AMFEIX ponzy is DONE. All telegram group admins are gone, just a note from the CEO stating that that due to some "apparent" congestion from the bitcoin halving, all withdrawals have to be manually processed and that takes time while the "AMFEIX system" gets redeveloped. LOL : the AMFEIX wallet shows no outgoing transactions for a few days already. How about the fact that AMFEIX requested to be removed and dissolved on 31.05.2020 from the UK companies house? https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/12245633/filing-historyYou have all been warned many times. Lets see if the Cheerleaders and referral whores have the guts and balls to come out and apologize. Yes you know who you are. When this is official rest assured that you will be called out So it finally collapsed? |
|
|
|
I don't get why people interested in BTC like OP can still say such naive things like "bitcoin is taking a big hit" The sky is falling! Bitcoin went down from 9800 to 9400 time to short and it doesn't matter that it was lower than 9400 just 5 days ago! Let's make a big thing out of it and keep saying that it's a big price hit because nobody will remember that this month we were trading for 8500  Any serious trader knows that an asset going from $9,800 to $9,400 is a bit hit. Perhaps if you only have $100 invested, you will not feel like it's a big hit but it is. |
|
|
|
So-called 'social distancing' is probably mostly about allowing cell tower triangulation to be effective for operations to be implemented under the 'new normal'. Has little or nothing to so with microbes and never did.
So far I've seen only one other person put two and two together here. I think it was that Rancid Buttar guy who is probably an NWO shill and a phony...which is why it is interesting to hear what he says and read between the lines. I'm suspicious of him and that Indian guy because their works are sent viral while more credible people are heavily censored.
Care to explain in what world would social distancing help cell tower triangulation? Are you trying to suggest coronavirus has something to do with 5G? Perhaps the reason only one person were able to put two and two together is because the theory is utterly baseless? Comes down to resolution, and the more 'towers' there are, the tighter the resolution can be. A characteristic of the 5G network is lots and lots more 'towers' due to the limitations of higher frequency EMF signals. If you've never heard of the cell tower triangulation technology, it's pretty simple. Here's something from 12 fucking years ago which is just the first thing which popped up on Google: https://searchengineland.com/cell-phone-triangulation-accuracy-is-all-over-the-map-14790If they are doing things with triangulation, it's probably mostly testing at this point. Making ready for devices which are not practically GPS-able. Devices such as ' implantable nano-platforms' for instance. https://profusa.com/injectable-body-sensors-take-personal-chemistry-to-a-cell-phone-closer-to-reality/Seem that this, or something like it, is what Bill Gates wants injected into everyone in the world before they are allowed to leave their houses again. I see you are still saving the world through your Bitcointalk posts, thanks god we have you, you have it all figured out!! You are a mastermind!!1!?!?!? |
|
|
|
Why would anyone trade there if it goes down every time there is some volatility? Name recognition and resistance to change. They are one of the largest and most well known exchanges, and so a lot of people will pick them as their first exchange without doing that much research. Once you've gone through the effort of creating a new account, enabling 2FA, completing all the ridiculous KYC, scanning your documents, answering their questions, waiting days or weeks to become verified, linking to your bank account or credit cards, etc., then a lot of people will opt to put up with sub-optimal conditions rather than switching to a new provider. Certainly if you are concerned about your KYC documents (as everyone should be), then once you've completed KYC at one exchange you are going to be in no hurry to complete it any more. The fact they keeping "crashing" when the bitcoin price moves is only a tiny propotion of all the shady or objectionable things Coinbase have done over the years, from spamming the network with non-batched transactions for years and listing trash coins their investors wanted to dump on their users, all the way through to partnering with a company who produce and sell surveillance technology to human rights abusing dictators. Exactly, it's not like it's a surprise either, Bitcoin will do 5-10% moves in minutes, that's how it is and everyone knows it. If you can't fix that after 3 years, then you are either incompetent or doing it on purpose. |
|
|
|
Theoretically possible for whatever agenda, but I don't think it is. In my opinion, intentional outages for whatever agenda is a lot more likely to happen when talking about leverage trading exchanges like BitMEX as outages can wreck out people's shorts/longs when huge price movements occur. Why would they do it? Idunno.
