Idiot.

agorahooawayyfoe

wztyb7vlfcw6l4xd

abraxasdegupusel

mango7u3rivtwxy7

nucleuspf3izq7o6

outfor6jwcztwbpd

tfmarket6iaddx45

Bitcointalk is relatively uncensored (except when you try to post theymos's dox).

Not correct.

'Treitel defines an offer as "an expression of willingness to contract on certain terms, made with the intention that it shall become binding as soon as it is accepted by the person to whom it is addressed"'

Does the typical Bitcointalk account seller intend that?

In this hypothetical example you're using, erikalui is the seller and the person making the offer.

If erikalui does not intend for the contract to be binding the moment someone verbally accepts it, then it's not a formal offer but rather an invitation to sell. There's a fine difference.

Given that a high percentage of deals fall through over anonymous forums, then you will find that the courts will agree that the seller may reasonably intend acceptance to be conveyed through payment.

If you don't believe this, just look at Amazon.com.

(1) You add something to your cart
(2) You proceed through the checkout process
(3) The price of an item has increased, you are notified and prompted if you wish to continue the checkout process.
(4) You pay for the order

When does acceptance occur?

(Hint: It's at 4, not at 2).

Satoshi made bitcointalk and passed on ownership to theymos.

Do you think Satoshi wants his forum to sell whore off space to crapcoins?!?!

hilariousandco, are you quickseller?

Citation needed.


/point

tspacepilot is stalking Quickseller and trolling threads with off-topic personal attacks, based on disputed facts.

As here:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=425135.msg11348612#msg11348612

And in another incident I've personally experienced, tspacepilot loves stirring up drama and trolling and has committed fraud.

Is his opinion even remotely valid?

People are missing the point.

Your smartphone won't mine on battery power. Your smartphone will mine when it's fully charged but still plugged into the power outlet. Let's say you leave your phone on your charger for 10 hours a day. Take 2.5 hours to charge, you have 7.5 hours of mining.

About the power costs: Will you really care if your smartphone uses $0.02 more worth of power per day?

21 will make money from their ecosystem, not from mining bitcoins.

Cool? Nah, it doesn't fit the criteria for negative feedback.

Is it abuse? No, her reasons for leaving him negative feedback is reasonable.

Thank you for being fair with the coverage.

TL;DR: he made a bot that copied stuff from wikipedia or something to collect the free BTC, and defrauded coins.

here's an email exchange where he wastes my time.

tspacepilot banned
14 messages
JC <traditional.spacepilot@gmail.com>   Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 8:41 AM
To: admin@glados.cc
Hi admin,

I seem to have been banned from coinchat.  What a shame, I was having such a lovely time.  Can I ask what happened?

--TSpace
gladoscc <admin@glados.cc>   Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 8:43 AM
To: JC <traditional.spacepilot@gmail.com>

#Spacechat
[Quoted text hidden]
JC <traditional.spacepilot@gmail.com>   Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 8:57 AM
To: gladoscc <admin@glados.cc>
Hi admin,

In #spacechat, I was trying to test out a bot.  What was the problem?

In any case, I enjoyed the site a lot and had a lot of fun chatting with others and playing with moobot.  If you don't want me around anymore, that's ok, I'll get over it.

I guess I might remind you that I asked several times about whether there were any rules I should know about.  You never got back to me on that.  Seems like I've broken some rule or made you angry in some way.

Still not sure what went wrong.

Best,
--TSpace
[Quoted text hidden]
gladoscc <admin@glados.cc>   Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:01 AM
To: JC <traditional.spacepilot@gmail.com>
I know you know what the problem is, I'm not interested in BSing, but if you want to come back you'll need to return all the BTC you've withdrawn since you started running the bot.
JC <traditional.spacepilot@gmail.com>   Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:05 AM
To: gladoscc <admin@glados.cc>
Sounds good.  I think here's where I'm confused:

a) I don't know what the rules are
b) You are suggesting that I owe you something

If you can address (a) then I could be sure not to break these rules again.  Without knowing what the rules are it's hard to know that I'm not breaking them.  Without (b) it's hard to know what you think I owe you or how you came to that conclusion.

Can you be more specific about (a) and (b)?

Best,
Tspace
[Quoted text hidden]
gladoscc <admin@glados.cc>   Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:11 AM
To: JC <traditional.spacepilot@gmail.com>
a) Bots must be run from a specially designated bot account that does not earn tips.

b) Common sense tells you that the mBTC you've obtained from the bot is fraudulent, and it may also have infringed the copyright of whatever site you copied it from, as you were using it for a commercial purpose.

