Bitcoin Forum
April 27, 2024, 09:52:01 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 [59] 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 »
1161  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: BitBay | Decentralized Marketplace | Unmoderated Thread on: December 08, 2014, 01:51:01 PM
Altcoin UK

you seemed to have asked earlier for me to make it clear that im not in control of the project finances and details and if that isnt already clear(i thought that was obvious) so of course im not nor did i ever imply not even tacitly.

The parts of the tech end of course were mine and people come to me for tech questions. The fact that im the only public figure makes it a little stressful but im working with it.

In the temperament of things, my time is shifting to pegging Ive just started looking over the c++ source now.

Great David, and unfortunately the fact that you are the public figure will make your life very-very difficult in the coming months - except that you can make some damage limitation by trying to be transparent and in my opinion you are doing the right thing by being transparent.

On the technicality note, actually I am quite interested in the pegging model, I have read the Nubits white paper and while it's not in the league of Buterin or Gavin Wood, and while it's not clear yet whether the pegging could work at all, it's a quite interesting piece of material. Could you please push a public link of the c++ source? I have over a few decades c++ experience under my belt and just as a pure professional interest it would be great to see the implementation details of Nubits.
1162  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: BitBay | Decentralized Marketplace | Unmoderated Thread on: December 08, 2014, 01:38:07 PM
@Mig-23, what you do in that official thread and what you do here says a lot about the nature of the Bitbay scam. Soon will be here an army of shill accounts to troll this thread and that will be just the final verification that the Bitbay scammers are desperate  and the 108 satoshies price is indeed the result of a scam.
1163  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: BitBay | Decentralized Marketplace | Unmoderated Thread on: December 08, 2014, 01:33:51 PM
I posted this in the moderated BAY thread and for some strange reason it was deleted. I will just leave it here instead.

All of the positive posts about BAY in this thread come from the few remaining hopeful members of our pump and dump group that were promised BAY was going to go to the moon a month ago. Most of the bitcoin from the ICO went directly in to bob's pocket. He does not care what happens to the rest of us, he is already rolling in profit. How do you guys in our group (you know who you are) plan to get out of this coin at even break even now? It is quite obvious that there is no outside interest in this coin, all of the volume has come from within our group itself. The legitimate investors have gotten wise to these scams, they are not going to be here to pump up the price for you and take the bags out of your hands this time. It's funny, every time bob mentions there might be a pump, you guys get a massive hard on for bay, the thread starts getting bumped frequently, the buys pick up in anticipation for the pump, then what happens? You get dumped right in to, again and again from bob himself, because you are fools that keep believing every word that he says. You guys are a joke. If you still believe his bullshit, you deserve to lose your coins. I am extremely happy that I stayed the fuck out of this one. I came very close to going all in with what I earned from previous pumps with this group, good thing I didn't get blinded by greed like the rest of you.

No worries, feel free to post in this thread, this is an unmoderated thread, and all opinions, both supporters and skeptics are welcomed.
1164  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: BitBay | Decentralized Marketplace | Unmoderated Thread on: December 08, 2014, 01:30:57 PM
The scam is epic and the scammers are entered into panic mode, they delete all posts like this:



The scam is not epic at all. It is a total failure, as a matter of fact and when all is said and done and BTER is paid their commission, they will probably be in the hole after having paid Zimbeck his 100BTC and 20 million BAY (which he won't be able to cash for anything of significance. I am going to guess that no more than 300BTC -and quite probably much less- was sole between 250-300 sat. And they have had a few expenses. Plus BTER charges commission whether they are in on the back end deal or not, so the "chinese" guy is in for a very rude awakening when this goes to 25 sat well before Christmas and declared technically dead before the new year.

Not to mention that Zimbeck still has to come up with some semblance of a marketplace before BTER releases the final 33%.

So no, as far as scams go, even the guys at XBOT got close to 100 BTC clean. This guys will more than  probably end in the red.

As for Bobsurplus, I don't believe he is in on this one... yet. Now he's trying to get people to bet on a price and, supposedly, he will bet on a higher price than anyone. It could be interested because this will be another scam, quite a different one... and a very risky one... unless the "chinese" fully participates, because while Bob buy massively, the "chinese" will be dumping like mad (unless he is in on it). If "he" is in on it -most likely- it sounds like a master stroke as scams go because a lot of people will believe in Bob pump -with good reason, for it will be real- and would want to participate on the run up.

