|
so we are launching, but no description about how this torrent thing works?
|
|
|
|
|
is there any binary osx wallet available ?
|
|
|
|
|
Heil, mein Führer! , Sieg heil!
congratulation on great launch !
|
|
|
|
|
be prepared for next launch of AlliedCoin !
|
|
|
|
thats on dedicatedpool, while suchpool.pw already mining for 10 minutes... they just late, and u choose wrong pool |
|
|
|
|
i am ordering reserved EC2 instance, they send me invoice of 200$
can i use this code to pay that invoice?
can this voucher stackable into 200$ credit?
how to use this code? just enter redeem voucher on my account page?
|
|
|
|
|
yes it almost dead, please sell your gpus so diff can go down, and i will be happy
|
|
|
|
Within 24 hours I will release new version of my XPM GPU miner for ypool. Crazy speedup 50-60% on all cards. Up to 1.6 chains per day on a single 290X. Be ready  nice, waiting for it, please upload as soon as possible before difficulty goes beyond 11.0 |
|
|
|
Shouldn't this be called Palestinecoin?
yeah WTF is this coin, they not even a recognized country, get loss ! |
|
|
|
|
it is just scrypt with lower n-factor right?
Scrypt-N , currently 11
Scrypt , fixed at 10
Scrypt-OG , at 6
thats why its faster, but if you push it, it will still use same amount of heat and electricity as it is scrypt which is memory intensive algorithm
|
|
|
|
based on transaction structure https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Protocol_specificationThe TxOut structure consists of the following fields: Field Size Description Data type Comments
8 value int64_t Transaction Value
1+ pk_script length var_int Length of the pk_script
? pk_script uchar[] Usually contains the public key as a Bitcoin script setting up conditions to claim this output
so maximum transaction value is signed? 64-bit integer ? why we use signed int? can transaction value be negative? then if its uin64_t so then max value would be 2^64-1 = 18,446,744,073,709,551,615 there are max 21 million cap of bitcoin so 184467440.73709551615
21000000.00000000xxx
so we can add 3 more digits after satoshi unit? if its int64_t then max value would be 2^63-1 = 9,223,372,036,854,775,807 92233720.36854775807
21000000.00000000xxx
still more 3 digits after satoshi unit? |
|
|
|
|
i am creating cpu bitcoin miner (with stratum) just for learning
i can test my sha256d function are correct by compared input and output to other well known function,
but my concern is, how to make sure that my share to pool is correct as pool requested (byte order, json format, etc..), currently i tested it on ghash.io pool, with minimal difficulty is 16, still i can't found a share since i am mining with cpu, is there a pool with minimal difficulty is 1 so i can test if pool can accept or reject my hash?
or is there any other scheme where i can test against ?
|
|
|
|
new 1gh miner is out, get it from their website I just went from 8.8mh/s to 11.7mh/s with it.
holy sh*t... went from 5.5 to 8 a bit tweaking... 8.5 +50% more hashrate  on a xfx 7950 wootwoot Weird, im only getting 7.5 on my 7970. Got any tips for me? I am getting 6.7 with my 7970 on I 0 getting 9.3 MH/s on R9 280x  and , 8.4 MH/s on HD7970  anyone can get better than this, share the settings please.. Could you show the cgminer.conf of 280X rig that has 9.3M hash? By 1GH's new 3-20-Cgminer? And which AMD card driver/SDK is the better for mining HVC? My 280X only has 8.2M on 1100/1250. Thanks so much! {
"pools" : [
{
"url" : "stratum+tcp://hvcpool.1gh.com:5333",
"user" : "HQ8YZdn2hEwuLXDH5FjHDeKUzEGugqUbur",
"pass" : "x"
}
],
"failover-only" : true,
"no-submit-stale" : true,
"api-listen" : true,
"api-port" : "4028",
"api-allow" : "W:0/0",
"api-mcast" : true,