This whole dump was orchestrated to wreck longs. There were some comments on trading channels where people who do this for a living couldn't even set a position in time before it was all over. One guy said he went away for a few minutes to make some tea and when he was back it was all over. It doesn't happen that fast unless it's set by bots or the exchanges itself. That's why I stay away from trading. This game is rigged. Even if it's not and Coinbase has nothing to do with it, it's ridiculous that such a big exchange still has this problem after years. Why would anyone trade there if it goes down every time there is some volatility? Bitcoin is VOLATILITY, the exchange is basically going to be down 50% of the time. |
|
|
|
Coinbase Pro has gradually grown to lead the price action at times. That's going to put a strain on any company's operations. Bitfinex has been the leader in the past and they had the same crapping out in intense moments too.
An exchange going down at peak moments loses them plenty of money in fees. I can't see them doing it on purpose and there have been more lucrative and pivotal times to do it on purpose if that was some sort of policy.
Well, they might be losing money in fees but if they are involved in some sort of scheme to buy/sell before anyone else, I'm sure they would make a lot more money. If it's not on purpose, then it's a shit exchange that hasn't been able to solve this issue in 3+ years. |
|
|
|
Right now Coinbase is live and running.I don't think that they've done this on purpose. Perhaps there were too many orders on the exchange that caused the platform to crash,I'm not an expert. Companies like Coinbase usually have more benefits from a bull situation on the crypto markets-more newbies buying Bitcoins,more revenue from fees.It doesn't make sense for them to cause a Bitcoin price crash and a bearish trend.They aren't the biggest crypto exchange in the world,so a possible outage can't influence the Bitcoin price. They are not causing a Bitcoin crash. The point is that they might be going down on purpose during periods of high volatility to sell/buy before anyone else on their exchange and benefit from that, of course, this is just a hypothesis. Whenever there is a big pump or dump in bitcoin prices, the coinbase crashes. Maybe because they are not able to handle the increased number of people accessing the site. They shoud upgrade their system. I don't see any other motive for coin base to purposely down their system. Sure, however, they had this problem since 2017 and it seems they haven't been able to solve it, what does that say about a 'professional exchange' ? |
|
|
|
In the post above this one, franky1 says a bunch of stuff that isn't what is shown or said in the video.
But that's just a video, it's not proof. I asked for proof, not a silly video. mhm.. badecker is known for this tactic to want to describe a zebra as a banana. and says here watch a video talking about banana.. then he asks for proof of what a zebra looks like.. .. many people show him what a zebra actually looks like then badecker says thats not what is shown in the videos he prefers.. dismisses real stuff and goes straight back to talking about a banana I know, I had 400 pages of discussion with him about evolution and God, I'm now using his tactics against himself. |
|
|
|
Welp, USA 52k deaths already, Badecker's argument is going to shit fast lol
52K deaths from what? Dr. Deborah Brix and the CDC both tell doctors to call it Covid-19 if they want, even if it isn't. Tests for Covid-19 are inconclusive. All they show is that it is one of the Coronavirus family, which includes MERS and SARS... but can easily be mistaken for the common flu at times. Similar tests have shown that millions of Americans are infected, but show no symptoms at all, and have a natural immune system resistance developed in themselves. At first CV was a mistake. Then it became a lie. Now it's all a hoax. Death happens, but it is not known to be CV, even though they say it is. One of the best places to go to see that what I am saying is true... https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCq6oOuhSx7ESreh6m9LGy6Q/videos.  'Dr. Deborah Brix and the CDC both tell doctors to call it Covid-19 if they want, even if it isn't.' Where is your proof?Since there isn't any proof for any Covid-19 deaths that's available, I'll simply play the hearsay game for both you and franky1.Check out The Hiwire - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCq6oOuhSx7ESreh6m9LGy6Q/videos - and find the video of Dr. Deborah Brix saying what I said she said. You really need to see this stuff so that you realize that Coronavirus is just another flu, and the CV flu season isn't any more than any other bad flu season. In the post above this one, franky1 says a bunch of stuff that isn't what is shown or said in the video. But that's just a video, it's not proof. I asked for proof, not a silly video. |
|
|
|
Welp, USA 52k deaths already, Badecker's argument is going to shit fast lol
52K deaths from what? Dr. Deborah Brix and the CDC both tell doctors to call it Covid-19 if they want, even if it isn't. Tests for Covid-19 are inconclusive. All they show is that it is one of the Coronavirus family, which includes MERS and SARS... but can easily be mistaken for the common flu at times. Similar tests have shown that millions of Americans are infected, but show no symptoms at all, and have a natural immune system resistance developed in themselves. At first CV was a mistake. Then it became a lie. Now it's all a hoax. Death happens, but it is not known to be CV, even though they say it is. One of the best places to go to see that what I am saying is true... https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCq6oOuhSx7ESreh6m9LGy6Q/videos. 'Dr. Deborah Brix and the CDC both tell doctors to call it Covid-19 if they want, even if it isn't.' Where is your proof? |
|
|
|
|
Welp, USA 52k deaths already, Badecker's argument is going to shit fast lol
|
|
|
|
FULL ARTICLE https://www.coincurb.com/news/crypto-vc-squandering-75-million-of-investor-money/ The 2017 crypto bull run helped basically anyone involved in the market. Practically any crypto investment was profitable at the time. Multicoin Capital was doing extremely well back then, however, current numbers show that the VC ROI over the years has gone down significantly. The fund became famous in 2017 during the crypto bull run after raising at least $75 million. Since then, the crypto fund has been trying to raise more money trying to reach its $250 million funding target.