I'm not interested in wasting my time with BSing with you. You know exactly what you did wrong, and if you play dumb it's the last time I'll be talking to you.
[Quoted text hidden]
JC <traditional.spacepilot@gmail.com>   Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:19 AM
To: gladoscc <admin@glados.cc>
Below:

On 08/29/2013 04:11 PM, gladoscc wrote:

    a) Bots must be run from a specially designated bot account that does not
    earn tips.


That sounds fair, it's the first I've heard of it.  Is this the only rule?  Is it posted somewhere?  Is there a list of rules I can read and know about so that if we were to resolve our differences (sounding less likely given your tone) that I could be sure not to make you angry again.


    b) Common sense tells you that the mBTC you've obtained from the bot is
    fraudulent,


I think that "fraud" is defined by juridical/legislative/governmental process, not "common sense".  Seems like you want to accuse me of something, but you won't go ahead and say what it is that you want to say.  Not sure why you're being evasive.

    and it may also have infringed the copyright of whatever site
    you copied it from, as you were using it for a commercial purpose.


I haven't copied anything.  I'm not sure what you mean here.  Several times you and I had conversations about your API and I told you that I was working on a bot.  I'm a relatively good programmer, and I enjoyed learning about node.js and experimenting with robots on your site. Given that I discussed what I was doing with you several times, I'm not sure why you're trying to accuse me of copying or "commercial purposes".  What sort of commerce to you suppose I'm involved in?  I'm not sure where you're going with this.

For all your crytic allegations here, you still haven't talked about how much you think I owe you or how you arrived at that number.  From what I can tell, your site gives out BTC for chatting.  I got some of that BTC and now you want it back.  Please let me know what I'm missing.


    *I'm not interested in wasting my time with BSing with you. You know
    exactly what you did wrong, and if you play dumb it's the last time I'll be
    talking to you.*


Also not interested in wasting time.  Seems like you got angry about something and you don't want to discuss it plainly.  If you change your mind, I'm all ears.  I really did enjoy your site and the community there.

Best,
tspacepilot
[Quoted text hidden]
gladoscc <admin@glados.cc>   Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:23 AM
To: JC <traditional.spacepilot@gmail.com>
The site gives you free mBTC for *chatting*, not for bots.

See here for a list of the rules http://glados.cc/coinchat.html

You've withdrawn 213 mBTC (0.213 BTC) after your first withdraw, and that is the amount you need to send back if you would like to be unbanned from coinchat.
[Quoted text hidden]
JC <traditional.spacepilot@gmail.com>   Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:30 AM
To: gladoscc <admin@glados.cc>
Thanks this reply is much more to the point

On 08/29/2013 04:23 PM, gladoscc wrote:

    The site gives you free mBTC for *chatting*, not for bots.

    See here for a list of the rules http://glados.cc/coinchat.html


I will review these rules.  Thanks!


    You've withdrawn 213 mBTC (0.213 BTC) after your first withdraw, and that
    is the amount you need to send back if you would like to be unbanned from
    coinchat.


Well, I don't believe that's correct, a very small percentage of my chatting was autogenerated and none of it was done with bad intentions.
Secondarily, I only started experimenting with autogenerated chatting over the last week, and I think I've been a member for over a month.

Oh well, it seems my love affair with coinchat was brief and passionate.

Best of luck in your endeavors.  If you ever change your mind...

tspacepilot



    On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:19 AM, JC <traditional.spacepilot@gmail.com>wrote:

        Below:


        On 08/29/2013 04:11 PM, gladoscc wrote:

            a) Bots must be run from a specially designated bot account that does not
            earn tips.


        That sounds fair, it's the first I've heard of it.  Is this the only rule?
          Is it posted somewhere?  Is there a list of rules I can read and know
        about so that if we were to resolve our differences (sounding less likely
        given your tone) that I could be sure not to make you angry again.



            b) Common sense tells you that the mBTC you've obtained from the bot is
            fraudulent,


        I think that "fraud" is defined by juridical/legislative/**governmental
        [Quoted text hidden]


            On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:05 AM, JC <traditional.spacepilot@gmail.**com<traditional.spacepilot@gmail.com>

                wrote:


              Sounds good.  I think here's where I'm confused:


                a) I don't know what the rules are
                b) You are suggesting that I owe you something

                If you can address (a) then I could be sure not to break these rules
                again.  Without knowing what the rules are it's hard to know that I'm not
                breaking them.  Without (b) it's hard to know what you think I owe you or
                how you came to that conclusion.

                Can you be more specific about (a) and (b)?

