Bitcoin Forum is the best forum for Cryptocurrency where everyone can discuss Crypto but, since they have been running this forum for a long time, I think they should launch their own Coin because it seems that Crypto is slowly becoming popular, so they should. A coin needs to be launched so I will ask the Moderator/Admin of this forum to think about it. (Just My Opinion)
You imagine headlines in newspapers, something like "the forum that Satoshi founded is launching a new shitcoin." And what algorithm will this coin be based on and why is it needed? Bitcoin is enough to ensure the work of the forum, but altcoins are also not prohibited here. ___ I did not see a special team on the forum that would promote the community and attract new people, developers of other projects, and so on. By default, all forum members do this by writing good posts, but I think that this is not enough. |
|
|
|
But, I believe that the US Dollar has a pretty strong influence on the world economy and is used almost everywhere, online as well, so it won't be an easy task for any country or a couple of countries to try and shatter this influence.
The problem for the US is that it is not necessary for China, Russia or anyone else to completely eliminate this influence, even the emerging downward trend in influence is very painful for the US. When the dollar's share of international trade shrinks, you can no longer routinely print trillions and export inflation to emerging economies. Now the inflation boomerang is coming back to the US. It is true that the US's influence in the global economy is tied to the dominance of the US dollar as the world's reserve currency. The decline of the dollar's share in international trade poses a significant challenge to the US, as it limits its ability to export inflation to emerging economies by printing trillions. This results in the boomerang effect, where inflation returns to the US, causing economic pain. I Think As the world becomes increasingly multipolar, the US will need to adapt its monetary policies and engage in constructive dialogue with other countries to maintain its position in the global economy. In fact, the so-called "going countries away from the dollar" is just China's game. The game is that he has brought together a group of, no offense, not very smart countries, and replaces their international currency reserves, from a highly liquid dollar to his yuan. China has several goals here: 1. "Export inflation" of the yuan to other countries. Now they will pay for the depreciation of the yuan, at the expense of their citizens. 2. The flow of dollar reserves from non-smart countries to the bins of China. The dollar is critical for China, and China's rejection of the dollar is a synonym for "China is returning to the 70s of the last century. Peripheral, backward, agrarian country producing cheap consumer goods" 3. China recognizes the world as bipolar, where the first pole is the US, the second is China. And China needs to create a "servant environment, within the framework of the usual concept of empire. Someone will be a raw material appendage, and someone will be a" tame dog "who, having no dollar, i.e. the opportunity to buy on a civilized market, will be forced to buy only from China. And for this, all the "servants" of China should receive income and pay only in Yuan, and as a matter of fact, they should not have a dollar in their reserves. If everything goes as China plans, in 5 years you will see how "partners in the fight against the dollar" will begin to squeal and return again to the international open economy and markets, where the currency of mutual settlements is the dollar. True, not everyone will return ... Someone will completely lose their independence and become a "region of China"  If you asked me 10-15 years ago what to keep your savings in, I would answer that in dollars. Now I wouldn't say that. If you look at the statistics, the US produces 18% of world GDP, and consumes 2 times more because it prints dollars. The USA has a big debt, but it doesn't matter because the dollar printer is installed in the USA. Every country wants to repeat this trick, but resources are limited. If it gets better in China, it will get worse in the US and Europe. China and India are half of the world's population, and it is impossible to ignore them. |
|
|
|
Every country is using the resources at its disposal to protect its national interest. Joe Biden administration is not pleased with the human abuse that is spearheaded by the Saudi government headed by Mohammed bin Salman Al Saud. The crown Prince is gradually tilting toward Russia and China to seek partnerships. The cut in oil prices is spearheaded by Russia and other oil-producing nations because they want the price of oil to go high so that they can make more money. I am sure that the members of BRICS such as China and India will still enjoy discounted crude. But this influence will not last for too long because crude oil will soon become obsolete. Not every country has this opportunity. The US has been supplying a lot of weapons to Saudi Arabia and Saudi Arabia has had conflicts with Iran since 2015. American politicians used this conflict to achieve their goals. Now China and Russia are entering the game, and before they kept aloof from this country. Geopolitics is starting to change. What kind of human abuse are you talking about? If you read the facts about Guantanamo Prison, it is not clear who is more cruel. |
|
|
|
The best strategy is to buy bitcoin at a price below the bitcoin realized price. This strategy is as reliable as a Kalashnikov assault rifle. Over the past 11 years, this strategy has never failed, and you do not need to study complex charts and economists' forecasts. https://bgeometrics.com/bitcoin-realized-price/ |
|
|
|
|
Have you tried to study how Microstrategy makes money?
