Bitcoin Forum
May 25, 2024, 05:59:54 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 ... 68 »
21  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Gambling. Is It Wrong? on: September 14, 2018, 11:46:12 AM
How is gambling wrong? I think people who think it is immoral are just of that opinion for religious reasons. It's just like playing a game but with money on the line which can make it exciting, but it's not morally wrong. It's like saying alcohol is wrong. It's not illegal in most places and most people can enjoy it responsibly without it becoming an issue, but on the other hand there are those that can't and it does become an issue for them, but others can enjoy it in moderation and without it becoming an issue or a problem. Same goes for gambling. I gamble once every while, but I can go weeks or even months without doing so, but it's nice to have a 'flutter' as they say every now and again and I think it's just another form of entertainment and something I enjoy. For sure I don't like losing but that's part of the game and something you accept and you should certainly never chase your loses as that's how gambling can become a problem very quick.
22  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Premier League Prediction Thread (EPL) on: September 14, 2018, 11:35:33 AM
Will Watford be the new Leicester?

Too early to tell, but I doubt it. Let's see what happens on the weekend. Could be a good time to put some money on them now though as if they beat Manchester the odds will surely drop drastically. They're at 200 to 1 right now so could be worth $5 or $10 on them. Leicester had a very strong squad when they won the league with a lot of players who were honestly too good for them and Watford don't really have any superstars in my opinion. Mahrez has gone on to better things but I'm surprised more players haven't left as well. I thought Schmeichel would be the next to go but he signed a new contract recently. Who have Watford got? Troy Deeny? lol.

What do you guys think about Everton v West Ham? Apparently Everton are going to be missing a load of first team players

With their terrible start there's some decent odds on West ham, like 3.6-3.7 atm. Wondering if it's worth a little bet?

I'd stay well away from that game. West Ham are terrible and are probably going down this season. I would back Everton for sure but maybe not if they've got players out.
23  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Please Explain on: September 13, 2018, 01:14:26 PM
I dont really get you guy's whenever you encounter situation like this you panic because the price goes down.

Who is "you guys". There are many different types of bitcoin users in it for all different reasons but the ones who panic and crap their pants every-time the value drops a bit are the get rich quick schemers watching their money go down the drain. Ignore them.

If you really trust this technology why are you losing your hope everytime there is  a small storm coming on bitcoin? Panicking makes you blind on what you really need to do, Instead of investing more because it is a good opportunity to buy you are selling your bitcoin's and taking your loss.  Cheesy

You can be a fan of both the technology but also the potential to make money from it and lets not kid ourselves that money makes both the world and bitcoin keep turning. The miners don't mine for free and they rely on their paycheck to keep the cogs behind the scenes turning and if bitcoin ever does become unprofitable to them then they'll abandon ship and that's why the value is at least somewhat important so lets not kid ourselves about that.
24  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Premier League Prediction Thread (EPL) on: September 13, 2018, 01:03:37 PM
Yes! Super excited! Watford has a chance for 3 points against United? I don't think so..

Watford are 4-0 including a win against Spurs, while United are 2-2 including a loss to Brighton. Could easily go either way.

Another win for Watford will put them on almost 40% of their total points last year (41) after only 13% of the games.
This is going to be very interesting match as Watford is doing very good in last four matches and United is unpredictable but now they are gaining confidence and have good away win but I am going with Watford as they was super against Tottenham and this win can give them more confidence and they can go dark horse like Leciester other interested match is Tottenham vs Liverpool for me visitors are in pole position as they are doing very good in this season.

Watford's winning streak will almost certainly come to an end very soon and this is the game that will likely break that. I think there's too much at stake for United but maybe the pressure will get to them and Mourinho. If United lose then this would be very bad news for him as he's already on shaky ground. He can't keep losing especially to teams like Watford even despite their recent performances.

I think the Tottenham game will be a draw and Chelsea will win putting them to 1st place. I think a lot of people have overlooked Chelsea focusing on the Liverpool/Man City and Tottenham teams but I wouldn't be surprised at all if they win the league this year (though I agree they've got some very tough competition and my money would be on one of the other three).
25  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Alternatives to death penalty? on: September 13, 2018, 12:16:15 PM
Death penalty has its pro and con but I think it has little effect on reducing crimes.

