No. Discussion of altcoins belongs in the Altcoin section.

This forum is not affiliated with Multiply BTC and does not provide support for such services. If you can call it a service. I'd call it a scam. You won't get your bitcoins back, as the operator of Multiply BTC simply absconded with them.

The threads currently being spammed to the Press section still are mostly off-topic. I've complained about this before, but nobody listened.

So in other words, no.

---

OP, I noticed you edited the subject to "Satanists Jews", and I have to ask what you mean by that, as it's ungrammatical to the point of losing meaning. Do you mean "Satanic Jews", ie, Satanists who are ethnically Jewish? Or perhaps you mean "Are Satanists Jews who are mentally ill?" The answer is still no in both cases, though the latter betrays a fundamental misunderstanding of either Satanism or Judaism. Or do you mean something else entirely?

No. Why would they be?

Nobody said anything about America. Why would I? I don't even live in America, nor have I ever been to America. I said Bitcoin is an international payment system. When was the last time you made a $1 transaction using SWIFT?

My own preference is that nobody would be poor and everyone could have the basic necessities of life for free, but that's simply not possible in the real world. Bitcoin is expensive. It's by far the most powerful distributed computing system ever conceived. And anyone who wants to use it has to pay for it. That's the plain reality of the matter, whether I like it or not.

It wasn't. Ever. Everyone who has ever tried has complained about how impractical it is for that purpose. The problem is the greed of freeloaders expecting to use a ridiculously expensive payment system for free.

A $1 purchase is not a normal transaction that a normal person makes with an international payment system. I've been complaining about this increasingly loudly since 2012, long before Blockstream was founded.



Remember. Those are the things that I have said. You can't change that, regardless of when I said it.

I think the rest of my post made it clear that it's a rhetorical question.

Explain how they are "force feeding" RBF and SegWit. Those who do not like these features do not have to use them, and, more importantly, do not even need to upgrade in order for other people use them. Old versions of Bitcoin will continue to work, and new versions get new features. Users of the new version can even downgrade if there are problems with the new version. That's what makes soft forks less dangerous than hard forks.

No.

No, it's not okay. It's delusional. It's also not okay to think you have to be, or should be. Women can be more than just sex objects, not that I expect you to understand that.

We only celebrate posting naked pics of hot girls, which you are not. This is not a confusing concept to anyone who has a dick. Even people who don't have dicks tend to have no great difficulty understanding it.

Hey, whatever turns you on. Just don't get deluded into thinking it turns us on.

It's not an insult, it's just contradictory to your claim of being hot. You asked how hot you are and the answer is "not at all". That's not an insult either, unless you only see yourself as a sex object. If you are instead a person with other qualities, then you ought to be able to impress men (and women, for that matter) in ways other than by being hot.

Why would you ask a question if you don't care about the answer? That would mean you're posting indecent photos of yourself for no reason, so it seems like the only person who's lost any sense of decency is you.

Unsexy women have that effect on men.

Ignore the trolls. Just call or write to your local Masonic Lodge and ask about joining. They're not actually a secret society, people just think that because their members include powerful people who conspire to do... conspirational things. Most of the conspiracies are actually just elaborate practical jokes that got way out of hand.

The site's down at the moment so I can't read the article, but based on your post, I don't see what this has to do with Bitcoin?

Well, we can't very well talk about Byzantine generals without talking about military action.

8/17/15
Not Bitcoin XT
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1154520.0

I thought that was quite cute.

It means he knows nothing about the law, in case we couldn't already tell by his not even knowing what the First Amendment is. I can only assume this "soliciting settlements" business is some sort of scam.

Yes, exactly like that. Free as in speech, not as in beer.

This is probably the second dumbest thing I have ever read on the Speculation board, and that's saying a lot.

He didn't lie, nor did he promise you a damn thing. He speculated, ie, made a wild-ass guess. That's what we do on the speculation board. I'd say only a complete retard would trust the wild-ass guesses of some random person on the Internet enough to gamble their entire fortune on it, but that would be an insult to the mentally disabled.

You're welcome. We also offer lessons in taking responsibility for one's own stupidity, but you probably won't be interested in that.