                Best,
                Tspace


                On 08/29/2013 04:01 PM, gladoscc wrote:

                  I know you know what the problem is, I'm not interested in BSing, but if

                    you want to come back you'll need to return all the BTC you've withdrawn
                    since you started running the bot.





JC <traditional.spacepilot@gmail.com>   Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 1:22 PM
To: gladoscc <admin@glados.cc>
I reviewed the rules.  It certainly would have been helpful to have seen this *before* you banned me.

Also, nice style on that page.  I really like the notepad.

I'd look forward to coming back if you ever want to unban me.

Best,
Tspacepilot

On 08/29/2013 04:23 PM, gladoscc wrote:

    The site gives you free mBTC for *chatting*, not for bots.

    See here for a list of the rules http://glados.cc/coinchat.html

    You've withdrawn 213 mBTC (0.213 BTC) after your first withdraw, and that
    is the amount you need to send back if you would like to be unbanned from
    coinchat.


    On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:19 AM, JC <traditional.spacepilot@gmail.com>wrote:

        Below:


        On 08/29/2013 04:11 PM, gladoscc wrote:

            a) Bots must be run from a specially designated bot account that does not
            earn tips.


        That sounds fair, it's the first I've heard of it.  Is this the only rule?
          Is it posted somewhere?  Is there a list of rules I can read and know
        about so that if we were to resolve our differences (sounding less likely
        given your tone) that I could be sure not to make you angry again.



            b) Common sense tells you that the mBTC you've obtained from the bot is
            fraudulent,


        I think that "fraud" is defined by juridical/legislative/**governmental
        [Quoted text hidden]


            On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:05 AM, JC <traditional.spacepilot@gmail.**com<traditional.spacepilot@gmail.com>

                wrote:


              Sounds good.  I think here's where I'm confused:


                a) I don't know what the rules are
                b) You are suggesting that I owe you something

                If you can address (a) then I could be sure not to break these rules
                again.  Without knowing what the rules are it's hard to know that I'm not
                breaking them.  Without (b) it's hard to know what you think I owe you or
                how you came to that conclusion.

                Can you be more specific about (a) and (b)?

                Best,
                Tspace


                On 08/29/2013 04:01 PM, gladoscc wrote:

                  I know you know what the problem is, I'm not interested in BSing, but if

                    you want to come back you'll need to return all the BTC you've withdrawn
                    since you started running the bot.





gladoscc <admin@glados.cc>   Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 2:02 PM
To: JC <traditional.spacepilot@gmail.com>

Return the BTC if you want to be unbanned.
[Quoted text hidden]
JC <traditional.spacepilot@gmail.com>   Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 2:08 PM
To: gladoscc <admin@glados.cc>
Emailing with you is a little like chatting with a bot.  How do I know this exchange isn't automated. 

Cheers!

(gladoscc replies: 'return the BTC or be destroyed!')

Regarding this feedback in question, I copy pasted that thinking you were trying to hack someone else. Didn't read much, I'll remove it.

It's pretty funny watching people get almost everything wrong.

admin@glados.cc had 2FA, but it was set up to forward all emails to lailai625@hotmail.com. I set it up previously and forgot I had to forwarding on. The hacker only needed to reset lailai625@hotmail.com.

And yes, I had 2FA on the linode, but they were able to get in via Lish which did not ask for 2FA at that time (still not sure if it does).

The Inpts campaigns were by no means the first, it was one of the earliest ones (and the largest at that time).

Butterfly Labs had a signature campaign back in early 2012.

I was?

It is pretty obvious there is something Havelock has not told you about. Something bad.

2) can be addressed by a 1 satoshi per day fee on all outputs less than 5460 satoshi UXTOs. Within a day this will prune all the 1 satoshi spam from the blockchain. The 5460 satoshi threshold can be halved every block cycle until eventually this fee no longer applies.

Yes they do.

-Satoshi
https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

Every single transaction that pays the cost per kB belongs in the blockchain, and the cost per kB should be low enough to make all reasonable transactions feasible. A $2 cup of coffee belongs in the blockchain every bit as much as a $200 payment.

What we need is:

1) charging miners for the cost of network transfer
2) charging transaction creators for the cost of network storage (if their UXTOs are not spent / not feasibly spendable)
3) removing the blocksize limit altogether.

Email

Exactly. 30 kBps upload is common in Australia, and you sure should be able to run a full node in a typical internet connection in Australia, or Brazil, or Philippines, or whatever. The block size needs to be useful for the (lowest reasonable) common denominator, not the median.

IMO 10 MB is too much, maybe 5 MB.