I N T E R E S T I N G ANONYMOUS last chance call after nearly a decade of a nut telling everyone to buy buy buy. Buy moor? Cheers! |
|
|
|
|
I d say so, it is still in the phase of basic (financial & tech) definitions
What is really legally compliant
what not
Start with the diff impl: What eneables crime, what counters it
hmm
|
|
|
|
Printers being prepped and read to mint billions of fake dollars as we approached the Friday of next month. So about $10 days. For meow yo-yo btc and cash in billion in options cash. Edit: About Malta. Binance will be the biggest crypto exchange on the planet. Bigger than Conbase which everyone hates and is slow to make moves. Binance isn’t CZ. CZ is another peasant front like Jack Ma. Binance is the full force of China taking over the world of crypto my storm. They’re gonna get a license everywhere they want. Berlin/EU and the US. Who’s gonna stop them? Haha So finally they got a high class / court accountant now - for many years, quaterly to report, where first 90 days might be most interesting ones... https://amycastor.com/2021/02/23/ny-ag-tether-bitfinex-settlement-reveals-commingling-of-funds-years-of-shenanigans/  |
|
|
|
Stop / Verbot in NY - was heisst das für den Rest ? - Das Urteil copy / paste ? |
|
|
|
Original version deals with number 1 of cryptolist, while the other shows clones or altcoins. Bitcoin Satoshi version is a plagiat, the authors utilizes a original name of Satoshi it is incorrect to business.
Proof of Tether ? Trading at all those bucket casinos https://twitter.com/ahcastor/status/1363863711211872256/?? Some sane ( sadly pareto distributed) say the opposite, since the original is on sourceforge, not on the copy-github The original works like a chaamp, as delivered by Satoshi - btc: broken but shilled by (twitter) trolls - good luck! Tomorrow might be Christmas-Day in Feb, let's see Long term: Regulatory, definitions (specs) and economics are with the original anyway |
|
|
|
Bitcoin is just a internet protocol for an open transparent ledger - trx can be seen by everybody and public key can be linked to IDs, that needs just a token to keep running, some incentive Flat earthers stop with : Token - ticker - price , now btc is just sth simple, but not transparent any more, nice for trolls to hide and sybill attack |
|
|
|
Der Kurs ist da nicht so wichtig (er "muss" jedenfalls nicht irgendwo stehen). Wichtig wäre stattdessen die Höhe der Transaktionsgebühren.
Jedenfalls ist es zu erwarten, dass wenn Bitcoin mindestens so genutzt wird wie heute, die Transaktionsgebühren in 2 Halvings (also 2028) die Rewards übersteigen werden.
Ist nicht eher wichtiger, wie viele Transaktionen durchgeführt werden? Ich gehe mal davon aus, dass es 2028 noch Fiat gibt. Also wenn 2028 die Transaktionsgebühren > 1.5625 BTC sind und wir Kurse über 100k$ haben, dann wird doch niemand mehr großartig eine Transaktion vornehmen. Eher wenn die Summe aller Transaktionsgebühren in einem Block > 1.5625 BTC, könnte das System weiter funktionieren. Anders gefragt: Würde nicht eher die Anzahl der Transaktionen die Transaktionsgebühren regulieren? Als erstes: Künstliche Kapazitäts-Beschänkungen auf Protokoll-Basis machen nirgendwo Sinn Zweitens: Bitcoin ist genügend dezentral durch den offenen Wettbewerb der Miner und nur diese SCHREIBEN die Blockchain, der ganze Rest hört nur andächtig zu |
|
|
|
Richard Hein is a fraud, just like Craig.
Craig is satoshi, that annoys you and that's good. The fraud here is BTC, the cartel that took it over with the updated SegWit and the name of the Bitcoin they stole, compare the source codes to see. Here's how Bitcoin has evolved since 2008 > Creation 2008 = XBT (Original ticker name) Turing complete Ok. 2010 Satoshi takes a personal step back. > Update 2017 = BTC (SegWit increment = modify source code, unlocked protocol, limited, fee modified, just steal Bitcoin name). No Ecosystem except LN which doesn't enter data in the ledger when leaving channels (transfers) open. Not Turing. Not evolving as is. > Update 2017 (bis) = BCH = Refusing SegWit (Unlocked protocol + Modified source code + Proven Oligarchy + Remains limited). But closest to XBT until 2018 compared to BTC. No Ecosystem. Not Turing. Not evolving as is. > Update 2018 > BSV (Locked protocol + Cleaned source code + No SegWit + unlimited + full opening of Bitcoin potential). BSV is certainly Bitcoin, like XBT, but with the potential released as well as its locked protocol = evolving as is, that's why the ecosystem is perennial because it is stable and healthy, with already hundreds of applications redistributing the economic and technological models accessible to all. Complete Turing Ok. Now that all the morons buy BTC and Hodl without being able to use, get screwed on the fees that fill the pockets of the BTC cartel then the only logical alternative because these cartels (and partners) accumulate so many BTCs will be to create a BTC upgrade fork to multiply the buns. This is the same model that has happened several times in the past and the only possible continuity for their Hodl Ponzi shema. Will they use the word Bitcoin with affrons > yes for sure or not, this is also why Satoshi defends his legacy. The copyright is not to make the white paper disappear, on the contrary, so many bots are turning your head and making you believe that BTC is Bitcoin and its BTC potential is Bitcoin but is clearly a deception! it's a big deal to be fooled by BTC aficionados and BTC social speakers who don't do any code introspection, research, proof or even try to understand, others will bite you with venom. Compare the source codes 👑 so you can understand with your own eyes. Original XBT is now no longer available (After 2010 BTC Core have control on the sourcecode. Maybe Core control "erased it"?) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin (BTC Core have control on the sourcecode) https://github.com/Bitcoin-ABC/bitcoin-abc (BCH) https://github.com/bitcoin-sv/bitcoin-sv (BSV) Also note that the keys were modified by Core control all this is in the highlights worn by Coingeek to help you open your eyes to this painted canvas to make you accept that BTC is Bitcoin. https://coingeek.com/news/tag/crypto-crime-cartelUnderstand that the economic context is the stakes are colossal for the BTC cartel even their personal financial interests advocates priority compared to the technological advances and the original essence of what Bitcoin is. It seems that BTC is controlled by Blockstream and has no locked protocol, so it is centralized. If you are truly passionate with the Bitcoin soul then you might understand what Bitcoin really means? I encourage you to do your own research and preserve yourself from BTC bots. Keep this in mind: One would have to be stupid not to understand this and miss the potential Bitcoin liberated. Yes: Keep any code as clean, simple as possible: better to maintain, scale or deep risk assess and most important: Keep it to what the specs / legal terms are defining it, or copyrights / law enforcments / wrong product selling class actions are coming - as everywhere |
|
|
|
Bitcoin is electronic CASH for internet use, solves the payments fun for small fees like no other system It's here to solve lots of cases where nano fees are needed... IoT Not hard to learn, that this is sustainable LONG term. And it kills trolls , cause way too transparent  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
... one day ... it seems. 
