You have a good point with this topic. Probably the best thing you can do for yourself - since you know all this - is go out and commit suicide. After all, odds are you are going to die someday, anyway. Why go through all the troubles of life? Take the easy way out, right?

Have you ever heard of a nation - especially a large one - disbanding, on purpose?

There is no over population. There is lots of under population. Government needs lots of people to get ahead in life. People make government happen, because it's people - not machines or AI - that get things done. Does government want to go to the moon? People will do it. Does Government want to solve the energy crisis? People will do it. The only thing that government has to do is find the right incentive for the people. When they do, the people will bend over backwards to do the government's bidding. Ecclesiastes 5:9:If the king/government wants more "stuff," they need more people to make it for them. GROW THE POPULATION! INCENTIVE!

  If the available resources can be fair shared amongst available inhabitants this would greatly spore a happy community, state, and even nation.
 The birth of a child, the first cry of a baby, a new life should most likely bring joy and happiness but no being able to take care of the child because of low income and resources can become a night mare and very frustrating. This is a circumstance experienced by developing countries.
With few economical developments going on the level of over population in developing countries is worrisome not only to the country but to the world at large, we get to see on a daily occurrence immigrant try to legally or illegally get into a country with more prospect than theirs. Some get them self killed and to those that manages to get in "any thing to survive" becomes there watch word which can increase crime rate.

     Why are developing countries getting over populated
Developing countries are getting over population via so many reasons like

Poor education~ developing countries are struggling with poor educational system, they lack adequate family planning orientation, a family who feeds on below1$ a day can get over 8-12 kids and they see it as a blessing

Early marriage~ this is also an urgent issue that should be tackled you girls as young as 9 get pushed into marriage and start as a very early stage to give birth and when the hit menopause they must have given birth to over a dozen of kids.

Sexual crimes~ sexual offense like rape, taking advantage of the poor for sex, child trafficking, sex trafficking can cause a rise in unwanted pregnancy and over population grows.


Overpopulation is dangerous for developing countries and the government has it as a priority to educate the people on this and also look into the issue.

 

Nah.

The biggest would be the fall of the CCP.
Second the fall and execution of Xi.
Third the independence of Hong Kong.
Fourth the formal declaration of statehood by Taiwan followed by recognition of major powers.

All those are, because of the coronavirus, possible but I don't think probable and certainly not likely.

Fifth more nations leave the EU.

Venezuela's biggest (recent) debt is to China. I really don't see the US giving a fuk about Venezuela. The banks have already written off the money they lent in the 1990s.

Trump is not going to be impeached. The Dems will not play that game again. And, if they do, they will look even further out of touch then they do now.

Das habe ich ihm hier auch schon vorgeschlagen!

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5221798.msg53736333#msg53736333

Everyone will have seen the announcement by the world's richest man that he is donating $10b to fight climate change.

Whilst it's a welcome gesture, it does smell very strongly of virtue signalling. And why does it have to have his name plastered all over it? The "Bezos Earth Fund". This presumably is what he thinks is the most acceptable wording of "Superman Jeff Bezos saves the World".

Perhaps he should just pay taxes instead. Perhaps he should look at how Amazon is contributing to climate change, rather than attempting to dissociate himself from his own business and rise from it like some (renewables-powered) phoenix from the (coal-fired) flames.

Amazon is one of the world's biggest polluters and has absolutely zero interest in preventing climate change, beyond maintaining a facade of ethical concern and accountability purely for PR purposes..

Okay, here are some facts and links:

More than 350 Amazon employees have spoken out about the company's disregard of and contribution to climate change, and its attempts to silence those employees. Comments are here and well worth a read.

Amazon threatens to fire employees who speak about the climate crisis.

Amazon funds climate-denying think tanks, such as the Competitive Enterprise Institute.

Amazon donates to politicians who are climate-change deniers. This includes "68 legislators who have denied climate change — including those who have voted against environmental legislation 100% of the time" (from poynter.org).

Amazon is happy to sell AWS to the oil and gas industries:
"The energy industry should have access to the same technologies as other industries. We will continue to provide cloud services to companies in the energy industry" It continues: "to make their legacy businesses less carbon intensive and help them accelerate development of renewable energy businesses", but there are no numbers here, it's just vague ethical hand waving.
_{https://www.aboutamazon.com/our-company/our-positions}

Amazon was scored at an "F" by the Carbon Disclosure Project, and was "the largest U.S. publicly traded company not to participate"

... although they did admit in 2018 that their carbon footprint is 44 million tonnes, which is roughly 85% of the emissions of Switzerland.

The way things work in the US is flawed, but ordinary folks still got much power (though they're easily manipulated, which we can clearly see lately). Any democracy is still better than tyranny, that's a life lesson I've learned first hand

Scientists have found HIV fragments in the virus DNA that seem unlikely to be naturally evolved.

We know that this virus has certain unprecedented behaviors, like long incubation period, asymptomatic transmission, ease of transmission and severe re-infection that seem designed to evade containment.

