This is with my 2 480's.  Custom 29mh boysie rom. Dang you are getting 20% higher hash than I am on stock roms... I am tempted. Is that on a 480 reference card? |
|
|
|
Good call  I adjusted my above post. My z was referenced in the github password area and i guess is a null value that you dont need hahaha. You think he can use 2 zec's on a 470? That would be neat! Yes, as he said they are 4GB cards, so he will get better utilization that way. Also if he did only need one instance then he should leave the -k param out completely. It only supports dual or higher modes according to the readme. I adjusted my post for two zecs then I think dudes gone tho. |
|
|
|
which setting to use the rx 470 4gb nitro?
win 7 64
Maybe try out this: genoil.exe -c zec.suprnova.cc:2142 -u xxxxxx.xxxxx -p xxxxxx z -i 20 -w 64 -P 0 -k zec pause 3x 470 4gb genoil.exe -c zec.suprnova.cc:2142 -u xxxxxx.xxxxx -p xxxxxx z -i 20 -w 64 -P 0 -g 0 1 2 -k zec pause Why would you name the second instance 'pause'? I would stick with convention and name both instances 'zec' to avoid confusion with the pause command that you would normally put at the end of a batch file. Also what is the 'z' after the password? -P 0 is the default so unless you're having problems leave that out. If you do need it you probably need -P 1. If you are using a looping batch file that restarts on a crash you will want the '-f 2' flag. Try this instead: cd c:\zcash (or wherever your genoil.exe is located)
:restart
genoil.exe -c xxxx:xxxx -u xxxx.xxxx -p xxxx -i 20 -w 64 -g 0 1 2 -f 2 -k zec zec
TIMEOUT /T 10
goto restart
pause Good call I adjusted my above post. My z was referenced in the github password area and i guess is a null value that you dont need hahaha. You think he can use 2 zec's on a 470? That would be neat! |
|
|
|
which setting to use the rx 470 4gb nitro?
win 7 64
Maybe try out this: genoil.exe -c zec.suprnova.cc:2142 -u xxxxxx.xxxxx -p xxxxxx z -i 20 -w 64 -P 0 -k zec pause 3x 470 4gb genoil.exe -c zec.suprnova.cc:2142 -u xxxxxx.xxxxx -p xxxxxx z -i 20 -w 64 -P 0 -g 0 1 2 -k zec pause With this configuration it opens and closes full batch would be this but make sure to put in your login information in place of the x's -u is username.worker and -p is password: title 480
:start
setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
genoil.exe -c zec.suprnova.cc:2142 -u xxxxxx.xxxxxx -p xxxxx -i 20 -w 64 -P 1 -g 0 1 2 -k zec zec -f 2
cls
timeout /T 10
goto start I changed it up a little... |
|
|
|
which setting to use the rx 470 4gb nitro?
win 7 64
Maybe try out this: genoil.exe -c zec.suprnova.cc:2142 -u xxxxxx.xxxxx -p xxxxxx z -i 20 -w 64 -P 0 -k zec pause 3x 470 4gb genoil.exe -c zec.suprnova.cc:2142 -u xxxxxx.xxxxx -p xxxxxx z -i 20 -w 64 -P 0 -g 0 1 2 -k zec pause |
|
|
|
Has anyone mined successfully more than 20 on a 380 4G card???
On launch day this was possible with a 480 farm and properly configured genoil except the accounts balances got wiped out on suprnova so the real winner is whoever has all that. |
|
|
|
which setting to use the rx 470 4gb nitro?
win 7 64
Maybe try out this: genoil.exe -c zec.suprnova.cc:2142 -u xxxxxx.xxxxx -p xxxxxx z -i 20 -w 64 -P 0 -k zec pause |
|
|
|
I use the -k zec zec zec zec so that it loads 4 threads per 8gb card which it can hold and it seems stable with worker loads up to 128. I love the 480 reference cards. And again I am on 16.9.2. Just switched it up a bit and got a 110h/s peak that was neat with the following batch from an earlier post from mohnori: title 480
:start
setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
genoil.exe -c zec.suprnova.cc:2142 -u xxxxxx.xxxxxx -p xxxxx z -i 20 -w 64 -P 1 -g 0 1 -k zec zec zec zec pause -f 2
cls
timeout /T 10
goto start |
|
|
|
Big thanks to Genoil! My 2 x 480's are cookin now!  z -i 20 -w 64 -P 0 -k zec zec zec zec pause Edit* just changed worker load to 128 and will report back with results. Probably wont help with odd 0.05/s watcher armed message but we will see. |
|
|
|
Wow I am really impressed with this new 0.6 miner. I have 3 batch files now. 1 batch files launches two others. Start.bat start cmd /k call start1.bat
start cmd /k call start2.bat start1.bat (runs my RX 480) @echo on
taskkill /f /im genoil.exe
timeout /t 1
genoil.exe -c zec.suprnova.cc:2142 -u name.miner1 -p password1 -P 0 -f 0 -g 1 -k zec zec zec zec start2.bat (runs my R9 280x and 380x) @echo off
set GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
set GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
set GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
set GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
set GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
@echo on
taskkill /f /im genoil.exe
timeout /t 1
genoil.exe -c zec.suprnova.cc:2142 -u name.miner2 -p password2 -P 0 -f 0 -g 0 2 This boosted my has rate up quite a bit but one problem with this miner is my 280x card will stop mining and the -f 0 is not restarting it. I like it! I am running "z -i 20 -w 64 -P 0 -k zec zec zec zec pause" on my 480s and it seems to restart but without the -f on it's own but the wierd thing is that I am tagged with a 0.05 thing when I launch the miner then when it does lose the threads the hash drops from my 100 h/s down to the 0.05. Super odd. still trying to figure that out but I am getting about 70-100h/s on 2x 480's when it is running (runs for 6 hours at a time). Mind if I ask what speeds you see on your 480? I tried yours but get stuck around 36h/s. edit* driver is 16.9.2 |
|
|
|
For personal use I still like Malwarebytes the best, and run it in combination with Panda Cloud Free.
