|
ww2 was an age where many germans and japanese where nationalists, they declared war on their neigbours in order to obtain financial gains,
they didn't used a free market, in order to obtain shares in productive processes, like they did after world war 2.
regards
|
|
|
|
This is all bad (about the negative points). This all happens while in many developed countries families often either have 1 child or not at all. Now it is inconspicuous, but imagine what will happen in 50 years. The population is going down a lot. Therefore it is not necessary to go to extremes. The problem is not overpopulation, but how it is organized. But I agree that on one territory there should be such a number of people who will be comfortable. There should be so much land that every person can be full when some kind of agro culture is grown on these lands
Yes if there's enough land people can cultivate many crops by cultivating Because the population is increasing at the speed of food production isn't increasing. People consider the population because the biggest problem which may be a major obstacle for developing countries when the population is above required that's why we all got to increase the quantity of cultivable land. You are right but it will not only increase the amount of arable land but also control the population If the population is reduced then the amount of cultivable land will increase Due to the housing crisis, the amount of cultivable land is decreasing. In that case if the population is controlled the amount of cultivable land will increase. Even Bangladesh, probably the country that has more population per square mile than any other, is surviving and expanding. Properly organized, the population of the country is its wealth. The more population the better. Are there any countries of the world that don't exist any longer? Look at history. Search on "Tartary." This is a nation that existed to some extent as recent as the early 1900s. It was bigger than most nations, and covered most of Siberia and Northern Europe into Northern Canada. Why are they gone (they aren't really gone)? Because they didn't have enough population for the land they were trying to hold.  jes but third world countries are dependent on the scientific development of the centuries old imperial powers, without the scientific skills of the western and european powers and china, and also their massive landmasses and natural ressources a tiny country like bangladesh can't develop itself, it is then simply just a zergish mass of people full of extremists and not a potential labourforce. the leftists and billionaires in the developed world completely have forgotten that without the so called "racist right wingers and deplorables" their labour force wouldn't work |
|
|
|
|
like guarding its border, or integrating those africans and middle easterners into their economy and workforce why pulling nato into a war, and burdening europe with those migrants from africa and the middle east unneccessarily even more?
a nation doesn't has to invade its neigbours to grow, look at germany, it is just a third of the size of turkey and by focusing on internal issues it becma most powerful and influential country in europe.
regards
|
|
|
|
Keiner der darüber hier schreibt? Sowas geht doch nicht ohne Diskussion.  Also was meint ihr zum Virus? Fürchtet ihr euch? Macht ihr Hamsterkäufe oder seit ihr sowieso schon als Prepper vorbereitet? Welche Auswirkungen auf die Wirtschaft, auf das öffentliche Leben seht ihr? man kann eh nix gegen das virus tun, besser einfach durch, wer überlebt ist immun. wird bestimmt ganz revitalisierend für die rentenkasse und den immobilien und arbeitsmarkt sein so ein virus. |
|
|
|
Very true. The saying "no justice no peace" exists for a reason. In an environment where the laws are only enforced on people and not used to protect them, respect for the rule of law is eroded and disregarded. This results in general societal breakdown, and is difficult to recover from as it means rebuilding a culture of rule of law which takes large amounts of time and sustained effort to psychologically reinforce.
justice however depends on the oppinion of the powerful, african leaders today apply slavery and because the people there are too hungry to rise up, and resist they can't fight for justice |
|
|
|
https://www.azquotes.com/quote/504926this is a quote from martin luther king a black people's rights movement, we have to ask ourselves here however the question, what does justice ultimately mean? every single human being has a different oppinion about that. in my oppinion there can then only utlimately be a divine justice like the muslims claim. just is what god (the owner and creator of the world) decides regards
|
|
|
|
Approximately 120,000 Japanese Americans were forced in to prison camps during World War 2 under the Executive Order of Franklin D Roosevelt which was backed by California State.
Executive Order #9066 was signed on 2nd February 1942 because there were fears the Japanese American population would help Japan during the war. Those incarcerated were forced to live in one of the 10 camps which were ringed by barbed wire and had armed guards. Many victims died because of medical negligence, many died at the hands of the guards that were supposed to ensure nobody escaped.
In 1976 the then US President Gerald Ford issued an apology for those camps and in 1983 the Commission of Wartime Relocation and Internment of Civilians (CWRIC) came to the conclusion the camps were not "military necessity" but were effectively driven by "racial prejudice, wartime hysteria and a failure of political leadership". They also stated "A grave injustice was done to American citizens and resident aliens of Japanese ancestry who, without individual review or any probative evidence against them"
5 years later in 1988 the Civil Liberties Act came in to force and Congress backed reparation payments of $20,000 to each living survivor (or next of kin) along with a signed apology from the then US President Ronald Reagan. A total of around 82,000 people received payments.
