1345
|
Economy / Digital goods / Re: Selling Starbucks Gift Cards $25 each or $22 each if you buy 5 or more
|
on: February 03, 2015, 03:38:41 AM
|
You are a troll of the trolls and act all superior and mighty just because you are on badbears trust list. But everyone can see that you are a closed minded scum who is obsessed about protecting your own interest on this forum. You are now ignored and I will leave this trust left by a hero member who observed everything on the scam accusation thread which can be found here and let everyone decide for themselves: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=939260.0"bitspill 0: -0 / +1(1) 2015-01-31 0.00000000 Reference Regularly trades gift cards, "purchases" starbucks card from jamesphamm33. First claims he'll pay after he uses them to verify they work. Later claims he didn't know they were carded so he will not be paying. jamesphamm33 is out the BTC and the GCs, read reference and decide for yourself who's right." Just note however that trust was a neutral trust and does not side in your favor either. I'm fairly certain your cards are obtained via illegitimate means and will get zeroed at some point, just in this particular case I'm not yet sure if Wardrick was exploiting that possibility for his own gain at your "expense", even though you really had no "loss" other than a potential sale.
|
|
|
1347
|
Other / Off-topic / Re: Let's talk about how hot Asian girls are. [NSFW]
|
on: February 02, 2015, 04:35:46 AM
|
I like the one in red the best! Fine! I take the other three! gimme the smiling one on the right Agreed, Far right is the best. I second this. But the one on the left has bigger boobs I showed my wife this picture and the comment chain. Like most of you, she also likes the girl on the right. Now, being a breast man myself, I'm sort of partial to the two slightly more ample pairs on the left, but I told her I wouldn't complain whatsoever if she brought home any one of these girls. I prefer small/no tits anyway More for me! (Pun intended.) Great, while all of you argue about the other three, I still want the one in red. It would seem no one cares about the one in the white Edit: somehow my text appeared in the middle of the quotes rather than below :/
|
|
|
1352
|
Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Wardrick scammed me out of $110
|
on: January 31, 2015, 07:16:08 PM
|
You stated in your thread that you don't send the codes first. I messaged you showing interest in them, completely different than saying "Hey send me $500 of codes and I will pay you within 12 hours of receiving them, and guess what? I'll even pay you if the gift cards are completely useless and have no value whatsoever!". Either way if you send me something and don't discuss the trade details you're basically agreeing to my terms unless they are ridiculous.
If you know his thread says he won't send first why even bring it up? You wanted him to look at your reputation, deem you trustworthy, then send the codes to you.
|
|
|
1353
|
Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Wardrick scammed me out of $110
|
on: January 31, 2015, 06:32:14 PM
|
Conspiracy mode. Wardrick is using his classic SB card until he gets down to $0.33 and needs to load up again Wardrick acquires 5 $100 cards from james Wardrick transfers $499.67 to his primary card SB cards have a max value of $500 so he couldn't move it all 4 cards are now $0.00 1 card is now $0.33 Wardrick claims SB zeroed them Wardrick has a reputation james is the new guy ergo james is the bad guy Wardrick laughs his way home while drinking starbucks You told me to send you cards first after checking your reputation. So I checked your reputation and decided to send you cards and assumed you would pay me and not make things complicated.
This is how I see the situation also, james did what was asked of him
|
|
|
1354
|
Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Wardrick scammed me out of $110
|
on: January 31, 2015, 06:16:26 PM
|
Cancellation of This Agreement
We may suspend or terminate this agreement and revoke or limit any or all of the rights and privileges granted to you at any time without notice or liability. Termination may result from your fraudulent or unauthorized use of the Starbucks Card. If we terminate this agreement without cause, we will refund or issue store credits equal to the balance held in your Starbucks Card account less any amounts that you may owe us. So in the case of cards being cancelled for fraud they would have cause and the entire balance is gone with no refunds. There should not be $0.33 left we should be seeing a big 'ole $0.00 Although I've got no experience with Starbucks, Wardrick's story just doesn't sit right with me. I read his first PM about check my history decide if you want to send first as agreeing to the established price and expecting either james to actually send first or to object in which case it would likely progress to escrow. Wardrick then later adds the term that he wants to use then pay.
|
|
|
1355
|
Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Wardrick scammed me out of $110
|
on: January 31, 2015, 05:45:41 PM
|
I don't have an explanation for the $0.33, although I also don't know how exactly the loading of balances works. It looks like there were 4 $25 transactions to load the funds onto the card. If Starbucks only allows for one payment method for each "reload" then this is defiantly suspicious. However if they allow customers to split the payment (e.g. paying $20 in cash and $5 with their credit card.....or $24.67 on their credit card and $0.33 in cash - or $20 on one credit card and $5 on another, or $20 with their credit card and $5 from a refund), then it is possible that the $0.33 is simply the only portion that is not stolen funds.
Here's a link to a forum where someone bought a gift card from ebay, added it to their existing card that they've used for a while and say StarBucks cancelled the entire card and all funds. When they spoke with a manager about getting their legitimate balance back they said only if a receipt could be provided for every balance added. Seems StarBucks cancels everything if one bad cards slips in. http://forum.purseblog.com/ebay-forum/bought-a-starbucks-giftcard-from-ebay-and-starbucks-863611.html
|
|
|
1356
|
Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Wardrick scammed me out of $110
|
on: January 31, 2015, 05:24:58 PM
|
Ok, you're probably right about the automation Quickseller, but if the cards are cancelled they should have a zero balance right? I noticed card 0933 only spent $99.67 as shown in OP's screenshot and sure enough it still has $0.33 on it
|
|
|
1357
|
Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Wardrick scammed me out of $110
|
on: January 31, 2015, 05:11:26 PM
|
I dont know why, the order was just cancelled and I received that message. Probably because they're stolen gift cards.
Then wouldn't it say "sorry we had to cancel your order" not "sorry you cancelled your order" ?
|
|
|
1358
|
Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Wardrick scammed me out of $110
|
on: January 31, 2015, 05:02:38 PM
|
Go ahead and post every PM you and I have sent, it will just make you look like more of an idiot than you do now. That's been my story from the start, the cards never worked and on top of that they're stolen (which you admittedly say, what a stupid thing to say Imo if you're trying to get paid for something that never worked in the first place). You have a a screw loose buddy.
https://i.imgur.com/5siKDKA.pngWhy does it say you cancelled the order?
|
|
|
|