|
|
|
|
Del Bigtree isn't a doctor, hes a TV producer. I'll also pass on having the producers of Grey's Anatomy interpret my MRIs. I get the whole lets question authority, look for probable cause, motives, etc thing, but that isn't really applicable here. Do I believe that CNN would report something inaccurate and cause a panic for the sake of ratings? Absolutely. Would the CDC or other real medical institutions? No... they're working harder for less pay as a result. While I can appreciate the expertise you've accumulated observing the population of your local walmart, I suppose I have a few questions regarding your scientific process that lead you to the conclusions you've come to. What has been the exposure in your area so far? If you're in American Samoa your empirical study may be less meaningful than if you were in Ohio. How do you know that no one in that Walmart is sick? Have you observed them for 14 days, screening them for symptoms, and recorded the results? The 94% / 99% thing is absolute nonsense, the numbers do not make any realistic sense. New York alone has had 11,000 Corona virus deaths, meaning about 10500 were terminally ill to begin with? in 2017 155,000 people died in New York of all causes. Old age, heart disease, cancer, etc. https://www.health.ny.gov/statistics/vital_statistics/2017/#mortin 2016 154,000 people died in New York of all causes. https://www.health.ny.gov/statistics/vital_statistics/2016/table31a.htmin 2015 154,000 people as well https://www.health.ny.gov/statistics/vital_statistics/2015/table31a.htmCorona virus alone in less than 2 months has made up 7% of the state's yearly deaths. Yet 94% of those that die are terminally ill right? I have not had anyone that I know personally die from covid, but I also don't know anyone that has personally died in a house fire, and while I'm suspicious that house fires don't actually exist, I'm not ready to call them myths just yet. I've an ER nurse neighbor and my own personal doctors confirming what all of the liars and amateurs are. Find your own nurse neighbors and doctors if you don't want to listen to main stream media. Your question of asking if the shutdowns are worthwhile, and comparing it to the 2017-2018 flu is valid. I bet you could do some modeling and predict some number of deaths that will occur due to economic decline. The direction you're heading is one of "which sources do we trust" which isn't a great direction to go considering your sources for the 2017-2018 flu statistics you're using to support your idea are the same. Don't make this a crazy thread, keep at finding the actual cost of the shutdown. So then, you, also, are part of the medical conspiracy (along with the media, Big Pharma, and some government prople) using an almost harmless virus, Covid-19, to take over the world. Thanks for informing us. You would think your God would have prevented something like that lol |
|
|
|
 DAO Maker is launching a Twitter bug test campaign. Sign up in the platform and just make Tweets or re-Tweets and get paid. Every week, the campaign pays out some of the best tokens in the market, listed on top exchanges like Binance. Last week, some users earned $30 to $40 for their Tweets and re-Tweets. Payment was in LTO, trading on Binance. Sign-Up Here https://daomaker.com/bug_testingThis week's prizes are in USDC, a stablecoin traded on all top exchanges. https://twitter.com/TheDaoMaker/status/1248239569239248896 |
|
|
|
Well look at this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5240262.msg54221231#msg54221231. A reasonably coherent post from franky1.Regarding what you said in your post, the 60,000 number is a reduced number that Fauci was pushed into, because he couldn't continue to hide the truth. There were too many discrepancies to his earlier report. So, what is he still hiding? He dumped down from whatever the high number was, to the 60,000. So, how do we know that this isn't a lie as well? You are talking through your hat when you say that this projected number is what there would be with lockdowns. What I mean is, somebody in Fauci's position is smart enough to check his numbers before he starts talking the first time. He is smart enough to do this. What that means is that he has an agenda. And that agenda is to cause panic. Do you really think that Fauci is suddenly trying to stop the medical panic he invoked the first time? Use your head. He couldn't get away with it the first time, but maybe he can get away with some of it the second time, if he lies about the pandemic some more, and simply reduces his numbers. The pandemic is a lie. Fauci has to protect himself, both from the people if they catch his lie, and from his real bosses in the medical if he tells the truth. His only recourse is to reduce the numbers. There isn't any pandemic that is greater than any other year. At worst it is only different. BTW, if you look at the first article in the OP, you will find so many flaws in the pandemic that the lockdowns and shutdowns are totally useless in themselves... except if your plan is to throw the world into turmoil over nothing. 