unprincipled?
will do anything for power?
 --- Okay, I will give you that Trump is not very principled, but he is not willing to do anything for power. Trump called for ending the filibuster, but never put substantial pressure on Senate Republicans to do so. Trump also didn't try to change voting laws in a way that would guarantee the US would be a one party state as Biden and Democrats are doing today. You say this as if ending the filibuster or implementing voting laws that would favor your party are things that only someone that would do anything for power would do. They aren't. The less principled you are, the more you would be willing to do to keep power. These aren't separate things. And the 'they're trying to make it a one party country' argument I keep hearing from right wing media is just ridiculous. Even if a one party system were a realistic possibility (it's not), no party should exist just for the sake of having one more political party. |
|
|
|
|
I haven't looked into this too much, but want to say it's an interesting project and, assuming you have no malicious intent, I hope you don't let all the attacks here and in other threads discourage you too much.
|
|
|
|
That many posts, over such a long time should prompt some questions.
Questions that have almost certainly been addressed already. |
|
|
|
These withdrawal talks are another example of Stake is not shrimp friendly
Just. Use. Another. Coin. LTC - 8 cents TRX - 6 cents EOS - 35 cents DOGE - 7 cents XRP or BCH - less than a cent ETH - $12 BTC - $13 |
|
|
|
You said it doesn’t seem *that* shady. As in, you disagree about the level of shadiness that I have have indicated. But notice you did not say “it doesn’t seem shady” because even the casinos most fervent defenders must reasonable concede that it is shady. To what degree? We may agree or disagree.
Actually it really doesn't seem shady at all. It's probably not intentional, and I can understand why someone would be annoyed by it, which explains why they apologized and gave you the bonus. What is shady is you depositing again and then complaining about the limits again and then creating this thread with the obvious intention to try and get another, larger, hand out. And I don't think I've ever defended them before. I think I criticized them at some point years ago, something to do with their poker. But yeah, overall I've had very little interaction with nitrogen compared to most other well known sites so the shill card won't work on me. |
|
|
|
I just read that the new stimulus money in some areas is only going to be paid out to non white families. How is this even possible? There are plenty of poor white families who also need that money.
In some areas there are no White families that qualify for stimulus payments. In other areas there are no Black families that qualify for stimulus payments. Think about it... |
|
|
|
I am very pleased with this casino! I've been playing it for a very long time, though there were big pauses. There used to be a faucet, now it is not, we could have made a progressive faucet for VIP players.
There are similarly distributed bonuses given out to VIP players still called a reload. It is weird that you came in here, there has been talks about stake not doing great for the time being, I get that symphonized is just marketing person, but you didn't even care about all these talks. There are talks about how you guys give whales so much and do not care about shrimps anymore and you do not even do anything for them anymore, compared to how you started and how much you were fair to everyone, you guys just ignore small amount players. There are talks about how third party apps are not trustworthy anymore, the fact that you built something like a provably fair foundation or something but then ignored all of it and got third party providers did upset some people. And there are talks about how your sportsbook provider and how you deal with that is not fair and should be done better as well. All of these are negative thoughts about stake, would you care to respond to those people with these fears? He's already addressed the third party stuff, and complaining about whales getting a lot more than people who don't wager very much is just....dumb. They have daily roll hunts with 0 wager required, tons of weekly promotions that require 5 and 10 cent minimum bets, all the bonuses that the whales get the are based directly on how much they wager. If you want bigger bonuses, wager more. It's a casino not a charity. |
|
|
|
Lazy attempt of a smokescreen, that's what I'd say...
Jeez that's really fucked up. Does Adkins seem to be getting any sort of organic traffic? It seems like the best response at this point is to just keep keeping track of the shills and not engaging with any of them since nothing productive could possibly come from it. The site will shrivel up and blow away like so many before them. |
|
|
|
California Officials Accepted 99.4 Percent Of Mail-In Ballots In 2020. With Newsom Recall, It’s A Completely Different Story
Is it a completely different story because one thing is an election and the other is a recall? Both cases involve signature verification, but the verification can be lax or strict. In case of the election it was lax, in case of the recall it is strict, or worse (real voters are disenfranchised on purpose). Petition signatures are gathered on street corners and knocking on doors. It's a lot different than an actual election. |
|
|
|
I believe that Kamala will push him down the stairs and step up to become America's first non-white female president.
I believe the main reason Harris is being vilified by the right so much more than Biden is because she's a woman of color and Biden is white male. You don’t think it has anything to do with the fact that Harris is a radical? Or that she is unprincipled? Or that she will do anything for power? She's not a radical and I don't think she's unprincipled and therefor wouldn't do "anything" for power. |
|
|
|
I believe that Kamala will push him down the stairs and step up to become America's first non-white female president.
I believe the main reason Harris is being vilified by the right so much more than Biden is because she's a woman of color and Biden is white male. |
|
|
|
Sometimes I really want to throw up on this site.
2 full minutes to go in a NBA game and they suspend all petting until the end.
Which bookmaker does that?
First the ass move against platinum 1 players and now this stupidity.
Time to leave this site, its getting to annoying!