This company does not care how much they buy bitcoins, and until now their wallets are secret. If anyone knows their wallets, then write here. The company sells stocks, futures and other financial instruments, and its actions should not be used to judge the bitcoin market.
|
|
|
|
so they demand 90% of the total assets stolen, do those who demand know who did the theft, or is there some kind of address tracking where the hackers are? and if that's the case I think the thieves will have a hard time selling the asset since their address has been tagged.  I don't think Ethereum is very difficult to sell or exchange for other coins right now. Euler Finance returned their 90% of the assets, then they will restart the protocol and fix the bugs. ___ https://twitter.com/peckshieldalert/status/1642717704934273030?In Mar. 2023, $10.9M worth of #NFTs were stolen, representing a 32.72%% decrease from the previous month Half of the stolen NFTs were quickly sold on marketplaces within 2 hours ~74.9% of the stolen NFTs were first sold on @blur_io, followed by 19.5% on @opensea  |
|
|
|
https://www.blockhead.co/2023/04/04/exploiter-front-runs-25m-from-mev-bots-using-ethereum-validator/Exploiter Front Runs $25M From MEV Bots Using Ethereum Validator "Twitter reminds us that the MEV exploit in the code is a feature, not a bug In smart contract land, it is well known that if there's a vulnerability in the code, it is a feature and not a bug. One sophisticated exploiter albeit with malicious intent had successfully deployed an exploit using an Ethereum validator and a Flashbots MEV-relay to drain a group of MEV bots for a total of $25 million at time of writing. The exploiter planned the reverse-sandwich attack by essentially honey potting a group of top performing Maximal Extractable Value (MEV) bots after verifying that these bots used his validator on low-liquidity pools throughout an 18-day operation." https://twitter.com/Mudit__Gupta/status/1642844239733071872?s=19
|
|
|
|
Very interesting on the topic of 1inch, a decentralized exchange aggregator that recently secured $2.8 million in funding from top institutional investors including Binance Labs, Galaxy Digital, and Dragonfly Capital.
So What do you think about 1 inch and its recent developments? Do you see it as a promising project in the decentralized exchange space? Or are you worried about the risks of using a DEX aggregator?
I see that many funds are investing in decentralized exchanges, because it is dangerous to store your coins on centralized exchanges now. Decentralized trading will be actively developed in the future. ___ (April Fool's joke) Introducing 1IS, the 1inch Stablecoin https://blog.1inch.io/introducing-1is-the-1inch-stablecoin/Guys, please don't take this information too seriously. Just check your calendar and relax, it's an April Fool's Day joke, and nothing more. |
|
|
|
Anyone willing to share their wisdom?
I want to participate your interview... Please give me chance. I want to share my feelings and wisdom. OK, I'll send you a list of questions. |
|
|
|
|
Пока манипулятор не начнет пампить, на рынке тишина. BTC показал рост, а многие альты нет. Дот колебался в районе 5-7 долларов и ничего не показал. Если проекты экосистемы пойдут в рост, то и ДОТ будет расти. Но еще есть нюансы с регулятором, т.к. проекты продавали токены и они могут быть наказаны за это. Я не верб в ДОТ по 1-3 доллара, если только не минутная свеча вниз на бирже
|
|
|
|
|
Anyone willing to share their wisdom?
|
|
|
|
По поводу Перцева, вероятно, что закрыли и арестовали не владельца миксера, а человека с большими деньгами, имеющего отношение к крупному шухеру. Причины могли быть вплоть до политических.
По вопросу опасений перед смартконтрактами - ну,... Смартконтракт это просто программа. Которая гарантирована выполняет свой алгоритм и не более. Если вы знаете этот алгоритм, то все опасения не более чем предрассудок. И вот тут смартконтракты намного выгоднее, чем классические серверные решения, на которых вы не имеете никакого представления, что там вообще творится. И ключевой вопрос в том, чтобы перестать бояться смартконтрактов заключается в том, чтобы знать, что внутри в них реализовано.
Мне известны только два способа, как разработчику смартконтракта подтвердить перед пользователями логику своего решения. Это или аудит авторитета, или выкладывание исходников (по второму скрорее всего, можно скомпилировать исходники и сравнить полученный двоичный код с тем, что был залит в блокчейн самим разработчиком. И на основании чтения кода исходника и совпадения двоичного кода затем гарантировать заявленную разработчиком логику. Но сам я так никогда не делал). Первый способ подходит когда вы (как разработчик) не планируете раскрывать исходный код, например по причине коммерческой тайны, или заложенной в него незаявленной логики (забрать себе всю текущую ликвидность, например, списав всё на хакеров).
Относительно привлечения внимания - если вы до этого внимания не привлекали, то затея со стороны спецслужб обращения на вас внимание за пользование миксером бессмыслена. По крайний мере до тех пор, пока ими не будет разбираться какая-нибудь крупная ситуация в которой будут искать прям вообще всех. Но и здесь есть решение - вполне можно запретить пропускать через миксер крупные суммы и всё внимание спецслужб будет рассеяно. А состава преступления - 5 лет с конфискацией за пользование миксером... ну-ну.