"api-mcast-port" : "4028",
"log" : "1",
"heavy" : true,
"vote" : "1",
"gpu-engine" : "1225",
"gpu-memclock" : "1500",
"gpu-fan" : "100",
"gpu-threads" : "1",
"gpu-powertune" : "20",
"intensity" : "8",
"worksize" : "256",
"vectors" : "1",
"shaders" : "2048"
}
iam using http://www.cryptoslax.web.id , it use 13.12 driver and 2.9 sdk |
|
|
|
* miner count for 1gh is an estimate based on total hash rate (T), summed top 100 (Sc) hash rate (Sh), extrapolation of miners 81-100 progression through to 1Mh/s (Xh, Xc) dividing the remainder (T-Sh-Xh) by 1Mh/s (Rc) and summing these 3 results together (Sc+Xc+Rc), and is likely wildly inaccurate1gh Top 100 hash rate: 15,812.24Mhash/sMore miners flooding into 1gh, some left the others. Having tried a few just for fun, I can see several reasons why. why more on 1gh 1. its simple, no registration, direct payout to wallet 2. its more secure, pool doesn't hold your mined coin, no withdraw request whatsoever 3. its reliable, tested during ddos era on MAX and PTS 4. they got optimized miner, and support user with their miner 5. site are clean, easy to read 6. mining centralization doesn't have big impact anyway, if 1gh do double spend, we can see it, then people will move out, and so far none! 7. most people will choose consistent payout, which is from high hashrate pool such as 1gh |
|
|
|
|
oh no why scrypt, dev should assume that scrypt-coin will be future dead, atleast use scrypt-n even better your own algorithm, or hefty1
|
|
|
|
|
Lower your VOTE people !
we need to increase the price !
|
|
|
|
270xs from 4.3 to 5.8mh/s. 7970s from 6.5 to 9.8mh/s. WOW
how is your settings for 7970 ? Here's the settings from my config file. "intensity" : "6", "vectors" : "1", "worksize" : "256", "kernel" : "heavy", "gpu-engine" : "1200-1200", "gpu-fan" : "0-85", "gpu-memclock" : "1100", "gpu-memdiff" : "0", "gpu-powertune" : "0", "gpu-vddc" : "0.000", "temp-cutoff" : "95", "temp-overheat" : "85", "temp-target" : "75", "api-mcast-port" : "4028", "api-port" : "4028", "expiry" : "120", "failover-switch-delay" : "60", "gpu-dyninterval" : "7", "gpu-platform" : "0", "gpu-threads" : "2", "log" : "5", "log-dateformat" : "0", "no-pool-disable" : true, "queue" : "1", "scan-time" : "60", "heavy" : true, "temp-hysteresis" : "3", "shares" : "0", "kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin" my gpu dead with that settings |
|
|
|
270xs from 4.3 to 5.8mh/s. 7970s from 6.5 to 9.8mh/s. WOW
how is your settings for 7970 ? |
|
|
|
ati r9 270x from 4.1 to 5.6Mhs @1130/1250 .Great work
wow, what are your settings for the bat file? i'm still gettin 4 on the new cgminer. Did tuning down memclock help? I tried but didnt notice any difference settings are the same as on previous version of cgminer . gpu clock 1130, mem clock 1250 setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
COLOR 0A
del *.bin
cgminer.exe --heavy --vote 512 -o stratum+tcp://hvcpool.1gh.com:5333 -u wallet -p x -o stratum+tcp://hvcpool.1gh.com:5333 -u wallet -p x -I 4 --no-submit-stale vote for lower reward please to increase the price of HVC |
|
|
|
uray Could you share your settings for the HD7970 plz?
{
"pools" : [
{
"url" : "stratum+tcp://hvcpool.1gh.com:5333",
"user" : "HQ8YZdn2hEwuLXDH5FjHDeKUzEGugqUbur",
"pass" : "x"
}
],
"failover-only" : true,
"no-submit-stale" : true,
"api-listen" : true,
"api-port" : "4028",
"api-allow" : "W:0/0",
"api-mcast" : true,
"api-mcast-port" : "4028",
"log" : "1",
"heavy" : true,
"vote" : "1",
"gpu-engine" : "1125",
"gpu-memclock" : "1575",
"gpu-fan" : "100",
"gpu-threads" : "1",
"gpu-powertune" : "20",
"intensity" : "8",
"worksize" : "256",
"vectors" : "1"
}
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