Never had any issues with SDC. Always make sure you download from the official source, because it is possible that someone might put an infected version out there.
Just for grins I ran my blk0001.dat through the latest version of Malwarebytes and Panda, and it comes up clean. I remember back in the day, all the mining software I used to run came up as a false positive, so I'm betting it's just another flaw in AVAST.
Anti-malware Malwarebytes OK, no virus Yeah avast is kind of crap. I don't know what happened to that company but they went the way of McAfee. I remember a time when McAfee would flag everything as a virus. So so so many false positives, then it would actually find something and not be able to do anything about it. Seems McAfee is getting on their feet now though a bit now that intel owns them. Would be cool to see them do some good in the world. AVG even has started to deal out some pop-ups lately but they still do a great job at protection though IMO. |
|
|
|
Avast detected blockchain bootstrap.dat port to blk0001.dat virus Stoned (2).
Probably a false positive. Not hard to do. The BTC blockchain has virus code written into it. I don't know if it was done intentionally or it happened randomly. It can't execute of course but it still throws off the antiviruses. I suppose a malware artist could write a virus payload to a blockchain, then circulate innocuous code to get the payload from the blockchain file and do the damage. It's FUD. He is from Librexcoin. This blockchain is clean.  |
|
|
|
Hi. Quiet investor here.
I proposed the same thing over at the Syscoin thread a while back, but they decided to stick with Syscoin and that is their decision. I think a name is very important for a product, especially if it is intended for wide adoption. I agree that the word ''Shadow'' holds negative connotations in the eye of the common people. That's why I think you should go with a name that (in an abstract way perhaps) represents freedom, safety, trust or maybe even adventure, but still sound catchy. Maybe you could use it in a slogan.
I was drawn to ''Anchor'' or ''Haven'' from your list. I would like to propose a few others to consider:
- Agora (name is propably taken)
- Astralis
- Calypso
- Falcon
- Steadfast
IMO it's all about Haven. |
|
|
|
i have $450 , with this value i can buy 2nd vga R9 390x , so which is better ? buying VGA to mining INFX or buying INFX at this momenth and stake it ?  Buying to mine is good but you might want to wait to see what the 490 does. I myself PoS on a pi which is super efficient but I can't resell my 35 dollar pi. You could buy a new 490 next month when they come out and mine for a month or two and resell it for 10% off your buy price. So its a tough call I suppose... nevermind me hahaha. But if you wait until the 490 drops you will get a better price on the 390x anyways. |
|
|
|
arcanum: Works for me <http://explorer.shadow.cash/chain/ShadowCash>
yes that 1 works, i pressed link from here: https://www.worldcoinindex.com/coin/shadowcashand it is completely dead. someone should update the worldcoinindex site, looks really bad. The WorldCoinIndex is a 3rd party site, Shadow has nothing to do with it. The other block explorer ( http://explorer.shadow.cash/chain/ShadowCash) works fine; and after all, there's a block explorer built-in the wallet. such an under-rated feature. |
|
|
|
sorry for noob question, but didn't someone find an exploit with SDC code? was that repaired? I own some SDC so I hope the exploit was either false, or if true, it was fixed
just trying to sort out fact from fud
Yeah repaired, bounty paid, and it caused some transactions to get deringed but stealth addresses were still in tact. |
|
|
|
info
You should delete that post to keep some email privacy when you successfully log into slack. |
|
|
|
Yea im mulling over having the option of having DDE aswell as arbiters and letting the market decide which is best... I can see that its a better process but I'm not sure how many mechants would like putting up deposits.. although giving the option doesn't hurt.
That makes sense to me. For most cases I believe DDE is superior, but there are obvious situations where arbiters are needed. Buying a house, to use an extreme example. There is no way I would be able to put up the money for DDE when buying something that expensive. In extreme examples like that I would think you would need a licensed professional to assist in the escrow, not just a random escrow junkie. Or trust in a trustless non-centralized system which I think is the ideal way. This is where both parties having 100% of the transaction's worth to lose comes into play as being the superior way imo. 10% doesn't cut it in any scenario imo. Nor do real exploitable persons handling arbitration or escrow like sys has. |
|
|
|
I think your troll account is the cancer of crypto. Shame on you! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
