|
i see caix price going up nicely
|
|
|
|
Come on guys, it can be simpler...I'd suggest using Yacoin's dynamic block reward and go multi algo as suggested. Yacoin's usd valuation has been relatively stable, and the coin is still great for miners.  mmmm how moist do they make you and why |
|
|
|
Good Morning: We are working on final node count to be published today with wallet addresses, and payment will start SOOON afterwards. Multipool is done, it's been tested and is working fine, we are adding front end improvements for stats and such. The wallet is in it's final stages of GUI improvements and will also be available SOOON.
We appreciate the presence of the troll groups who are very concerned about our progress, and leadership status and, and, and... I read all your concerns and found one answer for you and your multiple personalities " GO F#$K yourselves " and your group. That goes to RoscoeWins and TheGir and Virtualann and any other name you like to call yourself.
As for the people who invested in CAIx we will answer all your questions after the node count release.
lol such bright colors  |
|
|
|
|
so when are this new features comming out feel like a inpatient kid on xmas lol
|
|
|
|
Does anyone else think that we need a "Trusted Buyer" system integrated with bitcoin and escrow? Fuck a trusted seller. Trusted sellers can command higher prices. In the case of the "Trusted Buyer", sellers can reduce prices with the expectation of reduced headaches (disputes [bitcoin escrow] - or chargebacks in the case of PayPal). I'd expect something like this on the market soon that will rival ebay (minus the "PowerSeller"). A good bitcoin seller gives an accurate description of their product and delivers as agreed. A trusted buyer releases escrow immediately if the terms are met.
I think the biggest hurdle to adoption for debit purchases (cash, bank account, bitcoin) purchases is third party trust; which unfortunately we still need to some extent. Escrow solves this. It is essentially what Paypal does and gets paid handsomely. The second hurdle is for the seller to trust that he/she will actually get the agreed upon price in a timely fashion. It's going to happen.
Things like OpenBazaar are likely the future, but running a client that manages financial transactions on a PC is not going to be in any common man's wheelhouse anytime soon. I've been in bitcoin since early 2013 and still refuse to run QT, multibit, or any other client on my desktop. Most consumers will not do this.
truested buyer / trusted seller would be excellent and top it off with trusted company like paypal should be good .... i hope lol |
|
|
|
|
alright we need SPA coin back to 2500 like it was not even 2 weeks ago and held on there for like 2-3 days
|
|
|
|
Ya because a completely moronic decision to copy another coin and release it as "weeks of hard work" isn't a good enough reason not to sink 20k in mining hardware into this coin. It was just a "convenient" time to pull out right? What is really convenient is that CAIx leadership "forgot" to tell us all when they found out. This investor had the good sense to get out when he did. Actually the investor bailed on CAIx because of poor decisions and lack of results from the leadership and development team. He pulled his mining support, sold all his coins and basically said he will not touch CAIx again. This happened in the wake of the Silk Coin copy and paste blunders after we were told the devs were working so hard on this update. Ok, this is a huge blow, but it's not the end of the world. If this coin is legitimate and the devs still support the coin, we have to face the fact that someone scammed us about the two additional miners. But let's do the math and figure out what Joseph's miner is capable of at these prices.
Using the same figures from the original PSP document, one Titan miner should create 21.9 BTC per month. At a current price of 0.00014 BTC, that single miner could purchase 151,761.90 CAIx per month. Is it as good as three miners? No. But considering the current price of CAIx, it makes a dent.
I never purchased CAIx with the idea that I was purchasing a "currency". There are 1000+ coins all trying to be a currency and CAIx in that regard has nothing special about it. However, if you look at it more as a stock that pays dividends, this organization has potential. The Titan miner could hypothetically destroy about 10% of the coins in circulation over the next ten months. If you combine that with other projects and the developers can get back in their groove and create value again (think Tiny Elementals), those dividends could continue supporting the price and the "coin".
I believe we all got scammed, investors and the foundation (although the foundation seems to have known about it first). But I'd just like to point out that once the dust settles, this could work.
I also propose we end the "masternode" idea with this current round. Any dividends paid to shareholders should be done by destroying coins (share buybacks rather than dividends), and investors should be kept up-to-date on a weekly basis of such destructions. I also suggest the Foundation keep investors abreast of any huge changes. Something this large like the investor with 2 miners reneging is grounds for an immediate announcement. This was not handled well. But I am not dumping at this price, so I hope some of these comments and suggestions are heard.
+1 i'm with you on this. I'm not in Caix because it's another currencey like other one, but becasue it's a Cryptostock. The investor with the 2 titans promise probably scammed us, you are right. His intention was to help a pump group to rise the price imo. Yeah pretty convenient how he found a reason to back out after he realized it wasn't about to pump by itself eh? Fancy that.. Dude... just stop already.. you've made your point (the same point) like 40 times now. We get it.. the Foundation decided to wait to tell everyone about the two titans till they had a way to do it in a less damaging light. You thought that was wrong and blew the whistle hard as you could (in a very damaging way). Just let us try to recover, you're not helping anybody but yourself at this point. would you like a little bit more salt for that wound perhaps some lime juice? " btw not making fun of you making it clear i have caix, im refferring to what it feels like with the 40ths post of that person like you said " |
|
|
|
Ok, this is a huge blow, but it's not the end of the world. If this coin is legitimate and the devs still support the coin, we have to face the fact that someone scammed us about the two additional miners. But let's do the math and figure out what Joseph's miner is capable of at these prices.