There are no pros to it in my opinion, and like you said it isn't a deterrent.

Though it does help reducing cost spent on prison.

But does it? It might save on costs of housing the prisoner in the long run, but you're forgetting all the extra costs there will inevitably be with all the process and appeals and lawyers and extra time a death penalty case will go on for and they go on for many years.

Is there alternatives to punishing crimes?

Yes. Just actually life in prison, and life actually meaning life not just 20-35 years or whatever it might be (it differs from country to country). You can argue that putting someone to death is them getting off without doing their time as well (though the death penalty is obviously the ultimate punishment) and they can still get to 'enjoy' life (though I'm not sure how enjoyable life would be in a maximum security prison). Unless you're like a truly insane mass murderer that is guilty beyond all doubt then I don't think the death penalty should be even considered.
26  Economy / Economics / Re: Money Matters on: September 13, 2018, 11:30:40 AM
It is impossible to live without money if you live in a society where everything depends on money.

It is practically impossible in today's capitalistic society, but money isn't actually essential and there are other ways to function without it, but money is the best system we currently have.

We need to pay for everything what is necessary for life and that include food, water, electric energy, health care and many other things. If you have no money to pay for all that you will have terribly hard life probably on the street. Only way that the money does not play a major role in our life is to try move out from civilization and live life by the nature and from the nature.

In the society we live today this is true (and is probably the most ideal way), but what did people do before money existed? We used a bartering or trade system. For instance, you have a cow and you exchange it with someone else for six months worth of corn or something. Or an electrician would re-wire your house if you did all the painting and decorating in theirs. A granny might swap you a sweater she knitted in exchange for your beef jerky you made and so on and so forth. That's how it worked in the old days but it wasn't an ideal system but it worked well enough for the time so like it or not 'money' is probably the best thing we have right now..

But even in such case money can not be completely expelled from the equation of life, humans are just create such a society in which we depend on money. Problem is that some let's say 5% of human population hold 90% of world wealth, they have so much money that at one point it becomes a trivial thing for them.

Obviously greed and materialism is a huge issue but that's never going to change and greed is as old as mankind itself. I think as a society we should be better educated about the sickness that is greed and materialism. Do we really need flashy cars and super expensive clothes? Not at all. Look at the root cause of why people actually want to spend $250 on some Gucci flip flops or $250k on a Lamborghini. I know why people do, though: insecurity. Buying such things as designer clothing and Lambo's is called conspicuous consumption and is done so as a status symbols to show how 'wealthy' you are to others.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspicuous_consumption
27  Bitcoin / Legal / Re: Why I don't Support KYC in cryptocurrency as it is on: September 13, 2018, 11:18:52 AM
I also do not understand or are confused about KYC like this, why should there be cryptocurrency. I think it makes us complicated or makes us difficult to know cryptocurrency. I agree with you KYC must not exist.

What are you confused about? Would you ask something similar like why should there be laws? Most people know not to murder or steal without having laws or regulations prohibiting and punishing the bad behavior, but of course there are those who don't care about such laws and murder and steal any way. Regulations are just laws meant to protect the consumer and prevent criminals using bitcoin and such services that utilize bitcoin to commit crimes such as money laundering and so on. Granted, we do not need them and most people can use bitcoin for its intended purpose and have no interest in breaking any laws by using it, but there are people who are the opposite and that's why things like AML and KYC laws exist and there's nothing we can do about that. As I said above though, if you are fundamentally against them you can use services that don't have such regulations but beware you may be using illegal services or breaking the law in doing so but that's up to you to whether you use them or not.
28  Bitcoin / Legal / Re: Why I don't Support KYC in cryptocurrency as it is on: September 12, 2018, 06:12:13 PM
I am going to be very honest here with you guys. I know some of you may antagonise or kick against my view. But I will still speak the truth as it is.

My major reason centered on the fact that there is no regulation for cryptocurrencies.
How can someone somewhere in the name of ICO project team, whom you don't even know, some without a verifiable office address, whose presence is just online and the internet, demand your sensitive information including your international passport, government issued ID, proof of your residential address, and other personal information or documents?
What if this person is just a scammer? What if this person works for maybe a terrorist organization who is just looking for real biodata or identities? What if this person is just a criminal looking for ways to fake his own identity and take upon yours or anyone else? What if your verified photograph (face) matching your identity is used in pornography or nudity? What if the data is accidentally leaked? My questions go on and on.

