CSW has never presented any evidence of being Satoshi.

Lightning is stillborn, unintended, custodial, Blockstream patented,
insecure, off-chain and not Bitcoin. #BitcoinCash is the #Bitcoin
Satoshi intended and we are growing our vendor and user numbers
rapidly with faster than lightning on-chain transactions and the cheapest fees.

LN (or better: payment channels) is a mechanism to bundle several (potentially thousands of) Bitcoin transactions together. If something goes wrong while you're transacting offchain, you can always settle on-chain. And you're always using Bitcoin Script contracts, the pure Bitcoin protocol.

Liquid is very different from LN, as it requires trust in a federation. Once you use the sidechain buying the token, you can't rely on the protocol exclusively to be sure to get back your coins. In LN, in contrast, you can - as long as you observe your channels to be ready to close them (or let them observe by watchtowers).

So you're mixing apples and oranges.

The only issue I agree a little bit with you is that I am a bit concerned about the probabilistic methods that are planned to subdivide satoshis into millisats. The decision to use millisats is based on a megalomaniac conception of Bitcoin's future -- as if the satoshi could be worth 1$ eventually or so (the maximum Bitcoin price I can imagine is the equivalent of around 1 million USD, this would result in a 1 cent satoshi), or if it could make sense to do nanotransactions worth 0.001 cent (why, why would you use Bitcoin for that? And for what purpose?). This part of the design is making LN sort of "impure", because obviously millisat differences can't be represented adequately on-chain. But as long as you transact only values measured in satoshi, you're using pure Bitcoin, only bundled together.

And it should be possible without problems to build an implementation of LN that doesn't support millisat.

Wir befinden uns im Bear trap nach dem First Sell off.

Das ATH dieses Bullrun wird der tiefste Punkt von Jetzt*10 sein.
Also 280 000 Dollar. Eventuell auch erst Anfang 2022.

69`000 Bitcoins bei einem Exitscam (Africrypt) gestohlen: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5345799

In the last 10 years, concepts like blockchain and digital currencies have moved from small online communities to being supported by some of the world’s largest firms. These concepts and ideas were best presented by Satoshi Nakamoto in the creation of Bitcoin. With the rise in popularity, and the different offerings, MNP found it necessary to investigate what Bitcoin implementation best fits Nakamoto’s original vision.

Satoshi Nakamoto’s whitepaper “Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System” sets the stage for our analysis. Nakamoto’s whitepaper, emails, forum posts, and original source code define the protocol — the rule set for Bitcoin as a data network — and the key elements that make Bitcoin a functional technology. Along with the whitepaper, we reviewed the publicly available emails, forum posts, and original code left by Nakamoto. We used these source materials to determine what Nakamoto’s original purpose for Bitcoin was – a global electronic cash system (that works peer-to-peer), while also laying the foundation for a network that can support more advanced data applications.

Using the sources mentioned above, we developed an assessment framework and related criteria assessing the relevance of the Bitcoin scripting language (including OpCodes incorporated in it), protocol elements, and capabilities in current implementations — Bitcoin SV (BSV) and Bitcoin Core (BTC) against Nakamoto’s original vision.

Our findings indicate that BSV is most representative of Nakamoto’s original intention and design for Bitcoin. One key factor is because the BSV blockchain demonstrates the ability to scale to support significant volumes of transactions in a timely manner for macro-payments and even micropayments, resulting from BSV’s “Genesis” hard fork in February 2020. This removed any arbitrary cap on block size and allows the BSV blockchain and transaction capacity to grow unbounded, while also removing state restrictions limits and improving the code base to allow for unbounded scaling. In addition, the Genesis hard fork restored key aspects of the original functionality of Bitcoin script, the programming language used within the Bitcoin protocol. In our whitepaper, we also identify what technology capabilities can be enabled once Nakamoto’s vision for Bitcoin has been fully realized.

A general outline of report is as follows:

The Bitcoin Whitepaper
Nakamoto’s known Forum Posts, Emails
The Original Bitcoin Protocol
Capabilities
Critical components
Non-functional requirements
Implementation attributes
Comparison of current Bitcoin implementations to Nakamoto’s original vision
Impact of Nakamoto’s vision once fully realized.