Lifeforce.info is as a pool  |
|
|
|
|
I've already sent a link to this thread to the Attorney's of record for Disney - assholes like this guy should not be able to exploit all the work, money and years that Disney has put into branding itself.
I am sure that the forum owners will get a legal notice from Disney asking them to release the users IP addresses and email address, if they don't comply I'm sure they'll get a subpoena.
I also reported his Coca Cola thread to their attornies.
|
|
|
|
|
Bill Gates Coins - officially authorized by Bill Gates himself!!!
|
|
|
|
I can just sense that this will be a real 'Mickey Mouse" coin : LOL  |
|
|
|
|
I'd like to thank the devs for being so resposnsive!
|
|
|
|
www.minep.it stole everyone's funds and zeroed out our accounts, they should be shut down and reported to the authorities. that's hard to believe... when I have had problem on lifeforce with a corrupted database that made processing impossible, I printed out a sheet with everyone's balances and then manually sent the coins to their addresses from the pools wallet: they still have your coins in their wallet - can you contact anyone there? |
|
|
|
Sorry for the confusion. Will all the changes I may have created a jumbled mess of information in the OP. I edited it to be a bit more clean now.
After you sent to the "invalid address" did you coins stay in your wallet? If they were on Polo they should have and if they aren't in there open a ticket with them and they should be able to put your coins back in your account.
Also all the exchanges have been changed over so the site only needs to be used if you have coins in a wallet or maybe a pool/other random site (ie gambling) that wasn't updated.
COINS NEVER LEFT POLO - IT DID TAKE THEM A FEW DAYS TO POST A MESSAGE THAT THE ADDRESS WAS INVALID. |
|
|
|
|
I will have a pool for this coin
|
|
|
|
|
if someone wrote a how to on installing wallets it it would probably cut the number of posts in half here on the forum
|
|
|
|
if Polo has already converted my coins that is not make clear in the OP - all I knew is that they were old coins mined months ago. and the answer is YES - they are still on Polo but the op says they must be converted before 10/1 the OP needs to be rewritten for clarity purposes. and what's this supposed to mean? (check spelling in OP) |
|
|
|
I successfully converted all my V1 coins that way, no issues. I think you may need to provide some more information, about what you did and when. yea - well I did not get my coins.... when - last week some day - I don;t remember the exact date - Polo sucks any they always have. I downloaded their wallet - got the address from my new wallet which was: aVCraoi8FAj9CN4b1JuxuR6Mx8WiogLUqV got this address back: ANDJFjxYPp8FX2zETUbg6pnny223muJNNh logged into polo and withdrew my coins to: ANDJFjxYPp8FX2zETUbg6pnny223muJNNh and so far - NOTHING! oh yea - here's what I found on POLO this morning - yea - this was really tested well : LOL - did anyone tell polo about these new addresses? seems as though they did not get the memo Currency Amount Address Date Status
CGA 457.00000000 ANDJFjxYPp8FX2zETUbg6pnny223muJNNh 2014-09-26 16:12:17 ERROR: INVALID ADDRESS Cancel I thought this was tested? |
|
|
|
|
by the way Devs -
I followed your directions and never got my coins back.
|
|
|
|
You do know that this coin is usually at the top of coinwarz and whatmine, so multi pools jump off and on it all the time, and diff jumps from 100 to 400 all the time, so maybe that is what you are seeing, don't blame the DarkWaveGravity.
that's because the algorithms that coinwarz and whatmine use are both flawed and the reason diff jumps all over the place is exactly because of dark gravity wave - DUH. Their estimates and reality could not be farther apart. do yourrself a favor get rid of DGW and use KGW - DGW is just as screwed up at Digishield. |
|
|
|
|
this is one screwed up coin - the darkwave gravity shit is a waste - no blocks for 25 minutes then all of a sudden 15 blocks in 3 minutes - you guys should have used KGW which is a proven winner.
My test pool had 25% of the network hash for 3 hours and got 8% of the blocks - forget quatloo.
|
|
|
|
just wondered because my luck is sucking big time with another coin that also has POS and I'm wondering how mnay of the blocks are going to POS holders?
You mean POW right? no : I mean blocks that are being generated are being shared between POW and POS |
|
|
|
if I have 10% of the network hash if it reasonable to assume I will get 10% of the blocks (over some time) - regardless of difficulty?
Yes, it's a fair assumption. If during such a period 100 blocks are mined, and you hold 10% of nethash - you are most likely to find ~10 blocks. just wondered because my luck is sucking big time with another coin that also has POS and I'm wondering how mnay of the blocks are going to POS holders? this is their info: Novacoin... root@ns500637:/usr/local/bin# novacoind getmininginfo
{
"blocks" : 126391,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : {
"proof-of-work" : 1030.90524432,
"proof-of-stake" : 0.96902262,
"search-interval" : 1
},
"blockvalue" : 7870000,
"netmhashps" : 2731.46471908,
"netstakeweight" : 6571693.72838555,
"errors" : "",
"pooledtx" : 0,
"stakeweight" : {
"minimum" : 0,
"maximum" : 0,
"combined" : 0
},
"stakeinterest" : 310000,
"testnet" : false
}
|
|
|
|
|
is it possible to determine bow many of the blocks generated are going to POS and how many go to POW presently?
|
|
|
|
question - in this block chain I've observed that block are not being generated at the advertised rate.
There is no such thing as an "advertised rate". Block: 42105,Target: 69.91 GH/s, Hashrate: 9.81, 9.30, 9.27 GH/s, Performance: 20.41% Diff: 1953.27040885, next: ~488 (confidence 47%) - Last Retarget: 56.33 hrs ago, change in 375 blocks (~61.25 hrs) Expect to see blocks on average every 10 minutes for now, until either difficulty changes in 2-3 days, or hashrate increases back up to the target. is there some mathematical formula that can be used to calculate the expected number of blocks that will be released in to the black chain based on current difficulty and hashrate as of last adjustment and if so - does the original specs for block times weigh into this calculation. I am working on software that needs to calculate the number of blocks that will be introduced into the blocks chain over the the forthcoming 24 hours period. 720*(average-hashrate/target-hashrate) in the above example 720*(9.81/69.91) = 101 blocks per 24 hours edit: http://api.bitmark.co gives you all the info you need thanks - one other question for you. if I have 10% of the network hash if it reasonable to assume I will get 10% of the blocks (over some time) - regardless of difficulty? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