Now, if that materializes, it is going to be quite epic with both the "chinese" and Bob dumping on the people (after collecting the bets, of course). Macchiavelian scheme and scam, indeed. Needless to say, I'll be watching every step of the way.

I think we have an issue here :-)))  Since I have a very different figure from David, David Zimbeck was either not truthful with you or me. I have a lot higher payment figure than the 100 BTC you mentioned. It would be great to get clarification from David how much he received for "licensing" and developing the software. I never asked him how much here received, you never asked him as well, but since here revealed it and the figures are different it would be great to get some transparent clarification from him - mainly to establish his trustworthiness.

I would disagree on Bob. Once he advertise that he is buying, up to this date never happened that he buys - when he says he buys in fact he is dumping already. I don't see why this natural method of a P&D operator would be different with Bitbay.

Sure i can clarify this, the original offer for the license was 100 BTC and that was increased during the ico there was an extra 91 which a portion of that was supposed to go towards developing which i was fine with some of it was moved into a joint dev fund only 20 btc. They were supposed to set up a 5 of 5 multisig for that but they never did. I still have the difference set aside on my end.

Thanks David for clarifying about your payment. It still doesn't make sense terms of the figures as you have mentioned earlier a very different figure, and I really don't want to be pedantic about 100-200 BTC differences, but the few legit investors who put their hard earned cash into your project has the right to know about the expenditure of the ICO fund and at least you are - unlike the Bitbay team - trying to be transparent about it.

It's not my role to tell you what to do, but since this scam will be obvious for everyone very soon and there will be quite a few very-very unhappy people it's your primary interest to come forward with transparent information. I think everyone understand that you are passionate about your software and you want your hard work to be widely used, still probably it's not the best way to realize your dream via an association with a very shady project. Do you really need to give your name to such a project and its thread? The moderated thread, the deleted posts, the army of secondary, third and newbie nicks mobilized by the Bitbay team that desperately trying to hype the project is the sign of a proper scam and since you have been in the altcoin business for long you know it very well what's happening there is the sign of a proper scam. Do you really need to associate your name with such a desperate money collecting party? You are a very intelligent individual, how can you be part of a project when the investors are presented with such a tragicomic professional team bio, like Nico from Russia who loves dog and Holly from Taiwan who has the family - this is the team who supposed to build a 1 billion $ business and take on eBay, however investors can't know more about them because there's an alleged NDA in place. Please ... such bullocks don't even acceptable in an Uganda based ponzy scheme ... how can you accept such project handling in your venture? We understand the nature of this altcoin market, but your Bitbay project takes the bullocks to the very highest level and you have an active role in this.

It's clear that you are very unhappy about this operation, you expected a different attitude from the Bitbay team in many aspects of the project. In my opinion it is better if you are vocal about the issues, because if you don't then you mislead a few legit investors who put their money into your project.


   
1165  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: BitBay | Decentralized Marketplace | Unmoderated Thread on: December 08, 2014, 12:15:50 PM
What are you guys going to do when this project turns out to be legit?

Buy them cheap. Instead of wasting money on the overpriced ICO I can have 5-10 times the number by buying at a later time.


That's not logical and also shows you are out to lower the price rather that legitimately call this out as a scam. The only correct answer would be its a scam.

How can it be overpriced if the project is legit and therefore is gunning to be a decentralised ebay? That makes the marketcap of 3,000btc pocket change compared to the potential a semi popular decentralised trading site is worth. Surely we could be talking billions if popular.

I guess you could say you've shown your hand if we were playing poker.

Personally, I am not "out for a lower price" and I do not have any agendas. I am just pointing out on an Internet forum that is by definition here to discuss digital currency matters that the Bitbay operation is a scam. I am sure you would agree, that the only logical explanation for the scale of dump is that only the Bitbay team who bought their own ICO has the incentive to dump at 1/3rd of the ICO price.
1166  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: BitBay | Decentralized Marketplace | Unmoderated Thread on: December 08, 2014, 12:12:52 PM
Some posts that were deleted by the scammers.
 
Or they could use those funds to develop the functions that really give this coin it's value. In a way a floor set by them essentially means they'd put their business on sale. Long term investors would never stand for a company doing that in real life, so why are people expecting such a thing for a coin under development?