This comes down to trust more than anything. I wouldn't trust some random ICOs with this sort of information, but you certainly will likely have to trust some online companies with such info to be able to use exchanges online. If you're fundamentally against KYC though I would avoid online exchanges altogether and deal with cash only or unregulated exchanges that don't require KYC verification (though use at your own risk).

Remember, the cryptocurrency as it is currently has no regulation, as such there is no regulatory body or authority you can petition your grievances or seek redress should any of the aforementioned incidences happens to you as a result of the information you have forwarded. The ICO project team whom you sent your details can as well disappear without trace.

Therefore, as long as there is no Cryptocurrency Regulation, then there should be NO KYC.

Where have you heard this? There may be no direct regulation over the actual bitcoin network but there is certainly regulations with things like exchanges or other such mediums or third parties that utilize bitcoin, but those will differ country by country. Places like the UK and US usually require exchanges at least to comply with KYC and AML laws.
29  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Should a person with terminal illness be able to end their own life ? on: September 12, 2018, 06:08:05 PM
I don't think this should be a choice based on anyone else but the individual person who is actually suffering. I've often seen a lot of people say that suicide is selfish, but I don't think it is, especially if you're truly suffering (and possibly already dying anyway), but you shouldn't have to keep yourself alive just for the benefit of your family who will miss you. I find that is selfish on their part.

Something that has always confused me though is the people who may or may not be terminally ill and/or those that have a very serious illness that makes their life misery who go to places like Dignitas to end their own life when they have the ability to do it themselves. I thought euthanasia clinics like Dignitas were for those people who were disabled or so ill that they were physically unable to take their own life, so need assistance, and they travel to Switzerland because assisted suicide is illegal in their own country and anyone who helps them there can possibly be charged with some sort of manslaughter or even murder.

There's a couple of videos of people on youtube who went to Dignitas and they were all seemingly able bodied and fully functional (even though they had illnesses that made their quality of life very low):

Michèle Causse : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JfyxUO4ZsDo
Peter Smedley: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xXgkNxqYYQQ

Why didn't they just take an overdose at home or something?
30  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Why do we need to regulate digital money on: September 11, 2018, 03:52:53 PM
For the same reason we need regulations for everything else. People often see 'regulation' as a dirty word but is it bad that we have things like building regulations and money laundering regulations? No. They're put in place to stop people cutting corners and abusing the system and to profit from crime etc as well as keep people safe. Regulations are going to come into the cryptoworld whether we like it or not and if we want bitcoin to go mainstream then it's something that is going to happen sooner or later anyway so we might as well embrace it than try oppose it because that's not going to be something we have any power over anyway.
31  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Trump supporters are burning Nike apparel because... Kaepernick? on: September 11, 2018, 03:34:25 PM
it is raw stupidity. why can't the viewers of infowars on youtube see ads? I mean aren't they human beings too with needs who go to the market? why would an advertisers renounce to this market? for me it is economic sabotage !




Nobody on Youtube can see ads on Infowars anymore because they were banned entirely from the platform due to multiple instances of breaking their terms of service. Youtube's (fairly) recent demonetization policy seems very overkill in my opinion but multiple HUGE advertisers were dropping out from advertising completely on there because their adverts were being shown before videos of objectionable content so they had to do something to keep them on board. Coca Cola really don't want their brand associated with videos of people getting killed or racist/controversial content so YouTube just went overboard on what they class as 'questionable' content and anything that wasn't family friendly PG13 stuff now gets shunned from earning. They could have handled it much better and only prohibited certain channels from being able to earn rather than the huge blanket ban on anything that may or may not be 'adult' or questionable content but at the end of the day all YouTube care about is the money they earn and not that channels that actually use the platform to earn from them. 
32  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Electric cars are the future, but not with batteries. on: September 07, 2018, 01:33:37 PM
I'm sure there could be a mechanism that allows you to swap fully charged batteries for the empties as well so charging times wouldn't be an issue if you have spares.
The problem is that you cannot simply swap your batteries as fast as you can fill your gas tank to full. Also, anyone would not want to go through the hassle of opening up your hood(or anywhere your battery is stored) and the hassle of removing and reattaching some things when you are in a long distance travel because you could have had used that time to do other more important things or rest.
Free energy is free whereas gas costs a lot of money. Doesn't really matter if it takes a little longer to 'fill up' and seems a small price to pay for free energy.
Still, the time it would take for it to be fully charged is a long time and typically charging happens at the busiest time of the day(which is in the morning). You would not need to drive to work at night, do you? (unless you are in a night shift or travels for only a kilometer or two, the long charging time is fine).