And FWIW, the White House announced an investigation of the virus as a weapon.

But, if you think that the shenanigans stop with the Chinese government, think again.  Apparently, a Canadian lab (ie one exempt from strict post-9/11 rules on securing bio agents) has been in the habit of getting its vials 'stolen' by Chinese.  Strangely, its director just died while attending a conference in Kenya.  For details and background, see this link.

To make the plot even thicker, it seems the virus predominantly targets East Asians who have a far higher proportion of ACE2 receptor cells than Caucasians, Africans or Arabs.  (It's through these receptors that the virus binds to and attacks human cells.)

I don't know anything beyond the public information.  What I can say is:

Objectively, at the end of the expansionary phase of the asset-inflation cycle of the modern financial and economic system, it benefits the long-term stability of the system to have a reset or re-calibration.  Such an event is always painful, at the very least transferring wealth from one set of people to another.  But if it can be blamed on something other than the core nature of the system, then it's a net benefit to the system.  (This applies to the Chinese economy, all other economies, and the global economy as a whole.)

Sounds a lot like the forum trust system.

I’ll skip the part about Harry and Meghans decision to leave their royal life behind as I feel all would be knowing it by now, and this decision has cost them dearly as the Queen has now decided that they cannot use the trademark ‘Sussex Royal’. It’s also worth mentioning that Harry and Meghan had spend ten thousand pounds on a new website branded with Sussex Royal, and even had even applied for many trademarks with the name ‘Sussex Royal’ and now they can’t use it anymore. So who’s loss is it theirs or the common man who’s money they had used to build the website, further what do you’ll think of the queen's decision?.

Source:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8018043/Queen-BANS-Prince-Harry-Meghan-Markle-using-Sussex-Royal-brand-cost-thousands.html?ito=social-facebook&fbclid=IwAR2GOoxJG0wQ6B0aWigE206wlFos-h40RVS2B8wW_PaJzhbBZfOZ8wppILM

Except for Britain, now that they are out of the EU.

Actually, Britain has been a republic all along, and one with libertarian processes, just like the USA. Learn to understand Queen's Bench... which most of the encyclopedias don't understand, and therefore classify Britain incorrectly.

Do you prefer the Russian democracy, where people vote, but the members of the voting committees vote as well (more than once)?
Democracy has always been a joke because how can you ask some drunkard or someone who can barely read to decide on the future of a country? Assuming that most people are lazy and unintelligent, you just have to persuade thosse bums and morons to vote for you and you'll win.

"White Bernie Bro Attacks Black Dude At Bernie Rally, Bernie Has A SERIOUS Supporter Problem"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5oVzjNUo0eU

Separation of powers. Checks and balances. Executive, legislative, judicial.

POTUS: "I'm actually, I guess, the chief law enforcement officer of the country"

FFS. Half-wit or dictator? Or both?

Well it seems the EU will not allow US (or any other) companies to simply do what they want within the EU. If the US regulators took a strong stance then lots of the problems visible today would not have occurred. Facebook has too much user data on its hands and wants to monetise it as best as it can.

I'm not a supporter of the Eu, but I could play the devil's advocate and ask if you really believe that everything should be free and unregulated.
Currently, you need licenses for fishing, even with your little fishing rod in a nearby lake. You need a license to sail, to shape the riverbanks and so on.
What if you could do whatever you wanted without any rules? People would be fishing by electrocuting fish with car batteries, throwing fireworks, sail speedboats wherever they please disrupting wildlife.

EU regulations are usually stupid but I see the need for at least some licensing.

God does what people ask. When you move your hand, what you are really doing is asking God that your hand be moved as you wish it to. God willingly does it for you, and you think that you did it.

Satan is called Abaddon and Apollyon (Destroyer) in Revelation... Revelation 9:11:
Satan's one creation, destruction, is being used on him by God better than he thought to use it himself.

In a no-sin world, there would be balance in everything that people did. In this sinful world, God does the balancing  for purposes of destroying destruction.

Are you a man/woman? Psalm 115:16: So, it is mankind that controls the fishing. But get yourself an understanding of Queen's Bench in Britain, so that you know that only if you hurt another of mankind can you be convicted of a crime. If in Britain you are found guilty by a barrister and magistrate, you have agreed with your own conviction.

So, the fishing laws of Britain don't apply to you as a man, but only to your corporation.

I'm not a supporter of the Eu, but I could play the devil's advocate and ask if you really believe that everything should be free and unregulated.
Currently, you need licenses for fishing, even with your little fishing rod in a nearby lake. You need a license to sail, to shape the riverbanks and so on.
What if you could do whatever you wanted without any rules? People would be fishing by electrocuting fish with car batteries, throwing fireworks, sail speedboats wherever they please disrupting wildlife.

EU regulations are usually stupid but I see the need for at least some licensing.

Because we want those people working and making/growing beer, whiskey, hot cars, nice clothes, big OLED televisions, swimming pools, airplanes, chocolate, Christmas trees, and AR15 assault rifles.