'There isn't any pandemic that is greater than any other year. At worst it is only different.' Are you dense? This virus is different and worse because it requires hospitalization if everyone gets infected at once, the healthcare system collapses. How difficult is that? Are you dense? Show us that anybody is hospitalized from this virus. All you can show is blab from the media, or from hospital staff, who don't know how to correctly determine if what people have is this virus or that, or something else entirely. Prove that it is any different than other years. 'All you can show is blab from the media, or from hospital staff' So if I show something from another source, it becomes true? |
|
|
|
Well look at this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5240262.msg54221231#msg54221231. A reasonably coherent post from franky1.Regarding what you said in your post, the 60,000 number is a reduced number that Fauci was pushed into, because he couldn't continue to hide the truth. There were too many discrepancies to his earlier report. So, what is he still hiding? He dumped down from whatever the high number was, to the 60,000. So, how do we know that this isn't a lie as well? You are talking through your hat when you say that this projected number is what there would be with lockdowns. What I mean is, somebody in Fauci's position is smart enough to check his numbers before he starts talking the first time. He is smart enough to do this. What that means is that he has an agenda. And that agenda is to cause panic. Do you really think that Fauci is suddenly trying to stop the medical panic he invoked the first time? Use your head. He couldn't get away with it the first time, but maybe he can get away with some of it the second time, if he lies about the pandemic some more, and simply reduces his numbers. The pandemic is a lie. Fauci has to protect himself, both from the people if they catch his lie, and from his real bosses in the medical if he tells the truth. His only recourse is to reduce the numbers. There isn't any pandemic that is greater than any other year. At worst it is only different. BTW, if you look at the first article in the OP, you will find so many flaws in the pandemic that the lockdowns and shutdowns are totally useless in themselves... except if your plan is to throw the world into turmoil over nothing. 'There isn't any pandemic that is greater than any other year. At worst it is only different.' Are you dense? This virus is different and worse because it requires hospitalization if everyone gets infected at once, the healthcare system collapses. How difficult is that? |
|
|
|
a few things ignorant badecker is not realising
first case was nearly in february for USA. and its now only april.
not even 3 months
where 1 month is isolation to hamper the numbers down
exponential means without isolation the next quarter would have many multiple more death than first quarter.
the third quarter would have exponential more then second. and so on
based on numbers, not even 10%, heck not even 5% of people have contracted it yet.
this alone shows that the asymptomatic vs symptomatic vs critical is much more harmful that usual
so comparing a full number year end vs numbers of not even 1 quarter, and where isolation has lessened the death count.. shows how bad it could be without isolation if it played out for the entire year
i want badecker to look at todays numbers. and for every week calculate a exponential multiple of 2.6 a week
then tell himself the end number at after a further 40 weeks
Meh, not just that but these idiots fail to realize the biggest problem here. It's not only about deaths, it's about hospitalization, the coronavirus is significantly worse than the flu because even younger people will need hospitalization although they will likely survive. The healthcare system of any country would collapse quickly without any kind of restriction or quarantine. |
|
|
|
It’s also pertinent to note that Trump won’t win the elections easily, and in my personal opinion Biden has a good chance of winning it if the situation doesn’t improve in America soon.
At the opposite I think Trump will win this time easily. Coronavirus choas will not change the mind of MAGA fans since they are not thinking at all, most of them at least, they just follow their leader like sheep? no offense just a metaphor  At the opposite, fragile Biden is weak, saying nonsense, can't stand a second face to face to Trump's speech, in addition to accusations from here and there that will pop up, he will be doomed. It is unfortunate to see an impeached and "all bad descriptions here" person being elected again just because his rivals cannot choose a reasonable person to face him. Lucky Trump 'Impeached' because the Democrats wanted to lol. They are all a bunch of clowns trying to 'defeat' Trump at all costs instead of actually helping the United States. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