All the bookmakers that use the same provider as stake? Name 1. Bet365 Wrong, LOL. They had moneyline open until 30sec before ending  . I didn't ask for a guess by the way. Also stake once claimed they don't use the same odds provider as bet365. Odds are different as well. I know that because I asked the chat support a while back. They use sportradar as of a little over a year ago, same as bet365, William Hill, etc. So thats even worse they use the same provider but choose to suspend betting in the last minutes while bet365 for example has open bets in same games until last seconds. What I also dont understand, often at live games the odds are for example 2.0 : 1.7 on bet365 and on stake its 2.2 : 1.55 at the same time/game. The provider is the one that makes those kind of decisions almost always, not the casino. Ahm, do do read what you quote, right? Anyway, have a nice day/week/year/life. While a large provider services many different sites, this doesn't mean each of the sites will have identical odds. In many cases a company operating in multiple jurisdictions will offer different prices in each jurisdiction. The international Bet365 odds, for example, are not identical to the American branch of bet365. As I said, decisions like when or when not to take live action on a game is almost certainly a decision made by the provider, not the Casino (stake). |
|
|
|
Sometimes I really want to throw up on this site.
2 full minutes to go in a NBA game and they suspend all petting until the end.
Which bookmaker does that?
First the ass move against platinum 1 players and now this stupidity.
Time to leave this site, its getting to annoying!
All the bookmakers that use the same provider as stake? Name 1. Bet365 Wrong, LOL. They had moneyline open until 30sec before ending . I didn't ask for a guess by the way. Also stake once claimed they don't use the same odds provider as bet365. Odds are different as well. I know that because I asked the chat support a while back. They use sportradar as of a little over a year ago, same as bet365, William Hill, etc. So thats even worse they use the same provider but choose to suspend betting in the last minutes while bet365 for example has open bets in same games until last seconds. What I also dont understand, often at live games the odds are for example 2.0 : 1.7 on bet365 and on stake its 2.2 : 1.55 at the same time/game. The provider is the one that makes those kind of decisions almost always, not the casino. |
|
|
|
Sometimes I really want to throw up on this site.
2 full minutes to go in a NBA game and they suspend all petting until the end.
Which bookmaker does that?
First the ass move against platinum 1 players and now this stupidity.
Time to leave this site, its getting to annoying!
All the bookmakers that use the same provider as stake? Name 1. Bet365 Wrong, LOL. They had moneyline open until 30sec before ending . I didn't ask for a guess by the way. Also stake once claimed they don't use the same odds provider as bet365. Odds are different as well. I know that because I asked the chat support a while back. They use sportradar as of a little over a year ago, same as bet365, William Hill, etc. |
|
|
|
 At least he's not doubling down ala Tash/Mindtrust/Tzupy and co. I guess.
Seems like a reasonable defense, when you really think about it. "Judge, what I said was so utterly braindead that no one could possible think that I was telling the truth!". This is the same as Alex Jones's lawyer saying he was just a character when it came time for his divorce proceedings and no one should believe him. Makes you think if anyone that actually thought her lawsuit was worth a damn will admit they fell for a grifter but probably not. I agree, seems like it's probably the best defense. I'm guessing she didn't go to the same law school as the lawyer defending her. |
|
|
|
Sometimes I really want to throw up on this site.
2 full minutes to go in a NBA game and they suspend all petting until the end.
Which bookmaker does that?
First the ass move against platinum 1 players and now this stupidity.
Time to leave this site, its getting to annoying!
All the bookmakers that use the same provider as stake? Name 1. Bet365 |
|
|
|
Sometimes I really want to throw up on this site.
2 full minutes to go in a NBA game and they suspend all petting until the end.
Which bookmaker does that?
First the ass move against platinum 1 players and now this stupidity.
Time to leave this site, its getting to annoying!
All the bookmakers that use the same provider as stake? |
|
|
|
You still shouldn't say "There were just a couple hundred seats traded after being listed only a few days." if they were actually listed for a few months.
They weren’t. The data is very clear as well as me personally witnessing the seats being listed for less than two days before being sold to a different user on the public auction. It isn’t something we can debate. The facts are very black and white. As far as things to complain about, a user making money selling an item on a perfectly functioning public auction seems to be one of the stranger ones I’ve heard. Bless your little heart though. I love that you want to participate here, even if your efforts are misguided. It takes all kinds.  Ok, well, according to the apparent seat holder and you they were. Those seats were actually listed for sale for several months, they sold a few days after being listed at rock bottom prices, below their share of bitcoin that NF has in savings.Yes, you had them listed way too high with the rising BTC rate and the market wouldn’t pay that price. You then lowered it down substantially (lower than probably needed) and they sold extremely quickly. That’s how free markets work. |
|
|
|
Former top State Dept investigator says COVID-19 outbreak may have resulted from bioweapons research accidentAs top U.S. officials prepare to meet their Chinese counterparts for their first face-to-face meeting during the Biden administration, the State Department's former lead investigator who oversaw the Task Force into the COVID-19 virus origin tells Fox News that he not only believes the virus escaped from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, but that it may have been the result of research that the Chinese military, or People’s Liberation Army, was doing on a bioweapon.
"The Wuhan Institute of Virology is not the National Institute of Health," David Asher, now a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute told Fox News in an exclusive interview. "It was operating a secret, classified program. In my view, and I’m just one person, my view is it was a biological weapons program." There are zero coincidences in this world. If something gives an advantage to certain people, then it means it is those people who are responsible for "something". So was it an attack or a mistake? Can't be both. Seems like you're grasping for straws at this point. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