The Federal government has apologised on several occasions and now the State Assembly of California has apologised too. Even though reparations have been made and the issues date back to the second world war but has this move on part the state of California opened old wounds rather than heal them? Is it too little too late?
How do you think the average American would feel about this? And how would that compare to the feelings of survivors and families of those camps?
usa was in a war with japan back then, there where important reasons for that, us population didn't trusted the japanese. regards |
|
|
|
|
as soon as people in a society don't have to work,
then work makes fun for quite a huge portion in the society.
in societies in which people have to work, work is often considered horrible.
|
|
|
|
corona causes Muslims can't go on Umrah
umrah and hatch is about exchanging the diseases |
|
|
|
Yes, different races have different reactions to viruses. Different people also have different reactions. If you lead a healthy lifestyle, if you don't smoke, don't drink alcohol, play sports, then your immunity and excretory system will work much better.
skin color is completely insifnigicant compared to other factors like: age, health, fitness, wealth, exposure, and last but not least: divine destiny. |
|
|
|
Chinese doctors also said that he remained alive because he has black skin, the antibodies of a black are 3 times stronger, powerful and resistant compared to that of white.
thats actually not true, most african countries are corrupt and don't run a healthcare system at all. therefore they don't do any data on healthcare at all, additionally africa ist still very rural, and many people life far away from the globally connected cities, so the virus will get there with a huge delay. they die like flies and invent other reasons for it, africans died since decades of diseases that are completely unknown in the west. |
|
|
|
There is no over population. There is lots of under population. Government needs lots of people to get ahead in life. People make government happen, because it's people - not machines or AI - that get things done. Does government want to go to the moon? People will do it. Does Government want to solve the energy crisis? People will do it. The only thing that government has to do is find the right incentive for the people. When they do, the people will bend over backwards to do the government's bidding. Ecclesiastes 5:9: The increase from the land is taken by all; the king himself profits from the fields. If the king/government wants more "stuff," they need more people to make it for them. GROW THE POPULATION! INCENTIVE! population isn't actually the big problem, considering how big and ressourceful the world is, afrika, sahara, russia the americas are still extremely thin populated, but people from there still migrate to dense populated europe? why? because of better organisation of life. overpopulation is a labour chance, the problem however is, not enough people want to be working class, everyone wants to be a banker or a capitalist. If people won't work, let them starve. That would be population reduction for those who want it. Often minorities in America protest against government to give them MORE. Help them wak up by sending them to real 3rd world countries. Better oranisation of life has to do with libertarian freedom - do unto others... - which is really less government. exactly however massive industrial productivity makes it possible to do socialism in limited ways's societies then thrive because people don't have to be constantly afraid of their social security people become relaxed and easygoing, and have time to orient themselves. however radical capitalism removes the neverending mental destruction of people abusing a nation's welfare system. |
|
|
|
People are constantly banging on about racism, and nationalism, but nobody ever mentions the real power split. This is the Anglophone elite. They control the EU, despite the fact that no members counties speak English. The UK is no longer a member of course, but it still controls the banking. The non-Anglophone countries are just there to be milked. Just look at the way they treated Greece.
thats not true, the uk banks controll only the pound. they have nothing to say about the euro. the euro is getting more and more under controll of eastern europeans |
|
|
|
Brexit left the Uk out of the EU, suddenly Uk thinks sovereign nations are valuable but why? and what is the use of national sovereignty in an environment globally in which, the us dollar is ruling everything? usa might give a bunch of finish or duth nazis national sovereignty but only to then enslave themselves to the us dollar.
Brexit and the collapse of the EU is in the interest of usd imperialists, chinese, russian and other imperialists. brits are betraying their neigbourhood for the benefit of the decadent and evilthinking distant. usa gave a fuck about illegal migration into the EU.
nazism has a very bad meaning and nazism and fascism is today being asociated with nationalists and much less with socialists.
if the usa sites with the uk it will end up having more and more segregationists uprisings in the usa (texas germans, nativism, black racist nationalism, muslim nationalism)
if the usa sites with the EU it holds up the creation of a huge tradeblock with few lingual differences.
meaning
siding with the EU will preserve the USA, with a weakened usdollar but business opportunities for americans earning euros.
siding with uk will desintegrate the usa into more and more nations.
regards
You have a good point with this topic. Probably the best thing you can do for yourself - since you know all this - is go out and commit suicide. After all, odds are you are going to die someday, anyway. Why go through all the troubles of life? Take the easy way out, right? Have you ever heard of a nation - especially a large one - disbanding, on purpose? nations disband, for financial reasons. compare the USA with europe, many languages suck, they reduce the size of the market. etc. regards Disbanding for financial reasons is simply being conquered by bad money management. They didn't want to do it intentionally. But if they did, it was only the leaders who had this plan ever since they became leaders. The people don't like the idea of being conquered by their leaders or anyone else. the problem with "bad money management" is that its always bad for those not being billionaires. |
|
|
|
|
germany and eastern europe have a very clear logic what a nazi is; thats a nation thats puts its national interest over other nations, and acts rouge. eastern europe and germany together therefor think that uk and all exiteers are nazis.
