How can some little ano point on a public successful man and doesn't seem hilarious himself? At least this funny 'public' bloke tries it and hopes to find some little peas between the 16000 - funny, but off the road https://mobile.twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1259255430859104260 It's just totally funny, that all of u try to derail from the tech and legal issues of btc with hunting ppl and name calling Satoshi, was wrong White Paper- don't care First code, didn't understand First code maintainer - send to hell 2x contract- broken Now Segwit solves it all .... still believe that crap?
|
|
|
The guy is a real fraud, in a year or two he probably won’t ever be mentioned. He’s so insignificant, I don’t know why people are still interested in him.
Ummm. BSV is the #4 cryptocurrency in the world today and gaining. I don't think the CTO of Blockstream would be spending his time on this subject if he wasn't a grave concern. Why not? Trolling still too cheap. Metanet gonna fix it. Wait - that s biggest concern?
|
|
|
Die Uhr zeigt 00:00:00:00 und der Reward ist dann halbiert, was soll sonst passieren Stimmt, interessant ist eigentlich nur wenn das difficulty adjustment mit mining power drop zusammen fällt
|
|
|
The court recently released the January deposition with Lynn Wright, Craig's first wife. It's pretty dry, but there are some interesting parts. Probably the most interesting is that Craig told her he kept "some" bitcoin on MtGOX, which she believes was all of his bitcoin, based on the way he acted about GOX going under. A: Well, he intimated that he had lost a lot of bitcoin when that Japanese company - when that guy in Japan, I think the - the bitcoin - I don't know if it was a bank or what sort of outfit it was, but he, I guess, absconded with all the money, and Craig had kept some of his - had - well, "some of it", I think he kept all of his bitcoin there...
Q. And what's your basis for your understanding that he kept a lot of his bitcoin there?
A. Because he said he lost a fair - lost a fair bit of money.
Seems a bit odd to me that Satoshi would keep his coins on MtGOX, whether it be "all" or just "some" of them. And that he would refer to whatever he had there as "a fair bit of money" (I read somewhere it was 50 BTC -- I know the data is out there but I don't have it in front of me). Other takeaways: - Neither Craig or Dave Kleiman once mentioned bitcoin in front of her while Dave was still alive - In 2013, Craig asked her to write a paper explaining bitcoin to the Australian Tax Office - In April 2015, Craig wanted her to attest to a statement saying she had known Craig and Dave had been working on bitcoin since 2009. Here was response: She was questioned by the plaintiffs about it: Q: And it says at the bottom: I do remember you working privately on Bitcoin and such well before 2009. Do you know what that statement is in reference to?
A. No.
Q. Okay. So you don't know what you were talking about in this email with Craig?
A. I don't remember it.
Q. And does the email refresh your recollection at all?
A. No... No, it confuses me more.
Q. Do you believe this email is forged?
MS MARKOE: Objection.
THE DEPONENT: I wouldn't - I don't know. I wouldn't - I wouldn't think it is, but I can't - I - I don't understand the time frame. You can see all of her other email correspondence as evidence at the bottom of the court docket... This is the only one where words were typed below her signature... Hmm... There d be much more u could 'report' but that d hurt all bags? The case is getting turned, and scammers debunked on a side where u wanna be aligned with? Mmm. We are all anonymous trolls, except Satoshi
|
|
|
Interested to see what'll happen when conventional academia starts to strip Craigy of his baubles.
Cryptoland is so full of shit and shit heels it would've been quite possible for him to keep enough people touching themselves at the idea of him for long enough. If he starts to be pulled apart by the real world outside too I wonder whether they double down on their furious ononism or go quiet.
I guess it'll be framed as an attack by 'Them'.
Quite funny how you try to bury aussie man bad, Satoshi, others who want just pure Bitcoin But only thing that happens in your backyard is btc is dying the slow chain death caused by SEGVID-17
|
|
|
Everyones shitting on the idea that we will bart down.. that just gives me more confidence that im right
Why? Because many experienced Bitcoiners think you're full of it? Experienced bitcoiner =/= experienced trader Note that your (in)equation obeys the reflexive principle. The trail of the dead in Bitcoindom is populated with many conventional traders that think their previous success in other markets uniquely qualifies them to apply the same principles to Bitcoin. Why does everyone keep assuming Im a trader who traded traditionals in the past? In my case, it was the “ Experienced bitcoiner =/= experienced trader” retort. Congrats - we all are about to grow up. Some more quickly , some more lucky ... Happy Bearday!
|
|
|
Ich glaube es wird Zeit dafür: Schade, dazu würde noch die Krabbe passen aber die ist bestimmt im UBoot. Na dann, prost. Jedes U-Boot muss mal auftauchen
|
|
|
those anno pages / sources seem to be proof / evidence only for annos grow up tutitutituuu Your trolling is getting worse and worse. thanx - just learning here
|
|
|
I just literally merited both of you... Long ? Short ? Sideline ?
|
|
|
those anno pages / sources seem to be proof / evidence only for annos grow up tutitutituuu
|
|
|
BSV is not a fork of BTC.
The funny thing is that you are not even wrong about that. BTC is a fork of Bitcoin. One could argue that BSV is a fork of Bitcoin as well. However, it is the only such that has forked itself back into near compliance with the original definition (i.e. the definitive definition) of the Bitcoin protocol. BSV is a fork of BCH BSV never had segwit never had CTOR is just refactored / cleaned out any CoreStream shit (Satoshi never ever wanted such crap - ask Gavin / Hearn) After research: BSV IS BEST BITCOIN - max compliant - does everything Satoshi wanted it to do btc is POSMcoin - not bitcoin at all - that's the funniest fork ever (blocked in the core - no stream left)
|
|
|
BSV TO BTC -3.1% not going well for this imposter coin is it?
poor bagholder view - again nobody tells you to hodl, ponzl, specl, segwitl The Original White Paper is about P2P Cash - USE - Peer - to - Peer (no hodl here) do your own research
|
|
|
These big blocks and the world ready capacity of Original Bitcoin is the reason why so many other fork-supporters are getting triggered / mad and try to tear down BSV https://twitter.com/brad1121/status/125815848528543334413 Mio TX in a single block 33 BitCoin fee !! > cause that is real long term planning of security coming by PoW (!) / mining - fees getting job done once block rewards vanish more and more by halvenings Relay-node count is no security - full nodes are miners - do own research and don't listen on segwidiots Grow up learn Bitcoin - it was planned for running in data centers - not on sybill hobby tech
|
|
|
Let’s try it again with another channel. All the hacking and now this silly stuff by commie google, don’t worry, Sergey, #Ripple can join the coming global crypto party. 😬
https://youtu.be/C2EDHWaN1-wThe ban on my channel is the most significant sign possible that Ixcoin has something different from other projects. No Doubt!!!Seems your trust decorations still too neutral for proof of mods are really concerned of some real significance
|
|
|
Don't try to find an ICO. Find an IEO. I personally would advise you learn trading more actively then IEO investing. This is a way to earn much more significant profit but you need to get some strong skills.
These are all illegal central emitted securities if not registered due to SEC rules and traded by regulated security exchange.
|
|
|
Uhh - not that bad aussie man ?? But McAffee 'knows'
|
|
|
|