Каких причин? Политических? Пруфы будут что разработчик и его партнеры участвовали в политике? Не первый раз встречаю разработчиков, которые далеки от жизни. Это у нас можно делать что угодно, когда есть покровители, и наша страна граждан не выдает. А в Европе законы работают, нельзя там быть наполовину беременным и говорить что так случайно получилось, что через мой миксер хакеры отмывали средства. Откуда вы знайте что для спецслужб бессмысленно? У них такой же бюджет, планы и планируют они на много лет вперед. В блокчейне остаются все следы, что бессмысленно сейчас, через 5 лет будет выступать косвенными или прямыми доказательствами против вас, а вы об этом уже забудете. |
|
|
|
Ратимову для ранга всегда нахватало активности а не заслуг. Берите с него пример! Так у тебя такая же история всегда тут была.  Меритов выше крыши, а активити ну ооооочень медленно ползет. Кстати, не помню совсем, на каких отметках ты легенду забрал? Надеюсь, не сильно мучился в ожиданиях? Непомню, но я не долго ждал, в начале 900х. Excimer, мерит за старания. Чтобы твои заслуги росли с активностью. |
|
|
|
|
Присоединяюсь к поздравлениям Polkeins,bakasabo,internetional,tenant48!
Ратимову для ранга всегда нахватало активности а не заслуг. Берите с него пример!
|
|
|
|
From the USA there is a big struggle for spheres of influence in the crypto-currency market between the SEC and the CFTC. If cryptocurrencies had no future, then this process would be more peaceful. Howey Test from 1946 does not correspond to current realities and therefore any issuer of coins, tokens, stablecoins can be charged and fined. The BUSD ban is a prime example of arbitrariness in the US. Paxos Trust Company, the firm behind Binance’s stablecoin, was unable to administer the token in a “safe and sound” manner, a spokesperson for New York’s chief financial regulator told Reuters on Monday. The New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS), which has ordered Paxos to stop issuing Binance USD, found that Paxos “violated its obligation to conduct tailored, periodic risk assessments and due diligence refreshes of Binance and Paxos-issued BUSD customers to prevent bad actors from using the platform,” the NYDFS spokesperson said via email. (Reporting by Elizabeth Howcroft; editing by Tom Wilson) https://www.reuters.com/article/fintech-crypto-binance-stablecoin-idUSL8N34T42OUnder such pretexts, you can block any stablecoins and whatever. |
|
|
|
~snip
It's not just about yesterday's comic announcement. When I first started as a member of the BestChange signature campaign, BestChange was in first place in terms of weekly payment among all signature campaigns existing at that time (with the exception of chipmixer, which we will consider as an exception, because the conditions there were clearly exceptional for the entire forum). BestChange was paying 100$ per week, while the rest had a maximum of around 80$ (correct me if I'm wrong). Now, paying 100$ is common and I counted 6 campaigns (I can list) that have the same bids. Add to this that some campaigns still have an avatar campaign, which, as a result, allows you to get about the same 100$ per week. In addition, many have added a bonus for the best posters following the example of the Betnomi. That is, I want to say that 100$ has become a kind of payment standard on the forum (although there are campaigns with a smaller amount, I don't argue). If BestChange used to stand out in terms of payment ratings (and of course not only), now it has practically identical pay rates with the top-priced campaigns. Maybe it's time to go back to the roots and once again show that BestChange is head and shoulders above the rest? Demonstrate level and distinctiveness, so to speak. I expressed my opinion. To support it or not, everyone's business. But I'm sure that every participant in the depths of his soul, at least, will be happy if the pay is increased, even if he doesn't publicly admit it. You compromised yourself when you published this post on April 1st. Maybe it's a coincidence, but Royse777 posted his jokes on April 1st. If the project spends more money on advertising, then it will close faster. I think that most signature mixer campaigns will close in 1-3 months. If you want to get the maximum payout, then become a famous poster like Ratimov. If campaign members want to get a bigger payout, then you need to make an offer to increase the number of posts, for example, 30 or 35 paid posts instead of 25. Then maybe this will be beneficial for BestChange management. |
|
|
|
This kind of investment, with the people's money, should be invested in a low risk market. And not like a 20 year old who can afford to take more risk in his investment portfolio. And perhaps I should say, the funds shouldn't be invested somewhere because it's not the goal of the pension funds to make a profit
So it might be better to ban commercial pension funds. There were no commercial pension funds in the Soviet Union, there was only one state pension fund, and not a single pensioner lost his pension. In Russia, banks and funds are now prohibited from investing in cryptocurrency companies. It is enough to ban these investments until the market is ready for it. In 3-5 years I think there will be more favorable conditions. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