Who the fuck are you with this newbie nick that you defend and justify all steps/non-steps of these scammmers 24/7 in the last few days?

We understand the nature of the scam that an army of newbie accounts must support the operation, and in this thread the organizers of this money party certainly mobilize the number of secondary, third and newbie accounts that we have never seen before, but take it easy man, your desperation to support these scammers is to obvious here.

 


the problem is that at least 5-6 names in this thread belong to one or more pure scammers. These guys coordinate the conversation with the purpose of getting more people buying into their dumps.


You are too conservative with the 5-6 names estimations. At least 50% of the accounts that post here to support this desperate scam are the secondary, third and newbie nicks of the scammers.

As I can read above, finally there are rational people point out that only the Bitbay team who bought into their own ICO has the incentive to dump at 100 satoshies, and the newbie nicks just try to trick people into this obvious scam.

More in the unmoderated thread at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=857457.0


AltcoinUK's position makes absolutely sense.
Also, Zimbeck's puts his reputation completely at risk. This "I am only a contractor" shit makes me totally laugh. A person of his gage would definitely want to know who he is working for unless he is involved in that scam himself. Of course, in the internet contracting pretty often works anonymously. But if you have a serious reputation overall, you would still be very careful before accepting a role as a developer only for highly shady people.
If this goes to zero, I'll spread the word about Mr. Zimbeck in a way very different from what I spread about him in the past.

That's a very good point. We discussing it at the unmoderated thread at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=857457.msg9775086#msg9775086

David by default configuration is not a bad guy, but in this case - as you pointed it out correctly - he sold himself out to a very shady group of people. Moreover, the main issue with David is, that he is unwilling to make clear publicly that he is just a contractor here and therefore this operation is in the hand of the scammers who presented a laughable team that will take on eBay, you know Nicos from Russia who loves dog and Holly from Taiwan who has a family (as this is the professional bio of the Bitbay team).

Most of the legit investors invested here because of David, however David's role is not what the legit investors anticipated here, and David must be clear about this.
1167  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: BitBay | Decentralized Marketplace | Unmoderated Thread on: December 08, 2014, 11:47:24 AM
The scam is epic and the scammers are entered into panic mode, they delete all posts like this:



The scam is not epic at all. It is a total failure, as a matter of fact and when all is said and done and BTER is paid their commission, they will probably be in the hole after having paid Zimbeck his 100BTC and 20 million BAY (which he won't be able to cash for anything of significance. I am going to guess that no more than 300BTC -and quite probably much less- was sole between 250-300 sat. And they have had a few expenses. Plus BTER charges commission whether they are in on the back end deal or not, so the "chinese" guy is in for a very rude awakening when this goes to 25 sat well before Christmas and declared technically dead before the new year.

Not to mention that Zimbeck still has to come up with some semblance of a marketplace before BTER releases the final 33%.

So no, as far as scams go, even the guys at XBOT got close to 100 BTC clean. This guys will more than  probably end in the red.

As for Bobsurplus, I don't believe he is in on this one... yet. Now he's trying to get people to bet on a price and, supposedly, he will bet on a higher price than anyone. It could be interested because this will be another scam, quite a different one... and a very risky one... unless the "chinese" fully participates, because while Bob buy massively, the "chinese" will be dumping like mad (unless he is in on it). If "he" is in on it -most likely- it sounds like a master stroke as scams go because a lot of people will believe in Bob pump -with good reason, for it will be real- and would want to participate on the run up.

Now, if that materializes, it is going to be quite epic with both the "chinese" and Bob dumping on the people (after collecting the bets, of course). Macchiavelian scheme and scam, indeed. Needless to say, I'll be watching every step of the way.

I think we have an issue here :-)))  Since I have a very different figure from David, David Zimbeck was either not truthful with you or me. I have a lot higher payment figure than the 100 BTC you mentioned. It would be great to get clarification from David how much he received for "licensing" and developing the software. I never asked him how much here received, you never asked him as well, but since here revealed it and the figures are different it would be great to get some transparent clarification from him - mainly to establish his trustworthiness.

