fuck you, I am a marketer and I am pumping and dumping this shit. It was still a scam, but at least - unlike these wankers who talk about all kind of nonsenses like decentralized applications - you said clearly you pump the thing and will dump it, and then you will get out. So everyone with over IQ 80 and age over 14 knew that no matter what, shouldn't invest in Bob's coins. (Of course, still you shouldn't scam the under 14 and IQ 70 absolute idiot children who still invested in your P&Ds, but that is another matter). On the other hand, these LISK and IOTA scammers come up with all kind of blatant lies to lure money out from these greedy idiots - not classy at all. |
|
|
|
What do you expect from a wanker who gave his name to such blatant scam?
Send me your personal details, once I have more time (end of the week) I will forward it to the German law enforcement to press a charge against these fraudsters.
I suggest not to send personal details to this guy. He will use them in his next scam. Regarding German law enforcement - he already contacted USA, China, Russia, Batman and Superman regarding another project. You see how "sane" he is, lol. Oh dear, it seems this piece of shit, semi autistic Belarusian scammer Come-from-Beyond put some of his IOTA scam money into the LISK scam. |
|
|
|
Holding my bag but extremely unprofessional for the kids to make a move like this.
You need to plan ahead and be able to foresee things that will happen.
Young business people make this mistake way too often. And its only experience that makes them learn.
Unfortunate in this situation that all of us investors are on that learning ride with the dev team as well.
Never mind, you, the matured, experienced and wise man gave money to the university student and a German lawyer-wanker, the LISK scammers. It is "unfortunate", isn't you idiot? on the lawyer. he did fail to reply to my ICO due diligence email, which i consider to have been unprofessional. What do you expect from a wanker who gave his name to such blatant scam? Send me your personal details, once I have more time (end of the week) I will forward it to the German law enforcement to press a charge against these fraudsters. EDIT: It is not unprofessional - it is criminal. The LISK money collection scam - just like IOTA - is a straightforward law enforcement matter. |
|
|
|
Holding my bag but extremely unprofessional for the kids to make a move like this.
You need to plan ahead and be able to foresee things that will happen.
Young business people make this mistake way too often. And its only experience that makes them learn.
Unfortunate in this situation that all of us investors are on that learning ride with the dev team as well.
Never mind, you, the matured, experienced and wise man gave money to the university student and a German lawyer-wanker, the LISK scammers. It is "unfortunate", isn't you idiot? on the lawyer. he did fail to reply to my ICO due diligence email, which i consider to have been unprofessional. What do you expect from a wanker who gave his name to such blatant scam? Send me your personal details, once I have more time (end of the week) I will forward it to the German law enforcement to press a charge against these fraudsters. |
|
|
|
Holding my bag but extremely unprofessional for the kids to make a move like this.
You need to plan ahead and be able to foresee things that will happen.
Young business people make this mistake way too often. And its only experience that makes them learn.
Unfortunate in this situation that all of us investors are on that learning ride with the dev team as well.
Never mind, despite of your infinite wisdom, you the matured, experienced and wise man gave money to a university student and a German lawyer-wanker, the LISK scammers. It is "unfortunate", isn't you idiot? |
|
|
|
Holding my bag but extremely unprofessional for the kids to make a move like this.
You need to plan ahead and be able to foresee things that will happen.
Young business people make this mistake way too often. And its only experience that makes them learn.
Unfortunate in this situation that all of us investors are on that learning ride with the dev team as well.
Never mind, you, the matured, experienced and wise man gave money to a university student and a German lawyer-wanker, the LISK scammers. It is "unfortunate", isn't you idiot? |
|
|
|
If you cannot think of a solution to solve a simple problem of a handful of people not "validating" their keys and are prepared to delay an entire operation as a result, what hope is there when there is a significant problem to deal with?
Again send emails until the 11th and fire away.
100% this is not the problem. How was it determined to wait till the end of the month + maybe into May to wait for these remaining people exactly? How exactly is this delay determined? In particular the 'maybe into May' part? Was a survey done? Did emails get sent to those people and they replied and begged please wait I am on vacation, I am in the hospital?
Bullshit. This delay and maybe into May is something else. Not waiting on people to validate their stupid keys.
Prove this wrong by sending everyone an email each day until the 11th, failure to respond, send their funds back to their sending address. Or proceed minus them and include them later on.
