15 BTC for all, shipped.  Escrow through John K.

You submitted a share at difficulty 4 when the requirement was difficulty 2 (i.e. "4/2").  If the share difficulty threshold was set at 16 and you submitted a share of difficulty 36, then it would read "Accepted xxxxxxxx Diff 36/16 GPU 0"

"GPU 0" refers to your graphics card.  If you had two graphics cards mining, it would show something like "GPU 0" and also "GPU 1."  In other words, it's just indicating which graphics card was responsible for submitting that particular share.

I think of a higher difficulty in a pool as solo-mining with a lower difficulty.  If you want to try to be lucky for a day as a GPU or Block Erupter miner, set your stratum difficulty to 128 or 256 and watch the variance kick in.

No, he's having a good time watching you self-incriminate.

I'll let my lawyer be the judge of that.  He likes the reality version of reality, not yours.

I bought a fire resistant/water proof/burglary resistant safe to protect my private keys and laptop.  Three days after the purchase, my entire house got flooded. I lost everything except my private keys and laptop!  Whew!

Of course I did.  The share was 121M, while a share > 50.8M will solve a block.

FYI I submitted a share difficulty 121M with block erupter

You have a terrible habit of isolating little snippets and totally taking them out of context.  That might work if you told person B a snippet said by person A.  If you think that you can take what I said and spin it back to me to fit the context of your argument, you're a retard.

Yes, my opinion is infinitely more important than a poll, even if that poll contained opinions from an infinite number of people.  You see, I actually think for myself and form my own opinions.  If I say Hardees's is better, it's because it fucking is.  My experience infinitely outweighs others' opinions, and especially your horrible arguments.

I'm still waiting for you to make a relevant point without committing a logical fallacy.  Yeah I said In 'N Out is tasty.  So what?  That doesn't imply a fucking thing about In 'N Out relative to anything else, you dumb fuck.
Girl Scout cookies are tasty too. That doesn't mean McDonald's sucks.  Schmuck.

Yeah, I read your pseudoscience articles.  Gotta love when journalists butcher the scientific method.

My opinion is infinitely more important to me than the opinions of others.  Quit your ad populum bullshit.

Honestly, Hardee's burgers taste better to me than In 'N Out.  In 'N Out "secret sauce" is absolutely disgusting.  And price to me is more important, hence I'd prefer McDonald's because, yes, it's cheaper.  Actually, if I could pick any fast food joint in the world, I'd pick this place Nicky's Red Hots right by my house.  They absolutely obliterate In 'N Out.  But, they have like 2 or 3 stores max.  Actually, I prefer Wendy's over In 'N Out simply because I can get chili or a baked potato, far healthier than anything In 'N Out has to offer.

Sure ya did.

That's not your fault.  That's how far he's pushed his own topic -- people reading this thread will assume its about something other than what it was originally intended to be.

Do you like being stupid?  I can't believe you just asked that question.

I created this thread to have a discussion about the topic.  You have instead insisted on replacing the topic of the thread with your own topic. 

I guess I should've created a thread that contained absolutely nothing that I wanted to discuss.

Imagine going to a steak restaurant, and so you order a steak.  Instead, they bring you the kids' corn dog meal.  When you complain, they ask you, "Why do you insist on the steak?!"

You're an evolutionary cul-de-sac.

Ok, listen up, you dumbass.  You just listed 7 things that are "everything that needs to be known."

Not a single fucking one of them has ANYTHING to do with the attitudes of striking workers, the topic of the OP.

You're the type of person that makes me want to sacrifice good karma just so I can have fun being a dick to you, and also the type of person that makes me want to report you to a moderator like a child tattling to a grown-up.

You might want to get evaluated for dementia, old timer.

I've eaten at both having lived in both Cali and the Midwest.  Unfortunately for you, Rassah and myself have experience with reading comprehension, which gives us perspective that you lack.  We understand what you're saying and so we know your arguments not only suck, but they're in no way relevant to the OP.  You don't understand what we're saying, so you make up your own issue and push it relentlessly so it will appear as though you're not a fucking imbecile.  Maybe if you try harder it'll work!

I'm beginning to believe that ad-hominems were designed especially for you.  You don't even have the faintest idea about how I arrived at my opinion.  Quit being a fucking idiot.

@ Badbear,

Regardless of what Theymos is entitled to do or not do, I can tell you that my suspicion has increased, and trust decreased, with regards to Theymos as a result of inconsistent moderation, claims that he is protecting scammers, and his avoidance of this thread.  I bet I'm not the only one.

Inconsistent moderation will be caught and scrutinized by others. If enough people are unhappy about it, it's just going to make your job and Thymos's job a lot more annoying.  It also makes this site a target among those that are inconsistently moderated, even if a ban just means they'll create 10 sock puppet  accounts just to troll you harder.  

Good one.  You have to love memes, the last retort from bandwagoners and the uncreative.

You're really going to blast someone for sharing an opinion on a public forum founded upon the opinion that Bitcoin is a superior currency, and after voicing your opinion through a picture indicating someone else's opinion about what people should do with their opinions?  Wow.  You're complex.