I would disagree on Bob. Once he advertise that he is buying, up to this date never happened that he buys - when he says he buys in fact he is dumping already. I don't see why this natural method of a P&D operator would be different with Bitbay.
1168  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: BitBay | Decentralized Marketplace | Unmoderated Thread on: December 08, 2014, 11:38:07 AM
What are you guys going to do when this project turns out to be legit?

While I agree with Barabbas that the decentralized marketplace is a dead proposition, I don't question the tech and I have no doubt Zimbeck is going to release something, but the released software does not make the project legit. It's a fact that the majority of the ICO was bought by the Bitbay team and that makes this project not legit.
1169  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: BitBay |Decentralized Marketplace|Smart Contracts|IoT Tech|Markets Open on: December 08, 2014, 11:33:33 AM
the problem is that at least 5-6 names in this thread belong to one or more pure scammers. These guys coordinate the conversation with the purpose of getting more people buying into their dumps.


You are too conservative with the 5-6 names estimations. At least 50% of the accounts that post here to support this desperate scam are the secondary, third and newbie nicks of the scammers.

As I can read above, finally there are rational people point out that only the Bitbay team who bought into their own ICO has the incentive to dump at 100 satoshies, and the newbie nicks just try to trick people into this obvious scam.

More in the unmoderated thread at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=857457.0

its pretty obvious  Smiley but what is the point of explaining this to sheeps? let's all just make money  Smiley

Well, it's a personal choice. We are all here for the dollar, but personally I don't like to make money with scammers. Besides that, there's not much money here, Bob & Co. won't able to pump this thing, in my opinion hard to make money here, not even with swing trades.
1170  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: BitBay | Decentralized Marketplace | Unmoderated Thread on: December 07, 2014, 02:40:12 PM
The scam is epic and the scammers are entered into panic mode, they delete all posts like this:

This is hilarious. You think Bobsurplus will destroy this coin?

Bobsurplus bought in ICO price. If he bought lower then devs are scamers.

How he'll destroy coin? Selling coins to rebuy lower? Market is uncentralised, all of you can sell to buy lower.

I saw this many times: price is falling and ppl see wrong reason of dropping...

They say "whales destroyed our coin" LOL

But the real problem is:

-too expensive ICO

-too much supply

-too low demand

-no buywall support from ICOs funds

-weak community with crypto stockholm syndrome ("price is not important"; treating all good criticism as a fud/sock puppets of pump group etc. classic blind bagholding)




Oh dear ...are you really that stupid ... or you must be joking. Just because Bob says that he bought it as an "independent" investors you believe that? You beleive it regardless, that Bob's buddy the marketing guy was pushing the ICO in 24/7?

Bob pushed this ICO to 3000 BTC with the Bitbay team to create volume and attract naive and legit investors into the ICO, and then Bob gets the BTCs from Bter justlike the Bitbay team gets who bought into their own ICO, and then he and the Bitbay team can sell the coins at any price, even selling at 20  satoshies is a pure profit for them.

You really don't understand the most basic and obvious scam?
1171  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: BitBay | Decentralized Marketplace | Unmoderated Thread on: December 07, 2014, 02:29:36 PM
LoL

It seems the dump is urgent for Bob & Co., Bob and the great Bitbay team (you know Nicos from Russia who loves dog and Holly from Taiwan who has a family, but their professional profile can't be revealed as an alleged NDA in place) dump the thing at 110 satoshies.

Epic scam indeed - just as we said it will be.
1172  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: BitBay | Decentralized Marketplace | Unmoderated Thread on: December 07, 2014, 02:25:11 PM
Just for the records, the post that was deleted from the official thread.

LOL

Bobsurplus aka @EMC2Whale   https://twitter.com/EMC2Whale aka @CryptoGekko https://twitter.com/CryptoGekko fooled your asses once again.

This guy and his multiple accounts on twitter and numerous on Bitcointalk is literally the new @theblonde82. Every coin this guy calls, you better dump ASAP or get dumped on.

You learn something new everyday right? Let this be your hard lesson for the day.   Wink
[/size\

pm me for more Bobsurplus secrets  Cheesy


In case if these fucking scammers delete your post again, post it to the unmoderated thread at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=857457.0

These guys are getting so desperate with this scam that started to dump the thing at low 100 satoshies, in the meantime the secondary nicks plus a few idiots interpret this as "the coins bought by smart hands". A typical desperate scam operation.
1173  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: BitBay | Decentralized Marketplace | Unmoderated Thread on: December 07, 2014, 02:06:01 PM

FUDDER caught with his pants down.  Grin Grin

So who is the FUDDER now? Or more precisely the real question is, who is the irrational now?

