Bitcoin Forum
June 14, 2024, 08:39:37 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 [98] 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 »
1941  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Unique Bitcoin Owners on: August 26, 2013, 12:12:08 AM
You might be able to achieve a rough estimate if you do some cluster analysis on transactions, looking for which transactions from separate addresses eventually collide into a single address or group of addresses that are closely related. This might give you some indication of which addresses are grouped in a wallet or controlled by the same entity.

In the (not too?) distant future, I expect law enforcement will seek these kinds of tools for criminal transaction analysis. Can you imagine a time when they present a blockchain analysis to a judge to secure a signed warrant? You know... assuming we in the United States have any sort of Fourth Amendment rights at that point.

I've been wondering about how they got the warrant to seize bitcoins in this case:

http://www.dailydot.com/business/11-bitcoins-seized-government-dea/

Apparently they already have something compelling enough for a seizure?
I'm sure there was no warrant for the seizure is just as the article said, a honeypot on Silk Road or the computer itself was seized and there happened to be bitcoins on it and the news media twisted it to say the coins had been seized
1942  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [QRK] Quark | Super secure hashing | CPU mining on: August 25, 2013, 11:56:23 PM
Finally put my code up on github.

https://github.com/uncle-bob/quarkcoin-cpuminer

I'm looking for suggestions or ideas. Groestl-Hash seem to be the deal breaker right now. It's taking up as much time as all other 5 hashes combined. Any speed up for Groestl would be a win. Currently the V1 release confuses the compiler slightly less and is a smidgen faster. However I think this code is currently the best option for speeding up beyond that. It's still around twice as fast as the default miner.

Added bonus, almost everything for quark now fits a single function. While it won't fit on a GPU until the code size is reduced and memory is shrunk, it's just yet. Consider this my last update for cpuminer.

I wrote this cause I'm greedy, and so I leave my tipjar.
BTC: 1DaSUSqcr13G4QJYamsecW6yHh95QTT39R
QRK: QQRNpg7aGHcvgEFvXEk1DoCtLydboVsAzf

I cannot get it to compile. I'm on Ubuntu 13.04 and I get stuck at:

"checking for pthread_create in -lpthread... yes
./configure: line 5534: syntax error near unexpected token `,'
./configure: line 5534: `LIBCURL_CHECK_CONFIG(, 7.15.2, ,'"

Any help would be appreciated.

I had the same error when compiling quark itself it is due to curl not being properly installed
A fix can be found here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4823.0

Edit: Or install libcurl-dev Wink
1943  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Vanitygen: Vanity bitcoin address generator/miner [v0.22] on: August 25, 2013, 11:02:40 PM
Mmmerlin, I do not know much about the parameters as I only use a laptop with a single gpu but I recall having trouble with driver versions
1944  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Vanitygen: Vanity bitcoin address generator/miner [v0.22] on: August 25, 2013, 09:16:18 PM
Sorry for asking a question that's probably already been answered but I have looked a bit and this thread is very long.

Anyway, I'm trying to run on Win7 x64, I can run the plain vanitygen binary no problem, but the oclvanitygen gives me the LLVM ERROR problem. What is the latest on this? Is it a Catalyst problem? If not what are the causes?

I have on 6950 and one 7950 and it doesn't seem to run on either... Any tips for a total n00b would be very much appreciated!
The catalyst control center 13 and associated drivers has trouble running vanitygen you must downgrade to version 12.8
1945  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Vanitygen: Vanity bitcoin address generator/miner [v0.22] on: August 25, 2013, 08:51:51 PM
just opened a beer and found   https://blockchain.info/address/1HaLfdrunk5LC5a4By9vZ2YmLz5o3mbkXT    Donate if you like it Wink

Nine character non-caps patterns arn't so hard to find. Now try and find a 13+ character "1" pattern short address.

What do you mean by 13+ 1 pattern short address?
I think he is talking 13 or more 1's in a row, at least that's what I get out of it.
1946  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Vanitygen: Vanity bitcoin address generator/miner [v0.22] on: August 25, 2013, 08:42:56 PM
Try just

Code:
./vanitygen -i 1jerodev

Yea, but I would like to do some other stuff with this server too.
It is a server on wich I connect via ssh.
Run it in a screen.
Code:
Sudo apt-get install screen
Screen ./vanitygen <params>
Ctrl+A, D <- detach from current screen
Screen -list <- list running screens
Screen -r # <- resume a  previously active screen where # is number before the . from list above (123.something)
1947  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [QRK] Quark | Super secure hashing | CPU mining on: August 25, 2013, 01:58:49 PM
No, this is not a new qt wallet, only a standalone miner that mines more efficiently than the miner built into the qt wallet. You keep your current qt wallet application and wallet.dat file the same.