Having to swap batteries is a small price to pay. I'm sure changing them will become as easy as swapping them in your remote or laptop at some point in the future as well. These things always become more efficient. The time it takes to charge cars will become faster as well. Look how quick phones charge now. I remember having to charge my very first few phones for hours back in the day and now they are super fast. There will be more and more places available to charge them also. I'm seeing charging points all over the place, and as electric cars become more popular so will access points to charge them. You can also buy hybrid cars that take both gas and electricity. If you ever run out of juice then you can stop off at a place to fill up gas, but I imagine people with electric cars become accustomed to knowing how far they can go on a charge and factor that into the places they go to.
33  Economy / Economics / Re: Money Matters on: September 07, 2018, 12:50:50 PM
Isn't it interesting that those who pontificate that "Money is not everything" usually have money?

Not always. I think a lot of people who say this actually don't have much money. After all, what good is money if you're miserable? Money can't buy you happiness and most people know that with or without having much themselves, but it does often make your life more comfortable.

Be broke for a few weeks unable to pay your bills, pay rent and afford basic necessities, and then let's see if you'd still hold the same position about money.

So if you had enough money for those things you'd be truly happy? If money is the only thing that is stopping you from happiness then all you need to do is find a job. Lucky you.

Let us be sincere and stop fooling around; MONEY IS SOMETHING! A very huge something!! At least in this present world. Might not be a big deal in another world. But in this world? Save me the sermon.

Nobody is saying money is nothing. It is something. It's just not everything. I would rather have my health than a million in my bank. Money cannot buy you your health.

So please, before you sermonize me that money is not everything or that money is no big deal, credit my blockchain address with one thousand units of Bitcoin and forget about it. Then I'd believe you. In fact, I'd sing it along with you...money ain't nothing!

Why don't you earn it? You can still be of the opinion that money isn't everything but not want to give it away to prove a point. Some people work very hard for their money and know the value of it.
34  Economy / Economics / Re: Life with out money ? on: September 07, 2018, 12:36:21 PM
The only way you could get rid of money is by going back to some sort of bartering or trade system. For instance, you have a cow and you exchange it with someone else for six months worth of corn or something. Or an electrician would re-wire your house if you did all the painting and decorating in theirs. A granny might swap you a sweater she knitted in exchange for your beef jerky you made and so on and so forth. That's how it worked in the old days but it wasn't an ideal system but it worked well enough for the time. Like it or not 'money' is probably the best thing we have right now. Obviously greed and materialism is a huge issue but that's never going to change and is as old as mankind itself. Maybe bitcoin can be the new form of money but it's still money and people will still be greedy and unscrupulous with it.
35  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Trump supporters are burning Nike apparel because... Kaepernick? on: September 05, 2018, 06:03:22 PM
Dig deeper. People burn US flags. Does it matter if they bought them from China or from US themselves?
Burning a flag is a message, not an economic transaction.

Oh well. That was MSM attempt to mock Trump supporters, so why do I even bother...

I agree with you to a certain extent, but burning a flag is a little different. Flags aren't made by one person, corporation or country, and this is obviously meant at least to appear like a serious boycott of a brand. There will obviously be some people doing this as a political statement, but I think these things tend to get blown out of proportion by the media, and a lot of people will probably just be burning some old piece of Nike clothing they have in a drawer somewhere and don't care about just to troll or take part in the meme (which is probably what it is more than a genuine protest). Just look at the things they're burning or chopping up. I don't see any fresh Nike kicks or anything that looks recent or decent. People are probably just doing it to cause faux hysteria and have a laugh in the process.