Are you still defending that operation which organizers bought into the ICO and then collected the investment from Bter and then they can sell the coins at any price? Since the scammers received the 66% of the ICO and there is no doubt they will receive the remaining 34% - as David will meet with the release coniditons -, any coins dumped by the organizers of this scam at any price is a risk free pure profit. Doesn't matter if they sell at 20 satoshies, it will be a pure profit.

I think you start to understand the nature of Bitbay operation my boy :-)))
1174  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: BitBay | Decentralized Marketplace | Unmoderated Thread on: December 07, 2014, 01:50:52 PM
THIS THREAD IS AWESOME LMAO!! OMG I never knew such a think existed. AltcoinUK you are awesome. And according to this thread im 5 ft tall?

"5 ft tall David Zimbeck"

Lol where do you get this information? I'm 5' 11. lol...

And you realize I was paid to incorporate Halo in Bitbay right? That is all this was. Nothing more, nothing less. These absolute hilarious accusations here are really all coming from one person. And my guess is, you are a very jealous bagholder from BC. Or maybe just some crazy guy. (Or maybe Bitbay paid you to act like this, who the heck knows)

What is the things you guys say here about Russian mobs and Cambodia and scams and craziness. I'm in Cambodia, lived in Mexico, Los Angeles. I'm not hard to find. Call me in for a meeting, I'll be there   Cheesy

Let me make this simple for you.

I was working on Halo, i was approached by a group of guys. They offered me funds to license my tech, I took the deal. They paid in advance. Then they run and ICO with BTER. They raise money, you complain. End of story. Any details beyond this you can take it up with them.

Also, I'm forced to manage this project. They asked me for good ideas for features, I felt this was a good environment for practicing hedging. Stated many times we are going to target RMB/USD price like Nubits. We can do this by restricting supply. The question is what our target price is and how much supply we want to restrict. You can read NuBits whitepaper and look at my video.

Coding takes time, not sure you ever tried it but maybe you should put yourself in my shoes and then you may read over this thread again and question your own judgement.

I'm more than willing to protect the privacy of the people that hired me because they asked me to. Its not complex, its called honoring your word. You would do the same.

As for the funds, they control that. There is a dev fund, its smaller than i would have liked it to be but I'm happy, will work with it.

What happens if they sell? Well thats the risk we all take. Thats the nature of penny stocks. The analogy is this: A penny stock pays me for a license, i took it, people "invest" and take a risk with it. Thats their choice.

Want to be a real investor? Go to wall street invest in Apple. Want to be a self proclaimed investor? Come to crypto and gamble. Nobody can stop whales from buying up new coins. Nor can they stop people from mining 90% of a coin (look at Fuelcoin for example)

How do we know Blackcoin wasnt 50% ninja mined? Is there really any proof it wasnt? And what about Bitcoin? How do we know. Maybe someone sits on billions of dollars. There is not a way of knowing. So I think you need to relax, and maybe take a breath of fresh air and realize I'm just working. Don't start throwing around your ideas without any basis in reality.

Instead of talking behind my back. I invite you to call me on the phone and talk to me like a man. Instead of this nonsense.

I'm a bit busy to log on to bitcointalk all the time but PM me your number. I'm more than happy to discuss openly whatever you wanna know.

OK David. We discussed this in a civil and calm private dialogue, there is no reason to continue this here, except, if you are not one of the scammers who pushed the ICO to 3000 BTC which I believe you are not, if you are just a contractor as you said you are, please make clear to the investors of Bitbay that you have no control over the spending of the 3000 BTC whatsoever as well as please acknowledge publicly as well that there are many-many worrying and unclear elements in the operation of Bitbay.

Since we both know, in fact all rational person knows that the 3000 BTC was achieved by a desperate buy in from the Bitbay team and the full 3000 BTC is not the result of a legit, free market investment process, you should be clear about this publicly as well.