germany will side more and more with eastern europe against all those who abandon the EU.
|
|
|
|
?.. nationalisation is racism as soon as national banks/currencies are created..?
nationalism is about creating a national currency/bank.. but thats not the racism
thats uniting different regions into an agreeable single form of banking/currency
if you want to know an example of racism
take india for instance. did you know that as a national agenda they wanted to form a criteria for allowing people to become an indian citizen.
first of all all non-indian born (hereditary citizens) get classed as undocumented. eg refugee's and undocumented people of all religions
and then claim that all undocumented people are then allowed citizen no matter what religion they are.. apart from.. muslim
..yep muslims cant be granted citizenship.
nothing to do with money or bank. but just due to do with being picky about which people can and cant become a citizen based on race/religion
atleast try to learn things
ofc, how do you want to keep your investments in national education then? you will get robbed by everyone else. racism and hatred are important tools of nations to maintain a positive economic balance. uk will have to teach its youth to hate europe in order to prevent its labour flowing out, like the eastern bloc. |
|
|
|
Nationalism is not equivalent to racism. This argument is horse shit. You are against globalism right? Pretty much the only force resisting globalism is nationalism.
of course it is, the langauge only doesn't create enough sovereignty for nationalistic capitalists, look at ukraine, they all spoke russian and nationalistic capitalism increased the amount of langauges in europe, completely pointless. it starts with nationalism, and the more extreme it gets it then starts asociating nationality with race, this is how the whole system is running and this is how it put europe into 2 world wars. what do you want to do when nations start competing against each other for financial gains, and labour? in that case they start being racist. If nationalism goes to the point of equating the nation with race and the concept of racial superiority then it has gone too far. But leftism with its quest for egalitarianism also goes to far: the french revolution the russian revolution the chinese revolution. All of them wanted to get rid of "old ideas", "old culture", "old language." All lead to ever more out of control purity tests. And we see that once again today. Equality of outcome over everything else. And you're concerned about racism? Look to the fuking left and its identitarian policies to see racism gone rampant. nationalism becomes racist and fascist as soon as there are national banks and national currency (nationalist capitalism) because those are evaluating the production of a nation, germany for example claimed its national citizens abroad as their property as they have educated them etc. if there are no national capitalists, the nation is doomed and gets sooner or later underdogiesed by a nation that has capitalists. germanies and eastern europes point of view is: if you are not in the EU then you are a nazi. because they think you are an uneuropean nation and do what you want and act in private greed. while the view of many european kingdoms are if you are in the EU and not 100% sovereign then you are a nazi. but a 100% sovereign nation could be anything, and so EU minded nations distrust nonEU minded ones. what they all don't understand is that if they want to buy stuff from other nations they have first to commit that they are friendly, and for that there is the EU. as soon as germany and the european community drops the euro of other nations they all go bankrupt. |
|
|
|
Nationalism is not equivalent to racism. This argument is horse shit. You are against globalism right? Pretty much the only force resisting globalism is nationalism.
of course it is, the langauge only doesn't create enough sovereignty for nationalistic capitalists, look at ukraine, they all spoke russian and nationalistic capitalism increased the amount of langauges in europe, completely pointless. it starts with nationalism, and the more extreme it gets it then starts asociating nationality with race, this is how the whole system is running and this is how it put europe into 2 world wars. what do you want to do when nations start competing against each other for financial gains, and labour? in that case they start being racist. |
|
|
|
|
USA will have to chose weather to side with nationalism or continentalism.
the problem with nationalism like uk france etc. is that
it will surge nationalist racist and segregationist movements in the usa,
while siding with the EU will show to all those seperatists in the usa that europe despite having so many different langauges doesnt feel really happy about them and would prefer to have less of them, like in the americas.
therefor allying with the EU will support american legtimiacy, allying with uk will damage it.
at the expense of course of the financial sovereignty (usd vs. euro)
regards
|
|
|
|
the problem with destruction is that it depends how you interpret it, there are people who think a fisher is a destroyer. as he takes fish from a fishstocks and removes biomass out of an ecosphere.
If the fish are ocean fish, stocks wil be replenished naturally. If they are hatchery fish, the hatchery feeds the fish. No destruction. Even if the ocean fish are fished out of existence, they really aren't. There are tiny pockets of them that will grow back. But it might take decades. Ocean fishing laws simply keep certain fish available so that they can be fed to people at greater cost. It makes more money for the commercial fishermen. jeah partially correct ocean fishing cartels and regulations are about maintaining fishing stocks, they exclude others from also doing industrial fishing, they end up being excluding foreigners |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