Interesting. This is from the other blatant scam LISK. When the scammers realize, ooopppps, they must launch the project, then they start find excuses to delay the release and instead of start bullshitting. Like the Belarusian IOTA scammer is delaying the release with the "intentional" bug. |
|
|
|
I'm sure few days later you will regret ...
Boring trolling. This is what matters: Anybody who ever wrote a line of software by working for a serious software company or working on a serious open source project understand that I am correct about your non-existent skills. Good enough to scam the greedy idiots and poor naive souls - not good enough to do real businesses. That's why your JINN scam never became a real business and never will be. That's why your IOTA scam will be never a real business. Scams. You made some money with your ICO, you will make some money with the P&D, and then when you will go to jail I will be still here. |
|
|
|
I don't want to escalate
No, you don't want. The reason you don't want to escalate, because you don't know how to design software. Your skill is good enough to produce that 12 Java files, carry out your P&D scam, give some ROI to your greedy shills - nothing more your skill can achieve. |
|
|
|
It would be unacceptable even from a junior software engineer to implement "intentional" bugs to test/validate the correctness and robustness of the software. Only self-taught software developers or engineers who never worked on any commercial project do such nonsense. There are well known methods to perform test and quality assurance (QA) - "intentional bug" is not one of them. How "intentional bugs" (i.e. sit and wait until someone find the bug) can save time and money for a software project? It can't. Proper design, implementation and test can.
To those who might be misguided by the quoted text. Google for Bugs can also be placed into code on purpose, and the number of bugs that have not been found can be predicted based on the percentage of intentionally placed bugs that were found. The problem is that it assumes that the intentional bugs are the same type of bug as the unintentional ones. to get more information on that technique. Come again? Why would any software engineer waste time in the context of the software you design by putting intentional bugs, sit and wait until someone find it to verify the correctness and robustness of a software? Software engineers verify the correctness with unit tests, the robustness with stress test. What you can achieve with "intentional bug" in the context of your software what you can't achieve more quickly and efficiently with proper software engineering test? Nothing. Of course, you don't have any unit test in your software and we already learnt (CIYAM exposed it was well) that you don't even do test because it is "complicated" to test to software. WTF? Complicated to test the software - so you don't test it. Fuck off wanker, learn how to design, write and test software and then come back when you learnt it. |
|
|
|
When you were wearing another face you gave the opposite characteristic to my skills.
Your skill is described above. Read it and refute it. You can't. Anybody who ever wrote a line of software by working for a serious software company or working on a serious open source project understand that I am correct about your skills. Good enough to scam the greedy idiots and poor naive souls - not good enough to do real businesses. That's why your JINN scam never became a real business and never will be. Scam. |
|
|
|
Maybe you should write a book on the topic of intelligent investing...
Ohh you IOTA shill, I see you are getting agitated as I am exposing the non-existent software engineering skills of the Belarusian wanker. So everyone can see that his software development skills only good enough to sell scam. That was sold for $500K for the noobs, naive and idiots? Is your business plan to challenge IBM and Fujitsu in the IoT with this junior level, anonymous Belarusian developer? Is your business plan to challenge INTEL in the microprocessor sector with this anonymous Belarusian who write this shambolic software? Keep shilling IOTA shill - the software the Belarusian junior writes only good enough for a pathetic P&D what you have been working on. |
|
|
|
Why? The bug is intentional and easy to find.
Now, when you see this then you understand this Belarusian wanker who collected $500K for 12 poorly written Java files from the noobs, naives and idiots never ever worked for any serious software development company nor he was ever involved with any serious software projects. He acquired his junior level software development skills by scamming the poor souls with shits like NXT and JINN. It would be unacceptable even from a junior software engineer to implement "intentional" bugs to test/validate the correctness and robustness of the software. Only self-taught software developers or engineers who never worked on any commercial project do such nonsense. There are well known methods to perform test and quality assurance (QA) - "intentional bug" is not one of them. How "intentional bugs" (i.e. sit and wait until someone find the bug) can save time and money for a software project? It can't. Proper design, implementation and test can. The IOTA software (after 5 months) is not ready, so the Belarusian scammer came up with his usual BS to sell the delay to the "investors". This time the BS is the "intentional" bug. The shills and sockpuppets of course sell the nonsense the "investors". While the bit intelligent "investors" say, WTF. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
