This seemed unusual so I snapped it. Kurious is there a meaning or reason when the line is oscillating so neatly around the other, see poor sketch.
|
|
|
I don’t know, near 100K I think no one of us talks about the price anymore, more where to visit etc or how to life carefully etc
What mistakes not to make etc
Are you certain? I will be moving around in one these pulled by 15-20 drag queens. I am likely to be seeking employment at that time
|
|
|
I mean the range I saw the price action
|
|
|
Bitcoin has escaped my range quite significantly, looking good for you guys. I found this bigger picture interesting. (do I also see a bit of recurring support and resistance over quite a long time)
|
|
|
Buying decline repeatedly is to lover the DCA though so can see the mentality. Still is the average cost really your focus?.
|
|
|
Wondering how can Iowa vote for a gay? Pressing a button, baby. How could you have missed that detail? The Irish PM likes his fellas too and no one there seems to mind. That traditionally hasn't been a bastion of inclusiveness until recent times. Mhh. I think it is different, In Iowa it isn't technically a primary election, but a caucus, you have to actually stand in a designated area to support your candidate: Each precinct divides its delegate seats among the candidates in proportion to caucus goers' votes. Participants indicate their support for a particular candidate by standing in a designated area of the caucus site (forming a preference group). An area may also be designated for undecided participants.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iowa_caucuses#Democratic_PartyConsensus!
|
|
|
Lol, BSV tracks are just too big EMPTY, no issues with any collision possible
|
|
|
US Marshals Will Auction $40M in Bitcoin This MonthThe U.S. Marshals Service is auctioning nearly $40 million in bitcoin, the first such auction since the end of 2018.
The Marshals will auction "approximately" 4,040 bitcoin, worth $37.7 million at press time, according to CoinDesk's Bitcoin Price Index, to registered bidders on Feb. 18, the press release said. Potential bidders must register by Feb. 12.
"The auction will take place during a six-hour period Feb. 18. Bids will be accepted by email from pre-registered bidders only," the release said.
Bidders will also be required to make a $200,000 deposit before being able to bid. Participants who do not win their bids will receive these back.
The bitcoin will be sold in four lots, with 2,500, 1,000, 500 and 40.54069820 bitcoin each. The first three lots are further split into blocks, each with their own set number of bitcoin. https://www.coindesk.com/us-marshals-will-auction-40m-in-bitcoin-this-month This is something very important because every time they auction Bitcoin is incrementally more difficult to declare it illegal. If it were illegal they would “burn it”, like they do with seized drugs. This is something very important regarding this aspect una common law system, way more important than any price-related issue. ha they want the monies
|
|
|
You mean like this? Nah, he probably meant like the time I crashed my lambo, and lost the memory to my passphrase in the process: Sad story really. Hodl - job done Lambo SV
|
|
|
^ Jeep, I've always had one at home, you can do anything with them. Self levelling active air suspension my man. The wheels should go up and down but the cabin should remain stable. That guy in the backseat isn’t going to have a spine left. I tested this on a Citroen once, at about 60 mph the speed bump is invisible like you said, then approaching 70-75 it become a jump
|
|
|
Lancet study from Wuhan market. Average age of patients was 55.5 years old. 51% of patients had pre-existing co-mordity factors such as (51%) patients had chronic disease such as cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, endocrine system disease, digestive system disease, respiratory system disease, malignant tumour, and nervous system disease. Of that (unhealthy) cohort, there was an 11% mortality rate. Good job this forum isn’t full of unhealthy middle aged men. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)30211-7/fulltextOh FS
|
|
|
Surely you Liverpool guys are feeling confident.
It would be the mother of all fuck ups to lose now.
GL
|
|
|
Lampard once again spoiled my day by introducing substitute that had no impact on the game most especially Barkley and not surprisingly he left Mount on the pitch who's impact wasn't felt althrough out the match (except the one time he assisted Rudiger's second goal). While Leicester were busy making substitution to win the game, Lampard was busy settling for a draw by removing our only striker on the pitch.
The Chelsea game just spoiled my whole mood, making me to miss other matches and thankfully I didn't bother watching them since from the scores I'm seeing, only Liverpool impressed as always while others were just drawing their match. First 15/25 minutes, Chelsea was dominating the game and would had easily scored twice but as usual, they missed all the chances which almost cost them the match if not for Rudiger's superb performance.
Took off the fucking forward player FS
|
|
|
This flies farther because its been spliced with cum at some point
|
|
|
Shit I got 12/1 Chelsea when they went behind. fiver.
Nearly then it petered out.
|
|
|
|