See this thread for using the miner on the p2pool:

http://forum.quarkcoin.org/Thread-Quark-Mining-Pool-Creation-Needed?pid=74#pid74


It's basically:
Code:
minerd_xyz.exe [b]-a quark[/b] -t <numthreads> -o http://176.221.46.81:8372 [b]-u <youquarkaddress>[/b]


This pool takes cucrrently 3% fee, which you can verify yourself:
http://176.221.46.81:8372/fee

Please also inform you about how p2pool works, esp about that fake difficulty:
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/P2Pool#Payout_logic
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/P2Pool#Frequently_Asked_Questions

----snip---

Putting the hash_init-stuff outside of the loop isn't gaining anthing in cpuminer Sad

Anyone able to get payout from this pool?

My shares has not been get paid so far.
50 kh/s received shares for first hour, 46 blocks, but then they stopped coming so I went back to solo for now
1948  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [QRK] Quark | Super secure hashing | CPU mining on: August 25, 2013, 06:08:59 AM
5 blocks in a row for the P2Pool, not good. Is that almost a 51% attack?

https://i.imgur.com/tcBwsk7.png
That is called luck Wink

Maybe if they had 51 of the last 100 blocks I would be more concerned or if this "pattern" were to continue
1949  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: What happened to mtrlt?: A continuing story on: August 25, 2013, 05:01:43 AM
He went to prison after hunting down and brutally torturing ReCat to death.


~BCX~
Why does this turn me on..?  Tongue

Because I would actually enjoy this.  Wink
PM me with your home adress.  Cheesy
Well, this is getting kinky.



And we are getting quite far from the original topic, this thread started very professional and now it is going the opposite
1950  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: What happened to mtrlt?: A continuing story on: August 24, 2013, 06:51:54 PM
He went to prison after hunting down and brutally torturing ReCat to death.


~BCX~
Why does this turn me on..?  Tongue

Because you are a sadistic person
1951  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [WTS] 600K+ ZetaCoin on: August 24, 2013, 04:47:31 PM
Sound like it paid off well for you, sometimes you must just wait.
1952  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [ANN] Neocoin is scheduled for the Saturday 24th of August at 18:00 UTC on: August 24, 2013, 04:38:21 PM
Here we go again
1953  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: What happened to mtrlt?: Breaking News on: August 24, 2013, 02:31:13 AM
I saw the footnote and the only mistake I noticed was point 11 "Can teh readers"

Another well written post although it would be better if you addressed the points after you listed them, being such a long post I had a hard time remembering what each point was in reference to
1954  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: What happened to mtrlt? Did he just scam us of 75 BTC? on: August 24, 2013, 01:21:38 AM
All other of my facts that you speak of as if false that I have made are correct as far as we are concerned.

"Correct as far as we are concerned" What does that mean?
I thought we were talking facts here and aren't they always true otherwise they are no longer a fact.
1955  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: What happened to mtrlt?: An exercise in reporting on: August 23, 2013, 08:21:08 PM
Much better report than the "other" thread that intended to distribute the same information in a more hate fueling manner.

We must have faith, maybe he went on vacation for 2 weeks and didn't want to say "hey guys I'm going to be gone for a while why don't you all go rob my house"
1956  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: What happened to mtrlt? Did he just scam us of 75 BTC? on: August 23, 2013, 08:16:57 PM
Bcp19, very well done Smiley
1957  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][KING]KingCoin,POW+POS Coin with new algo|Coin Control|No Premine on: August 23, 2013, 06:46:17 PM
Scam scam scam.
I think that has been established already
1958  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: (ANN)(PRERELEASE) - parabolas - launching with pools, faucets-YOU can contribute on: August 23, 2013, 05:04:00 AM
hashing parabolas with complex solutions
That sounds like it would be difficult to put into a coin.
1959  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][KING]KingCoin,POW+POS Coin with new algo|Coin Control|No Premine on: August 22, 2013, 10:14:47 AM
Antiy-AVL    RiskTool/Win32.BitCoinMiner.gen    20130821
Avast    Win32:BitCoinMiner-CA [Trj]    20130821
ESET-NOD32    a variant of Win32/BitCoinMiner.K    20130821
Ikarus    Win32.SuspectCrc
Kaspersky    not-a-virus:HEUR:RiskTool.Win32.BitCoinMiner.heur
McAfee    Artemis!8C81AB18352F
Panda    Suspicious file
Symantec    WS.Reputation.1
TrendMicro    HKTL_BITMINE.SML    20130821
TrendMicro-HouseCall    TROJ_GEN.F47V0821
1960  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Would you like to help beta-test a Bitcoin strategy game? on: August 22, 2013, 02:51:49 AM
This is a funny community everything is a scam until proven otherwise.  

Personally I would like to see consistent up time and fast page loading times.

The gambling category of services must be "provably fair" which does not apply here due to the lack of chance but rather pure skill.

If players are to keep a balance on the website 2 factor authentication is needed to prevent unauthorized withdrawals or bets.

I'm not sure what else you could do beside continue onward and overtime build trust within the community
Pages: « 1 ... 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 [98] 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!