Using the same figures from the original PSP document, one Titan miner should create 21.9 BTC per month. At a current price of 0.00014 BTC, that single miner could purchase 151,761.90 CAIx per month. Is it as good as three miners? No. But considering the current price of CAIx, it makes a dent.
I never purchased CAIx with the idea that I was purchasing a "currency". There are 1000+ coins all trying to be a currency and CAIx in that regard has nothing special about it. However, if you look at it more as a stock that pays dividends, this organization has potential. The Titan miner could hypothetically destroy about 10% of the coins in circulation over the next ten months. If you combine that with other projects and the developers can get back in their groove and create value again (think Tiny Elementals), those dividends could continue supporting the price and the "coin".
I believe we all got scammed, investors and the foundation (although the foundation seems to have known about it first). But I'd just like to point out that once the dust settles, this could work.
I also propose we end the "masternode" idea with this current round. Any dividends paid to shareholders should be done by destroying coins (share buybacks rather than dividends), and investors should be kept up-to-date on a weekly basis of such destructions. I also suggest the Foundation keep investors abreast of any huge changes. Something this large like the investor with 2 miners reneging is grounds for an immediate announcement. This was not handled well. But I am not dumping at this price, so I hope some of these comments and suggestions are heard.
NOW THIS IS GOOD READING well said my friend even if what you say is true no matter how horrible it is. We have to move onward to the future and keep on building otherwise will end up like FLAP coin |
|
|
|
@virtuallann: you might want to remove that signature from your profile to avoid confusion, since you're no longer member of the CAIx Foundation after your dramatic public resign.
dam now i am wondering what did i miss " dramatic public resign " sounds like 1600's england monarchy haha |
|
|
|
I think virtual should fuck off. He has no place here
lol i am gone for 5 days and return and load up page to read where i thought i should be and this 1st post i see haha to funny |
|
|
|
Let's me say this, Our current situation is not many people in Bitcointalk or Altcoin world know we are working on Stealth Address, and gonna be released soon ( end of this month ). That's the problem because finally we gonna open source, and then other coins will copy our code without giving credit or change name from Stealth Address to StealthSend or whatever name. At that time, investors will think those coins have active devs, and short time implementing the feature. As a result, Vertcoin value will decrease although we released the new features first.
So, after you reading, please help us doing whatever you can to help other people know we are the first coin who implement Stealth Address, and how good is it when comparing with other coins. I think it is only way to increase Vertcoin value, and attract future investors.
Thanks,
bushido
ouch... that sounds bad... really bad  the bad thing is that exe coin is simply copying everything and posting on twitter. Yeah, look at this shit: http://cryptocoinchronicle.com/2014/06/execoin-innovates-plus-giveaway/  well i posted my comment on there but i guess it has to wait for moderation but incase in dont make it this is what i posted maybe will get answer lol? tristanskiever says: Your comment is awaiting moderation. June 28, 2014 at 2:33 pm so are EXE and VTC developers the same or part of sme team? I am just confussed as to how whenever something changes for Vertcoin VTC the same change with like a 5-10% difference comes out for EXE coin |
|
|
|
|
wow vtc price has drop alot makes me sad
|
|
|
|
Miracle on 34th st thanks to kind people |
|
|
|
someone please send me 8.09566932 CAIX lol so i can have a even 250 CAIX in my wallet  Xazq5XXJ8PfCQRK4PGEcE2CDRcE3cwHrhf |
|
|
|
Is there a command to automatically decrease the GPU workload, for example, when streaming a movie. I have some stuttering and a lot of artifacts while the SGminer is running. It would be excellent if the GPU workload was maximized only when the computer is idle. "GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT" does not seem to affect this.
This is what dynamic intensity is for. You can set this in the running miner by pressing G, I and D (in case of a single GPU) or G, I, 2, D for GPU #2. Alternatively, use "d" instead of the intensity number in your config. IMHO, it's better to keep a fixed, high intensity otherwise, but you can set it to dynamic for the movie, and then back. now that my friend is interesting to know even though i did not ask the question the answer appeals to me |
|
|
|
I really do not see how bitcoin and paypal are even compatible.
One method is reversible and one is not. It is really as simple as that.
that my friend is why they say opposites attract lol maybe a match made in heaven |
|
|
|
yeap, bitcoin is a huge notion, and they're starting to realize that they have a big competitor waiting to give them to whoop down. Rather than fighting a meaningless battle, finding ways to survive based on mutual benefit, seems to the way.
We still don't know for sure. There has been no official announcement from Paypal regarding this matter. What John Donahoe said might be his personal opinion, and not the official position of his company. that is so true but it is fun to speculate on the growth of crypto, well at least in my opinion |
|
|
|
is there a reason why they say dont go past I 15 i normally run my card between 17 - 19 granted its on N scrypt or just scrypt
you just answered your own question lol its not answering my question so i just put it at 17 and seems to be running fine 1 hour in getting about 800 kh more total from my 3 cards, but if there is a legit reason please tell me i seen something about a 2% but did not quite understand it |
|
|
|
|
is there a reason why they say dont go past I 15 i normally run my card between 17 - 19 granted its on N scrypt or just scrypt
|
|
|
|
Here´s a good Overview:  My assessment in terms paypal: The end of this year when Amazon also goes into the bitcoinboat this is funny as hell bitcoin does more than wester union |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