With that being said, I'm also sure there's a few racists doing it because they're genuinely upset about such a petty thing, but the people doing this to troll will probably dwarf them. It's like the tide pod challenge. Very few people were actually eating tide pods in reality, but that didn't stop people making videos about it and pretending to eat them and meme spread: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consumption_of_Tide_Pods
36  Other / Serious discussion / Re: Cryptography could be illegal soon on: September 05, 2018, 05:43:52 PM
I started to think that they're crazy enough to really want to ban cryptography. (I like the "terrorist and criminal activities" excuse, you can use it for a lot of things)


So do they think if they make something illegal the terrorists are going to stop using it?  Roll Eyes. The irony is it's the overbearing state intrusion of ordinary citizens that forces the regular Joe to have to start thinking about things like encryption. If it wasn't for states such as the UK and US trying to spy on everyone the average person wouldn't even need to be doing this.

The protecting 'against terrorism or bad guys' shtick is usually the excuse they use. It'll be the same thing they try to go after bitcoin for.

B-b-b-b-ut terrorist and drug dealers use it!

37  Other / Off-topic / Re: Where is your "Dream Place" to travel? on: September 04, 2018, 11:41:31 AM
I want to travel to Japan and eat shushi made by local chief.

A chief?



Or a chef?



 Grin Grin Grin

Why don't you find a Japanese sushi chef in your own country?  Grin

I would love to go to japan though. Never tried sushi though as the thought of raw fish doesn't really appeal to me at all. I hate the smell of raw fish. Can't even eat prawns unless they're covered in something like Marie Rose sauce.
38  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Electric cars are the future, but not with batteries. on: September 04, 2018, 10:56:14 AM
What happens if you use the free energy from the solar panels on your house? That seems to me to be more efficient than oil-powered cars and certainly cheaper (assuming you don't but a ridiculously expensive electric car that will take you a lifetime to recoup the costs of).
It would not be more efficient since it will take a longer time to charge electric cars using the free energy from the solar panels unless someone can invent a more convenient solar panel that can speed up the electric car charging to at least an hour. Nevertheless, oil-powered cars would still be better to use in long-distance travels since refilling up their tanks is faster than waiting for an electric car's full charge.

This doesn't make sense to me. Free energy is free whereas gas costs a lot of money. Doesn't really matter if it takes a little longer to 'fill up' and seems a small price to pay for free energy. I'm sure there could be a mechanism that allows you to swap fully charged batteries for the empties as well so charging times wouldn't be an issue if you have spares. Just simply swap them every time you're out of juice.
39  Other / Serious discussion / Re: Does any of you spend bitcoin in physical shops? on: September 03, 2018, 09:14:24 PM
I've bought a few things online with bitcoin, but never used it in an actual physical shop, simply for the fact that there's not really any places I know that accept it and I'm certainly not going to go out of my way just to spend some bitcoin just for the sake of it. As others have also said, I'd also much rather keep the coins I have right now as an investment. Bitcoin is almost certainly going to be worth more at some point in the future than it is today, and this is already true for this week alone. Bitcoin has gone up quite a bit already the past few days and I hate spending it then a couple of days later I could have got far more bang for my buck and if you think bitcoin is going to go up by thousands at some point then it's pretty silly to spend any of it now. I guess that's just bitcoin for you and you can't have it both ways and sometimes you win and sometimes you lose. I enjoy the ride either way.
40  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Electric cars are the future, but not with batteries. on: September 03, 2018, 09:01:43 PM
2. People think that they're saving the environment, while they're not -- the precious resources that are used to make these batteries and such are depleting and you're not saving the environment at all.

3 You're able to 'fill up' at your own house (with the proper equipment) and don't have to stop at the gas station anymore.

What happens if you use the free energy from the solar panels on your house? That seems to me to be more efficient than oil-powered cars and certainly cheaper (assuming you don't but a ridiculously expensive electric car that will take you a lifetime to recoup the costs of).

I think an even better solution is to reduce the need to go anywhere in the first place. The digitization of the world in all aspects will make the need to physically go places much less important.

Seriously? Not everybody wants to be stuck at home behind their computer screen every waking hour. Why bother having a girlfriend when you can just sit at home and fuck a sexdoll and just sit in your own filth all day whilst jacking it to online porn?

Why travel the world when you can just look at pictures or watch a movie?



Are you telling me you'd rather sit at home than experience that in real life 3D? Looking at pretty pictures or a film with great cinematography is great and all, but there's something about experiencing the real thing and in the moment that just can't be beaten.
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 ... 68 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!