$16

Well, it saves me $0.99 and it helps further the BTC system... I'll take it

Edit: Payment sent to 1DRiK

$11

Which method do you think would be better: Continue with a pooled quota with donations or individual pay per download approach?


Right now there is one common quota shared by all and a single donation address which adds to the pool.

Edit: added a poll.

Would the owner of 1G26Gk7GKM18NRCeAXVaBS7CsZVtVnTi4y shoot me a PM I haven't gotten around to actually implementing payments and would like to make sure you get your download going.
User reached out to me via PM and situation is resolved


And yes...

Mako Oda

Beseige? $7 on steam http://store.steampowered.com/app/346010/

Google says February 19

If that's the case it'd be good if he can at least confirm it does exist and is being worked on so both quickseller and him remove their negative feedbacks.

SHILL! You're a shill for a 3rd party trying to discredit both of these fine gentlemen.

pythonpro1337: The 'p' in (mod p) is 2^255 - 19 and he's not searching for 10 but rather some arbitrarily large number such as 83402281777707715381485212681368749158073214888176003645002923212220704930559

That's exactly what your not supposed to do when trying to disclose a bug.

http://mashable.com/2013/08/18/facebook-hacker-zuckerberg-timeline/

No, because then he'd be saying if you don't pay me the 10 btc I'm going to start shooting down every node I see until it's fixed.

Rather he simply wants to be compensated for his time spent digging into the code and finding a vulnerability.


To those who believe the Bitcoin Foundation should not offer these bounties I ask why does the EFF offer bounties and prizes?



Edit: Has gmaxwell verified the claim sent by PM yet?

Open your trust page in a new incognito window and you will see it with default trust which the majority of users are on.

It is not solved. Funds were used by the wallet for another bounty but he does have enough to cover it, and actually raised it to 40 BTC

Hodl my beer, I'm going in!

One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.

That does not appear to be the case from super basic testing

http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=C9KhyFry
https://github.com/bitspill/Doubling/blob/master/main.cpp

A value of -999 means it attempted doubling 100 million times and did not find the goal, so I'm treating that as if it wont ever find it.

It's likely possible to add checks such that when all possibilities have been exhausted it quits rather than an arbitrary 100 million but I have not


So it would seem in some cases you can't simply double your way there, an add is required occasionally.


Edit: actually it shouldnt be checking for the exhaustion of possibilities but rather the entrance of a loop. Which is possible to implement on tgese small scale test but a loop would be nearly impossible to detect at the scale of 2^256

mod: 11
Goal: 6
9 doubles:
4 doubles 1 add
2 doubles 2 adds