And why would you want a society based on an imaginary being?

More humans is bad. As automation and robotics increases, then most of them will have no function other than that of consumer.

The other problem is that most of the world is still controlled by the Eton/Oxford elite that have morphed the old British Empire into a new supra-national entity that is run through trusts, derivatives and holding companies that are managed through the City of London. The origins go back to a creation by Cecil Rhodes, the Rothschilds, the English Crown, and some other dynasties. Washington, Westminster and the EU are just the fronts to act as fall organisations to protect the City of London.

There is hope though. UK politics used to be split vertically between, Conservatives and Labour, and the US had a similar structure. Recently the split has been horizontal with leaders like Clinton, Obama, Blair, Theresa May, Margaret Thatcher, and many others controlling the decision making in the "democracies", and the junior back benchers only having a minor role as noisy protesters. Nigel Farage's Brexit party is collecting those populist back benchers into one political group, and this poses a real threat to the Eton/Oxford elite. Countries auch as Italy that want to remove central banking, and the creation of debt, are another hope for the removal of the  banking slave masters.

And why would you want a society based on an imaginary being?

The only coin that has reached almost its all time high while the whole market stumbles in bear market.

BNB IEOs and DEX made it possible but how long it will sustain to maintain its good price?

The problem with US healthcare:  It's singular focus is profit.

In as much as the idea is not that bad , I do think that it would nit be possible for a group of people to be "forced " to have their own country based on their choice to align with a concept such as feminism etc.

The problem with US healthcare:  It's singular focus is profit.

There a MANY examples of very effective and cost efficient universal healthcare, there are literally ZERO examples of successful purely for profit healthcare systems, but hey lets not let actual real world examples affect our thinking!

As Suchmoon mentioned this is really not difficult and literally the entire rest of the develop world moved on from this half a fucking century ago LOL.  Yup a few more more decades, a few more trillion dollars, a lowering level of healthcare and lowering age expectancy and eventually the US will figure out not EVERYTHING needs to be purely profit driven!

Now to start to fucking haggle with a doctor or to shop around for something like surgery FUCK that shit OMG, can my doctor focus on fixing my problems and not selling me his cheap ass services, fuck me sideways, I don't want some hack cheap cunt slicing me open with cut rate shit so he can do it cheaper...

Earning money based on sold work is a VERY good system, though when people are separated from cost decisions, there is an artificially low amount of doctors allowed to become licensed, AND government money is being poured into the system -- then you're going to face an issue where prices remain artifically high.

So all this talk about utopian societies and insects leads to anti bitcoin propaganda and praising of socialism. If this thread had any real philosophical value it's gone now.
As for the socialist spirit of my society, I think it's still in abundance. It could really use some bitcoin.

This is probably the worst possible example of a group of people "having" their own country. They basically weaseled, lied, threatened, bribed and murdered their way into their own country.

Do you really want to compare bees with people? Bees are drawn by pure instinct and pheromones. They work themselves to death because they know no other role, no pleasure. Also, their males (drones) live to inseminate the queen and die after mating. Those who don't get to mate are removed from the hive and left to die.
This is a vision of a perfect world... for a psychopath.

Like WHAT 1/10 of what things? What exact things would be in that 1/10 that you imagine the GOP would go nuts over?

Go ahead, lay them out.

I guess healthcare is costly because hospitals have to treat everybody even the patient is able to pay or not .so they charges a premium fees so that they can remain profitable at end.

Only option I find to cut the cost is to stay healthy.

Women should not be separated from men. God made both men and women to help each other to take care of the world. Nothing can put a wall between them cause they are meant to be together and that means there should no country for women only.

Früher war es der Prinz aus Zamunda, heute ist es die Kaiserin von China.

Das Schlimme daran ist, dass nette Mensche wegen solcher Arschlöcher zu Zynikern werden.  

sad day for humanity. My hearts to all the victims family

Finanzielle Freiheit ist für jeden etwas anderes, das kannst du dir selbst definieren. Hängt natürlich von den eigenen Ansprüchen ab. Manchen reicht ein Dach über dem Kopf und was zu essen, der andere braucht Lambo, Villa, Yacht.

Für mich ist finanzielle Freiheit, wenn ich meinen jetzigen Lebensstil weiterleben kann ohne mich finanziell von einem Arbeitgeber oder Kunden abhängig zu machen. Ich möchte das Arbeiten, was mir gefällt, soviel es mir gefällt und wann es mir gefällt.

Es heißt für mich nicht, nicht mehr zu arbeiten. Obwohl, wenn die Arbeit ein Hobby ist, ist es dann noch Arbeit?

Healthcare is one of the most debated issues in the American political system, those on the left are calling for a government takeover of the system. Stating that the best system is in the European socialist systems. Those are in the right are calling for reform as well, though not the same sort of reform --  relaxed government policy, and less government involvement.

Though I think both of these solutions have their flaws, I think there is a much better plan that neither party will agree too. Because the lobbyists on both sides will fight them tooth and nail.


1.American Medical Association Influence / Interest
The problem is the American Medical Association (AMA), for those that don't know who they are -- they are an association of physicians and medical students that have an enormous influence on healthcare-related decisions. This association has a vested interest in the status quo.

The AMA limits the number of doctors in the country and makes every single medical procedure in the country require a doctor to be present (or at least signing off on the procedure occurring) Most procedures don't need doctors, and they're merely being paid to sign off on a procedure for no reason. Remove them from the equation, and you've saved a large amount of money -- though you've angered doctors + the AMA and lowered their salaries as there is less demand.

2.Consumer seperation from cost decisions

Have you ever had a doctor tell you something along the lines of "You don't need this procedure, but the insurance company is going to cover it so why don't we just check anyway, we're just being safe!" This sort of behavior, this wasteful behavior that is filled with greed (on the side of the doctor) and carelessness from the patient is what causes a large amount of waste in the healthcare sector.

People don't care about what things cost, because either the government is paying (Medicare, low income, etc.), their company policy is paying, or something along these lines.

This gives the healthcare sector little (to no) incentive to lower costs because no one is shopping around for prices anyway.

If you want a prime example of people being close to cost decisions in a small sector, look to the LASIK eye / plastic surgery business. Cost has been falling for decades because people have to pay for these procedures out of pocket and are going to shop around for the combination of the best deal (price wise) and the best doctor.

3. Failure to allow for common sense reform

ALLOW FOR COMPETITION ACROSS STATE LINES FOR PRIVATE INSURANCE

This can only be summed up by corruption and greed; politicians don't want to anger the private insurance companies in their state by forcing them to compete with other states. Politicians are raking in large amounts of money from the healthcare sector; why would they make business harder for them by forcing them to compete.

Competition is vital in an industry where cost is EVERYTHING.

INCREASE IMMIGRATION OF DOCTORS / NURSES / MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS

If we have such high costs, and people want to come into our nation to either study to be a medical professional, or they are currently one and want to work, we should allow them to thrive like that. Give them a work visa, and let them come into this country to work. Every single new doctor you bring in lowers the cost for all of those as supply increases.

DON'T ALLOW HOSPITALS TO VETO NEW DEVELOPMENT

I don't know if this is an issue all around America, though I know where I live the Hospital around me is allowed to veto development of a new hospital in the area if they'd like to. I don't understand the rationale behind a decision like this, though all it is doing is allowing a Hospital to avoid competition which is vital to our market.

There are without a doubt other issues with the system, though these are the issues that I feel are hurting people the most. I'd love to hear what people think about other issues, and what should be done to fix these problems.