 
1175  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: BitBay | Decentralized Marketplace | Unmoderated Thread on: December 07, 2014, 01:42:40 PM

because envy


There is nothing to be envy about what you try to achieve with the Bitbay operation. No rational person is envy of pushing a scam alongside with dozens of desperate newbie nicks and idiots like yourself to make 1-2 BTC the most from that scam or being envy of having a partnership with P&D operators like Bobsurplus to trick naive investors into desperate ICOs.
1176  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: BitBay | Decentralized Marketplace | Unmoderated Thread on: December 07, 2014, 01:21:08 PM
Just for the record, after all I was right about the BitBay scam, by now it's clear that Bitbay is indeed a scam.

No legit investors would dump in the scale of BitBay is being dumped since the ICO ended - only the organizers of the scam who bought the majority of the ICO have the incentive to sell below ICO price, as the 66% of their "investment" already returned by Bter and surely David will meet with the release conditions of the remaining 33% BTCs, and therefore there is no risk to sell BAY at any price. Even I am sure David agrees with this assessment, there is simply no other rational explanation for the continues, low price dump.




1177  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [VRC] | VeriCoin | POS-NSDI | VeriBit | VeriSend | VeriSMS | SuperNET Core on: December 07, 2014, 12:56:25 PM
The developers entered into this project for the dollar and then they caused loss for investors. Whatever we call this failed coin, some investors feel it is a scam for the reasons that so many great things were promised by the developers to bring investments into this operation, and the hype was pushed so hard by the Devs & Scotty team. Other investors are slightly relaxed about the failure and see it is not a scam but feel perhaps mislead, other investors are just disappointed. One thing is sure, because real money involved with this epic failure, this shamble will remain forever on the CV of Patrick Nosker, Douglas Pike and David Boehm not to mention the more harsh consequences they will have to deal with.
1178  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [VRC] | VeriCoin | POS-NSDI | VeriBit | VeriSend | VeriSMS | SuperNET Core on: December 04, 2014, 10:15:00 PM
That has been the question whether the Supernet deal is still on the table, at this stage no one knows.
 
Today the price was 3.1K. I guess it is completely irrelevant whether the price is 100 sat or 3.1k, at this price Vericoin is a failed coin. The three Stooges, the two PhD students and the Microsoft developer should be ashamed for this failed project.
1179  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [GDC] GadgetCoin | Smart Contracts on Hardware | IoT | M2M on: December 04, 2014, 03:39:37 PM
Very valid questions from @tobeaj2meraa, but as I said several times to the Bitbay and TileCoin crew, the same apply to GadgetCoin:  I totally get it, IoT can be a perfect area for the blockchain and smart contracts. IBM wouldn't start to work on this if it wouldn't be a billion $ business opportunity. If this and other IoT coins don't do anything else but secures devices then they will have more usage than all other digital currencies combined. But of course the biggie is the payment for IoT services, at least for me that is the most attractive in gadgetcoin.




 
1180  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [VRC] | VeriCoin | POS-NSDI | VeriBit | VeriSend | VeriSMS | SuperNET Core on: December 04, 2014, 12:28:36 AM

Oh please, you're smarter than that. I find it hard to believe that you don't know the difference between a Community Manager and a Project Leader. Maybe it's a language barrier thing?

....

My suggestion to you is to ask THEM. I'm not a developer; I'm a community member who has volunteered some of his own time and money to help out.


While it's true that I am not an English speaker, English is not even my third language - and therefore I am always grateful that you fine gentlemen try to decipher what I am trying to say, which is indeed very kind of you all - I think you are unnecessarily pedantic about the title of Jay Jay. Doesn't matter how we call him, he acts like the main man and the cheerleader herd follows him like he is the main man - which is quite absurd as he demonstrated excellence only in delusion so far. Even more worrying is that the community on your forum unconditionally share his delusion. I am talking about the main unique selling point of VeriCoin, what Jay Jay keep saying, that how much VeriCoin is better than Bitcoin.  I just don't understand how do you want to sell VeriCoin with this message? This is the biggest nonsense I came cross since my high school years, when one of my class mate invented the Perpetuum Mobile and I couldn't convince him that what he does is the stupidest thing of all time.

I think everyone understand that you do a lots of work, personally I hugely respect you and others who put work into such community project, and it is very unfortunate that your hard work is completely meaningless as the developers totally let down the community.

Pages: « 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 [59] 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!